It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses are associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix, a mass spectrometry-based means to detect monoclonal proteins, is superior to existing methodologies to predict for survival outcomes, samples from the STAMINA trial (NCT01109004), a trial comparing three transplant approaches, were employed. Samples from 575 patients from as many as three time points (post-induction [post-I; pre-maintenance [pre-M]; 1 year post enrollment [1YR]) were tested when available. Four response parameters were assessed: Mass-Fix, serum immunofixation, complete response, and measurable residual disease (MRD) by next generation flow cytometry. Of the four response measures, only MRD and Mass-Fix predicted for PFS and OS at multiple testing points on multivariate analyses. Although MRD drove Mass-Fix from the model for PFS at post-I and pre-M, 1YR Mass-Fix was independent of 1YR MRD. For OS, the only prognostic pre-I measure was Mass-Fix, and the only 1YR measures that were prognostic on multivariate analysis were 1YR MRD and 1YR Mass-Fix. SIFE and CR were not. Mass-Fix is a powerful means to track response.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X); Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
2 City of Hope, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.492639.3)
3 Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
4 The Emmes Company, Rockville, USA (GRID:grid.280434.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 5494)
5 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, USA (GRID:grid.240614.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 8635)
6 University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
7 Ohio State University, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943)
8 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA (GRID:grid.30760.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2111 8460)
9 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Rockville, USA (GRID:grid.279885.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2293 4638)
10 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA (GRID:grid.51462.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9952)
11 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, USA (GRID:grid.30760.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2111 8460)
12 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.240145.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2291 4776)
13 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.266102.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 6811)
14 Hackensack University, Hackensack, USA (GRID:grid.239835.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 6328)