Identification of a coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase gene and its correlation with nacre color in Hyriopsis cumingii

Abstract

Pearl color is an important factor influencing pearl value, and is affected by the nacre color of the shell in Hyriopsis cumingii. Coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase (CPOX) is a key enzyme in porphyrin synthesis, and porphyrins are involved in color formation in different organisms, including in the nacre color of mussels. In this study, a CPOX gene (HcCPOX) was identified from H. cumingii, and its amino acid sequence was found to contain a coprogen-oxidase domain. HcCPOX mRNA was expressed widely in the tissues of white and purple mussels, and the highest expression was found in the gill, followed by the fringe mantle. The expression of HcCPOX in all tissues of purple mussels (except in the middle mantle) was higher than that of white mussels. Strong hybridization signals for HcCPOX were observed in the dorsal epithelial cells of the outer fold of the mantle. The activity of CPOX in the gill, fringe mantle, and foot of purple mussels was significantly higher than that in white mussels. Moreover, the expression of HcCPOX and CPOX activity were decreased in RNA interference experiments. The findings indicate that HcCPOX might contributes to nacre color formation in H. cumingii by being involved in porphyrin synthesis.

About the Authors:

Xiajun Chen

Contributed equally to this work with: Xiajun Chen, Jixiang He

Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Aquaculture & Stock Enhancement, Fishery Institute of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, China, Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai, China, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China

Jixiang He

Contributed equally to this work with: Xiajun Chen, Jixiang He

Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Aquaculture & Stock Enhancement, Fishery Institute of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, China

Mengying Zhang

Roles Investigation, Software

Affiliations Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai, China, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China

Zhiyi Bai

Roles Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources

Affiliations Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai, China, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquaculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China

Jiale Li

Roles Funding acquisition, Project administration

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai, China, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquaculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China

ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7903-3889

Abstract

Pearl color is an important factor influencing pearl value, and is affected by the nacre color of the shell in Hyriopsis cumingii. Coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase (CPOX) is a key enzyme in porphyrin synthesis, and porphyrins are involved in color formation in different organisms, including in the nacre color of mussels. In this study, a CPOX gene (HcCPOX) was identified from H. cumingii, and its amino acid sequence was found to contain a coprogen-oxidase domain. HcCPOX mRNA was expressed widely in the tissues of white and purple mussels, and the highest expression was found in the gill, followed by the fringe mantle. The expression of HcCPOX in all tissues of purple mussels (except in the middle mantle) was higher than that of white mussels. Strong hybridization signals for HcCPOX were observed in the dorsal epithelial cells of the outer fold of the mantle. The activity of CPOX in the gill, fringe mantle, and foot of purple mussels was significantly higher than that in white mussels. Moreover, the expression of HcCPOX and CPOX activity were decreased in RNA interference experiments. The findings indicate that HcCPOX might contributes to nacre color formation in H. cumingii by being involved in porphyrin synthesis.

Figures

Fig 6

Fig 1

Table 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 1

Table 1

Fig 2

Citation: Chen X, He J, Zhang M, Bai Z, Li J (2022) Identification of a coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase gene and its correlation with nacre color in Hyriopsis cumingii. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0265318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318

Editor: Katherine James, Northumbria University, UNITED KINGDOM

Received: May 24, 2021; Accepted: February 28, 2022; Published: March 21, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was financially supported by the Doctoral Research Initiation Fund of the Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2021YL028), National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0901406), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872565). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

1. Introduction

Hyriopsis cumingii is a freshwater mussel that is widely distributed in China and produces high-quality freshwater pearls [1]. Pearl size, shape, color, and luster influence the value of pearls, with color being the primary factor [2]. Some studies have indicated that the pearl color of host mussels is affected by the nacre color of the donor mussels [3] and, therefore, nacre color has a substantial impact on the value of pearls. The nacre color of a shell is not only influenced by water environmental factors, but also by genetic factors [4]. Studies have reported that melanin and carotenoids are involved in nacre color formation, and related genes (e.g., HcTyr, HcMitf, hcApo) have also been found to play a role in nacre color in H. cumingii [5–9].

The pearl oyster shells are usually composed of nacre, prismatic layer and periostracum. The nacre is the inner layer of a shell, and its formation occurs as the shell is made, which involves a complex biomineralization process. Briefly, the gill, foot, and mantle epidermis absorb Ca2+ and HCO3− from the water, which is transported into the mantle through hemolymph or other mechanisms. These compounds are then secreted by epithelial cells between the hemolymph and mantle cavity, and deposited on the shell. However, some specific mechanisms of this process occur remain unclear [10–12].

Porphyrins are common natural pigments in multiple organisms. Different porphyrins show different colors, such as uroporphyrin is red and protoporphyrin is purple [13]. Moreover, they usually exist in organisms in the form of metal chelates, and the different metal ions they bind will result in different colors. For example, manganese porphyrin and magnesium porphyrin are green, while iron porphyrin is red [14]. Based on the organic chromophore theory and the chemical structure characteristics of porphyrins, Hao et al. [15] revealed that there are multiple conjugated double bonds in porphyrins, and its structure belongs to a cyclic conjugated system. The π-π conjugated structure of porphyrin will affect its spectral absorption band. When porphyrin is combined with different metal ions, the original conjugated structure of the porphyrin is distorted or deformed due to differences in the size of the metal ions, which cause the absorption band to shift, resulting in color differences.

Porphyrins are important for the color of organisms. In fact, a large number of studies have shown that porphyrins are the key substances that determine the color of bird eggshells, and that different metal porphyrins can lead to different shell colors [16–19]. Mussel shells are similar to eggshells in that they are both comprised of calcium carbonate. Williams et al. found that uroporphyrin I and uroporphyrin III are involved in shell color formation in marine snails [20]. Bonnard et al. indicated that the shell color is also related to uroporphyrin in Crassostrea gigas oyster [21]. Moreover, studies found that the color of freshwater pearls produced by H. cumingii related to porphyrins [22]. It is widely known that the nacre formation is similar to the pearl formation, so the effect of porphyrins on the nacre color formation is worth studying.

The synthesis of porphyrin in organisms is a complex process in which coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase (CPOX) is a key enzyme. CPOX catalyzes coproporphyrin III to synthesize protoporphyrinogen IX, and then further synthesis protoporphyrin IX under the action of protoporphyrinogen oxidase, and finally combines with metal atoms to synthesize metalloporphyrin. However, the CPOX effect on shell color has only been reported in Meretrix meretrix [23]. Therefore, the effect of CPOX on nacre color in H. cumingii requires further investigation.

In this paper, the full-length cDNA of the H. cumingii coproporphyrinogen III oxidase gene (HcCPOX) was obtained. The expression of HcCPOX and the activity of CPOX in different tissues were also determined. The distribution of HcCPOX in the mantle was detected using in situ hybridization. RNA interference (RNAi) was performed in purple mussels and the changes in HcCPOX expression and CPOX activity were evaluated in different tissues. The findings indicated that HcCPOX may affect nacre color by affecting the synthesis of porphyrins.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental animals

Sixty experimental mussels (aged, ~2 years; average shell length, 8.7 cm) were provided by Xuancheng Farm of the Zhexing Pearl Trading Co. Ltd. (Anhui Province, China), including 30 white mussels and 30 purple mussels (Fig 1). Before experimentation, mussels were acclimated for 1 week in tanks containing aerated fresh water (26 ± 1°C).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Mussels with white (left) and purple (right) nacre.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318.g001

2.2 RNA extraction and full-length cDNA cloning

First, mantle tissue was collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until use. Then, total RNA was extracted using TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of RNA was examined by a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000c, Thermo, USA) and electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels. The SMART RACE cDNA amplification kit (Clontech, Dalian, China) was used to obtain mantle cDNA, and then 5′- and 3′-RACE was performed to clone the full-length cDNA of HcCPOX. The specific primers (Table 1) were designed based on the HcCPOX expressed sequence tag obtained from the H. cumingii mantle transcriptome library [24]. The PCR parameters were as follows: 5 min at 94°C; 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and a 10 min final extension at 72°C. The PCR products were sequenced using the Sanger method (Sangon, Shanghai, China).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Primers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318.t001

2.3 Bioinformatics analysis

The open reading frame (ORF) of HcCPOX was predicted using the NCBI ORF Finder tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gorf/) [25]. The BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/blast) was used to perform homology analyses of the nucleotide and protein sequences [25]. The Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART, (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/)) was used to analyze the structural domains contained in the amino acid sequence. The online Protparam (http://www.expasy.org/tools/protparam) tool was used to obtain amino acid sequence composition, molecular weight, isoelectric point, and other physical parameter information [26]. Clustalx software was used to perform multiple sequence comparisons [27]. MEGA 5.2 was used to construct a phylogenetic tree using the maximum likelihood method, and the aligned sequences were bootstrapped till 1000 replicates were obtained [28].

2.4 Tissue-specific expression analysis of HcCPOX

Quantitative RT-PCR was used to detect the tissue-specific expression of HcCPOX in different tissues. Different tissues (fringe mantle, middle mantle, adductor muscle, gill, foot, hepatopancreas, and hemolymph) were obtained from 12 healthy H. cumingii (six white mussels and six purple mussels), and total RNA extraction was performed as described above. The PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Dalian, China) was used to synthesize cDNA for qPCR analysis. Specific primers (Table 1) were designed based on the sequence of HcCPOX, and EF-1α (Table 1) was used as the internal reference [29]. qPCR was carried out in a quantitative thermal cycler (Bio-Rad CFX-96; Bio-Rad, USA), with the following parameters: 3 min at 95°C; then 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 57.5°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. Finally, tissue-specific expression of HcCPOX was analyzed using the comparative CT method (2−ΔΔCt) [30].

2.5 In situ hybridization of HcCPOX in the mantle

In situ hybridization was used to detect the precise locations of expression of HcCPOX in the mantle of purple mussels. First, the RNA probes were synthesized using the T7 in vitro Transcription Kit (Promega, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mantle samples (including outer fold, middle fold, inner fold of the mantle) were then collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 6 h at 4°C, and then placed in 20% sucrose overnight at 4°C [5, 7]. A freezing microtome (Leica CM 1950; Wetzlar, Germany) was used to slice mantle samples into 13-μm thicknesses and stored at −80°C. Finally, in situ hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Enhanced Sensitive ISH Detection Kit, Boster, Switzerland).

2.6 Analysis of the coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase activity

Eight mussels (four white mussels and four purple mussels) were used to detect the coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase activity in H. cumingii. Tissues (gill, fringe mantle, middle mantle, hemolymph) were collected and enzyme activity analyses were performed using the Shellfish Coproporphyrinogen Oxidase ELISA Kit (LanPai, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 300 mg of each tissue was comminuted in liquid nitrogen. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was then added, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature, and the supernatant was taken as a test sample. Then set standard wells (add 50 μl standard) and testing sample wells (add 10 μl test sample then add 40 μl sample diluent) in the microtiter plate, which pre-coated with CPOX antibody. Horseradish Peroxidase-conjugated reagent (100 μl) was added to each well, covered with an adhesive strip, and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. Each well was then washed with wash solution (400 μl) five times, with complete removal of liquid at each step. Chromogen solution A and B were then added (50 μl) to each well, and incubated for 15 min at 37°C in the dark. Finally, 50 μl of stop solution was added to each well and the O.D. at 450 nm was read using a microplate reader (UV-3010; Shimadzu, Japan). The CPOX activity of H. cumingii was obtained by comparing the O.D. of the samples with the standard curve.

2.7 RNAi assays

Specific primers (Table 1) were designed for double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) synthesis based on the sequence of HcCPOX. T7 RNA polymerase (TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG) was added to the 5′ end of the upstream and downstream primers. The PCR product was used for the synthesis of dsRNA using the T7 in vitro Transcription Kit (Promega, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) dsRNA was synthesized as described above and used as the control group. Twenty-nine healthy purple mussels were divided equally into three groups (experimental group, negative control group, and blank group), and injected with dsHcCPOX (80 μg/100 μL), dsGFP (80 μg/100 μL) and 1 × PBS (100 μL) via the adductor muscle. Tissues (gill, fringe mantle, middle mantle, and hemolymph) from each mussel were collected after culturing in freshwater for one week. Finally, the expression of HcCPOX and the activity of CPOX in each tissue were detected as described above.

2.8 Statistical analysis

Data are shown as the mean ± SD, and a one-way ANOVA was performed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) to determine whether there were any significant differences. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1 Cloning and sequence analysis of HcCPOX

The full-length cDNA of HcCPOX (Accession No. KX447817) was obtained by 3’- and 5’-RACE (S1 Fig). It contained a 3-bp 5’-UTR, an 1173-bp open reading frame (ORF) and a 346-bp 3’-UTR. The ORF encoded a polypeptide of 390 amino acids with a calculated molecular weight of 44.9 kDa and a theoretical isoelectric point of 8.26. The ORF also contained a coprogen-oxidase domain (PF01218). A phylogenetic tree was constructed and showed that the amino acid sequence of HcCPOX belonged to the same clade as CPOX from Meretrix meretrix, Mizuhopecten yessoensis, and Crassostrea gigas, with a support of 62% (Fig 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Phylogenetic analysis of HcCPOX from Hyriopsis cumingii and related species.

GenBank accession numbers: Crassostrea gigas (EKC32626.1), Mizuhopecten yessoensis (OWF48267.1), Meretrix meretrix (AMY96566.1), Hyriopsis cumingii (KX447817), Danio rerio (NP_001035183.2), Homo sapiens (NP_005247182.1), Mus musculus (NP_031783.2), Apis cerana cerana (PBC27150.1), Aplysia californica (AAP34327.1), and Penaeus vannamei (ROT62892.1). Numbers are the bootstrap values for 1000 trials.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318.g002

3.2 qPCR analysis and in situ hybridization

The relative expression level of HcCPOX in the tissues of white and purple mussels was detected by qPCR. As shown in Fig 3, HcCPOX was expressed in all tissues of white and purple mussels. In white mussels, the tissue with the highest expression was the gill, followed by the fringe mantle. The level of expression in gill and fringe mantle were significantly higher than that in other tissues (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the expression levels of HcCPOX in hemolymph, foot, and middle mantle were observed (p > 0.05). The expression of HcCPOX in the adductor muscle was significantly lower than that in the hepatopancreas (p < 0.05). In purple mussels, the highest level of HcCPOX expression was also in the gill, followed by the fringe mantle. The level of HcCPOX expression in the gill and fringe mantle was significantly higher than that in other tissues (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between HcCPOX expression in the foot and the hemolymph (p > 0.05). The levels of expression in the remaining tissues followed the order from high to low of middle mantle > hepatopancreas > adductor muscle (p < 0.05).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Relative expression of HcCPOX.

The relative expression of HcCPOX in various tissues from white (A) and purple (B) mussels. Comparisons of HcCPOX expression in white and purple mussels (C). FM, fringe mantle; MM, middle mantle; AM, adductor muscle; G, gill; F, foot; H, hepatopancreas; B, hemolymph. Bars with different letters or * indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), the same as below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318.g003

Finally, comparing the expression levels of HcCPOX in different tissues of the two types of mussels, it was found that the expression of HcCPOX was higher in all tissues from purple mussels (with the exception of the middle mantle) than white mussels (p < 0.05).

In situ hybridization revealed the specific locations of HcCPOX expression in the mantle. As shown in Fig 4, strong hybridization signals appeared in the dorsal epithelial cells of the outer fold of the mantle (arrowed), while no positive signals were detected in the negative control.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. In situ hybridization analysis of HcCPOX in the mantle.

Panel B was a higher magnification of panel A. Panel C represents the negative control (using the sense probe). IF, inner fold; MF, middle fold; OF, outer fold. The arrows indicate the location of the positive signals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318.g004

3.3 Coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase activity

As shown in Fig 5, CPOX activity in mussel tissues was consistent with the HcCPOX expression levels. CPOX activity was the highest is the gill, followed by the fringe mantle. Additionally, the activity of CPOX in the gill, fringe mantle, and foot of purple mussels was significantly higher than that of white mussels (p < 0.05), however, no significant differences were observed in the hemolymph (p > 0.05).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. Coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase activity in tissues from white and purple mussels.

G, gill; FM, fringe mantle; F, foot; B, hemolymph.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318.g005

3.4 The impact of RNAi

HcCPOX expression levels and CPOX activities were detected after RNAi treatment. As shown in Fig 6A, the expression of HcCPOX in the gill, fringe mantle, foot, and hemolymph of the mussels injected with dsHcCPOX was significantly decreased compared to mussels injected with dsGFP and 1 × PBS (p < 0.05). However, the expression of HcCPOX in the tissues of mussels injected with dsGFP was not significantly different than that of mussels injected with 1× PBS (p > 0.05). Furthermore, CPOX activities in those tissues were also similar to the HcCPOX expression levels. After injection of dsHcCPOX, CPOX activities in all tissues were inhibited compared to that of mussels injected with dsGFP and 1 × PBS (p < 0.05). Additionally, no significant difference in CPOX activity was observed between mussels injected with dsGFP and 1 × PBS (p > 0.05) (Fig 6B).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 6. Effects of HcCPOX knockdown by RNAi.

A, RNAi attenuated HcCPOX expression after RNAi. B, RNAi attenuated coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase activity after RNAi. G, gill; FM, fringe mantle; F, foot; B, hemolymph.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318.g006

4. Discussion

CPOX is an indispensable enzyme that is required for the synthesis of heme in different organisms. Some studies found that many different pigments (e.g., uroporphyrin, cobalamin, phorcabilin, biliverdin, and bilirubin) are produced in the synthesis and decomposition pathways of heme, which affect the shell color in Pinctada margaritifera [31]. If the heme synthesis pathway is affected, it may also lead to the formation of different shell colors in marine snails [20].

In this study, the CPOX gene (HcCPOX) from H. cumingii was successfully cloned. The amino acid sequence contained a coprogen-oxidase domain, which belongs to the conserved sequence of the coproporphyrinogen oxidase superfamily. Phylogenetic analysis also revealed that the HcCPOX amino acid sequence was in the same clade as CPOX sequences from shellfish (M. meretrix, M. yessoensis, and C. gigas). Therefore, the data suggested that HcCPOX belongs to the CPOX superfamily.

The CPOX gene encodes porphyrinogen III oxidase in organisms, which catalyzes the formation of porphyrin substances via an oxidation reaction. Studies have found that porphyrin plays an important role in the synthesis of haem in the blood of mammals and mollusks [32, 33]. Williams et al. identified some genes of the haem pathway in marine snails, which affect shell color by participating in the synthesis of porphyrin [20]. Moreover, similar results were also found in P. margaritifera [31].

In a study in which the CPOX gene was knocked out in zebrafish, it was found that the hemolymph changed from red to nearly colorless, thus, indicating that CPOX gene is involved in the formation of hemolymph color (heme) in zebrafish [34]. H. cumingii is a bivalve mollusk, and its hemolymph is typically nearly colorless, which occasionally appears light blue after being fully oxidized. This color change is mainly caused by the small amount of hemocyanin contained within its hemolymph [35].

Combined with the qPCR results, we found that HcCPOX was expressed in hemolymph, but only a low levels. This may be due to its colorless hemolymph. In addition, there was no significant difference in CPOX activity in the hemolymph of white and purple mussels, and was much lower than that in the gill and fringe mantle.

The expression of HcCPOX in white and purple mussels was highest in the gills. Similar results were also obtained for CPOX activities. Cooper et al. found that the gills of mussels were the main locations for the uptake of metal ions from water environments [36]. The high levels of HcCPOX expression in the gill may be due to high level of metal ions contained therein, and gill may provide a suitable environment for the synthesis of metalloporphyrins, and then porphyrins transferred to the mantle. Comfort et al. indicated that metalloporphyrin is a key substance in the formation of color in shells [37]. Shi et al. found that a variety of metal ions exist in the pearls of H. cumingii by Raman spectroscopy, and speculated that they might affect the shell color in the form of metalloporphyrin [22]. The mantle is the tissue responsible for the nacre formation of shells and pearls. The qPCR results found that the levels of HcCPOX in the fringe mantle of white and purple mussels was high, and only lower than that of the gill. Moreover, positive signals were detected in the dorsal epithelial cells of the outer fold of the mantle using in situ hybridization. Studies indicated that outer fold of the mantle was directly involved in the nacre formation of shells [38]. Thus, these results suggested that HcCPOX may be involved in the formation of nacre in H. cumingii.

Zhan et al. found that the CPOX gene (MmCPOX) in M. meretrix was highly expressed in the mantle, and expression was positively correlated with shell color [23]. The uroporphyrinogen III synthetase (an important enzyme involved in the structural formation of porphyrin) gene was found to be involved in nacre color formation in H. cumingii [39]. In this study, the expression of HcCPOX in tissues of white and purple mussels were compared. The result revealed that the expression levels of HcCPOX were significantly higher in all tissues of purple mussels (except the middle mantle) than in white mussels. We also found that the CPOX activity in the tissues (fringe mantle, gill, and foot) of purple mussels were also significantly higher than that in white mussels. The RNAi experiments revealed that the activity CPOX was decreased following the inhibition of HcCPOX expression in all tissues. Therefore, we hypothesize that HcCPOX might affect nacre color formation by participating in the synthesis of CPOX.

In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that HcCPOX contributes to nacre color formation in H. cumingii. Such findings can help understand the mechanisms underlying the formation of pearl color, and assist in the cultivation of high quality pearls.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Full-length nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of the HcCPOX (Gene accession is KX447817).

The gray box indicates the predicted coprogen-oxidase domain.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank International Science Editing (http://www.international scienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript.

Citation: Chen X, He J, Zhang M, Bai Z, Li J (2022) Identification of a coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase gene and its correlation with nacre color in Hyriopsis cumingii. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0265318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265318

References

1. Wang G, Yuan Y, Li J. SSR analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among different populations of Hyriopsis cumingii from the five lakes of China. Journal of Fisheries of China. 2007;12(12):12–8.

2. Li J, Liu Y. The main influencing factors on the quality of cultured pearls. Journal of Fisheries of China. 2011;35(11):1753–60.

3. Li Q, Bai Z, Han X, Li J. Freshwater nucleated pearl quality is influenced by host mussel growth traits in Hyriopsis cumingii. Aquaculture Research. 2017;48(9):4656–65.

4. Jerry DR, Kvingedal R, Lind CE, Evans BS, Taylor JJU, Safari AE. Donor-oyster derived heritability estimates and the effect of genotype×environment interaction on the production of pearl quality traits in the silver-lip pearl oyster, Pinctada maxima. Aquaculture. 2012;338–341:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.02.001.

5. Chen X, Liu X, Bai Z, Zhao L, Li J. HcTyr and HcTyp-1 of Hyriopsis cumingii, novel tyrosinase and tyrosinase-related protein genes involved in nacre color formation. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;204:1–8. Epub 2016/11/14. pmid:27838409.

6. Shen J, Huang D, Sun C, Li J, Bai Z. Cloning of a microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene and its functional analysis in nacre formation and melanin synthesis in Hyriopsis cumingii. Aquaculture and Fisheries. 2018;3(6):217–24.

7. Li X, Bai Z, Luo H, Liu Y, Wang G, Li J. Cloning, differential tissue expression of a novel hcApo gene, and its correlation with total carotenoid content in purple and white inner-shell color pearl mussel Hyriopsis cumingii. Gene. 2014;538(2):258–65. Epub 2014/02/04. pmid:24486507.

8. Chen X, Bai Z, Li J. The Mantle Exosome and MicroRNAs of Hyriopsis cumingii Involved in Nacre Color Formation. Marine Biotechnology. 2019;21(5):634–42. pmid:31267359

9. Chen X, Zhang M, Zhang J, Bai Z, Li J. miR-4504 is involved in nacre color formation in Hyriopsis cumingii. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;517(2):210–5. pmid:31331644

10. Neff JM. Ultrastructural studies of Periostracum formation in the hard shelled clam Mercenaria Mercenaria (L). Tissue and Cell. 1972;4(2):311–26. pmid:4365410

11. Addadi L, Joester D, Nudelman F, Weiner S. Mollusk Shell Formation: A Source of New Concepts for Understanding Biomineralization Processes. Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany). 2006;12(4):980–7. pmid:16315200

12. Barry PH, Diamond JM. A theory of ion permeation through membranes with fixed neutral sites. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 1971;4(1):295–330. pmid:24174245

13. Comfort A. Acid-soluble pigments of shells; the distribution of porphyrin fluorescence in molluscan shells. Biochem J. 1949;44(1):111–7. Epub 1949/01/01. pmid:18131780.

14. Burnham BF, Zuckerman JJ. Complex formation between porphyrins and metal ions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1970;92(6):1547–50. pmid:5418445

15. Hao X, Han S, Liu Y. The Research Development of Porphyrins and Metalloporphyrins. Journal of Hebei Normal University(Natural Science Edition). 2009;33(1):85–8.

16. Igic B, Greenwood DR, Palmer DJ, Cassey P, Gill BJ, Grim T, et al. Detecting pigments from colourful eggshells of extinct birds. Chemoecology. 2009;20(1):43–8.

17. Cassey P, Hauber ME, Maurer G, Ewen JG. Sources of variation in reflectance spectrophotometric data: a quantitative analysis using avian eggshell colours. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2012;3(2):450–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00152.x.

18. Gorchein A, Lim CK, Cassey P. Extraction and analysis of colourful eggshell pigments using HPLC and HPLC/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Biomed Chromatogr. 2009;23(6):602–6. pmid:19277957.

19. Kennedy GY, Vevers HG. A survey of avian eggshell pigments. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry. 1976;55(1):117–23. pmid:947658

20. Williams ST, Lockyer AE, Dyal P, Nakano T, Churchill CKC, Speiser DI. Colorful seashells: Identification of haem pathway genes associated with the synthesis of porphyrin shell color in marine snails. Ecol Evol. 2017;7(23):10379–97. Epub 2017/12/15. pmid:29238562; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5723588.

21. Bonnard M, Cantel S, Boury B, Parrot I. Chemical evidence of rare porphyrins in purple shells of Crassostrea gigas oyster. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12150. Epub 2020/07/24. pmid:32699240; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7376061.

22. Shi L, Liu X, Mao J, Han X. Study of Coloration Mechanism of Cultured Freshwater Pearls from Mollusk Hyriopsis cumingii. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy. 2014;81(1):97–101.

23. Zhan Y, Dong Y, He L, Ruan W, Gao X, Lin Z. Gene cloning of CPOX and correlation analysis of shell colors in Meretrix meretrix. Journal of Fisheries of China. 2017;41(7):1054–63.

24. Bai Z, Zheng H, Lin J, Wang G, Li J. Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptome in Tissues Secreting Purple and White Nacre in the Pearl Mussel Hyriopsis cumingii. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53617. pmid:23341956

25. Rong OU. A New PubMed Search Tool——NCBI Search Toolbar and Its Applications. Researches in Medical Education. 2006;05(05):474–5.

26. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud Se, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, et al. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. In: Walker JM, editor. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2005. p. 571–607.

27. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X Windows Interface: Flexible Strategies for Multiple Sequence Alignment Aided by Quality Analysis Tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;25(24):4876–82. pmid:9396791

28. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2008;9(4):299–306. pmid:18417537

29. Bai Z, Lin J, Ma K, Wang G, Niu D, Li J. Identification of housekeeping genes suitable for gene expression analysis in the pearl mussel, Hyriopsis cumingii, during biomineralization. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2014;289(4):717–25. pmid:24638931

30. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. Epub 2002/02/16. pmid:11846609.

31. Stenger PL, Ky CL, Reisser C, Duboisset J, Dicko H, Durand P, et al. Molecular Pathways and Pigments Underlying the Colors of the Pearl Oyster Pinctada margaritifera var. cumingii (Linnaeus 1758). Genes. 2021;12(3). pmid:33804186

32. Reddi E, Ricchelli F, Jori G. Interaction of human serum albumin with hematoporphyrin and its Zn(2)+-and Fe(3)+-derivatives. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1981;18(4):402–8. pmid:7309386.

33. Paoli M, Marles-wright J, Smith A. Structure—Function relationships in heme-proteins. DNA Cell Biol. 2002;21(4):271–280. pmid:12042067

34. Zhang S. Creation and Analysis of Zebrafish Mutants as Models for Human Porphyrias and Anemia. Suzhou: Soochow University; 2015.

35. van Bruggen EFJ. Hemocyanin: the mystery of blue blood. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 1980;5(7):185–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-0004(80)90235-2.

36. Cooper S, Hare L, Campbell PGC. Subcellular partitioning of cadmium in the freshwater bivalve, Pyganodon grandis, after separate short-term exposures to waterborne or diet-borne metal. Aquatic Toxicology. 2010;100(4):303–12. pmid:20843564

37. Comfort A. The pigmentation of molluscan shells. Biological Reviews. 1951;26(3):285–301.

38. Gardner LD, Mills D, Wiegand A, Leavesley D, Elizur A. Spatial analysis of biomineralization associated gene expression from the mantle organ of the pearl oyster Pinctada maxima. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):455. pmid:21936921

39. Shen J, Huang D, Li J, Ye W, Wang Z, Bai Z. Identification of a uroporphyrinogen III synthetase gene and characterization of its role in pearl sac formation in Hyriopsis cumingii. Aquaculture and Fisheries. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2020.07.004.