It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
The prognostic value of serum chloride level has been reported primarily in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and hence, there is limited evidence in patients of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study was conducted to clarify the relationship between serum chloride level and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).
Methods and results
Patient data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT HFpEF) study, a prospective multicentre observational registry for ADHF‐HFpEF in Osaka. The data of 870 patients were analysed after excluding patients with in‐hospital death, missing follow‐up data, missing data of serum chloride level, or on chronic dialysis therapy. The primary endpoint of this study was all‐cause mortality. At discharge, right ventricular systolic dysfunction was significantly associated with the lowest tertile of serum chloride level after multivariable adjustment (P = 0.0257). During a mean follow‐up period of 1.8 ± 1.0 years, 186 patients died. Cox multivariable analysis showed that serum chloride level at discharge (P = 0.0017) was independently associated with all‐cause mortality after multivariable adjustment of major confounders, whereas serum sodium level was no longer significant (P = 0.6761). Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis revealed a significantly increased risk of mortality stratified by the tertile of serum chloride level [29% vs. 19% vs. 16%, P = 0.0002; hazard ratio (HR): 2.09 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.31 to 3.34), HR: 1.03 (95% CI: 0.65 to 1.64)].
Conclusions
Serum chloride level was useful for the prediction of poor outcome in ADHF patients with preserved ejection fraction.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Division of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
2 Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
3 Division of Cardiology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
4 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Amagasaki‐Chuo Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan, Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
5 Division of Cardiology, Kawanishi City Hospital, Kawanishi, Japan
6 Department of Cardiology, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
7 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Amagasaki‐Chuo Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
8 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan





