It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Prior work has shown the utility of using Internet searches to track the incidence of different respiratory illnesses. Similarly, people who suffer from COVID-19 may query for their symptoms prior to accessing the medical system (or in lieu of it). To assist in the UK government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic we analyzed searches for relevant symptoms on the Bing web search engine from users in England to identify areas of the country where unexpected rises in relevant symptom searches occurred. These were reported weekly to the UK Health Security Agency to assist in their monitoring of the pandemic. Our analysis shows that searches for “fever” and “cough” were the most correlated with future case counts during the initial stages of the pandemic, with searches preceding case counts by up to 21 days. Unexpected rises in search patterns were predictive of anomalous rises in future case counts within a week, reaching an Area Under Curve of 0.82 during the initial phase of the pandemic, and later reducing due to changes in symptom presentation. Thus, analysis of regional searches for symptoms can provide an early indicator (of more than one week) of increases in COVID-19 case counts.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Microsoft Research, Herzliya, Israel; Technion, Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Haifa, Israel (GRID:grid.6451.6) (ISNI:0000000121102151)
2 University College London, Department of Computer Science, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
3 UK Health Security Agency, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b); St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Merseyside, UK (GRID:grid.439526.f)
4 University College London, Department of Computer Science, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); University of Copenhagen, Department of Computer Science, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X)
5 Bar-Ilan University, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Safed, Israel (GRID:grid.22098.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0503)