1. Introduction
Globally, the share of the population aged 65 years or older increased from 6% in 1990 to 9% in 2019, and is predicted to reach 16% by 2050 [1]. In China, the population aged 60 years and older has reached 253 million, which accounted for 18.1% of the total population by the end of 2019, and this number is predicted to reach 34.9% by 2050 [2,3]. Accordingly, the health management and health promotion of the elderly are becoming an important topic in current China.
Dietary habits are closely related to the occurrence and mortality of chronic non-communicable diseases [4,5,6]. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017, dietary risks were responsible for 11 million deaths (22% of all deaths among adults) and 255 million Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) (15% of all DALYs among adults) [7]. For elderly people, a balanced diet and optimum nutrition were conducive to their fitness, which can enhance their immunity to resist the invasion of chronic diseases [8]. However, previous studies found that elderly Chinese are facing the problems of unbalanced and unhealthy diet, such as high nutritional risk, insufficient intake of retinol, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, and calcium [9,10].
Dietary knowledge is the basis of individual diet-related behavior change [11]. Previous studies suggested that dietary knowledge was significantly associated with the elderly’s dietary attitude and behaviors [12,13]. Spronk et al.’s [14] systematic review reported a significant positive correlation between higher nutrition knowledge and the adequate intake of fruit and vegetables. Kristine et al. [15] further indicated that nutrition knowledge was a modifiable determinant of diet quality, which may mediate the effects of socio-demographic characteristics on diet quality. Proper and adequate dietary knowledge can help the elderly to choose a healthy diet to promote their physical health [16]. However, elderly people are confronting a low level of dietary knowledge in China, and less than half of them know basic knowledge like dietary guidelines [17]. Few studies focused on the changing trends of dietary knowledge of Chinese older adults [18,19]. Generally, knowledge is limited regarding the changing trend of dietary knowledge over time and the weak points of dietary knowledge among Chinese older adults.
Previous studies reported the influencing factors of dietary knowledge, including education level, place of residence, and income level, etc. [20,21] Elderly people with a higher education level, living in urban areas, and with higher income generally have better dietary knowledge [22,23]. Some controversial results were also reported regarding the associated factors of the dietary knowledge level. For example, Zhou et al. [24] and Yu et al. [25] found that the dietary knowledge of adults had no significant influence on overweight and obesity, possibly due to a lack of systematic dietary knowledge and inadequate guidance on overweight and obesity. While Laz et al. [26] suggested that an increase in nutrition knowledge may promote healthy weight control behaviors among low-income reproductive-age women. In the field of gender, research showed that females tended to have higher dietary knowledge than males [20,27,28]. However, there were some contrary findings that dietary knowledge was uncorrected with gender [21,29]. As for age, certain studies suggested that the age of older adults was negatively associated with dietary knowledge [20,30], while others indicated that there was no association between them [13,21].
In July 2019, the Chinese government implemented “Appropriate Diet” and “Elderly Health Promotion” as part of the “Healthy China Action (2019–2030)” [31]. The “National Nutrition Plan (2017–2030)” also emphasized the importance of promoting the popularization of nutrition knowledge [32]. Thus, to clarify the above issue, and to provide references for the development of targeted intervention towards dietary health of the elderly, we conducted this study. The purposes of this study were to (a) describe the changing trends of dietary knowledge of the Chinese elderly between 2004–2015, and (b) examine the associated factors of Chinese elderly’s dietary knowledge.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Sources
This study used data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). In China, the CHNS aimed to investigate the impact of social and economic transitions in Chinese society on residents’ overall health and nutrition status. This longitudinal survey adopted multistage and random cluster procedures, and was first carried out in 1989 covering eight provinces. By 2015, the CHNS covered fifteen provinces in China, including Liaoning, Shandong, Henan, Jiangsu, Hubei, Hunan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Heilongjiang, Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing, Zhejiang, Yunnan, and Shanxi. CHNS collects data on socioeconomic factors, health indicators, diet, and nutritional status, and the content of each round is adjusted appropriately according to the social and economic development and the change of residents’ lifestyle. In 2004, the CHNS began to collect information regarding dietary nutrition knowledge using 12 items, and five more items were added in 2015. More details regarding the study design and sampling strategies are available at the CHNS website (
2.2. Study Population
In this study, individuals aged 60 years and older were included as study subjects from the CHNS database. In the description of dietary knowledge trends, CHNS data in 2004, 2006, 2009, 2011, and 2015 were used. A total of 15,607 samples were involved after excluding these with incomplete information in the 12 dietary knowledges (Q1–Q12). In the analysis of associated factors, CHNS data in 2015 were used. After excluding these with missing information in socio-demographic characteristics and five additional dietary knowledges (Q13–Q17), 4150 samples were included. Figure 1 illustrates the flow chart of the sample selection.
2.3. Measures
2.3.1. Demographic Information
Participants’ socio-demographic characteristics were collected, including age, gender, educational level, nationality, body mass index (BMI), places of residence, and geographical regions. Age was divided into 60–69, 70–79, and ≥80 years old. Educational level included below primary school, primary school, middle school, and high school or above. Nationality was dichotomized into the Han nationality and the minority nationality. BMI was divided into three categories (<20.0 kg/m2, 20.0–26.9 kg/m2, and ≥27.0 kg/m2) based on the BMI criteria for Chinese elderly from Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS), i.e., the elderly’s BMI is preferably not less than 20.0 kg/m2 and not more than 26.9 kg/m2 [34]. The place of residence included urban areas and rural areas. The geographical region was categorized into the eastern regions (Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shandong), the central regions (Henan, Hubei, and Hunan), the western regions (Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan, Chongqing, and Shanxi), and the northeast regions (Liaoning and Heilongjiang) based on the economic zone division criteria from China’s National Bureau of Statistics [35].
In addition, we included two indicators related to dietary knowledge: knowing about the Chinese Food Pagoda (CFP) [36] or Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents (DGCR) [37] and proactively looking for nutrition knowledge. The first indicator was calculated based on the question “Do you know about the Chinese Food Pagoda or the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents (yes/no)?” The second indicator was measured by the question “Do you proactively look for nutrition knowledge (yes/no)?”
2.3.2. Dietary Knowledge
Seventeen statements related to dietary knowledge were used to measure the participants’ dietary knowledge, including 12 items in 2004–2015 and 5 additional items in 2015. Each statement was originally coded as “strongly disagree”, “disagree”, “neutral”, “agree”, and “strongly agree”. For nine positive items (Q1, Q3, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q10, Q13, and Q17), the response of “strongly agree” or “agree” was considered as the correct answer. For the other eight negative items (Q2, Q4, Q6, Q11, Q12, Q14, Q15, and Q16), the response of “strongly disagree” or “disagree” was considered as the correct answer [11,18].
Based on the 17 dietary knowledge items in 2015, we computed the participants’ dietary knowledge literacy. Each item with the correct answer was scored 1 point, otherwise 0. Individuals with an actual dietary knowledge score ≥80% of the full score were defined as having adequate dietary knowledge literacy [11,38], i.e., the total score of the 17 dietary knowledge ≥14 in this study. Cronbach’s alpha for the 17 dietary questions was 0.86 in the study.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 23.0 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the condition of dietary knowledge in 2004–2015. The secular trends of dietary knowledge were tested using the Cochran-Armitage test. Chi-square test was applied to compare dietary knowledge literacy among participants with different demographic characteristics. Variables with p-value < 0.1 in chi-square tests were selected as independent variables for the regression model. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associated factors of dietary knowledge. The condition of dietary knowledge literacy (yes or no) was set as the dependent variable. All predictor variables were entered into the same model, and the model selection was automated.
2.5. Ethics Statements
Protocols, instruments, and the process used to obtain informed consent in CHNS were approved by the institutional review committees of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, as well as the National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (201524). All subjects gave written informed consent for their participation in the survey.
3. Results
3.1. General Information
A total of 15,607 samples from the CHNS 2004, 2006, 2009, 2011, and 2015 waves were involved in this study. The detailed socio-demographic characteristics of the samples are summarized in Table 1.
3.2. Dietary Knowledge Trend 2004–2015
Table 2 presents the results of 12 dietary knowledge between 2004 and 2015. Among the 12 dietary knowledge items, the correct rate of 10 items (Q1–Q10) followed upward trends over time from 2004 to 2015 (all p-values < 0.05). Compared to 2004, the top three dietary knowledge items with the highest increase in correct rate were Q9 (consuming beans and bean products is good for one’s health) (72.8%), Q8 (consuming milk and dairy products is good for one’s health) (71.9%), and Q10 (physical activities are good for one’s health) (69.2%). However, downward trends were detected for the correct rate of two negative dietary knowledge items, i.e., Q11 (sweaty sports or other intense physical activities are not good for one’s health) (χ2 = 20.05, p-value < 0.001) and Q12 (the heavier one’s body is, the healthier he or she is) (χ2 = 43.93, p-value < 0.001).
Figure 2 demonstrates the top five dietary knowledge items with the lowest correct rate in 2004–2015. Four of the dietary knowledges consistently followed the lowest correct rate between 2006 and 2015: Q11 (sweaty sports or other intense physical activities are not good for one’s health) (24.5%−25.8%), Q5 (choosing a diet with a lot of staple foods is not good for one’s health) (36.6%−41.5%), Q6 (consuming a lot of animal products daily is good for one’s health) (45.8%−59.5%), and Q7 (reducing the amount of fatty meat and animal fat in the diet is good for one’s health) (63.6%−64.9%). In addition, the overall lowest correct rate of dietary knowledge in 2004–2015 was Q12 (the heavier one’s body is, the healthier he or she is) (33.6%).
3.3. Factors Associated with Dietary Knowledge
3.3.1. Univariate Analysis
A total of 4150 elderly participants were included from the 2015 CHNS to examine the associated factors of dietary knowledge literacy. We found that 30.5% (n = 1267) of the participants reported having adequate dietary knowledge literacy. Chi-square tests indicated a significant difference in the dietary knowledge literacy among the participants with different education levels (χ2 = 130.57, p < 0.001), race (χ2 = 8.90, p < 0.01), BMI (χ2 = 13.81, p < 0.01), place of residence (χ2 = 36.78, p < 0.001), geographical area (χ2 = 197.66, p < 0.001), knowing about CFP/DGCR or not (χ2 = 129.49, p < 0.001), and proactively looking for nutrition knowledge or not (χ2 = 129.49, p < 0.001) as shown in Table 3.
3.3.2. Multi-Factor Logistic Regression Analysis
Table 4 demonstrates the results of binary logistic regression analysis for dietary knowledge literacy. When compared to participants who received an education level of below primary school, those who received primary school (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.02–1.52), middle school (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.11–1.67), and high school or above (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.68–2.55) were more likely to have adequate dietary knowledge literacy. Rural participants reported a lower proportion of adequate dietary knowledge literacy than those who lived in urban areas (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.73–0.99). When compared to participants lived in western regions, those who lived in the northeast (OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 2.24–3.61), eastern (OR = 2.57, 95% CI = 2.11–3.14), and central regions (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.11–1.74) showed better dietary knowledge literacy. In addition, participants who knew about CFP/DGCR (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.42–2.05) and proactively looked for nutrition knowledge (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.42–2.03) were more likely to have adequate dietary knowledge literacy than those who did not.
4. Discussion
Dietary knowledge plays an important role in developing healthy and reasonable food consumption habits. This study found that the dietary knowledge level of Chinese older adults generally showed upward trends over time between 2004 and 2015, except for two dietary knowledge items regarding physical activity intensity and healthy weight. Elderly people demonstrated a suboptimal dietary knowledge level, such as knowledge related to physical activity intensity and the intake of staple foods, animal products, and fatty meat or animal fat. Educational level, places of residence, geographical region, knowing about CFP/DGCR, and proactively looking for nutrition knowledge were detected to be associated with the dietary knowledge literacy of Chinese older adults.
In this study, the correct rate of most dietary knowledge items (Q1–Q10) increased over time, reflecting the improvement of individual health and health literacy of Chinese older residents. However, there were two exceptions: Q11 (sweaty sports or other intense physical activities are not good for one’s health) and Q12 (the heavier one’s body is, the healthier he or she is). That is, the knowledge of elderly Chinese residents related to physical activity intensity and healthy weight showed a slight deteriorating trend from 2004 to 2015, which is consistent with Jia et al.’s [18] results among Chinese residents aged 18 years and older. The findings indicated that physical activity intensity and health weight might be two important issues that need special attention in diet-related education. Considering the functional ability of elderly people, they generally tended to and also were recommended to participate in physical activities with low intensity [39,40], which may to some extent explain our finding that older adults believed sweaty physical activities were not beneficial to their fitness. Thus, a specific dietary knowledge list specifically designed for elderly people based on their health characteristics is necessary in China.
We found that the correct rate of four out of the twelve dietary knowledge items consistently ranked top four of the lowest from 2006 to 2015, including two positive items (Q5, choosing a diet with a lot of staple foods is not good for one’s health; and Q7, reducing the amount of fatty meat and animal fat in the diet is good for one’s health) and two negative items (Q11, sweaty sports or other intense physical activities are not good for one’s health; and Q6, consuming a lot of animal products daily is good for one’s health).
As for the intake of staple foods, more than half of the participants reported the wrong answer in this study; that is, older adults believed that eating plenty of staple foods was conducive to their health. Wang et al.’s [41] investigation in Jinan, Shandong province reported that half of the rural elderly people exceeded the recommended daily intake of cereals, which supports the present finding. According to the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents 2016, the intake of cereals and tubers for elderly people should be 250–400 g/day, including 50–150 g of whole grains and sweet beans, and 50–100 g of tubers [37]. This suggests that we should change the misunderstanding towards staple food consumption of older residents to promote healthy dietary habits.
Regarding the intake of animal products and fatty meat and animal fat, elderly people reported insufficient and inaccurate knowledge in this study. Previous studies reported that Chinese older adults tended to eat a large amount of animal products, in particular livestock meat, but their intake of fish and poultry, which were rich in high-quality protein and low in fat, was insufficient [42,43]. According to the DGCR 2016, elderly people are recommended to eat 280–525 g fish, 280–525 g livestock or poultry, and 280–350 g eggs every week, with an average daily intake of 120–200 g [37]. Moynihan et al. [44] found that even if elderly people were aware of the recommendation of reducing fatty food consumption, only approximately one-third of them identified saturated fat as the type of fat to reduce in the diet correctly. These findings suggest the existence of common misunderstandings and a lack of knowledge regarding animal products and fat consumption among Chinese elderly people.
This study indicated that elderly individuals with a higher education level were more likely to have adequate dietary knowledge literacy, which was consistent with Zhang and Xiong’s study [45] among elderly people in nursing homes. Mi et al. [42] proposed that older adults with a higher education level tended to adopt a healthy dietary model, which might be due to a high education level generally representing a higher sense of self-care and awareness of acquiring dietary knowledge. Thus, regarding the popularization of dietary knowledge, older residents with low education levels should be given special attention. Liu et al. [46] reported that people with a low education level were far more likely to acquire nutrition knowledge through television and radio than those with higher education levels. Thus, during the popularizing of dietary knowledge of elderly people, diversified communication channels should be fully utilized, such as offspring or family members, TV channels, and medical practitioners [22].
In this study, better dietary knowledge literacy was detected in elderly participants who lived in urban areas than those who lived in rural areas. Previous studies reported similar results that the dietary knowledge of Chinese older residents exhibited an obvious urban–rural dual structure [23,47]. Accordingly, the elderly’s dietary behaviors also showed significant urban–rural differentiation [48]. During the popularizing of dietary knowledge, it is necessary to identify rural areas as the focus of knowledge publicity. The differences between urban and rural knowledge weak points should be considered.
A significant association between geographical region and dietary knowledge literacy was observed in the present study. Older adults who lived in eastern, central, and northeast regions were more likely to have adequate dietary knowledge literacy than those who lived in western regions. The proportion of reporting adequate dietary knowledge literacy followed a trend of “western (18.1%) < central (23.3%) < eastern (40.0%) < northeastern (41.1%)” in this study, which was generally in line with previous research [18,29]. However, Kang et al. [10] conducted a multicenter community-based survey in China using the Nutrition Screening Initiative (NSI) and found that elderly residents in eastern regions faced the highest nutritional risks, followed by the western regions, and finally the central regions. These findings suggest that there was great regional inequality in the dietary knowledge and nutritional risk among Chinese older adults, which should be considered in developing targeted diet-related interventions.
Our results indicate that elderly individuals who knew about CFP/DGCR or proactively looked for nutrition knowledge experienced significantly better dietary knowledge literacy than those who did not. Previous studies reported the same findings in Chinese adults aged 18 years and older [18,47]. CFP and DGCR are important guidance for Chinese residents in nutrition. Huang et al. [19] found that elderly residents who knew about CFP/DGCR had a higher daily consumption of fruits, eggs, and milk, as well as higher intake of protein, vitamin B2, and calcium, compared to those who did not.
In 2016, the Chinese Nutrition Society formulated the Dietary Guidelines for the Elderly in China based on the current physiological characteristics, health status, and nutritional needs of the Chinese elderly. The guidelines added relevant contents adapted to the characteristics of the elderly on the basis of the dietary guidelines for the general population. In the future, it is necessary to promote the guidelines in communities and families to improve the awareness rate of the guidelines for all the elderly residents. According to the Nutrition and Health Report of the Elderly in China 2015, nearly one-third of the Chinese elderly were unwilling to accept nutrition knowledge and change their dietary habits for rational nutrition [17]. Therefore, it is necessary to change the nutrition-related attitudes of the elderly by introducing the significance of the appropriate diet before popularizing dietary knowledge.
Several potential limitations should be mentioned regarding the present study. First, all indicators applied in this study were obtained through participants’ self-report, which may cause recall bias due to false or inaccurate responses. Secondly, in terms of the associated factors of dietary knowledge, we used cross-sectional data in 2015 rather than longitudinal data; thus, no causal inferences can be drawn from the results. Thirdly, considering the data timeliness, the 2015 wave of CHNS may not fully reflect China’s current situation. Fourthly, dietary knowledge is not always static and is constantly updated over time. However, due to the limitation of the existing contents of the CHNS questionnaire, this study failed to update the content and standard of dietary knowledge. Despite these limitations, the present study is the first to describe the changing trends of the dietary knowledge of Chinese older adults and to attempt to identify their weak points on dietary knowledge, based on a large sample data. The identification of the associated factors of dietary knowledge provides an important basis for targeted health intervention. These findings might be a valuable reference for the implementation of the current “Appropriate Diet” action and further relevant research.
5. Conclusions
In China, older adults demonstrated a suboptimal dietary knowledge level, particularly for knowledge related to physical activity intensity and the intake of staple foods, animal products, and fatty meat or animal fat. The overall correct rates for knowledge regarding physical activity intensity and staple food consumption were only 26.1% and 33.6% between 2004 and 2015. The dietary knowledge level of Chinese older adults generally showed upward trends over time between 2004 to 2015, except for two dietary knowledge items regarding physical activity intensity and healthy weight. Older adults who had a lower educational level, lived in rural areas or western regions, did not know about CFP/DGCR, and did not proactively look for nutrition knowledge were less likely to have adequate dietary knowledge literacy. It is necessary to develop targeted intervention toward the weak points of dietary knowledge among Chinese older residents to improve the healthy level of the elderly. The associated factors above should be considered regarding dietary knowledge interventions for older residents.
Conceptualization, S.W., Y.Y., and Q.W.; methodology, S.W., R.H., and Y.Y.; software, S.W., Y.Y., and R.H.; validation, Y.Y. and S.W.; formal analysis, S.W., R.H., and Y.Y.; resources, Q.W. and Z.M.; data curation, S.W., Y.Y., N.W., and Q.W.; writing-original draft preparation, S.W., Y.Y., R.H., H.L., N.W., Q.W., and Z.M.; writing-review and editing, S.W., Y.Y., R.H., H.L., N.W., Q.W., and Z.M.; supervision, Y.Y., Q.W., and Z.M.; project administration, Y.Y., Q.W., and Z.M.; funding acquisition, Q.W. and Z.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Global Health Institute, Wuhan University, China. The role of funding body included designing the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
CHNS, China Health and Nutrition Survey.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Top five dietary knowledge items with the lowest correct rate in 2004–2015.
Participants’ demographic characteristics.
| Variables | 2004 |
2006 |
2009 |
2011 |
2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||||
| 60–69 | 1259 (57.7) | 1367 (57.0) | 1546 (56.9) | 2266 (60.5) | 2822 (61.8) |
| 70–79 | 734 (33.7) | 815 (34.0) | 900 (33.1) | 1128 (30.1) | 1306 (28.6) |
| ≥80 | 188 (8.6) | 217 (9.0) | 272 (10.0) | 351 (9.4) | 436 (9.6) |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 1024 (47.0) | 1124 (46.9) | 1275 (46.9) | 1775 (47.4) | 2136 (46.8) |
| Female | 1157 (53.0) | 1275 (53.1) | 1443 (53.1) | 1970 (52.6) | 2428 (53.2) |
| Education level | |||||
| Below primary school a | 1116 (51.4) | 1297 (54.4) | 1324 (48.9) | 1573 (42.1) | 1497 (32.8) |
| Primary school | 525 (24.2) | 451 (18.9) | 633 (23.4) | 795 (21.3) | 1043 (22.9) |
| Middle school | 260 (12.0) | 307 (12.9) | 401 (14.8) | 716 (19.2) | 1044 (22.9) |
| High school or above | 272 (12.5) | 331 (13.9) | 351 (13.0) | 651 (17.4) | 980 (21.5) |
| Nationality | |||||
| Han | 1933 (88.6) | 2109 (87.9) | 2351 (86.8) | 3357 (89.8) | 4078 (90.1) |
| The minority | 248 (11.4) | 290 (12.1) | 358 (13.2) | 381 (10.2) | 448 (9.9) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||||
| <20 | 444 (21.5) | 476 (21.2) | 494 (19.1) | 571 (15.6) | 493 (11.8) |
| 20–26.9 | 1318 (63.9) | 1452 (64.7) | 1710 (66.0) | 2463 (67.1) | 2825 (67.5) |
| ≥27 | 300 (14.5) | 317 (14.1) | 386 (14.9) | 637 (17.4) | 868 (20.7) |
| Place of residence | |||||
| Urban | 839 (38.5) | 892 (37.2) | 979 (36.0) | 1599 (42.7) | 1915 (42.0) |
| Rural | 1342 (61.5) | 1507 (62.8) | 1739 (64.0) | 2146 (57.3) | 2649 (58.0) |
| Geographical region | |||||
| Western region | 596 (27.1) | 650 (27.1) | 730 (26.9) | 1011 (27.0) | 1218 (26.7) |
| Central region | 665 (30.4) | 729 (30.8) | 837 (30.8) | 939 (25.1) | 1068 (23.4) |
| Eastern region | 554 (25.4) | 609 (25.4) | 681 (25.1) | 1279 (34.2) | 1680 (36.8) |
| Northeast region | 366 (16.8) | 411 (17.1) | 470 (17.3) | 516 (13.8) | 598 (13.1) |
Sample sizes of the demographic characteristics variables may not sum to n = 15,607 due to missing values. a Below primary school group includes participants who were uneducated or did not know their own education level. BMI, body mass index.
The proportion of correctly answering on 12 dietary knowledge in 2004–2015.
| 2004 | 2006 | 2009 | 2011 | 2015 | Cochran-Armitage χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Choosing a diet with a lot of fresh fruits and vegetables is good for one’s health. | 124 (5.7) | 1799 (75.0) | 2031 (74.7) | 2807 (75.0) | 3393 (74.3) | 1515.41 a *** |
| Q2 c | Eating a lot of sugar is good for one’s health. | 1536 (70.4) | 1631 (68.0) | 2007 (73.8) | 2952 (78.8) | 3222 (70.6) | 4.65 a * |
| Q3 | Eating a variety of foods is good for one’s health. | 74 (3.4) | 1794 (74.8) | 2005 (73.8) | 2861 (76.4) | 3303 (72.4) | 1487.21 a *** |
| Q4 c | Choosing a diet high in fat is good for one’s health. | 1510 (69.2) | 1577 (65.7) | 2013 (74.1) | 2888 (77.1) | 3158 (69.2) | 4.46 a * |
| Q5 | Choosing a diet with a lot of staple foods (rice and rice products, wheat and wheat products) is not good for one’s health. | 17 (0.8) | 879 (36.6) | 1009 (37.1) | 1554 (41.5) | 1790 (39.2) | 567.81 a *** |
| Q6 c | Consuming a lot of animal products daily (fish, poultry, eggs and lean meat) is good for one’s health. | 1160 (53.2) | 1099 (45.8) | 1398 (51.4) | 2141 (57.2) | 2717 (59.5) | 92.75 a *** |
| Q7 | Reducing the amount of fatty meat and animal fat in the diet is good for one’s health. | 62 (2.8) | 1525 (63.6) | 1943 (71.5) | 2786 (74.4) | 3054 (66.9) | 1403.74 a *** |
| Q8 | Consuming milk and dairy products is good for one’s health. | 149 (6.8) | 1959 (81.7) | 2258 (83.1) | 3195 (85.3) | 3593 (78.7) | 1801.89 a *** |
| Q9 | Consuming beans and bean products is good for one’s health. | 169 (7.7) | 2046 (85.3) | 2347 (86.4) | 3235 (86.4) | 3672 (80.5) | 1827.50 a *** |
| Q10 | Physical activities are good for one’s health. | 136 (6.2) | 1972 (82.2) | 2198 (80.9) | 3120 (83.3) | 3440 (75.4) | 1475.46 a *** |
| Q11 c | Sweaty sports or other intense physical activities are not good for one’s health. | 698 (32.0) | 619 (25.8) | 689 (25.3) | 919 (24.5) | 1156 (25.3) | 20.05 b *** |
| Q12 c | The heavier one’s body is, the healthier he or she is. | 1706 (78.2) | 1960 (81.7) | 2227 (81.9) | 3222 (86.6) | 3343 (73.2) | 43.93 b *** |
Q, question. a upward trend; b downward trend; c negative item. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01; *** p <0.001.
The dietary knowledge literacy of participants with different demographic characteristics in 2015.
| Variables | Categories | Total | Adequate Dietary Knowledge Literacy | χ 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes |
No |
||||
| Age (years) | 60–69 | 2630 | 831 (31.6) | 1799 (68.4) | 4.63 |
| 70–79 | 1194 | 336 (28.1) | 858 (71.9) | ||
| ≥80 | 326 | 100 (30.7) | 226 (69.3) | ||
| Gender | Female | 1932 | 617 (31.9) | 1315 (68.1) | 3.37 |
| Male | 2218 | 650 (29.3) | 1568 (70.7) | ||
| Education level a | Below primary school | 1334 | 295 (22.1) | 1039 (77.9) | 130.57 *** |
| Primary school | 970 | 272 (28.0) | 698 (72.0) | ||
| Middle school | 960 | 305 (31.8) | 655 (68.2) | ||
| High school or above | 886 | 395 (44.6) | 491 (55.4) | ||
| Nationality | The minority | 400 | 96 (24.0) | 304 (76.0) | 8.90 ** |
| Han | 3750 | 1171 (31.2) | 2579 (68.8) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | <20 | 491 | 121 (24.6) | 370 (75.4) | 13.81 ** |
| 20–26.9 | 2799 | 851 (30.4) | 1948 (69.6) | ||
| ≥27 | 860 | 295 (34.3) | 565 (65.7) | ||
| Place of residence | Urban | 1724 | 615 (35.7) | 1109 (64.3) | 36.78 *** |
| Rural | 2426 | 652 (26.9) | 1774 (73.1) | ||
| Geographical area | Western region | 1099 | 199 (18.1) | 900 (81.9) | 197.66 *** |
| Eastern region | 1580 | 632 (40.0) | 948 (60.0) | ||
| Central region | 948 | 221 (23.3) | 727 (76.7) | ||
| Northeast region | 523 | 215 (41.1) | 308 (58.9) | ||
| Knowing about CFP/DGCR | No | 3166 | 823 (26.0) | 2343 (74.0) | 129.49 *** |
| Yes | 984 | 444 (45.1) | 540 (54.9) | ||
| Proactively looking for nutrition knowledge | No | 3081 | 793 (25.7) | 2288 (74.3) | 129.49 *** |
| Yes | 1069 | 474 (44.3) | 595 (55.7) | ||
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. BMI, body mass index; CFP, Chinese Food Pagoda; DGCR, Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents.
Multi-factor logistic regression analysis testing the factors associated with dietary knowledge literacy.
| Variables | OR | 95% CI for OR | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Education level (vs. Below primary school) | ||||
| Primary school | 1.25 | 1.02 | 1.52 | 0.029 |
| Middle school | 1.37 | 1.11 | 1.67 | 0.003 |
| High school or above | 2.07 | 1.68 | 2.55 | 0.000 |
| Race (vs. The minority) | ||||
| Han | 0.93 | 0.72 | 1.21 | 0.590 |
| BMI (vs. <20) | ||||
| 20–26.9 | 1.07 | 0.85 | 1.35 | 0.570 |
| ≥27 | 1.22 | 0.94 | 1.58 | 0.142 |
| Place of residence (vs. Urban areas) | ||||
| Rural areas | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.99 | 0.033 |
| Geographical area (vs. Western region) | ||||
| Eastern region | 2.57 | 2.11 | 3.14 | 0.000 |
| Central region | 1.39 | 1.11 | 1.74 | 0.004 |
| Northeast region | 2.85 | 2.24 | 3.61 | 0.000 |
| Knowing about CFP/DGCR (vs. No) | ||||
| Yes | 1.37 | 1.13 | 1.67 | 0.002 |
| Proactively looking for nutrition knowledge (vs. No) | ||||
| Yes | 1.39 | 1.15 | 1.68 | 0.001 |
Goodness-of-fit test: Hosmer–Lemeshow test χ2 = 11.88, p-value = 0.156. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; CFP, Chinese Food Pagoda; DGCR, Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents.
References
1. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. World Population Prospects 2019. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Report.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2020).
2. National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical bulletin of national economic and social development of the People’s Republic of China in 2019. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html (accessed on 15 August 2020).
3. Chinese Government Website. The Elderly Will Account for about One Third of China’s Total Population by 2050. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018–07/19/content_5307839.htm (accessed on 15 August 2020).
4. Estruch, R.; Ros, E.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Covas, M.I.; Corella, D.; Arós, F.; Gómez-Gracia, E.; Ruiz-Gutiérrez, V.; Fiol, M.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. et al. Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2018; 378, pp. 2441-2442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1806491] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897867]
5. Lennox, J.; Petrucka, P.; Bassendowski, S. Eating practices during pregnancy: Perceptions of select Maasai women in Northern Tanzania. Glob. Health Res. Policy; 2017; 2, 9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-017-0028-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202077]
6. Dinu, M.; Pagliai, G.; Casini, A.; Sofi, F. Mediterranean diet and multiple health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.; 2018; 2018, pp. 30-43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.58] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28488692]
7. Afshin, A.; Sur, P.J.; Fay, K.A.; Cornaby, L.; Ferrara, G.; Salama, J.S.; Mullany, E.C.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abebe, Z. et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet; 2019; 393, pp. 1958-1972. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8]
8. Pae, M.; Meydani, S.N.; Wu, D. The role of nutrition in enhancing immunity in aging. Aging Dis.; 2012; 3, 91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.03.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500273]
9. Wang, L.; Zhang, B.; Wang, H.; Du, W.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z. Secular trends in dietary micronutrient intakes among the elderly in nine provinces (autonomous regions) of China from 1991 to 2015. J. Environ. Occup. Med.; 2019; 36, pp. 418-424. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2019.18610]
10. Kang, J.; Qiu, Y.; Li, H.; Shi, X.; Chen, W. Multicenter Cross-sectional Community-based Nutrition Risk Screening in 3885 Chinese Elderly Adults. Acta Acad. Med. Sin.; 2018; 40, pp. 637-641. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.10712]
11. Yang, Y.; He, D.; Wei, L.; Wang, S.; Chen, L.; Luo, M.; Mao, Z. Association between diet-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and self-rated health in Chinese adult residents: A population-based study. BMC Public Health; 2020; 20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08896-y]
12. Li, C. Gender Differences in Nutrition Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among Elderly People. Int. J. Manag. Econ. Soc. Sci. (IJMESS); 2017; 6, pp. 199-211.
13. Jiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Li, H. Investigation and study on nutrition KAP among elderly people in Guangzhou. Food Mach.; 2014; 30, pp. 65-67.
14. Spronk, I.; Kullen, C.; Burdon, C.; O’Connor, H. Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. Br. J. Nutr.; 2014; 111, pp. 1713-1726. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514000087]
15. Deroover, K.; Bucher, T.; Vandelanotte, C.; de Vries, H.; Duncan, M.J. Practical Nutrition Knowledge Mediates the Relationship Between Sociodemographic Characteristics and Diet Quality in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Am. J. Health Promot.; 2020; 34, pp. 59-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0890117119878074]
16. Agbozo, F.; Amardi-Mfoafo, J.; Dwase, H.; Ellahi, B. Nutrition knowledge, dietary patterns and anthropometric indices of older persons in four peri-urban communities in Ga West municipality, Ghana. Afr. Health Sci.; 2018; 18, pp. 743-755. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i3.33]
17. China Development Research Foundation. Nutrition and Health Report of the Elderly in China; China Development Press: Beijing, China, 2016.
18. Jia, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Su, C.; Du, W.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, H.; Huang, F.; Ou, Y.; Wang, Y. et al. Changes in the awareness of nutritional knowledge in Chinese adults during 2004–2015. J. Hyg. Res.; 2020; 49, pp. 345-356. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2020.03.001]
19. Huang, F.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhai, F.; Zhang, B. The trends in awareness rate of the dietary guidelines for Chinese residents and the effect on dietary pattern. Acta Nutr. Sin.; 2015; 37, pp. 325-329.
20. Liao, B.; Jiang, C.; Guo, S. Survey on nutrition knowledge, attitude and behavior of the elderly in different pension modes in Changsha. Chin. J. Gerontol.; 2015; 35, pp. 4343-4346.
21. Chen, Y.; Tang, Z.; Fang, Z.; Lu, W.; Li, Z.; Zhou, W.; Li, X. Analysis on nutrition related knowledge, dietary status and influencing factors among residents in 5 regions of Guangxi. Chin. J. Health Educ.; 2016; 32, pp. 36-40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2016.01.09]
22. Lin, W.; Lee, Y. Nutrition knowledge, attitudes and dietary restriction behaviour of Taiwanese elderly. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr; 2015; 14, pp. 221-229.
23. Gao, X.; Xue, P.; Liu, S.; Liu, H. Dietary knowledge of urban and rural elderly residents in China. Chin. J. Gerontol.; 2012; 32, pp. 2572-2573. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2012.12.057]
24. Zhou, L.; Zeng, Q.; Jin, S.; Cheng, G. The impact of changes in dietary knowledge on adult overweight and obesity in China. PLoS ONE; 2017; 12, e179551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179551]
25. Yu, J.; Han, X.; Wen, H.; Ren, J.; Qi, L. Better Dietary Knowledge and Socioeconomic Status (SES), Better Body Mass Index? Evidence from China—An Unconditional Quantile Regression Approach. Nutrients; 2020; 12, 1197. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12041197] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344738]
26. Laz, T.H.; Rahman, M.; Pohlmeier, A.M.; Berenson, A.B. Level of Nutrition Knowledge and Its Association with Weight Loss Behaviors Among Low-Income Reproductive-Age Women. J. Community Health; 2015; 40, pp. 542-548. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9969-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25394404]
27. Wei, M.I.; Jie, D.; Ge, Z.; Yan, Z.; Nan, W.; Wu, L. The Dietary Status and Nutritional Knowledge Levels among the Elderly in Yantai. Acta Nutr. Sin.; 2016; 38, pp. 195-197.
28. Ul Haq, I.; Mariyam, Z.; Li, M.; Huang, X.; Jiang, P.; Zeb, F.; Wu, X.; Feng, Q.; Zhou, M. A Comparative Study of Nutritional Status, Knowledge Attitude and Practices (KAP) and Dietary Intake between International and Chinese Students in Nanjing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2018; 15, 1910. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091910] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30177588]
29. Xu, Y.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, T.; Wang, D.; Hu, J.; Gao, J.; Zhou, Z. Explaining Income-Related Inequalities in Dietary Knowledge: Evidence from the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2020; 17, 532. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020532]
30. Fan, Y. Survey on KAP about the old people’s diet health in communities of Shaoxing city. Mod. Prev. Med.; 2007; pp. 1535-1537. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-8507.2007.08.063]
31. Chinese Government Website. Healthy China Action (2019–2030). Available online: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm (accessed on 15 August 2020).
32. Chinese Government Website. National Nutrition Plan (2017–2030). Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-07/13/content_5210134.htm (accessed on 15 August 2020).
33. Popkin, B.M.; Du, S.; Zhai, F.; Zhang, B. Cohort Profile: The China Health and Nutrition Survey—Monitoring and understanding socio-economic and health change in China, 1989–2011. Int. J. Epidemiol.; 2010; 39, pp. 1435-1440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp322]
34. Chinese Nutrition Society, Interpretation and Application of Dietary Guidelines for the Elderly in China (2016). Available online: http://health.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0323/c404200-29164663.html (accessed on 17 October 2020).
35. National Bureau of Statistics, Statistical System and Classification Standard. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/ (accessed on 15 August 2020).
36. Chinese Nutrition Society, Chinese Food Pagoda (2016). Available online: http://dg.cnsoc.org/upload/images/source/20160519163856103.jpg (accessed on 17 October 2020).
37. Chinese Nutrition Society, Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents (2016). Available online: http://dg.cnsoc.org/article/04/8a2389fd5520b4f30155b41b364b23df.html (accessed on 17 October 2020).
38. Xueqiong, N.; Yinghua, L.; Li, L. Statistic analysis of 2012 Chinese residents health literacy monitoring. Chin. J. Health Educ.; 2014; 30, pp. 178-181.
39. Gao, M. Investigation and Analysis on the Current Situation of Physical Fitness for the Elderly: Taking Liaocheng of Shandong as an Example. J. Cap. Univ. Phys. Educ. Sports; 2017; 29, pp. 202-206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14036/j.cnki.cn.11-4513.2017.03.003]
40. Pillatt, A.P.; Nielsson, J.; Schneider, R.H. Effects of physical exercise in frail older adults: A systematic review. Fisioter. E Pesqui.; 2019; 26, pp. 210-217. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/18004826022019]
41. Wang, X.; Chen, R.; Xing, C.; Zhang, N.; Guo, X. Investigation on diet and nutrition of rural elderly in China. Chin. J. Gerontol.; 2016; 36, pp. 4077-4078. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2016.16.097]
42. Wei, M.; Wu, L.; Manli, Y.; Yingjie, J.; Weijie, Y.; Yajie, W.; Jiting, L. Analysis on dietary patterns and influencing factors among the elderly in Yantai City. J. Hyg. Res.; 2017; 46, pp. 27-31. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2017.01.005]
43. Wang, L. Diet Quality Transition of Chinese Elderly in Nine Provinces (Autonomous Regions) and Its Multiple-Level Longitudinal Association with Abdominal Obesity; Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Beijing, China, 2019.
44. Moynihan, P.J.; Mulvaney, C.E.; Adamson, A.J.; Seal, C.; Steen, N.; Mathers, J.C.; Zohouri, F.V. The nutrition knowledge of older adults living in sheltered housing accommodation. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet.; 2007; 20, pp. 446-458. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00808.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17845379]
45. Zhang, C.; Xiong, X. Survey on nutrition knowledge of the elderly in a district nursing home. Chin. J. Gerontol.; 2015; 35, pp. 1102-1103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2015.04.115]
46. Liu, C.; Su, Y.; Jin, B. Relationship of the elderly nutrition knowledge and their education level in Nanjing. J. Hyg. Res.; 2013; 42, pp. 605-609.
47. Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Wan, T.; Ga, M.; Suo, L.; Ping, C. Status quo of dietary knowledge and attitudes and influencing factors of dietary health literacy among adult residents in China, 2015. Chin. J. Public Health; 2019; 35, pp. 1267-1270. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11847/zgggws1122422]
48. Zhao, D.; Huang, L.; Su, D.; Wang, W.; Fang, Y.; Gu, W.; Huang, E.; Zhang, R. Analysis on the dietary survey results of 60 years old and over population in different economic area of Zhejiang Province in 2010–2012. J. Hyg. Res.; 2018; 47, pp. 37-40.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Hu, Runhu 2 ; Long, Hongfei 3 ; Wang, Ni 2 ; Wang, Quan 1 ; Mao, Zongfu 1 1 School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China;
2 School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China;
3 Dong Fureng Economic & Social Development School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China;