It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The perennial native switchgrass adapts better than other plant species do to marginal soils with low plant-available nutrients, including those with low phosphorus (P) content. Switchgrass roots and their associated microorganisms can alter the pools of available P throughout the whole soil profile making predictions of P availability in situ challenging. Plant P homeostasis makes monitoring of P limitation via measurements of plant P content alone difficult to interpret. To address these challenges, we developed a machine-learning model trained with high accuracy using the leaf tissue chemical profile, rather than P content. By applying this learned model in field trials across two sites with contrasting extractable soil P, we observed that actual plant available P in soil was more similar than expected, suggesting that adaptations occurred to alleviate the apparent P constraint. These adaptations come at a metabolic cost to the plant that have consequences for feedstock chemical components and quality. We observed that other biochemical signatures of P limitation, such as decreased cellulose-to-lignin ratios, were apparent, indicating re-allocation of carbon resources may have contributed to increased P acquisition. Plant P allocation strategies also differed across sites, and these differences were correlated with the subsequent year’s biomass yields.
Hao et al. develop a machine learning approach to spectroscopy data of the tissue biochemistry of the switchgrass Panicum virgatum L. Using field and lab data with phosphorus-limited conditions, the authors show how soil phosphorus availability and nutrient allocations strategies may impact feedstock chemical components and quality.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth and Environment Sciences, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)
2 Noble Research Institute, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, USA (GRID:grid.419447.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0370 5663)
3 University of California, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
4 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth and Environment Sciences, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551); University of California, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)