An Improved Approach for Practical Synthesis of 5-Hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5hmdC) Phosphoramidite and Triphosphate

Abstract

5-Hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5hmdC) phosphoramidite and triphosphate are important building blocks in 5hmdC-containing DNA synthesis for epigenetic studies. However, efficient and practical methods for the synthesis of these compounds are still limited. The current research provides an intensively improved synthetic method that enables the preparation of commercially available cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdC phosphoramidite with an overall yield of 39% on 5 g scale. On the basis of facile and efficient accesses to cyanoethyl protected-5hmdU and 5hmdC intermediates, two efficient synthetic routes for 5hmdC triphosphate were also developed.

1. Introduction

5-Hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5hmdC) is a key oxidative intermediate in the demethylation pathway of 5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5mdC) mediated by ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins in epigenetic regulation [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. More recently, 5hmdC has also been found to play pivotal roles in many crucial physiological processes, such as embryonic development [8], neurodevelopment [9,10,11], cellular differentiation [12], and initiation/progression of cancer [13,14]. However, it is believed that more biological functions of 5hmdC are still waiting to be unraveled [15,16]. To this end, synthesis of 5hmdC-containing oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) has been employed as an essential tool. Other than conventional phosphoramidite-based DNA synthesis with protected 5hmdC phosphoramidite as the building block [17,18], polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has also been utilized as an alternative approach to incorporate 5hmdC into DNA fragments by using 5hmdC triphosphate as the substrate [19,20].

As shown in Figure 1A, five different types of 5hmdC phosphoramidite building blocks have been reported to date. 2-Cyanoethyl (1) is the first protecting group utilized for 5-CH₂OH of 5hmdC [21]. Afterwards, acetyl (2) [22], cyclic carbamate (3) [23], and t-butyldimethylsilyl (4) [24] have also been employed as protecting groups. More recently, 2-nitrobenzyl-protected 5hmdC phosphoramidite (5) has enabled photocaged epigenetic labeling of DNA fragments at specific positions [25]. Currently, cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdC phosphoramidite (1) is most widely used for automated DNA synthesis and available from commercial suppliers. Though the final cleavage of cyanoethyl ether requires elongated reaction time and elevated temperature, however, its excellent stability during DNA synthesis, compatibility with existing DNA synthetic protocols, and clean deprotection are its advantages over other competitors.

In 2011 and 2015, Schofield [26] and Shao [27] reported two improved methods for the synthesis of cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdC phosphoramidite (1) starting from 2’-deoxyuridine (dU) and thymidine (dT), respectively (Figure 1B). Other than the classic benzoyl (Bz) protection and phosphitylation steps, most of key steps including the initial conversion to 5-hydroxymethyl-2’-deoxyuridine (5hmdU), cyanoethyl protection, DMT protection, and C⁴-amination steps still suffer from either low-yielding or slow reaction rate. While Schofield’s route (Method A) gave 1 in 24% overall yield, Shao’s approach (Method B) afforded 1 in only 3% overall yield. Herein, we report an intensively optimized method for practical synthesis of 1 with an overall yield of 39% on 5 g scale. Moreover, two synthetic routes based on cyanoethyl protected-5hmdU and 5hmdC intermediates were also developed to access 5hmdC triphosphate on 50 mg scale.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of Cyanoethyl-Protected 5hmdC Phosphoramidite (1)

As illustrated in Scheme 1, our method employed inexpensive dT starting material, which was first converted to diTBS-protected dT (7) in 96% yield and purified via simple precipitation. After free radical bromination at 5-methyl position, 5-bromomethyl dU (5BrmdU) intermediate (8) was concentrated and directly treated with 2-cyanoethanol at ambient temperature for 15 min to afford cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdU (9) in 78% yield. Treating 9 with DMT tetrafluoroborate (DMT⁺BF₄⁻) in pyridine resulted in fast and efficient introduction of DMT to the sterically hindered 5’-OH (85%, 10). According to the new C⁴-amination method we developed, instant activation with PyAOP (1 min, 11) followed by aminolysis with conc. ammonia (4 h) yielded 5hmdC intermediate (12) in 84% yield. N-Benzoylation of 12 with benzoic anhydride in DMF at 70 °C greatly shortened reaction time of 13 from 2–4 days (at ambient temperature) [26] to only 2 h without adverse effects on either yield or chemoselectivity. Finally, phosphitylation with 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite in the present of triethylamine afforded the desired cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdC (1) in 83% yield. Compared to Schofield’s and Shao’s methods, the current approach achieved 39% overall yield in 5 g scale practical synthesis.

Originally, we found that 5hmdU (6) could be efficiently obtained by hydrolyzing 5BrmdU (8) with TFA/H₂O (10:1, v/v) in 71% yield. However, the following synthesis of cyanoethyl ether in the presence of TFA at 100 °C according to the previous reports [26,27] yielded the desired 9 in only 51% yield. Therefore, we abandoned the synthesis of 5hmdU and subsequent condensation with cyanoethanol under harsh conditions. Instead, we attempted to convert 8 directly to cyanoethyl ether 9 via alcoholysis with cyanoethanol under mild conditions. The simultaneous alcoholysis and cleavage of TBS by HBr generated in situ only took 15 min at ambient temperature, and column purification afforded 9 in 78% yield (Scheme 2).

In the following tritylation of 5’-OH with DMT-Cl in pyridine, we encountered the same incomplete reaction and low yielding scenario (51%, 12 h) mentioned by Schofield and coworkers [26] due to the elevated steric hindrance resulting from cyanoethyl protecting group. To solve this problem, we increased the reaction temperature to 40 and 60 °C (Table 1, Entry 1–3). However, the yield of 10 dropped ever lower due to the formation of more diDMT-protected side product. In addition, we also tested the reactions with a catalytic amount of DMAP, 2 equiv of DIPEA, and a new tritylation reagent, DMT-trifluoroacetate (Table 1, Entry 4–7) [28]. However, none of these conditions led to improved results. Surprisingly, when DMT⁺BF₄⁻ along with additives was applied according to Schofield’s method, the yield of 10 was still very low (Table 1, Entry 8) [26]. Fortunately, our further optimization found that DMT⁺BF₄⁻ alone in pyridine (without any additives) could afford the desired 5’-O tritylated product 10 in 85% yield within only 1 h. A possible mechanistic explanation for this result is because pyridine favors the dissociation of DMT⁺BF₄⁻ into ionic form. Compared to the covalently linked DMT-Cl, DMT⁺ cation is more flattened and, therefore, much easier accessible to the 5’-OH of 9.

The last bottle neck of the reported synthetic routes is the conversion of 10 to its dC counterpart 12. The reported reaction yields based on 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl chloride (TPS-Cl) activating reagent showed a large discrepancy (MA: 81% vs MB: 58%). In addition, both the biphasic activation and aminolysis steps were quite slow. In our hands, incomplete activation of urosine was observed and the yield of 11 (53%) was close to the one reported in Method B. We then tested the new BOP-based method reported by Lakshman and coworkers in 2017 [29]. However, the yield of 12 was still moderate (56%). To solve this problem, we systematically investigated the reactivity of different types of onium salt coupling reagents on the C⁴ amination and found that PyAOP is much more advantageous in both activation and aminolysis steps than BOP, especially in the case of structurally more hindered pyrimidine substrates such as 10. Compared to the TPS-Cl method, the ultrafast activation by PyAOP (1 min) followed by aminolysis with concentrated ammonia (4 h) afforded 12 in 84% yield (Scheme 3). The more detailed condition optimization, mechanistic investigation, and application scope of onium salt-based C⁴-amination method for oxidized 5mdC derivatives have been described in a previous research article reported by our group [30]. However, it should be noted that, similar to the above mentioned DMT⁺BF₄⁻, PyAOP is an onium salt coupling reagent. Therefore, the mechanistic rationale for its superb activating reactivity on sterically hindered 10 may also be ascribed to the significantly lowered steric hindrance of more flattened tripyrrolidinophosphonium ion.

2.2. Synthesis of 5hmdC Triphosphate (14)

As mentioned above, 5hmdC triphosphate (14) is the key substrate for PCR-based 5hmdC-containing DNA synthesis. Previously, we have reported a synthetic route for 14, starting from acetyl/diTBS-protected 5hmdC [31]. The current synthetic advances made in the preparation of cyanoethyl/DMT-protected 5hmdC phosphoramidite (1) offered an excellent opportunity to gain more efficient accesses to 14.

In the first synthetic route (Scheme 4), we started with cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdU (9). Activation by PyAOP (1 min) followed by aminolysis with concentrated ammonia (4 h) yielded cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdC (15) in 80% yield. However, regioselective phosphorylation at 5′-OH position gave cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdC monophosphate (16) in only 45% yield possibly due to the increased steric hindrance resulting from the cyanoethyl ether. Redox condensation with PPh₃, 2-aminophenyl disulfide, and piperidine smoothly mediated the conversion to phosphoropiperidate 17 (6 h, 88%) [32]. The coupling of 17 and pyrophosphate was conducted with 4,5-dicyanoimidazole (DCI) via the P(V)-N activation method. Then, the cyanoethyl protecting group was removed by treating the triphosphate with concentrated ammonia at 40 °C for 12 h. As has been reported [21,26], we found that concentrated ammonia can barely cleave cyanoethyl ether at ambient temperature. However, for small molecular substrates such as 14, moderately elevated temperature (40 °C) is enough for its deprotection. The high temperature (75 °C) required in DNA synthesis is not necessary and impractical for triphosphate synthesis. Finally, purification by ion-exchange chromatography afforded the desired 5hmdC triphosphate (14) in 72% yield over two steps on 50 mg scale. Compared to our previous method based on Ac-protected 5hmdC intermediate (8 steps from diTBS-dT and 15% overall yield), the new route afforded 14 in 18% over 5 steps.

Due to the low-yielding monophosphorylation step in the first route, we chose to start with DMT/cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdC (12) in the second route and synthesize 14 via fully protected 5hmdC phosphoropiperidate intermediate (20) [33]. First, the 3’-OH and 4-NH₂ of 14 were protected by benzyloxycarbonyl (Cbz) groups in 84% yield. After the DMT group was removed by TFA (90%, 19), 5’-OH was phosphitylated with 2-benzyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite. In situ hydrolysis and oxidative coupling with piperidine yielded the fully protected phosphoropiperidate 20 in 79% yield over three consecutive steps. After Cbz and Bn protecting groups were removed by catalytic hydrogenation, the deprotected phosphoropiperidate 17 was treated with pyrophosphate in the presence of DCI as the promotor. The highly efficient P(V)-N activation method afforded the triphosphate in over 95% conversion as determined by ³¹P NMR. Finally, cleavage of cyanoethyl ether with concentrated ammonia at 40 °C followed by routine ion-exchange chromatography gave 14 in 73% yield over three consecutive steps on 50 mg scale (Scheme 5). Compared to the first synthetic route based on 9, the second route based on 20 afforded 14 in a higher overall yield (24%) but required two extra steps (total 7 steps from diTBS-dT).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Methods

Chemical reagents and solvents were purchased from Leyan-Shanghai Haohong Scientific Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. Reactions were monitored by TLC plates coated with 0.25 mm silica gel 60 F₂₅₄ and visualized by UV irradiation (254 nm). Flash column chromatography employed silica gel (particle size 32–63 μm, Qingdao Haiyang Chemicals, Qingdao, China). NMR spectra were acquired on an AV-400 instrument (Bruker BioSpin, Faellanden, Switzerland) with chemical shifts reported in ppm and referenced to CDCl₃, DMSO-d₆, or D₂O. IR spectra were obtained with a Vertex-70 instrument (Bruker Optics, Billerica, MA, USA). High-resolution mass spectra were obtained with a Dalton micrOTOF-Q II spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Billerica, MA, USA) and reported as m/z. Melting points were determined with an X-4 digital melting point apparatus and uncorrected (Tech Instrument, Beijing, China). The characterization data of 1 and 9–13 and NMR spectra of all synthesized compounds are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

3.2. Synthetic Procedures of 5hmdC Phosphoramidite (1) and Intermediates (9–13)

5-(2-Cyanoethyl)hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine (9): To a solution of 7 (9.5 g, 20.3 mmol) in dry CCl₄ (100 mL) were added NBS (5.78 g, 32.5 mmol) and AIBN (541 mg, 3.3 mmol). The reaction was stirred at 75 °C for 30 min until the orange color faded. Upon cooling, the reaction solution was filtered. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and dried under high vacuum for 30 min. The crude 8 was dissolved in cyanoethanol (6.9 mL, 101.5 mmol) and the reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 15 min. Then NaHCO₃ (3.4 g, 40.6 mmol) was added to the solution to adjust pH to 7. The solution was washed with CH₂Cl₂ (200 mL × 5) to remove excess cyanoethanol. Flash column chromatography of the residual syrup (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH = 10:1) afforded 9 (4.9 g, 78%) as a white solid.

5-(2-Cyanoethyl)hydroxymethyl-5′-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)-2′-deoxyuridine (10): To a solution of 9 (4.7 g, 15.2 mmol) in dry pyridine (60 mL) was added DMT⁺BF₄⁻ (8.9 g, 22.8 mmol) under argon. The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 1 h, then quenched with MeOH (5 mL), diluted with CH₂Cl₂ (150 mL), and washed with saturated aq. NaHCO₃ solution (200 mL × 3) and H₂O (200 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH = 20:1) afforded 10 (7.9 g, 85%) as a white solid.

5-(2-Cyanoethyl)hydroxymethyl-5′-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)-2′-deoxycytidine (12): To a solution of 10 (7.3 g, 11.9 mmol) and PyAOP (12.4 g, 23.8 mmol) in dry THF (60 mL) was added DBU (3.55 mL, 23.8 mmol) under argon at 0 °C. The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 1 min and then concentrated NH₃·H₂O (28 w%, 7.2 mL, 95.2 mmol) was added. The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 4 h and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (DCM/MeOH = 10:1) afforded 12 (6.1 g, 84%) as a white solid.

N⁴-Benzoyl-5-(2-cyanoethyl)hydroxymethyl-5′-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)-2′-deoxycytidine (13): To a solution of 12 (6.0 g, 9.8 mmol) in dry THF (50 mL) was added benzoic anhydride (3.3 g, 14.7 mmol) under argon. The reaction was stirred at 70 °C for 2 h. Upon cooling, the reaction mixture was diluted with CH₂Cl₂ (150 mL). The solution was washed with saturated aq. NaHCO₃ solution (200 mL), H₂O (200 mL × 3). The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (PE/EA = 1:1) afforded 13 (6.1 g, 87%) as a white solid.

N⁴-Benzoyl-5-(2-cyanoethyl)hydroxymethyl-5′-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)-2′-deoxycytidine-3′-[N,N-diisopropyl-N-cyanoethyl]phosphoramidite (1): To a solution of 13 (5.0 g, 7.0 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL) were added N,N-diisopropylethylamine (3.6 mL, 20.9 mmol) and 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite (3.1 mL, 14.0 mmol) under argon. The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 1 h and then aq. NaHCO₃ solution (5 w%, 100 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL × 3). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (PE/EA = 1:1, 0.5% TEA) afforded 1 (5.3 g, 83%) as a white solid.

3.3. Synthetic Procedures and Characterization Data of 5hmdC Triphosphate (14) and Intermediates (15–20)

3-((4-Amino-1-((2R,4S,5R)-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyrimidin-5-yl)methoxy)propanenitrile (15): To a solution of 9 (930 mg, 3 mmol) in dry DMF (10 mL) was added PyAOP (2.5 g, 4.8 mmol) and DBU (730 mg, 4.8 mmol). The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 1 min and then concentrated NH₃·H₂O (28 w%, 460 μL, 12 mmol) was added. The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 4 h and then concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH = 8:1) afforded 15 (746 mg, 80%) as a white solid; mp 176–177 °C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, D₂O): δ 7.93 (s, 1H), 6.16 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.40–4.36 (m, 3H), 4.04–3.96 (m, 1H), 3.85–3.77 (m, 1H), 3.76–3.72 (m, 1H), 3.71–3.66 (m, 2H), 2.75 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 2.45–2.36 (m, 1H), 2.28–2.19 (m, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, D₂O): δ 164.6, 156.6, 142.1, 120.0, 103.5, 86.9, 86.4, 70.4, 65.6, 64.3, 61.2, 39.7, 18.3 ppm; IR (KBr): v_max 3470, 2900, 2267, 1666, 1489, 1304, 1093 cm⁻¹; HRMS (ESI+) m/z calcd for C₁₃H₁₈N₄O₅Na [M + Na]⁺ 333.1169; found 333.1170.

((2R,3S,5R)-5-(4-Amino-5-((2-cyanoethoxy)methyl)-2-oxopyrimidin-1(2H)-yl)-3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methyl phosphate (16): To a solution of 15 (500 mg, 1.6 mmol) in dry PO(OCH₃)₃ (10 mL) was added POCl₃ (489 mg, 3.2 mmol). The reaction was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was dissolved in deionized H₂O (2 mL) and loaded on a DEAE Sephadex A-25 ion exchange column (2.6 × 20 cm). Elution with NH₄HCO₃ buffer (linear gradient 0.1 to 0.5 M), combination of appropriate fractions, and lyophilization afforded 16 (293 mg, 45%) in ammonium salt form as a white solid. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, D₂O): δ 8.05 (s, 1H), 6.26 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.53–4.47 (m, 1H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 4.19–4.13 (m, 1H), 4.11–3.88 (m,2H), 3.70 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.15 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 2.44–2.35 (m, 1H), 2.29–2.21(m, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, D₂O): δ 164.8, 156.7, 142.2, 120.0, 103.8, 86.4, 86.0, 85.9, 71.0, 66.6, 64.6, 64.1, 46.9, 39.9, 18.4, 8.4 ppm; ³¹P NMR (162 MHz, D₂O): δ −0.08 ppm; IR (KBr): v_max 3345, 2982, 2854, 2260, 1694, 1671, 1415, 1226, 1060, 928, 852 cm⁻¹; HRMS (ESI-) m/z calcd for C₁₃H₁₈N₄O₈P [M − H]⁻ 389.0868; found 389.0868.

((2R,3S,5R)-5-(4-Amino-5-((2-cyanoethoxy)methyl)-2-oxopyrimidin-1(2H)-yl)-3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methyl piperidin-1-ylphosphonate (17): To a solution of 16 (220 mg, 0.45 mmol, triethylammonium form) and piperidine (192 mg, 2.25 mmol) in DMSO (4 mL) were added 2-aminophenyl disulfide (335 mg, 1.35 mmol) and triphenylphosphine (655 mg, 2.5 mmol). The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 8 h. Then, a solution of NaI in acetone (0.5 M, 5 mL) was added dropwise. The resulting white precipitated sodium salt was collected by centrifuge. Passage of the solution of the sodium salt in deionized H₂O through a bed of Dowex 50W-X8 ion exchange resin (Et₃NH⁺ form) and lyophilization afforded 17 (240 mg, 88%) in triethylammonium salt form as white hydroscopic foam. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, D₂O): δ 8.00 (s, 1H), 6.26 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.54–4.51 (m, 1H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 4.20–4.15 (m, 1H), 4.02–3.91 (m, 2H), 3.75 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.18 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 9H), 2.94–2.88 (m, 4H), 2.78 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 2.48–2.41 (m, 1H), 2.35–2.23 (m, 1H), 1.46–1.41(m, 6H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 14H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, D₂O): δ 165.2, 157.3, 141.9, 119.9, 103.7, 86.5, 86.2, 71.2, 66.8, 64.3, 64.1, 46.8, 45.9, 40.0, 25.8, 24.1, 18.3, 8.3 ppm; ³¹P NMR (162 MHz, D₂O): δ 9.23 ppm; IR (KBr): v_max 3458, 2262, 1670, 1562, 1420, 1333, 1126, 1058, 967, 854 cm⁻¹; HRMS (ESI-) m/z calcd for C₁₈H₂₇N₅O₇P [M − H]⁻ 456.1654; found 456.1653.

Benzyl(1-((2R,4S,5R)-4-(((benzyloxy)carbonyl)oxy)-5-((bis(4-methoxyphenyl)(phenyl)methoxy)methyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)-5-((2-cyanoethoxy)methyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyrimidin-4-yl)carbamate (18): To a solution of 12 (500 mg, 0.82 mmol) and DMAP (300 mg, 2.46 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (8 mL) was added Cbz-Cl (253 μL, 1.80 mmol) at 0 °C. The reaction was slowly warmed to ambient temperature, stirred at 20 °C for 3 h, and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (PE/EA = 8:1) afforded 18 (604 mg, 84%) as a white solid; mp 92–93 °C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 12.21 (br, 1H), 7.89 (s, 1H), 7.42–7.24 (m, 19H), 6.86–6.81 (m, 4H), 6.40–6.34 (m, 1H), 5.29–5.24 (m, 1H), 5.19 (s, 2H), 5.14 (s, 2H), 4.20 (s, 1H), 4.09–4.04 (m, 1H), 3.92–3.87 (m, 1H), 3.79 (s, 6H), 3.57–3.53 (m, 1H), 3.34–3.31 (m, 1H), 3.28 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.62–2.55 (m, 1H), 2.43–2.34 (m, 1H), 1.96 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 163.8, 159.3, 159.0, 154.4, 147.6, 144.5, 137.8, 136.2, 135.6, 135.4, 134.9, 130.3, 130.2, 128.9, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 127.3, 117.5, 113.5, 111.9, 87.1, 85.1, 84.0, 78.4, 77.5, 76.8, 70.2, 68.0, 65.6, 65.3, 63.6, 55.4, 38.5, 17.9 ppm; IR (KBr): v_max 3476, 3263, 2934, 2837, 2263, 1732, 1654, 1610, 1560, 1504, 1415, 1394, 1326, 1283, 1249, 1195, 1098, 1059, 1026, 981, 829, 741 cm⁻¹; HRMS (ESI+) m/z calcd for C₅₀H₄₈N₄O₁₁Na [M + Na]⁺ 903.3212; found 903.3210.

Benzyl(1-((2R,4S,5R)-4-(((benzyloxy)carbonyl)oxy)-5-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)-5-((2-cyanoethoxy)methyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyrimidin-4-yl)carbamate (19): The solution of 18 (500 mg, 0.57 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂/TFA (v/v = 50:1, 10 mL) was stirred at 20 °C for 30 min and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (PE/EA = 2:1) afforded 19 (297 mg, 90%) as a white solid; mp 136–138 °C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 12.20 (br, 1H), 8.10 (s,1H), 7.43–7.28 (m, 10H), 6.36–6.31 (m, 1H), 5.30 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 5.18–5.16 (m, 4H), 4.43 (s, 2H), 4.24–4.22 (m, 1H), 3.96 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 2.98 (s, 1H), 2.68 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 2.56–2.50 (m, 1H), 2.42–2.33 (m, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 163.6, 159.0, 154.6, 147.7, 137.6, 136.2, 134.9, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 119.0, 111.3, 86.4, 85.3, 78.9, 70.2, 67.9, 65.9, 65.2, 62.5, 38.3, 19.3 ppm; IR (KBr): v_max 3265, 2914, 2266, 1723, 1650, 1613, 1565, 1512, 1415, 1392, 1326, 1285, 1194, 1095, 1056, 983, 740 cm⁻¹; HRMS (ESI+) m/z calcd for C₂₉H₃₀N₄O₉Na [M + Na]⁺ 601.1905; found 601.1910.

Benzyl(1-((2R,4S,5R)-5-((((benzyloxy)(piperidin-1-yl)phosphoryl)oxy)methyl)-4-(((benzyloxy)carbonyl)oxy)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)-5-((2-cyanoethoxy)methyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyrimidin-4-yl)carbamate (20): To a solution of 19 (250 mg, 0.44 mmol) and Et₃N (180 μL, 1.3 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) was added the solution of 2-benzyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite (205 mg, 0.75 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (3 mL). The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 30 min and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was concentrated and coevaporated with CH₃CN (10 mL × 2) and then dissolved in EtOAc (5 mL). The solution was filtered and concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude phosphoramidite. To a solution of the crude intermediate (ca. 0.44 mmol) in CH₃CN (10 mL) was added 1H-tetrazole (61 mg, 0.87 mmol) and deionized H₂O (200 μL). The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 5 min and then concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (20 mL) and washed with aq. HCl solution (0.02 M, 20 mL) and H₂O (20 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude H-phosphonate intermediate. To a solution of the crude H-phosphonate in CH₃CN (10 mL) were added piperidine (52 μL, 0.52 mmol), Et₃N (300 μL), and CCl₄ (220 μL) at 0 °C. The reaction was warmed to ambient temperature, stirred at 20 °C for 30 min, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in EtOAc (5 mL), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (PE/EA = 4:1) afforded 20 (277 mg, 79%) as a white solid, mp 44–45 °C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 12.20 (br, 1H), 7.86–7.84 (m, 1H), 7.42–7.31 (m, 15H), 6.29–6.18 (m, 1H), 5.25–5.20 (m, 1H), 5.18–5.16 (m, 4H), 5.06–4.93 (m, 2H), 4.39–4.35 (m, 1H), 4.34–4.31 (m, 2H), 4.26–4.21 (m, 2H), 3.72–3.65 (m, 2H), 3.06–3.01 (m, 4H), 2.63–2.57 (m, 2H), 2.14–2.03 (m, 1H), 1.97 (s, 1H), 1.54–1.51 (m, 2H), 1.48–1.41 (m, 4H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 163.7, 159.4, 159.3, 154.3, 147.5, 147.4, 138.2, 137.9, 136.3, 136.2, 136.1, 134.7, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 127.9, 127.6, 118.0, 111.6, 111.4, 86.2, 85.8, 83.5, 78.1, 70.3, 68.2, 67.8, 65.6, 65.3, 45.4, 38.1, 26.1, 24.3, 18.7 ppm; ³¹P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 8.77, 8.45 ppm; IR (KBr): v_max 3469, 3260, 2265, 1662, 1612, 1561, 1501, 1452, 1394, 1327, 1282, 1195, 1099, 979, 779, 741 cm⁻¹; HRMS (ESI+) m/z calcd for C₄₁H₄₆N₅O₁₁PNa [M + Na]⁺ 838.2824; found 838.2820.

5-Hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxycytidine 5′-triphosphate, tetrasodium salt (14): Method A: To a solution of 17 (67 mg, 0.11 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) were added tris(tetra-n-butyl ammonium) hydrogen pyrophosphate (198 mg, 0.22 mmol) and DCI (78 mg, 0.66 mmol). The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 6 h and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in NH₃·H₂O (28 w%, 5 mL), stirred at 40 °C for 12 h, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in aq. NaOAc solution (4 M, 0.5 mL) and then EtOH (10 mL) was added. The precipitated crude product was collected by filtration, dissolved in deionized H₂O (0.5 mL), and loaded on a DEAE Sephadex A-25 ion exchange column (1.6 × 25 cm). Elution with NH₄HCO₃ buffer (linear gradient 0.2 to 0.6 M), combination of appropriate fractions, and lyophilization afforded 1 in ammonium salt form. Passage of the solution of the ammonium salt in deionized H₂O through a bed of Dowex 50W-X8 ion exchange resin (Na⁺ form) and lyophilization afforded 1 (46 mg, 72%) as tetrasodium salt, a white solid. Method B: To a solution of 20 (106 mg, 0.13 mmol) and Et₃N (16 μL, 0.13 mmol) in DMF (3.3 mL) was added 5 w% Pd/C (11 mg). The reaction was stirred at 20 °C under H₂ atmosphere for 3 h. The catalyst was removed by a syringe filter (0.45 μm aperture) under argon. To the DMF solution was added tris(tetra-n-butylammonium) hydrogen pyrophosphate (242 mg, 0.26 mmol) and DCI (97 mg, 0.82 mmol). The reaction was stirred at 20 °C for 6 h and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in NH₃·H₂O (28 w%, 5 mL) at 40 °C for 12 h and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was further purified according to the procedures described in Method A to afford 14 (55 mg, 73%) as tetrasodium salt, a white solid. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, D₂O): δ 7.94 (s, 1H), 6.24 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (m, 1H), 4.42 (s, 2H,), 4.17 (m, 3H), 2.37–2.25 (m, 2H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, D₂O): δ 165.2, 157.4, 140.6, 107.1, 86.0, 85.7, 70.3, 65.1, 57.7, 39.5 ppm; ³¹P NMR (162 MHz, D₂O): δ −7.90, −10.97, −22.05 ppm; IR: v_max 3346, 2986, 2856, 1694, 1413, 1226, 1080, 924, 813 cm⁻¹; HRMS (ESI-): m/z calcd for C₁₀H₁₈N₃O₁₄P₃ [M − H]^– 495.9711; found 495.9710.

4. Conclusions

In summary, an improved method for practical synthesis of cyanoethtyl-protected 5hmdC phosphoramidite has been developed. Direct synthesis of cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdU via in situ alcoholysis and desilylation of 5BrmdU intermediate skipped the two limiting steps of the reported methods, i.e., the very low-yielding synthesis of 5hmdU and subsequent condensation with cyanoethanol under harsh conditions. In addition, the optimization of DMT and Bz protections along with application of the PyAOP-based C⁴ amination method also significantly increased the synthetic efficiency. In a 5 g synthesis, the overall yield of 5hmdC phosphoramidite was promoted from reported 24% to 39%. In addition, two practical routes for 5hmdC triphosphate synthesis on 50 mg scale have also been developed on the basis of easily accessible cyanoethyl protected-5hmdU and 5hmdC intermediates. Moreover, mechanistic consideration of the remarkably improved reactivity of tritylating and activating reagents (DMT⁺BF₄⁻ and PyAOP) suggests that utilizing ionizable reagents could be an effective strategy to significantly promote the reactions on sterically hindered substrates due to their more flattened conformations.

Author Contributions

D.-Z.Y., Z.-Z.C., M.C. and Y.-Y.D. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; S.-Z.P. and Q.S. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21961013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figure, Schemes and Table

Figure 1. 5hmdC Phosphoramidites with different protecting groups (A) and two improved synthetic methods for 5hmdC phosphoramidite 1 (B).

Scheme 1. An improved method for practical synthesis of cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdC phosphoramidite (1).

Scheme 2. One-step synthesis of cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdU (9) from diTBS-protected 5BrhmdU (8).

Scheme 3. Comparison of TPS-Cl, BOP, and PyAOP-based amination methods for the synthesis of 12.

Scheme 4. Cyanoethyl-protected 5hmdU (9)-based synthetic route for 14.

Scheme 5. Fully protected phosphoropiperidate (20)-based synthetic route for 14.

Table 1

Optimization of tritylation conditions for synthesis of 10.

[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]
Entry	Conditions	Yield (%)
1	DMT-Cl (1.5 eq), 20 °C, Pyr, 12 h	51 a
2	DMT-Cl (1.5 eq), 40 °C, Pyr, 12 h	46 a
3	DMT-Cl (1.5 eq), 60 °C, Pyr, 12 h	34 a,b
4	DMT-Cl (1.5 eq), DMAP (0.15 eq), 20 °C, Pyr, 6 h	48 a
5	DMT-Cl (1.5 eq), DMAP (0.15 eq), DIPEA (2 eq), 20 °C, Pyr, 6 h	54 a
6	DMT-trifluoroacetate (1.5 eq), 20 °C, THF, 12 h	No reaction
7	DMT-trifluoroacetate (1.5 eq), 20 °C, Pyr, 12 h	No reaction
8	DMT+BF4−(1.5 eq), Li2CO3, (5 eq), DIPEA (3 eq), 20 °C, THF, 5 h	22 a
9	DMT+BF4− (1.5 eq), 20 °C, Pyr, 1 h	85

^a9 was not completely consumed when the reaction stopped. ^b diDMT-protected product formed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, characterization data of 1 and 9–13 and Figures S1–S29: NMR spectra of all synthesized compounds.

References

1. Kriaucionis, S.; Heintz, N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in purkinje neurons and the brain. Science; 2009; 324, pp. 929-930. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1169786] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19372393]

2. Tahiliani, M.; Koh, K.P.; Shen, Y.-H.; Pastor, W.A.; Bandukwala, H.; Brudno, Y.; Agarwal, S.; Iyer, L.M.; Liu, D.R.; Aravind, L. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science; 2009; 324, pp. 930-935. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1170116] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19372391]

3. Wu, X.J.; Zhang, Y. TET-mediated active DNA demethylation: Mechanism, function and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet.; 2017; 18, pp. 517-534. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.33]

4. Munzel, M.; Globisch, D.; Carell, T. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine, the sixth base of the genome. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2011; 50, pp. 6460-6468. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101547] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21688365]

5. Wu, H.; Zhang, Y. Reversing DNA methylation: Mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell; 2014; 156, pp. 45-68. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24439369]

6. He, Y.-F.; Li, B.-Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, T.; Tang, Q.-Y.; Ding, J.; Jia, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, L. et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science; 2011; 333, pp. 1303-1307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210944] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21817016]

7. Spada, F.; Schiffers, S.; Kirchner, A.; Zhang, Y.; Arista, G.; Kosmatchev, O.; Korytiakova, E.; Rahimoff, R.; Ebert, C.; Carell, T. Active turnover of genomic methylcytosine in pluripotent cells. Nat. Chem. Biol.; 2020; 16, pp. 1411-1419. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41589-020-0621-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32778844]

8. Stroud, H.; Feng, S.; Kinney, S.M.; Pradhan, S.; Jacobsen, S.E. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is associated with enhancers and gene bodies in human embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol.; 2011; 12, R54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r54] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21689397]

9. Munzel, M.; Globisch, D.; Bruckl, T.; Wagner, M.; Welzmiller, V.; Michalakis, S.; Muller, M.; Biel, M.; Carell, T. Quantification of the sixth DNA base hydroxymethylcytosine in the brain. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2010; 49, pp. 5375-5377. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201002033] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20583021]

10. Stricker, S.H.; Götz, M. DNA-methylation: Master or slave of neural fate decisions?. Front. Neurosci.; 2018; 12, 5. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449798]

11. Xiong, J.; Jiang, H.-P.; Peng, C.-Y.; Deng, Q.-Y.; Lan, M.-D.; Zeng, H.; Zheng, F.; Feng, Y.-Q.; Yuan, B.-F. DNA hydroxymethylation age of human blood determined by capillary hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Clin. Epigenet.; 2015; 7, 72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-015-0109-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207150]

12. Ito, S.; D’Alessio, A.C.; Taranova, O.V.; Hong, K.; Sowers, L.C.; Zhang, Y. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature; 2010; 466, pp. 1129-1133. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09303] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20639862]

13. Scourzic, L.; Mouly, E.; Bernard, O.A. TET proteins and the control of cytosine demethylation in cancer. Genome Med.; 2015; 7, 9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-015-0134-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25632305]

14. Chen, M.-L.; Shen, F.; Huang, W.; Qi, J.-H.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Y.-Q.; Liu, S.-M.; Yuan, B.-F. Quantification of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine in genomic DNA from hepatocellular carcinoma tissues by capillary hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography/quadrupole TOF mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem.; 2013; 59, pp. 824-832. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.193938] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23344498]

15. Olinski, R.; Starczak, M.; Gackowski, D. Enigmatic 5-hydroxymethyluracil: Oxidatively modified base, epigenetic mark or both?. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res.; 2016; 767, pp. 59-66. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.02.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036066]

16. Shi, D.-Q.; Ali, I.; Tang, J.; Yang, W.-C. New insights into 5hmC DNA modification: Generation, distribution and function. Front. Genet.; 2017; 8, 100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00100]

17. Pfaffeneder, T.; Sadeghian, K.; Hackner, B.; Steigenberger, B.; Schröder, A.S.; Steinbacher, J.; Kashiwazaki, G.; Höfner, G.; Wanner, K.T.; Ochsenfeld, C. et al. Deamination, oxidation, and C–C bond cleavage reactivity of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-formylcytosine, and 5-carboxycytosine. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2013; 135, pp. 14593-14599.

18. Schröder, A.S.; Raddaoui, N.; Carell, T. Synthesis of (R)-configured 2′-fluorinated mC, hmC, fC, and caC phosphoramidites and oligonucleotides. Org. Lett.; 2016; 18, pp. 4368-4371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02110]

19. Steigenberger, B.; Schiesser, S.; Hackner, H.; Brandmayr, C.; Laube, S.K.; Steinbacher, J.; Pfaffeneder, T.; Carell, T. Synthesis of 5-hydroxymethyl-, 5-formyl-, and 5-carboxycytidine triphosphates and their incorporation into oligonucleotides by polymerase chain reaction. Org. Lett.; 2013; 15, pp. 366-369. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol3033219]

20. Vaníková, Z.; Janoušková, M.; Kambová, M.; Krásný, L.; Hocek, M. Switching transcription with bacterial RNA polymerase through photocaging, photorelease and phosphorylation reactions in the major groove of DNA. Chem. Sci.; 2019; 10, pp. 3937-3942. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9SC00205G]

21. Tardy-Planechaud, S.; Fujimoto, J.; Lin, S.S.; Sowers, L.C. Solid phase synthesis and restriction endonuclease cleavage of oligodeoxynucleotides containing 5-(hydroxymethyl)-cytosine. Nucleic Acids Res.; 1997; 25, pp. 553-558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.3.553] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9016595]

22. de Kort, M.; de Visser, P.C.; Kurzeck, J.; Meeuwenoord, N.J.; van der Marel, G.A.; Rüger, W.; van Boom, J.H. Chemical and enzymatic synthesis of DNA fragments containing 5-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxymethyl)-2′-deoxycytidine-a modified nucleoside in T4 phage DNA. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2001; 11, pp. 2075-2082. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0690(200106)2001:11<2075::AID-EJOC2075>3.0.CO;2-J]

23. Münzel, M.; Globisch, D.; Trindler, C.; Carell, T. Efficient synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine containing DNA. Org. Lett.; 2010; 12, pp. 5671-5673. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol102408t] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21082782]

24. Dai, Q.; Song, C.-X.; Pan, T.; He, C. Syntheses of two 5-hydroxymethyl-2’-deoxycytidine phosphoramidites with TBDMS as the 5-hydroxymethyl protecting group and their incorporation into DNA. J. Org. Chem.; 2011; 76, pp. 4182-4188. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo200566d] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21462947]

25. Chakrapani, A.; Hausnerová, V.V.; Ruiz-Larrabeiti, O.; Pohl, R.; Krásný, L.; Hocek, M. Photocaged 5-(hydroxymethyl)pyrimidine nucleoside phosphoramidites for specific photoactivatable epigenetic labeling of DNA. Org. Lett.; 2020; 22, pp. 9081-9085. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03462] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156631]

26. Hansen, A.S.; Thalhammer, A.; El-Sagheer, A.H.; Brown, T.; Schofield, C.J. Improved synthesis of 5-hydroxymethyl-2’-deoxy-cytidine phosphoramidite using a 2’-deoxyuridine to 2’-deoxycytidine conversion without temporary protecting groups. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.; 2011; 21, pp. 1181-1184. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.12.098]

27. Xuan, S.; Wu, Q.; Cui, L.; Zhang, D.; Shao, F. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine and 5-formylcytosine containing deoxyoligonucleotides: Facile syntheses and melting temperature studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.; 2015; 25, pp. 1186-1191. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.01.070]

28. Shahsavari, S.; Chen, J.; Wigstrom, T.; Gooding, J.; Gauronskas, A.; Fang, S. Tritylation of alcohols under mild conditions without using silver salts. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2016; 57, pp. 3877-3880. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.07.062]

29. Akula, H.K.; Kokatla, H.; Andrei, G.; Snoeck, R.; Schols, D.; Balzarini, J.; Yang, L.-J.; Lakshman, M.K. Facile functionalization at the C⁴ position of pyrimidine nucleosides via amide group activation with (benzotriazol-1-yloxy)tris(dimethylamino)phos- phonium hexafluorophosphate (BOP) and biological evaluations of the products. Org. Biomol. Chem.; 2017; 15, pp. 1130-1139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6OB02334G]

30. Zheng, X.-A.; Huang, H.-S.; Kong, R.; Chen, W.-J.; Gong, S.-S.; Sun, Q. An efficient PyAOP-based C⁴-amination method for direct access of oxidized 5^MedC derivatives. Tetrahedron; 2018; 74, pp. 7095-7101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2018.10.046]

31. Sun, Q.; Sun, J.; Gong, S.-S.; Wang, C.-J.; Pu, S.-Z.; Feng, F.-D. Efficient synthesis of 5-hydroxymethyl-, 5-formyl-, and 5-carboxyl-2’-deoxycytidine and their triphosphates. RSC Adv.; 2014; 4, pp. 36036-36039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4RA07670B]

32. Sun, Q.; Gong, S.; Sun, J.; Wang, C.; Liu, S.; Liu, G.; Ma, C. Efficient synthesis of nucleoside 5’-triphosphates and their β,γ-bridging oxygen-modified analogs from nucleoside 5’-phosphates. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2014; 55, pp. 2114-2118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.02.031]

33. Sun, Q.; Gong, S.; Sun, J.; Liu, S.; Xiao, Q.; Pu, S. A P(V)–N activation strategy for the synthesis of nucleoside polyphophates. J. Org. Chem.; 2013; 78, pp. 8417-8426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo4011156] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915427]