Insulinotropic Potential of Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin: An In Vivo Rabbits Model Study Followed by Randomized Phase I Clinical Trial

Abstract

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have been reported to cause dysglycemia in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. However, diabetic patients are usually on polypharmacy, so we cannot attribute the dysglycemia specifically to FQs. To answer the question as to whether Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin influence blood glucose levels and serum insulin levels or otherwise, rabbits were used as experimental animals in an in vivo model followed by a phase I randomized clinical trial in euglycemic healthy volunteers. The effects on the serum insulin and blood glucose levels in the Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin treated groups were, respectively, determined on the fifth day in both the in-vivo rabbits model and in the test subjects of the phase I clinical trial. The effects of these drugs were also checked on the histomorphology of the pancreas in the rabbits. The findings of our study suggest that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the blood glucose levels via a subsequent significant shift in the serum insulin levels both in the in vivo animal model and in the test subjects of the phase I clinical trial. No prominent effects on the beta cells histomorphology were noted in this study. Moxifloxacin showed a more significant effect than Gemifloxacin. The insulinotropic effect was comparable to the effect of Glibenclamide. It is concluded that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin have a significant blood glucose lowering effect mediated through insulinotropic action. (Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT04692623).

1. Introduction

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) belong to a class of broad-spectrum antibiotics used to kill various microorganisms [1,2]. During the last two decades, newer fluoroquinolones have been introduced into the market [3]. These newer FQs were synthesized in the laboratory from Nalidixic acid, which was synthesized as a byproduct of antimalarial chloroquine [4]. Among these, the older Ciprofloxacin and Norfloxacin are the drugs of choice for gastro and urinary tract infections. Newly introduced Moxifloxacin is popular due to its better potency against infections of the upper and lower respiratory tract [5]. There are reports for antimitotic and antimalarial activities along with the antibacterial activities of the FQs [6]. Some serious adverse effects of FQs have also been reported besides its excellent therapeutic profile [7]. Many FQs have been recalled and banned due to causing severe adverse drug reactions. These adverse effects have badly affected the therapeutic significance of FQs. These adverse effects have also raised serious concerns regarding their safety profile [8]. Among these, tendinitis, cardiotoxicity, and dysglycemia are some of the top serious adverse effects noted with the use of FQs [9]. Trovofloxacin and Sparfloxacin were withdrawn from the market due to severe hepatotoxicity, phototoxicity, and cardiotoxicity [10]. Temofloxacin and Levofloxacin have limited use nowadays due to their phototoxic effects [11]. Previously, Enoxacin, Lomefloxacin, and Norfloxacin were causing severe hypoglycemia. Levofloxacin and Gatifloxacin have been reported for both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia [12]. Gatifloxacin, due to its high rate of causing severe hyperglycemia, was withdrawn from the market [13]. Three marketed fluoroquinolones, namely Gatifloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin, were placed in the Metabolic and Nutritional Disorders category by the Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Program (CADRMP) [14]. Moxifloxacin was approved by the US FDA in 1999 [15]. Moxifloxacin has also been reported for changes in the blood glucose homeostasis and abnormalities with both hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic effects [16]. Reports regarding the hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic effects of FQs on blood glucose levels remain controversial, so, in the current study, the newer fourth generation fluoroquinolones (Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin) were tested in a controlled in vivo environment (euglycemic rabbits), followed by their translation in a randomized phase I clinical trial in the healthy human volunteers (euglycemic) to identify their dysglycemic effects.

2. Results

2.1. Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin Effects on Blood Glucose and Serum Insulin Levels in In Vivo Rabbits Model

The concept of the possible effects on the release of insulin with a subsequent shift in the blood glucose levels in the working pancreas of euglycemic rabbits is due to activation of ATP sensitive K channels; hence, we designed the current in vivo rabbits model to translate the possible beta cells’ cytotropic effects in the working pancreas. The blood glucose levels of the experimental animals (treated and untreated groups) on the first day (as baseline) and on day five were determined. The values of blood glucose level (mg/mL) were shown in Table 1. The blood glucose levels were reduced significantly (p < 0.05) in the test drug treated groups versus the respective untreated (negative control) and positive control groups (standard Glibenclamide) (Table 1). Similarly, a surge in serum insulin levels on day five of all the drug treated and untreated groups was observed, as shown in Table 2. The serum insulin levels were significantly (p < 0.0001) increased in the Moxifloxacin treated group as compared to the Gemifloxacin treated group (p < 0.05). This shows that the effect of Moxifloxacin was more significant than the effect of Gemifloxacin.

No significant changes in the cellularity and density of the beta cells of the pancreas were noted in our present study in all the treated groups, as shown in Figure 1.

Tissues Histomorphology

No significant changes in the cellularity and density of the beta cells of the pancreas were observed in all the treated groups as we administered the test (Moxifloxacin, Gemifloxacin) and standard (Glibenclamide) drugs for 5 days (Figure 1).

2.2. Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin Effects on Blood Glucose and Serum Insulin Levels in Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Clinical Trial

In the phase I clinical trials, sixty-five healthy volunteers were screened for eligibility. Five subjects did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. The participants’ demographic information and baseline clinical characteristics are shown in Table 3.

Sixty volunteers were selected and were enrolled in the trial (Figure 2, Clinical trial profile).

The mean blood glucose levels were significantly decreased (p < 0.0001) with Moxifloxacin as compared to the respective baseline in the Moxifloxacin treated group. However, a relatively less significant effect (p ˂ 0.05) was achieved in the Gemifloxacin treated group in healthy volunteers. The serum insulin level was increased more significantly (p ˂ 0.0001) in the Moxifloxacin treated group, and a less significant effect (p ˂ 0.05) was observed in the Gemifloxacin treated group. Initially, the results were reproduced in the rabbits animal model studies, where more significant effects for Moxifloxacin were noted as compared to Gemifloxacin. The results of the animal model study reveal that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin significantly (p < 0.05) reduced blood glucose levels with a significant (p < 0.05) surge in insulin level. Moreover, we observed significant increases in the serum insulin level in both the Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin treated groups (p < 0.05). Hence, we report that the Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin produced significant blood glucose lowering effects via release of insulin, with a more significant effect for Moxifloxacin than Gemifloxacin.

In the healthy volunteers of the clinical trial, the Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin effects on blood glucose and serum insulin levels are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.

Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin caused a significant reduction in the blood glucose level, with a subsequent shift in the insulin level in the experimental rabbit model, and these are also translated in the phase I clinical trial. This study reports that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin produced significant blood glucose lowering effects via release of insulin.

3. Discussions

In this study, Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin best describe the possible insulinotropic effect for the decrease in blood glucose levels. We observed a classical surge in the serum insulin levels with a subsequent decrease in the blood glucose levels. Though there are reports of dysglycemia regarding the use of fluoroquinolones in treating different ailments with quinolones, previous case studies reported that quinolones induce dysglycemia [17,18,19,20]. However, there are also reports of hyperglycemia with Moxifloxacin, Gatifloxacin, and levofloxacin. Moxifloxacin has been related with dysglycemia, but the clear picture of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia has not yet been reported in the published studies [15,21].

In this study, group “A” was kept as the untreated group and was fed with fresh water and food only. The results of our studies showed that, in the controlled environment, these factors (food and fresh water) had no significant effect on the blood glucose and serum insulin levels. This confirms the hypoglycemic potential of the current fluoroquinolones (Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin), similar to that produced by Glibenclamide. It is evident from case reports and other studies that fluoroquinolones may cause dysglycemia, i.e., hypoglycemia and or hyperglycemia. In hyperglycemia, more insulin secretion is related to pancreatic vacuolation with concomitant use of quinolones [22]. In this study, Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin significantly decreased blood glucose levels, with proportionate surges in the serum insulin levels in euglycemic rabbits as well as in healthy euglycemic volunteers, which implies an insulinotropic effect of Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin.

On the other hand, high blood glucose levels also stimulate the pancreatic beta cells and thus ultimately cause insulin secretion [23]. It is pertinent to mention that the release of insulin was increased versus the baseline insulin levels. A high concentration of blood glucose level causes an increase in ATP and ADP levels, which causes depolarization of pancreatic beta cells. This further causes opening of voltage gated (vg) calcium channels that allow the influx of calcium in the β cells, which ultimately causes insulin release from the working pancreas [20,24]. This mechanism is true for the blood glucose lowering effect of Glibenclamide used as a standard drug. However, regarding Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin, this mechanism is yet to be explored. However, it is clear that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin caused insulin surges that produced blood glucose lowering effects, although there are reports that that hypoglycemic effect of fluoroquinolones is due to activation of ATP sensitive K channels in pancreatic beta cells [25,26]. Additionally, we translated that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin produced a fall in blood glucose levels.

Glibenclamide causes prolonged hypoglycemic effects [27] by binding to SUR1 and SUR2 (sulfonylurea receptors) in pancreatic beta cells, causing activation of the ATP-sensitive potassium channels [28]. This further causes calcium influx and insulin secretion via the opening of voltage gated calcium channels, and a hypoglycemic effect is achieved. Similar results were observed in the Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin treated groups [29].

In order to discover possible histological changes in gross morphology and histology, on the completion of the experiment, all the rabbits were slaughtered and their pancreases were excised, as per Mir et al., 2013 [30]. The beta cells density and cellularity in all the treated and untreated groups apparently remained the same and no prominent changes were observed, which still needs to be explained.

Thus, our findings now translate the already existing case reports of hypoglycemia associated with the use of Moxifloxacin [31]. Previous studies report that fluoroquinolones cause hypoglycemia when used concomitantly with sulfonylurea [20]. However, the newer quinolones are comparably potent to decrease the blood glucose levels via an increased surge in the release of serum insulin. Thus, the use of the current quinolones carries the risk of developing hypoglycemia amongst the diabetic patients who are already controlled on sulfonylureas and require antibiotic therapy.

In our present study, we only determined the effect of these drugs on blood glucose via any surge in the serum insulin level. Thus, blood samples were taken and respective surges in insulin levels were noted. It is not necessary that every surge in insulin shall be associated with hypoglycemia as there are other compensatory mechanisms, such as the secondary messenger system, i.e., secretion of glucagon, sympathomimetic activity (secretion of epinephrine), and a glycogenolysis-like effect, which were not the domain of our study at this stage and require further studies to identify the underlying mechanism in euglycemics (working pancreas).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. In Vivo Animal Model Studies

4.1.1. Drugs and Preparation of Drugs Solutions

All the drugs used in this research were of standard pharmaceutical grade. Moxifloxacin, Gemifloxacin, and Glibenclamide were, respectively, purchased from Getz, Sami, and Sanofi Aventis pharmaceutical companies. Moxifloxacin, Gemifloxacin, and Glibenclamide were given on the basis of average body weights calculated from normal adult normal doses. Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin salts were soluble in water as both are available in salt form. Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride and Gemifloxacin mesylate (5 mg/kg body weight) were solubilized in water for injection, while Glibenclamide (0.2 mg/kg) was given in hard gelatin capsule form orally as it was insoluble in water. Starch was used as excipient by using geometric dilution and extemporaneously filling of the capsules. The content uniformity of active ingredient was assured as per ranges mentioned in the BP 2011 Appendix XIIC.

Four groups had 6 rabbits (n = 6) in each group. Standard guidelines defined in the “Animals Bye-Laws 2008 (Scientific Procedures Issue-1) of University of Malakand” were followed [32]. Rabbits of all groups were weighed for respective dose calculation and were administered with various doses as shown in Table 4 [33]. The groups were then marked by various color coding in cages. The drugs solutions were administered per oral route using oral-gauge-tube. Group A was kept as untreated group that was fed on fresh water and food only to check whether water and food influence the blood glucose and insulin levels or otherwise.

4.1.2. Experimental Animals

Adult rabbits of either sex (1.5–2.5 kg) were kept at the animal house. They were retained on 23–25 °C temperature and 45–55% relative humidity. Standard pellet diet and fresh water were used as their feed. The research studies were approved by Institutional Research Ethics Committee (IREC) under notification No: SBBU/IEC-20-01. Rabbits of all groups were exposed to light and dark cycles (12 h each cycle).

4.1.3. Instruments

Blood glucose levels were determined by using Abbott’s free style glucometer. Insulin ELISA kits Accu Bind (96 wells, Monobind Inc., Lake Forest, CA, USA) were used to determine serum insulin levels. They were refrigerated at 2–8 °C. Sartorius balance was used for weighing of all drugs. Blood was collected from rabbits’ marginal ear vein through 26 Gauge disposable syringes.

4.1.4. Blood Collection and Analysis

On day 1st (baseline), the 1st sample of blood was collected from all the rabbits before the administration of drugs. Accordingly, the blood was screened for the blood glucose as well as for serum insulin levels. Second blood samples were collected on day five of the drugs administration and were screened for blood glucose and serum insulin levels. The drugs were given for 5 days according to our study design. The dosage schedule for these drugs (Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin) is already based on its respective preclinical data at time of its approval from FDA.

Serum insulin levels were determined by using Insulin ELISA kit as per recommended techniques [34]. Briefly describing, blood was collected from marginal ear vein of the rabbits. Out of 96 well plates (Streptavidin coated), 90 for test drug and six for reference samples were used. 50 µL serum were pipetted out through micro pipette from each sample and were added to each well in plate. Then, 100 µL conjugated enzyme was added to each well and were placed in incubator for 2 h at 25 °C. After incubation time completion, all wells were washed 5 times at least with buffer saline in order to remove the unbounded proteins. 100 µL of equimolar mixture of A (Tetramethylbenzidine) and B Chromogenic were then added to each well and were placed in incubator for 15 min at normal room temperature. After completion of incubation time, stop solutions (50 µL) were added to each well and their absorbance at 450 nm were measured by ELISA reader [34].

4.1.5. Histomorphological Observations

After the completion of the experiment, all the rabbits of all the groups were slaughtered and dissected to open their abdominal cavities for obtaining their pancreas. The pancreases were preserved in mixture of phosphated buffer and 10% formalin solutions. The dissected pancreatic tissues were sliced with microtome at 5 µm thickness. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains were added on each slide surface as per approved protocols [35]. The prepared slides were observed for possible histomorphological changes (beta cells cellularity and density) by using using olumphus microscope and pictures were captured [36].

4.2. Translating Basic Research (Pre-Clinical Studies Results) in Humans Healthy Volunteers (Clinical Trial Phase I)

4.2.1. Study Procedure

Phase I clinical trial study was conducted at single center (Department of Pharmacy Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal Dir Upper Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan) according to good clinical practice guidelines. One group received Moxifloxacin and another group received Gemifloxacin. Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin were of standard pharmaceutical firms (Getz healthcare Pharmaceutical, Karachi and Sami Pharmaceutical Karachi, respectively). Moxifloxacin (400 mg) and Gemifloxacin (320 mg) were used in once daily dosing by participants of respective groups for 5 days as per Table 5. Blood samples were collected on day one (baseline) and on day five and were analyzed for fasting blood glucose and serum insulin levels.

Both male and female volunteers of age range from 20 to 40 years were eligible for the study. Body weights, basal mass index, and other important parameters, such as(oral body temperatures, blood pressure, and pulse rates) were appropriately screened for all participants. They were informed and consents were signed from all participants. Lactating and pregnant women and subjects whose age limit <20 years or >40 years were excluded. Similarly, subjects having QTc ≥ 450 ms, having diabetes mellitus history or family history, facing hypokalemia or cardiovascular diseases, or with a predetermined history of fluoroquinolones allergy were also excluded from trial. The subjects participating in the clinical trial were instructed to use a scheduled uniform diet and were informed not to use any other medicine(s) during trial period. A total of 65 participants were screened out of which 5 were not meeting the eligibility. They were equally randomized into two groups on simple random sampling technique using R-statistical software in order to decrease the chances of biasness. The study protocols were approved by institutional Research Ethics Committee of Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Sheringal Dir Upper notified via notification SBBU/IEC-20-01 and was also registered with government agency for clinical trial registration. Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT04692623.

4.2.2. Collection of Blood for Blood Glucose and Serum Insulin Levels

On day 1st (baseline), the 1st blood samples (3–5 mL) were collected from peripheral vein of all treated volunteers of both groups and were assessed for blood glucose and serum insulin levels. The second blood samples were collected on day five for determination of blood glucose and serum insulin, respectively. The sites of veins were properly sterilized with dettol and sterilized cotton to prevent vein site from chances of infections. Insulin ELISA kits (Accuband) manufactured by Monobind Inc., Lake Forest, CA, USA) were used for determination of insulin level [34], as per procedures mentioned above in Section 4.1.4 [34].

4.3. Statistical Analysis

R-Statistical software 3.1.3 was used for the unbiased randomization of all participants into two equal groups. Mean blood glucose and insulin values on their respective baseline and on day five were plotted using Graph Pad Prism version-6 (Graph Pad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA). The changes in baseline blood glucose and serum insulin levels of all treated groups were compared using one way ANOVA (p < 0.05). One-way (ANOVA) tests were followed by Wilcoxon signed rank test to check the statistical difference.

5. Limitations

In our present study, we only determined the effect of these drugs on the blood glucose levels via any surge in the serum insulin level. Severe hypoglycemia was not reported either in the rabbits nor in the healthy volunteers. This may involve multiple compounding factors and underlying mechanisms, such as the secondary messenger system via glucagon and epinephrine release and cortisol and growth hormone release that counteract hypoglycemia. Therefore, further studies are required to check the underlying mechanisms of this insulinotropic phenomenology of Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin.

6. Conclusions

It is concluded that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin significantly increased the secretion of insulin, which subsequently lowered the blood glucose in a working pancreas both in experimental animals and human healthy volunteers.

7. Recommendations

The clinicians shall use Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin with caution in controlled maturity onset diabetic patients (working pancreas) already using antidiabetic drugs. The use of Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin may be avoided in maturity onset diabetic patients to avoid the possible risk of hypoglycemia. It is best advised to clinicians to opt for an alternate mode of antibiotic therapy in such diabetic patients.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, A.U.; investigation, Conceptualization, and methodology, H.H., S.H.B. and A.M.B.; formal analysis, S.A. (Shujaat ahmad) and N.A.; resources, S.U.R. and S.H.B.; writing—review and editing, S.A. (Shujaat ahmad) and N.A.; supervision, project administration, A.S.D., S.A. (Saad Alghamdi)., and M.A.; funding acquisition, methodology F.A.; Critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Taif University Researchers supporting project number (TURSP-2020/80) supported us financially for this manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Animals Bye-Laws 2008 (Scientific Procedures Issue-1) of the University of Malakand and approved by the Institutional Ethical Board (IEC) of Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal under reference number (Ref.no- SBBU/IEC/-20-01 and approved on 12 November 2020). The Clinical trial was conducted according to good clinical guidelines practices. The study was approved from institutional ethical review board under notification No: SBBU/IEC-20-01 and was also registered with US Clinical trial registration agency. (Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT04692623).

Informed Consent Statement

Yes; our present study also involved healthy human volunteers in a phase I clinical trial.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets (histological photographs) for the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Department of Pharmacy, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal Dir Upper Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan and Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan for making the resources available to carry out the research work. The authors would like to give thanks to Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia for their support (Taif University researchers supporting project number: (TURSP-2020/80).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ATP: Adenosine Tri Phosphate, ADP: Adenosine Di Phospahte, BP: British Pharmacopia, CADRMP: Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Program, ELISA: Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay, FQs: Fluoroquinolones, FDA: Food and Drug Administration, >: Greater, <:Less, H&E: Heamatoxylin and eosin, mg: Milligram, µM: Micromolar, µL:Microliter, PO: Per oral, Kg: Kilogram, KATP: ATP-Sensitive potassium channels, SUR1 and SUR2:Sulfonyl Urea Receptors1,2, VG: Voltage Gated, WFI: Water for injection.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Moxifloxacin, Gemifloxacin, and standard Glibenclamide effects on blood glucose levels using in vivo rabbits model study.

Descriptions(Groups)	Baseline (Day 1st) Glucose (mg/dL)(Mean ± SD)	Day 5th Glucose (mg/dL)(Mean ± SD)	p-Value
Untreated	108.8 ± 16.7	116.5 ± 8.6	0.3402 ns
Moxifloxacin	112 ± 4.5	86.17 ± 11.2	0.0002 ***
Gemifloxacin	117.3 ± 7.2	93.5 ± 7.4	0.0122 **
Glibenclamide	121.17 ± 16.17	89.7 ± 9.6	0.0011 ***

p-values show the level of significance compared to their respective day 1st (baseline) on day 5th values of blood glucose levels. p-values ˂ 0.0001 and ˂0.05 were expressed as *** and ** respectively. ns stands for non-significant. Untreated means they were fed only water and food and were kept as negative control group. Glibenclamide was given to positive control group.

Table 2

Moxifloxacin, Gemifloxacin, and standard Glibenclamide effects on serum insulin levels using in vivo rabbits model study.

Description(Group)	(Day 1st)Insulin (µIU/mL)	(Day 5th)Insulin (µIU/mL)	p-Value
Untreated	3.3 ± 0.44	3.28 ± 0.16	0.06 ns
Moxifloxacin	4.09 ± 0.92	52.45 ± 10.7	<0.0001 ****
Gemifloxacin	4.50 ± 1.37	23.48 ± 12.70	0.0088 ***
Glibenclamide	4.43 ± 1.95	68.13 ± 14.40	<0.0001 ****

p-values show the level of significance on day 5th to their respective day 1st (baseline) insulin values. ns stands for non-significant. p-values ˂ 0.0001 and ˂0.05 were expressed as **** and *** respectively. Untreated means they were fed only water and food and were kept as negative control group. Glibenclamide was given to positive control group.

Table 3

Demographic information and baseline clinical characteristics of the study group participants in the clinical trial study.

Items	Moxifloxacin Group (n = 25)(Mean ± SD)	Gemifloxacin Group (n = 25)(Mean ± SD)
Age (Years)	27.4 ± 2.9	31.4 ± 5.4
Gender, n (%)	Male 21 (84%)	Male 22 (88%)
	Female 04 (16%)	Female 03 (12%)
Weight (Kg)	68.16 ± 5.1	67.4 ± 4.1
Body Mass Index (BMI, Kg/m2)	23.9 ± 1.7	24.0 ± 1.9
Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)	120.8 ± 10	116.8 ± 7
Diastolic Blood pressure (mm Hg)	79.6 ± 4.5	78.8 ± 3.3
Pulse Rate (BPM)	77.4 ± 5.7	78.4 ± 6.7
Body Temperature (°C)	37.1 ± 0.3	37 ± 0.3
DM History/Familial History n (%)	Yes 0 (0%)	Yes 0 (0%)
	No 25 (100%)	No 25 (100%)
Smoking Status, n (%)	Yes 0 (0%)	Yes 0 (0%)
	No 25 (100%)	No 25 (100%)
Allergy to drugs/food/other substances, n (%)	Yes 0 (0%)	Yes 0 (0%)
	No 25 (100%)	No 25 (100%)

Table 4

Doses and dosage schedule of the groups in in vivo rabbits model study.

Groups	Drugs	Doses and Dosages PO
Group A	Untreated	Pellet food and fresh water only
Group B	Moxifloxacin	5 mg/kg/day once daily.
Group C	Gemifloxacin	5 mg/kg/day once daily.
Group D	Glibenclamide	0.2 mg/kg/day once daily.

Table 5

Doses and dosage schedule of the groups in the clinical trial.

Groups	Drugs	Doses and Dosages	Route
Group A	Moxifloxacin (M)	400 mg once daily.	Orally (PO)
Group B	Gemifloxacin (G)	320 mg once daily.	Orally (PO)

References

1. Vollmer, N.J.; Rivera, C.G.; Steven, R.W.; Oravec, C.P.; Mara, K.C.; Suh, G.A.; Osmon, D.R.; Beam, E.N.; Abdel, M.P.; Virk, A. Safety and tolerability of Fluoroquinolones in patients with staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections. Clin. Infect. Dis.; 2021; 73, pp. 850-856. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab145]

2. Mercuro, N.J.; Stogsdill, P.; Wungwattana, M. Retrospective analysis comparing oral stepdown therapy for Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections: Fluoroquinolones versus B-lactams. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents; 2018; 51, pp. 687-692. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.12.007]

3. Soni, K. Fluoroquinolones: Chemistry & action: A review. Indo Glob. J. Pharm. Sci.; 2012; 2, pp. 43-53.

4. Aldred, K.J.; Kerns, R.J.; Osheroff, N. Mechanism of quinolone action and resistance. Biochemistry; 2014; 53, pp. 1565-1574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi5000564] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24576155]

5. Bisacchi, G.S. Origins of the Quinolone Class of Antibacterial: An Expanded “Discovery Story” Miniperspective. J. Med. Chem.; 2015; 58, pp. 4874-4882. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm501881c] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25738967]

6. Wu, J.; Xiang, S.; Zeng, J.; Leow, M.; Liu, X.-W. Practical route to 2-quinolinones via a pd-catalyzed C-H bond activation/C-C bond formation/cyclization cascade reaction. Org. Lett.; 2014; 17, pp. 222-225. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol503292p] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25545799]

7. Scholar, E.M. Fluoroquinolines: Past, present and future of a novel group of antibacterial agents. Am. J. Pharm. Educ.; 2002; 66, pp. 164-171.

8. Berhe, A.; Russom, M.; Bahran, F.; Hagos, G. Ciprofloxacin and risk of hypolycemia in non-diabetic patients. J. Med. Case Rep.; 2019; 13, pp. 142-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-019-2083-y]

9. Mathews, B.; Thalody, A.A.; Miraj, S.S.; Kunhikatta, V.; Rao, M.; Saravu, K. Adverse effects of Fluoroquinolones: A retrospective cohort study in a South Indian tertiary healthcare facility. Antibiotics; 2019; 8, 104. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030104]

10. Sharma, P.C.; Jain, A.; Jain, S. Fluoroquinolone antibacterials: A review on chemistry, microbiology and therapeutic prospects. Acta Pol. Pharm.; 2009; 66, pp. 587-604.

11. Andersson, M.I.; MacGowan, A.P. Development of the quinolones. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.; 2003; 51, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg212] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12702698]

12. Lodise, T.; Graves, J.; Miller, C.; Mohr, J.F.; Lomaestro, B.; Smith, R.P. Effects of Gatifloxacin and Levofloxacin on rates of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia among elderly hospitalized patients. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther.; 2007; 27, pp. 1498-1505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.27.11.1498] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17963459]

13. Arce, F.C.A.; Bhasin, R.S.; Pasmantier, R. Severe hyperglycemia during gatifloxacin therapy in patients without diabetes. Endocr. Pract.; 2004; 10, pp. 40-44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4158/EP.10.1.40] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15251620]

14. Barrett, J. Moxifloxacin Bayer. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs; 2000; 1, pp. 45-51. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11249594]

15. Tailor, S.A.N.; Simor, A.E.; Cornish, W.; Phillips, E.; Knowles, S.; Rachlis, A. Analysis of spontaneous reports of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia associated with marketed systemic fluoroquinolones made to the Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Program. Can. J. Hosp. Pharm.; 2004; 57, pp. 12-17.

16. Gharib, H.M.; Abajy, M.Y.; Omaren, A. Investigating the effect of some fluoroquinolones on blood glucose and insulin levels in STZ-induced diabetic wistar rats. Res. J. Pharm. Technol.; 2020; 13, pp. 5993-5998. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.01045.8]

17. Aspinall, S.L.; Good, C.B.; Jiang, R.; McCarren, M.; Dong, D.; Cunningham, F.E. Severe dysglycemia with the fluoroquinolones: A class effect?. Clin. Infect. Dis.; 2009; 49, pp. 402-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/600294]

18. Gupta, T.; Gupta, T.; Mulkalwar, S.; Kulkarni, V.; Jadhav, S.; Tilak, A.; Rane, B. A comparative study of effect of fluoroquinolones on blood glucose levels in rats. Int. J. Basic Clin. Pharmacol.; 2020; 9, 1217. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20203137]

19. Singal, D.K.; Mittal, A.; Prakash, A. Recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia induced by moxifloxacin. Ind. J. Pharmacol.; 2013; 45, pp. 301-307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.111908]

20. Mandavia, R.; Virpariya, M.M.; Patel, T.K.; Tripathi, C. Moxifloxacin-induced hypoglycemia in a non-diabetic patient. Curr. Drug Saf.; 2012; 7, pp. 183-185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157488612802715744]

21. Gavin, J.R.; Kubin, R.; Choudhri, S.; Kubitza, D.; Himmel, H.; Gross, R.; Meyer, J.M. Moxifloxacin and glucose homeostasis. Drug Saf.; 2004; 27, pp. 671-686. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200427090-00005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15230648]

22. Jose, J.; Jimmy, B.; Saravu, K. Dysglycemia associated with the use of fluoroquinolones-focus on gatifloxacin. J. Clin. Diagn. Res.; 2007; 3, pp. 185-187.

23. Chou, H.-W.; Wang, J.-L.; Chang, C.-H.; Lee, J.-J.; Shau, W.-Y.; Lai, M.-S. Risk of severe dysglycemia among diabetic patients receiving Levofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, or Moxifloxacin in Taiwan. Clin. Infect. Dis.; 2013; 57, pp. 971-980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit439] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23948133]

24. Ambadasu, B.; Naikawadi, A. Evaluation of Glucose Homeostasis Abnormality Associated with use of Moxifloxacin in Rats. J. Chem. Pharm.; 2017; 9, pp. 75-78.

25. Saraya, A.; Yokokura, M.; Gonoi, T.; Seino, S. Effects of Fluoroquinolones on insulin secretion and β-cell ATP-sensitive K+ channels. Eur. J. Pharmacol.; 2004; 497, pp. 111-117. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.06.032]

26. Yabe, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Takada, S.; Mori, K. Functional and Morphological Characteristics of Pancreatic Islet Lesions Induced by Quinolone Antimicrobial Agent Gatifloxacin in Rats. Toxicol. Pathol.; 2019; 47, pp. 35-43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192623318809062]

27. Kelesidis, T.; Canseco, E. Levofloxacin-induced hypoglycemia: A rare but life-threatening side effect of a widely used antibiotic. Am. J. Med.; 2009; 122, pp. 3-4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.003]

28. Palácio, P.B.; Lucas, A.M.B.; Alexandre, J.V.D.L.; Cunha, P.L.O.; Viana, Y.I.P.; Albuquerque, A.C.; Varela, A.L.N.; Facundo, H.T. Pharmacological and molecular docking studies reveal that Glibenclamide competitively inhibits diazoxide-induced mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel activation and pharmacological preconditioning. Eur. J. Pharmacol.; 2021; 908, 174379. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174379]

29. Ishiwata, Y.; Itoga, Y.; Yasuhara, M. Effect of Levofloxacin on serum glucose concentration in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol.; 2006; 551, pp. 168-174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.08.081]

30. Mir, M.S.; Darzi, M.M.; Khan, H.M.; Kamil, S.A.; Sofi, A.H.; Wani, S.A. Pathomorphological effects of Alloxan induced acute hypoglycaemia in rabbits. Alex. J. Med.; 2013; 49, pp. 343-353.

31. Ishiwata, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Nagata, M.; Yasuhara, M. Effects of Moxifloxacin on serum glucose concentrations in rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull.; 2013; 36, b12-00930. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b12-00930] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23358329]

32. Ali, N.; Ahmad, B.; Bashir, S.; Azam, S.; Ahmad, M. Calcium channel blocking activities of Withania coagulans. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.; 2009; 3, pp. 439-442.

33. Erhirhie, E.; Ekene, N.E.; Ajaghaku, D. Guidelines on dosage calculation and stock solution preparation in experimental animals’ studies. J. Nat. Sci. Res.; 2014; 4, pp. 100-106.

34. Eliza, J.; Daisy, P.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Duraipandiyan, V. Antidiabetic and antilipidemic effect of eremanthin from Costus speciosus (Koen.) Sm., in STZ-induced diabetic rats. Chem. Biol. Interact.; 2009; 182, pp. 67-72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2009.08.012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19695236]

35. Gamble, M.; Wilson, I. The hematoxylins and eosin. Theory Pract. Histol. Technol.; 2008; 6, pp. 121-134.

36. Peachey, L.D. Thin sections: A study of section thickness and physical distortion produced during microtomy. J. Cell Biol.; 1958; 4, pp. 233-242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.4.3.233] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13549493]