Abstract

Conceptual and empirical advances in soil biogeochemistry have challenged long-held assumptions about the role of soil micro-organisms in soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics; yet, rigorous tests of emerging concepts remain sparse. Recent hypotheses suggest that microbial necromass production links plant inputs to SOC accumulation, with high-quality (i.e., rapidly decomposing) plant litter promoting microbial carbon use efficiency, growth, and turnover leading to more mineral stabilization of necromass. We test this hypothesis experimentally and with observations across six eastern US forests, using stable isotopes to measure microbial traits and SOC dynamics. Here we show, in both studies, that microbial growth, efficiency, and turnover are negatively (not positively) related to mineral-associated SOC. In the experiment, stimulation of microbial growth by high-quality litter enhances SOC decomposition, offsetting the positive effect of litter quality on SOC stabilization. We suggest that microbial necromass production is not the primary driver of SOC persistence in temperate forests. Factors such as microbial necromass origin, alternative SOC formation pathways, priming effects, and soil abiotic properties can strongly decouple microbial growth, efficiency, and turnover from mineral-associated SOC.

Mineral-associated soil carbon buildup is poorly explained by microbial necromass production (a common hypothesis). During litter decomposition, these processes are decoupled by priming effects and alternate soil carbon formation pathways

Details

Title
Fast-decaying plant litter enhances soil carbon in temperate forests but not through microbial physiological traits
Author
Craig, Matthew E 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Geyer, Kevin M 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Beidler, Katilyn V 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Brzostek, Edward R 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Frey, Serita D 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Stuart, Grandy A 5 ; Liang, Chao 6 ; Phillips, Richard P 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Indiana University, Department of Biology, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X); Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge, USA (GRID:grid.135519.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0446 2659) 
 University of New Hampshire, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.167436.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2192 7145); Young Harris College, Department of Biology, Young Harris, USA (GRID:grid.465785.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 8814 9176) 
 Indiana University, Department of Biology, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X) 
 West Virginia University, Department of Biology, Morgantown, USA (GRID:grid.268154.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 6140) 
 University of New Hampshire, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.167436.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2192 7145) 
 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Shenyang, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309) 
Publication year
2022
Publication date
2022
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20411723
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2637624934
Copyright
© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.