It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The ongoing pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) requires treatments with rapid clinical translatability. Here we develop a multi-target and multi-ligand virtual screening method to identify FDA-approved drugs with potential activity against SARS-CoV-2 at traditional and understudied viral targets. 1,268 FDA-approved small molecule drugs were docked to 47 putative binding sites across 23 SARS-CoV-2 proteins. We compared drugs between binding sites and filtered out compounds that had no reported activity in an in vitro screen against SARS-CoV-2 infection of human liver (Huh-7) cells. This identified 17 “high-confidence”, and 97 “medium-confidence” drug-site pairs. The “high-confidence” group was subjected to molecular dynamics simulations to yield six compounds with stable binding poses at their optimal target proteins. Three drugs—amprenavir, levomefolic acid, and calcipotriol—were predicted to bind to 3 different sites on the spike protein, domperidone to the Mac1 domain of the non-structural protein (Nsp) 3, avanafil to Nsp15, and nintedanib to the nucleocapsid protein involved in packaging the viral RNA. Our “two-way” virtual docking screen also provides a framework to prioritize drugs for testing in future emergencies requiring rapidly available clinical drugs and/or treating diseases where a moderate number of targets are known.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Michigan, Department of Pharmacology, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370); University of Michigan, Edward F Domino Research Center, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
2 University of Michigan, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
3 University of Michigan, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370); University of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
4 University of Michigan, Department of Pharmacology, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370); University of Michigan, Edward F Domino Research Center, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370); University of Michigan, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)