Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

The influence of different replacement ratios of steel-slag powder as cement-replacement material on the fracture performance of concrete is studied in this paper. A three-point bending fracture test is carried out on slag powder-cement-based concrete (SPC)-notched beams with steel-slag powder as cementitious materials, partially replacing cement (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%). Load-deflection curves and load-crack-opening displacement curves of SPC-notched beams with five different replacement ratios of steel-slag powder were obtained. The effects of different steel-slag-powder replacement ratios on the fracture properties (fracture energy, fracture toughness, and double-K fracture parameters) of the SPC were analyzed and discussed. The results showed that the incorporation of appropriate steel-slag powder can affect the fracture performance of SPC. Compared with concrete without steel-slag powder, adding appropriate steel-slag powder can effectively improve the bond performance between aggregate and matrix because the steel-slag powder contains hydration activity substances such as calcium oxide and aluminium trioxide. The fracture energy and fracture toughness of SPC increased and then decreased with the increase in steel-slag-powder replacement ratios, and the SPC concrete showed best fracture performance with a 5% steel slag powder replacement ratio. Its fracture energy increases by 13.63% and fracture toughness increases by 53.22% compared with NC.

Details

Title
Fracture Behavior of Steel Slag Powder-Cement-Based Concrete with Different Steel-Slag-Powder Replacement Ratios
Author
Ke-Xian Zhuo 1 ; Guo-Tao, Liu 2 ; Xue-Wei, Lan 3 ; Dong-Ping, Zheng 4 ; Si-Quan, Wu 4 ; Pei-Zong Wu 4 ; Yong-Chang, Guo 1 ; Jia-Xiang, Lin 1 

 School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; [email protected] (K.-X.Z.); [email protected] (D.-P.Z.); [email protected] (S.-Q.W.); [email protected] (P.-Z.W.); [email protected] (Y.-C.G.) 
 Guangdong GW Metal Industry Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510030, China; [email protected] 
 Guangzhou Zengcheng Zhengyuan Construction Engineering Testing Center Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511300, China; [email protected] 
 School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; [email protected] (K.-X.Z.); [email protected] (D.-P.Z.); [email protected] (S.-Q.W.); [email protected] (P.-Z.W.); [email protected] (Y.-C.G.); Guangzhou Hongchang Construction Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510006, China 
First page
2243
Publication year
2022
Publication date
2022
Publisher
MDPI AG
e-ISSN
19961944
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2642575072
Copyright
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.