This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Gliomas are the most common primary intracranial neoplasms, categorized into grades 1 to 4 according to the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system. In fact, except for pilocytic astrocytoma (WHO grade 1, a borderline tumor with unique molecular profiles and an extremely good prognosis), all the WHO 2-4 gliomas are malignant tumors. They are the most lethal brain tumors with the high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the basic research in-depth and advances in surgical techniques over the past few years, the pathogenic mechanism of these malignant diseases remains unclear and the prognosis of them still has not been greatly improved. Currently, more and more researches are focused on the genetic aberrations to explore the deep-seated mysteries of these diseases and novel therapeutic strategies.
Among them, there is a growing consensus that error changes in RNA splicing play an important role in tumorigenesis. At present, the researchers have discovered that there are approximately 145 genes involved in RNA splicing, which are widely expressed in brain, breast, colon, and prostate cancer [1]. Polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB) is a multifunctional component of mRNA metabolism that affects alternative splicing, mRNA stability, polyadenylation, internal ribosome entry site-independent translation, and possibly transcription [2]. Several pieces of evidence support the role of PTBP1 in the development and progression of gliomas. Due to its role in RNA processing and nucleolar function, PTBP1 shows predominantly nuclear localization in tissues. It plays an important role in pre-mRNA splicing and in the regulation of alternative splicing events.
In this study, we analyzed the expression, prognostic value, and potential mechanism of PTBP1 by immunohistochemistry in a single-center cohort of 150 glioma patients and by a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of TCGA and CGGA databases. Our findings revealed that PTBP1 was highly expressed in glioma, especially in GBM, and associated with pathological grade and predicted poor prognosis of patients, representing a potential therapeutic target.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients and Samples
Paraffin-embedded tissues were obtained from the archives of the department of pathology of Zhuzhou Central Hospital and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, between 2015 and 2020. Written informed consent was acquired in all cases, and the protocols of this research were approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee of Zhuzhou Central Hospital and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The final samples were from 150 patients with gliomas (WHO II-IV), including 30 cases of WHO II (oligodendroglioma and astrocytoma), 30 cases of WHO III (anaplastic oligodendroglioma and astrocytoma), and 90 cases of WHO IV (glioblastoma) and 20 normal brain tissues from patients who received brain surgery for reasons other than glioma. Overall survival represents the time interval between the date of diagnosis and the date of death or the last known follow-up.
2.2. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Assay
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) glioma tissues were cut into 3-4 μm sections, then deparaffinised using xylene, and hydrated through graded alcohol. Perform heat mediated antigen retrieval with citrate buffer (
2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis
The RNA-sequencing data and patients’ survival of PTBP1 in gliomas based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) were analyzed with the GEPIA tool (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/). The degree of PTBP1 mRNA expression of glioblastoma and normal tissue was validated by using the Oncomine database (https://www.oncomine.org/resource/login.html). MicroRNAs were predicted using miRanda and Targetscan databases. Transcription factors (TFs) of PTBP1 were predicted using the GCBI database (https://www.gcbi.com.cn). In addition, the Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis for biological process (BP) and Genomes (KEGG) pathway were analyzed by DAVID (https://david-d.ncifcrf.gov/).
2.4. Statistical Analysis
All the data were analyzed using the SPSS18.0 software (IBM, USA).
3. Results
3.1. PTBP1 Is High Expression in GBM and Correlates with Patient Age, WHO Grade, IDH Status, and Ki-67 Index
The median PTBP1 expression level in malignant glioma (WHO 2-4) was used as the cut-off point to divide the patients into low-PTBP1 and high-PTBP1 expression groups. PTBP1 protein was highly expressed in glioma tissues (79/150, 52.7%), but no expression was detected in normal brain tissues (0/20, 0%) in our cohort (Figure 1). The expression of PTBP1 was significantly higher in GBM. The high expression rate of PTBP1 increased with WHO grade (4/30, 13.3% in WHO 2; 13/30,43.3% in WHO 3; and 62/90, 68.9% in WHO 4). PTBP1 expression was significantly higher in grade 4 than in either grades 2 (
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 1
PTBP1 expression in the Oncomine glioma database.
Upregulation of PTBP1 in glioblastoma | Fold change | Database | |
Glioblastoma (542) vs. normal (10) | 1.32 | 5.091 | TCGA brain |
Glioblastoma (80) vs. normal (4) | 3.31 | 3.198 | Murat brain |
Glioblastoma (81) vs. normal (23) | 2.20 | 3.049 | Sun brain |
Table 2
Clinical-pathological characteristics of the patients and PTBP1 expression.
No. of cases | PTBP1 | |||
Low | High | |||
Age | 0.036 | |||
≤55 | 113 | 59 | 54 | |
>55 | 37 | 12 | 25 | |
Gender | 0.129 | |||
Male | 94 | 40 | 54 | |
Female | 56 | 31 | 25 | |
WHO grade | <0.001 | |||
2-3 | 70 | 53 | 17 | |
4 | 80 | 18 | 62 | |
Location | 0.624 | |||
Supratentorial | 147 | 70 | 77 | |
Subtentorial | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
IDH | <0.001 | |||
Wildtype | 99 | 32 | 67 | |
Mutated | 51 | 39 | 12 | |
KPS | 0.233 | |||
≤70 | 61 | 28 | 33 | |
>70 | 89 | 43 | 46 | |
Ki-67 | 0.002 | |||
≤10% | 22 | 17 | 5 | |
>10% | 128 | 54 | 74 |
3.2. High PTBP1 Expression Predicts Significantly Poor Prognosis, and It Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Glioma
Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test were employed to identify any associations between PTBP1 expression and OS. Patients in the low-PTBP1 expression group lived significantly longer compared with those in the high expression group in our cohort (
Table 3
Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survivals.
Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
Hazard ratio (95% CI) | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | |||
Gender: male | 1.231 (0.880~1.983) | 0.179 | ||
Age: >55 | 2.116 (1.397~3.207) | <0.001 | 1.464 (0.950-2.257) | 0.084 |
Location: supratentorial | 0.546 (0.173~1.729) | 0.304 | ||
WHO grade: WHO 4 | 1.845 (1.411~2.414) | <0.001 | 0.823 (0.558-1.213) | 0.325 |
IDH: mutated | 0.308 (0.191~0.494) | <0.001 | 0.613 (0.338-1.113) | 0.108 |
KPS: >70 | 0.721 (0.488~1.066) | 0.102 | ||
Ki67: >10% | 2.225 (1.182~4.187) | 0.013 | 1.624 (0.802-3.289) | 0.178 |
PTBP1: high | 5.807 (3.732~9.036) | <0.001 | 4.901 (2.778-8.645) | <0.001 |
3.3. Construction of Transcriptional Network of PTBP1 in Glioma
To further explore the potential upstream mechanism of PTBP1 involved in glioma progression, we predicted 126 transcription factors (TFs) related to PTBP1 through the GCBI database and screened out 74 TFs using the Funrich software. Furthermore, 37 TFs were further verified to be highly expressed in gliomas through GEPIA tool. We further analyzed the correlation between 37 TFs and PTBP1 in TCGA and CGGA databases. Finally, we found that TCF3 showed highly positive correlation with PTBP1 in glioma and was significantly higher in glioma compares to normal tissues (
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
3.4. Biological Enrichment Analysis of PTBP1 Downstream Pathway in Glioma
To analyze the PTBP1 downstream pathway, we firstly screened out the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) according to the expression level of PTBP1 in TCGA and CGGA databases. In each database, we group samples based on extreme PTBP1 expression. The DESeq R package was used to screen DEGs, cut-off criteria set as
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
4. Discussion
Malignant gliomas have been always an important cause of death in adults and children in brain tumors. The multiple genetic changes caused the formation, progression, invasion, and maintenance of these highly malignant tumors. Genomic methods have been used in several studies to determine the underlying cause of this cancer. In fact, as part of The Cancer Genome Atlas project (TCGA), GBM was one of the earliest tumor types to be included in the study [3]. The determination of glioma molecular features is accompanied by the beginning of stratified treatment strategies [4].
With the continued development of methods for detecting whole-genome RNA splicing, there is a greater understanding of the role of RNA processing in the creation of genetic diversity and the regulation of cellular functions. Researches using high-throughput sequencing methods have shown that more than 90% of protein-coding genes produce alternative mRNAs [5, 6]. Selective RNA splicing changes the function of the protein by changing the protein domain. Protein-coding genes can generate noncoding circular RNAs (circRNAs) by back-splicing. Due to their stable structures that are not easily degraded, some studies have pointed out that circRNAs can be used as serum biomarkers to assess the prognosis and diagnosis of glioma [7]. More importantly, misregulation may lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, leading to tumorigenesis [8, 9].
Human polypyrimidine bundle binding protein 1 (PTBP1) is a member of the hnRNP family of RNA-binding protein that moves between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and regulates the many RNA posttranscriptional processes [10]. It has been suggested that PTB protein recognizes specific pyrimidine-rich sequence in the 3
In conclusion, these results demonstrate PTBP1 serve as a promising prognostic biomarker in glioma, and patients with high-PTBP1 expression need more aggressive treatment. PTBP1 may be a potential therapeutic target for glioma, particularly for GBM.
Consent
No consent was necessary.
Authors’ Contributions
LP and HWM designed the study and assisted in writing and revising of the manuscript. HGC, TYZ, and LGX performed data analysis work and aided in writing the manuscript. LAM, ZY, and ZXP edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Pan Liu, Guo-Chao He, and Yu-Zhen Tan contributed equally to this work.
[1] N. Kirschbaum-Slager, G. M. Lopes, P. A. Galante, G. J. Riggins, S. J. de Souza, "Splicing factors are differentially expressed in tumors," Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 3 no. 4, pp. 512-520, 2004.
[2] H. C. Cheung, L. J. Corley, G. N. Fuller, I. E. McCutcheon, G. J. Cote, "Polypyrimidine tract binding protein and Notch1 are independently re-expressed in glioma," Modern Pathology, vol. 19 no. 8, pp. 1034-1041, 2006.
[3] "Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways," Nature, vol. 455 no. 7216, pp. 1061-1068, DOI: 10.1038/nature07385, 2008.
[4] E. G. Van Meir, C. G. Hadjipanayis, A. D. Norden, H. K. Shu, P. Y. Wen, J. J. Olson, "Exciting new advances in neuro-oncology: the avenue to a cure for malignant glioma," CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 60 no. 3, pp. 166-193, DOI: 10.3322/caac.20069, 2010.
[5] E. T. Wang, R. Sandberg, S. Luo, I. Khrebtukova, L. Zhang, C. Mayr, S. F. Kingsmore, G. P. Schroth, C. B. Burge, "Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes," Nature, vol. 456 no. 7221, pp. 470-476, DOI: 10.1038/nature07509, 2008.
[6] Q. Pan, O. Shai, L. J. Lee, B. J. Frey, B. J. Blencowe, "Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing," Nature Genetics, vol. 40 no. 12, pp. 1413-1415, DOI: 10.1038/ng.259, 2008.
[7] M. Stella, L. Falzone, A. Caponnetto, G. Gattuso, C. Barbagallo, R. Battaglia, F. Mirabella, G. Broggi, R. Altieri, F. Certo, R. Caltabiano, G. M. V. Barbagallo, P. Musumeci, M. Ragusa, C. D. Pietro, M. Libra, M. Purrello, D. Barbagallo, "Serum Extracellular Vesicle-Derived circHIPK3 and circSMARCA5 Are Two Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme," Pharmaceuticals (Basel), vol. 14 no. 7,DOI: 10.3390/ph14070618, 2021.
[8] A. Srebrow, A. R. Kornblihtt, "The connection between splicing and cancer," Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, Part 13, pp. 2635-2641, 2006.
[9] R. Ferrarese, G. T. Harsh, A. K. Yadav, E. Bug, D. Maticzka, W. Reichardt, S. M. Dombrowski, T. E. Miller, A. P. Masilamani, F. Dai, H. Kim, M. Hadler, D. M. Scholtens, I. L. Y. Yu, J. Beck, V. Srinivasasainagendra, F. Costa, N. Baxan, D. Pfeifer, D. von Elverfeldt, R. Backofen, A. Weyerbrock, C. W. Duarte, X. He, M. Prinz, J. P. Chandler, H. Vogel, A. Chakravarti, J. N. Rich, M. S. Carro, M. Bredel, "Lineage-specific splicing of a brain-enriched alternative exon promotes glioblastoma progression," The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 124 no. 7, pp. 2861-2876, DOI: 10.1172/JCI68836, 2014.
[10] J. Valcarcel, F. Gebauer, "Post-transcriptional regulation: the dawn of PTB," Current Biology, vol. 7 no. 11, pp. R705-R708, DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00361-7, 1997.
[11] G. J. Mulligan, W. Guo, S. Wormsley, D. M. Helfman, "Polypyrimidine tract binding protein interacts with sequences involved in alternative splicing of beta-tropomyosin pre-mRNA," The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267 no. 35, pp. 25480-25487, 1992.
[12] D. Barbagallo, A. Caponnetto, M. Cirnigliaro, D. Brex, C. Barbagallo, F. D'Angeli, A. Morrone, R. Caltabiano, G. M. Barbagallo, M. Ragusa, C. Di Pietro, "CircSMARCA5 inhibits migration of glioblastoma multiforme cells by regulating a molecular axis involving splicing factors SRSF1/SRSF3/PTB," International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19 no. 2,DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020480, 2018.
[13] D. I. Izaguirre, W. Zhu, T. Hai, H. C. Cheung, R. Krahe, G. J. Cote, "PTBP1-dependent regulation of USP5 alternative RNA splicing plays a role in glioblastoma tumorigenesis," Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 51 no. 11, pp. 895-906, DOI: 10.1002/mc.20859, 2012.
[14] B. Yang, P. Hu, X. Lin, W. Han, L. Zhu, X. Tan, F. Ye, G. Wang, F. Wu, B. Yin, Z. Bao, T. Jiang, J. Yuan, B. Qiang, X. Peng, "PTBP1 induces ADAR1 p110 isoform expression through IRES-like dependent translation control and influences cell proliferation in gliomas," Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 72 no. 22, pp. 4383-4397, DOI: 10.1007/s00018-015-1938-7, 2015.
[15] G. Aldave, M. Gonzalez-Huarriz, A. Rubio, J. P. Romero, D. Ravi, B. Minana, M. Cuadrado-Tejedor, A. Garcia-Osta, R. Verhaak, E. Xipell, N. Martinez-Vélez, "The aberrant splicing of BAF45d links splicing regulation and transcription in glioblastoma," Neuro-Oncology, vol. 20 no. 7, pp. 930-941, DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy007, 2018.
[16] I. E. McCutcheon, S. J. Hentschel, G. N. Fuller, W. Jin, G. J. Cote, "Expression of the splicing regulator polypyrimidine tract-binding protein in normal and neoplastic brain," Neuro-Oncology, vol. 6 no. 1, 2004.
[17] L. Zhu, Q. Wei, Y. Qi, X. Ruan, F. Wu, L. Li, J. Zhou, W. Liu, T. Jiang, J. Zhang, B. Yin, J. Yuan, B. Qiang, W. Han, X. Peng, "PTB-AS, a Novel Natural Antisense Transcript, Promotes Glioma Progression by Improving PTBP1 mRNA Stability with SND1," Molecular Therapy, vol. 27 no. 9, pp. 1621-1637, DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.05.023, 2019.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2022 Pan Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Objective. Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1) is an RNA-binding protein, which plays a role in pre-mRNA splicing and in the regulation of alternative splicing events. However, little was known about the correlation between PTBP1 and glioma and its prognostic significance in glioma patients. Our aim was to investigate the expression, functional role, and prognostic value of PTBP1 in glioma. Methods. We explored the expression of PTBP1 protein using immunohistochemistry in 150 adult malignant glioma tissues and 20 normal brain tissues and evaluated its association with clinicopathological parameters by chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the prognostic effect of PTBP1 in glioma. Univariate/multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors. Transcriptional regulation network was constructed based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of PTBP1 from TCGA/CGGA database. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were used to explore the function and pathways of DEGs. Results. Out of the 150 malignant glioma tissues (60 LGG and 90 GBMs) and 20 normal brain tissues in our cohort, PTBP1 protein was high expressed in glioma tissues (79/150, 52.7%), but no expression was detected in normal brain tissues (0/20, 0%). The expression of PTBP1 was significantly higher in GBMs (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Emergency, The Affiliated Zhuzhou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College CSU, Zhuzhou 412007, China
2 Department of Trauma Center, The Affiliated Zhuzhou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College CSU, Zhuzhou 412007, China
3 Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Zhuzhou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College CSU, Zhuzhou 412007, China
4 Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China