Abstract

Addressing global biodiversity loss requires an expanded focus on multiple dimensions of biodiversity. While most studies have focused on the consequences of plant interspecific diversity, our mechanistic understanding of how the diversity within a given plant species (genetic diversity) affects plant productivity remains limited. Here, we use a tree species × genetic diversity experiment to disentangle the effects of species diversity and genetic diversity, and how they are related to tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks. Tree species as well as genetic diversity increased tree productivity via increased tree functional diversity, reduced soil fungal diversity and marginally reduced herbivory. The effect of tree genetic diversity on productivity was partly different between tree species monocultures and mixtures: the functional diversity effect resulting from tree genetic diversity was only found in tree species monocultures, but the trophic feedbacks via herbivory were similar in species monocultures and mixtures. Given the complexity of interactions between tree species and genetic diversity, tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks on productivity, we suggest that both tree species and genetic diversity should be considered in reforestation.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Details

Title
Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks
Author
Tang, Ting; Zhang, Naili; Bongers, Franca J; Staab, Michael; Schuldt, Andreas; Fornoff, Felix; Lin, Hong; Cavender-Bares, Jeannine; Hipp, Andrew L; Li, Shan; Yu, Liang; Han, Baocai; Klein, Alexandra-Maria; Bruelheide, Helge; Durka, Walter; Schmid, Bernhard; Ma, Keping; Liu, Xiaojuan
University/institution
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Section
New Results
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Mar 28, 2022
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
ISSN
2692-8205
Source type
Working Paper
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2644203382
Copyright
© 2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (“the License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.