Introduction
CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), accounting for approximately 5–10% of total circulating CD4+ T cells, represent a critical subset of T lymphocytes involved in immune homeostasis. Through a broad set of effector mechanisms, these cells contribute to immune tolerance to self-constituents and to mucosal antigens derived from the commensal microflora and food (Lu et al., 2017; Xing and Hogquist, 2012). Tregs also participate in the resolution of inflammatory responses (Dominguez-Villar and Hafler, 2018) and play an important role in maternal immunotolerance against the semi-allogeneic fetus (Samstein et al., 2012). While critical to maintain tissue integrity, excessive activation of Tregs impedes adequate immune responses to tumors and pathogens, suggesting a tight control of their suppressive activity and tissue localization (Togashi et al., 2019; Aandahl et al., 2004; van der Burg et al., 2007). Although uniformly characterized by the expression of the lineage-specific, Foxp3 transcription factor (Lu et al., 2017), regulatory T cells display a wide range of phenotypic and functional properties that allow them to migrate to specific sites and suppress a variety of immune reactions, including inflammatory (Caridade et al., 2013) and humoral responses (Clement et al., 2019). Although diverse, the mechanisms whereby Tregs antagonize the activity of immune effectors are largely paracrine in nature (Vignali et al., 2008). Short-range suppressive mechanisms include competition for nutrients and/or growth factors (mostly cytokines), secretion of immunosuppressive factors, and direct, contact-mediated, inactivation of antigen-presenting cells (Wardell et al., 2021). These findings suggest that Tregs have to adapt to multiple lymphoid and nonlymphoid environments and suppress immune responses in a context and tissue-dependent fashion (Shevyrev and Tereshchenko, 2019; Panduro et al., 2016).
Oxygen represents an essential component of cellular bioenergetics and biochemistry. Because oxygen tension varies according to tissues and pathophysiological states (Ast and Mootha, 2019), cells need to adapt to fluctuations in oxygen availability in order to maintain an adequate functional and metabolic status. Of note, low-oxygen availability (hypoxia) plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of many immune disorders (McKeown, 2014; Bartels et al., 2013). Inflammation, in particular, is thought to reduce oxygen availability to tissues by affecting microvascular form and function, and through the recruitment of highly oxygen-consuming inflammatory cells producing NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species (Nanduri et al., 2015).
Immune cells patrolling through lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues need therefore to readily adapt to varying oxygen concentration levels in order to exert their function (Mempel and Marangoni, 2019), suggesting an important role for oxygen sensors in immune regulation. Several hypoxia-sensitive pathways are known to enable single-cell survival in low-oxygen settings. In particular, reduced oxygen levels are directly sensed by a family of oxygen-dependent prolyl hydroxylases (PHD encoded by
Multiple levels of complexity of this major regulatory axis have been recently uncovered. As previously suggested, the presence of several members of the PHD and HIF families suggests specialized functions of PHD-HIF pairs during ontogeny and in selected tissues (Watts and Walmsley, 2019). In particular, while HIF1α appears as ubiquitously expressed in all metazoans, HIF2α represents a late acquisition of vertebrates, displaying a more restricted tissue expression pattern (Talks et al., 2000). Although these factors bind to similar sequence motifs (hypoxia response elements [HREs]) and regulate the expression of a shared set of genes, both HIF1α and HIF2α-specific gene targets have been identified in multiple tissues (Downes et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2007; Bono and Hirota, 2020). Further complexity in this pathway stems from the possible occurrence of additional, non-HIF-related, PHD substrates (Meneses and Wielockx, 2016; Mikhaylova et al., 2008; Chan et al., 2009; Romero-Ruiz et al., 2012; Huo et al., 2012; Xie et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015b; Guo et al., 2016), a set of findings that however has not been confirmed in more rigorous in vitro settings using well-defined synthetic substrates (Cockman et al., 2019).
Hypoxia plays a dual role in inflammation and in the regulation of immune responses. In most settings, hypoxia promotes inflammation, while in some instances, such as in tumor sites, low oxygen levels generally cause unresponsiveness of immune effectors, thus favoring tumor growth. The often-opposing effects displayed by HIF activation on the activity of immune cells equally match this complexity (Corrado and Fontana, 2020). Previous work has indeed highlighted the important role of the PHD-HIF axis in regulating both innate and adaptive immune effectors (Watts and Walmsley, 2019). The role of HIF1α in regulating T cell activity has been described in many studies and is mainly linked to the capacity of this hypoxia-induced transcription factor to promote glycolysis (for a review, see McGettrick and O’Neill, 2020). Accordingly, HIF1α expression favors the development of highly glycolytic inflammatory Th17 cells, while inhibiting the development of Tregs, which rely mostly on aerobic metabolism (Shi et al., 2011). HIF1α also plays a direct role in Th17 development, through the transcriptional activation of
The role of hypoxia-induced factors in Treg development and function is presently not fully elucidated. As previously discussed, HIF1α deficiency improves Treg cell development, possibly a consequence of the limited requirement for glycolysis of this cell subset (Shi et al., 2011). However, hypoxia promotes Foxp3 expression in a HIF1α-dependent fashion (Ben-Shoshan et al., 2008) and expression of HIF1α is required for adequate regulatory T cell function (Clambey et al., 2012). Similarly, a recent report has identified HIF2α as an important mediator of Treg function in vivo, further stressing the important role of these hypoxia-induced factors in the control of in vivo inflammatory manifestations (Hsu et al., 2020). In agreement with these conclusions, PHD proteins have also been shown to play a role in the differentiation of peripheral (but not thymic-derived) Tregs (Clever et al., 2016). Expression of these proteins appears to redundantly regulate Th1 vs. iTreg development, mostly by limiting the accumulation of HIF1α. In contrast to this study, a recent publication has highlighted a selective role of the PHD2 isoform in the regulation of Treg function (Yamamoto et al., 2019). ShRNA-mediated knockdown of PHD2 expression in Foxp3-expressing cells (PHD2-KD Tregs) led to a systemic inflammatory syndrome characterized by mononuclear cell infiltration in several organs. PHD2-KD Tregs displayed reduced suppressive capacities both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting an important and intrinsic role of PHD2 in this cell subset. Of interest, loss of HIF2α expression reversed the phenotype of these mice bearing PHD2-KD Tregs, suggesting an important role of the PHD2-HIF2α axis in regulating Treg function.
To better delineate the role of PHD2, HIF1α, and HIF2α in the regulation of Treg development and function, we have generated a set of conditional mouse strains lacking expression of these hypoxia-responsive proteins in Foxp3+ cells. Using these tools, we confirm herein that mice in which expression of PHD2 is selectively inactivated in regulatory T cells display a spontaneous inflammatory syndrome characterized by altered immune homeostasis at the steady state and high sensitivity to Th1-type inflammatory diseases. This proinflammatory phenotype was accentuated by the concomitant loss of PHD2 and HIF1α, but almost completely alleviated in mice dually deficient for PHD2 and HIF2α. Transcriptome analysis confirmed a marginal role for HIF1α-dependent enhanced glycolysis in the regulation of Treg function and allowed us to identify STAT1 as a potential target of the PHD2-HIF2α axis in maintaining immune homeostasis and preventing excessive Th1-mediated inflammation.
Results
Deletion of PHD2 in Tregs leads to a systemic, type 1-like, inflammatory syndrome associated to altered Treg numbers and phenotype
Based on the predominance of
Figure 1.
PHD2ΔTreg mice display a spontaneous Th1-like inflammatory syndrome.
(a) Body weight of naive mice was determined weekly. (b) At 12 weeks of age, male and female mice were examined for rectal prolapse. (c) Splenomegaly and colon length summarized in (d). (e) Representative gross autopsy of a hemorrhagic abdomen, (f–i) Lymphoid cells from spleen, mesenteric (mLN), peripheral (pLN) lymph nodes, or the small intestine lamina propria were collected from Foxp3cre and PHD2ΔTreg mice. (f) Frequency of conventional, Foxp3- CD4 and CD8-expressing cells among TCRβ-expressing T lymphocytes. (g) Representative merged (n = 15) t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot after dimensionality reduction and unsupervised clustering of flow cytometry data from CD4-expressing spleen cells. Relative distributions of CD4+ lymphocyte subsets are shown as doughnut charts. (h) Frequency of effector-like (CD44hi CD62Llo) conventional T lymphocytes in the indicated lymphoid organs. (i) Frequency of IFN-γ (top panel) and IL-17A (bottom panel) producing CD4+ T cells after in vitro stimulation. (j) Expression of inflammatory cytokines determined by qPCR on extracts from unfractionated mLNs. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments with n = 9 (a, j), n = 25 (d), and n = 15 (f–i) per group. Values are presented as the mean ± SD and were compared by two-tailed unpaired Student’s
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Treg-restricted loss of
(a) Treg cells from Foxp3cre male and female mice were purified by cell sorting from spleen (n = 10), mesenteric (mLN) (n = 8), peripheral (pLN) lymph nodes (n = 4), or the small intestine lamina propria (n = 4) and expression of
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
Increased blood cells counts and elevated hematocrit in PHD2ΔTreg mice associated with an increase in vascular permeability.
(a) White blood cell (WBC) counts, (b) red blood cell (RBC) counts, (c) platelet (PLT) counts, and (d) hematocrit (HCT) from Foxp3cre, PHD2ΔTreg, and PHD2-HIF2αΔTreg male mouse blood. To assess vascular permeability, mice were i.v. injected with a 0.5% Evans blue solution, and the indicated, organs collected after 30 min and placed in formamide at 55°C during 24 hr. The absorbance of supernatants was measured at 600 nm, (e) Representative image of the colon supernatant after 24 hr in formamide, (f) ng of Evans blue per mg of tissue for spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN), colon, and liver of different groups of mice injected or not with Evans blue. Data are representative of two (a–d) or three (e, f) independent experiments with n = 7–9 per group (a–d) or n = 4–6 per group (e, f). Values are presented as the mean ± SD and were compared by one-way ANOVA (a–d) or two-way ANOVA (f) with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Only significant differences are indicated as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3.
Gating strategy for flow cytometry data analysis.
Representative flow cytometry dot plots displaying the gating strategy for the identification of conventional T cell populations in Figures 1 and 3—5 and for the identification of regulatory T cell subsets in Figure 2, Figure 4, and Figure 8 .
Figure 1—figure supplement 4.
Absolute cell counts.
Absolute cell counts of (a) CD4+ T cells, (b) CD8+ T cells, (c) regulatory T cells, and (d) activated conventional T cells in the spleen, mesenteric (mLN), peripheral (pLN) lymph nodes, and the small intestine lamina propria of Foxp3cre and PHD2ΔTreg male and female mice. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments with n = 15 per group. Values are presented as the mean ± SD and were compared by two-tailed unpaired Student’s
Much to our surprise, flow cytometric analysis of lymphoid organs from naive animals revealed an increased frequency of Treg cells in the spleen, lymph nodes, and lamina propria of PHD2ΔTreg mice when compared to control animals (Figure 2a). To evaluate the possible influence of PHD2 deletion on Treg development, thymic cell suspensions were analyzed for the expression of early Treg markers, including Foxp3, CD25, and CD24 (Owen et al., 2019). Recent studies have revealed that mature Foxp3high CD25+ Tregs can differentiate from two distinct thymic precursors identified as respectively CD25+ Foxp3- and CD25- Foxp3low precursor Tregs (pre-Tregs). Analysis of thymic cell suspensions revealed an accumulation of the Foxp3low pre-Tregs and a reduction in the number of mature Tregs in PHD2-deficient, Foxp3-expressing cells, suggesting an early role for PHD2 in the generation of thymic-derived Tregs (Figure 2b and c). Accordingly, PHD2-deficient, Foxp3-expressing cells retained higher expression of CD24 (Figure 2d), a marker associated to a thymic immature state (Owen et al., 2019), further confirming a putative role for PHD2 in the development of thymic-derived Tregs. No difference in the relative frequency of Treg subsets identified by the co-expression of Foxp3 with either naive and memory markers (Figure 2e) or with master transcription factors T-bet, GATA3, or RORγt (Figure 2f) was noted in these mice. The phenotype of splenic, PHD2-deficient Tregs was however significantly altered, showing a slight, but statistically significant, reduction in the expression of Foxp3 (Figure 2g), accompanied by reduced expression of the CD25, ICOS, and CD44 markers and enhanced expression of PD-1 (Figure 2h). Of note, neither CTLA-4 (Figure 2h) nor
Figure 2.
Increased number, but altered phenotype of PHD2-deficient Treg cells.
Lymphoid cells from the thymus, spleen, mesenteric (mLN), and peripheral (pLN) lymph nodes were collected at 12 weeks of age from Foxp3cre and PHD2ΔTreg male and female mice, and the relative frequency and phenotype of Foxp3-expressing cells were established by flow cytometry or qPCR. (a) Frequency of Foxp3-expressing cells among CD4-positive T lymphocytes. (b) Representative flow cytometry expression profiles of Foxp3 and CD25 expression among thymic CD4+ T cells. (c) Frequency of mature-like (CD25+ Foxp3+) and Treg precursors subsets identified respectively as CD25- Foxp3lo and CD25+ Foxp3- cells among thymic CD4+ T cells. (d) Frequency of immature-like, CD24+ Foxp3+ T cells in the thymus of adult mice. (e) Frequency of effector (CD62Llow CD44high), memory (CD62Lhigh CD44high), and naive (CD62Lhigh CD44low) splenic Foxp3-expressing cells. (f) Frequency of splenic Tregs expressing the master transcription factors T-bet, GATA3, and RORγt. (g) Ratio of the Foxp3 MFI of PHD2-KO splenic Tregs to Foxp3cre splenic Tregs. (h) Expression of CD25, CD44, ICOS, PD-1, and CTLA-4 in splenic Treg of Foxp3cre and PHD2ΔTreg mice. Top panel: representative traces of MFI. Bottom panel: ratios of the MFIs of PHD2-KO Treg to Foxp3cre Treg cells are expressed as the mean ± SD. (i)
To evaluate whether the altered phenotype of PHD2-deficient Tregs was a cell-autonomous phenomenon, heterozygous
Figure 3.
Cell-autonomous role of PHD2 in determining Treg cells phenotype.
Spleen, thymus, mesenteric (mLN), and peripheral (pLN) lymph nodes were collected at 8 weeks of age from
In vivo-reduced suppressive function of PHD2-deficient Tregs
To evaluate the suppressive capacity of PHD2-deficient Tregs cells, ex vivo-purified CD45.2-expressing Tregs from control and PHD2ΔTreg mice were adoptively co-transferred into syngeneic Rag-deficient mice with CFSE-labeled, CD45.1-expressing CD4+ naive T lymphocytes (Figure 4a). In the absence of Tregs, transferred naive cells rapidly divided and acquired an effector-like phenotype, a well-established consequence of homeostatic proliferation in a lymphopenic environment (Figure 4b). Addition of WT Tregs in the inoculum led to a significant reduction of conventional T cell proliferation and phenotype switch, while PHD2-deficient Tregs appeared functionally impaired in this assay (Figure 4b–d). Lack of suppressive activity of these Tregs was not a consequence of reduced viability and/or in vivo survival, as shown by the normal recovery rate of both Treg-populations at the time of assay readout (Figure 4e). In contrast, when tested in vitro, PHD2-deficient Tregs consistently displayed a fully functional suppressive activity (Figure 4f and g).
Figure 4.
Reduced in vivo but not in vitro suppressive capacity of PHD2-deficient Treg.
(a) Treg function was assayed following adoptive co-transfer of CD45.2 Foxp3-expressing cells with naive, CFSE-labeled congenic CD45.1 CD4+ lymphocytes (Treg: Tconv ratio 1:3) into syngeneic lymphopenic male mice (
Increased susceptibility of PHD2ΔTreg mice to type 1 experimental inflammation
A series of experimental acute and chronic inflammatory models were employed to further evaluate the capacity of PHD2ΔTreg mice to sustain an in vivo inflammatory challenge. We first exposed mice to a chemical-induced colitis protocol. This assay revealed an increased sensitivity of PHD2ΔTreg mice to most dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced inflammatory manifestations, including weight loss (Figure 5a), survival (Figure 5b), clinical score (Figure 5c), and colon length (Figure 5d). No difference was noted, however, in crypt morphology induced by DSS in both mouse strains (Figure 5e). Similar observations were made when mice were acutely infected with
Figure 5.
Increased sensitivity of PHD2ΔTreg mice to dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis and toxoplasmosis.
Foxp3cre and PHD2ΔTreg male mice were provided with 2% DSS in tap water for 5 days. On day 5, the 2% DSS water was replaced with normal drinking water and mice were followed during 14 days for (a) body weight, (b) survival, (c) colitis severity, and (d) colon length. (e) Colons were isolated from untreated mice or 6 days after colitis induction and were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E); arrows indicate inflammatory cell infiltrates. (f) Foxp3cre and PHD2ΔTreg male mice were infected by intragastric gavage with 10 cysts of ME-49 type II
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
PHD2ΔTreg mice display a near-normal response to anti-CD3-induced enteritis.
Foxp3cre and PHD2ΔTreg female mice were injected twice i.p. with anti-CD3 mAbs (20 µg) at 2 days interval and weighted daily. (a) Weight loss was found similar in both mouse strains tested. (b) Relative expression of inflammatory mediators evaluated by qPCR on whole, unfractionated mesenteric lymph nodes. A similar, Th17-like response was observed in both mouse strains. Data are representative of two independent experiments with n = 6 per group. Values are presented as the mean ± SD and were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Only significant differences are indicated as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2.
Loss of
PHD2ΔTreg mice were crossed with IFN-γKO mice (PHD2ΔTreg IFN-γKO mice) and were compared to Foxp3cre and PHD2ΔTreg male and female mice and analyzed for (a) colon length, (b) frequency of effector-like (CD44hi CD62Llo) conventional T lymphocytes in the indicated lymphoid organs, (c) frequency of IFN-γ production after in vitro stimulation, (d) frequency of IL-17A-producing cells after in vitro stimulation, and (e) frequency of Foxp3+ cells in the indicated lymphoid organs. Data are representative of three independent experiments with n = 10 per groups. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD and were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (a) or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (b–e). Only significant differences are indicated as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
Concomitant loss of HIF2α, but not HIF1α, expression partially corrects the proinflammatory phenotype of PHD2ΔTreg mice
Based on the notion that HIF1α and HIF2α represent well-described targets of PHD2, we established a series of conditional KOs mouse strains to identify the molecular pathway responsible for the decreased functional activity of PHD2-deficient Tregs at steady state (Figure 6; see Figure 6—figure supplement 1 for strain validation). Treg-selective deletion of HIF1α and HIF2α expression alone did not significantly alter colon length (used as a proxy for spontaneous inflammation) nor general T cell immune homeostasis (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). The same observation was made for double HIF1α and HIF2α KOs (data not shown). In marked contrast, combined deletion of PHD2 and HIF2α reversed some of the inflammatory symptoms observed in PHD2ΔTreg mice, such as splenomegaly, colon length (Figure 6a and b), and hematocrit counts (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Treg-specific, PHD2-HIF1α double KOs were virtually indistinguishable from PHD2ΔTreg according to these morphological criteria. Noteworthy, however, Treg-specific PHD2-HIF1α double KOs mice were born at sub-Mendelian ratios and displayed a marked weight loss during adult life and reduced viability, indicative of a more pronounced proinflammatory status (data not shown). This mouse strain also displayed a tendency toward increased expansion of Th1-like cells in peripheral lymph nodes (Figure 6e). PHD2-HIF1α-HIF2α triple KOs and PHD2-HIF2α double KOs displayed a similar phenotype, establishing a predominant role for HIF2α over HIF1α in mediating the effects of PHD2 on the capacity of Treg to regulate immune homeostasis at rest. Similarly, lack of HIF2α expression largely reversed the altered phenotype of conventional T cells induced by loss of Treg-associated PHD2 expression. Indeed, cells from double (PHD2-HIF2α) and triple (PHD2-HIF1α-HIF2α) Treg-specific KOs displayed a near-normal phenotype (based on CD62L and CD44 expression) and propensity to secrete IFN-γ (Figure 6c–e). Finally, loss of Treg-associated expression of HIF2α also reversed the expansion of Treg numbers (Figure 6f) and restored Foxp3 protein expression to near-control levels (Figure 6g).
Figure 6.
Concomitant loss of HIF2α but not HIF1α expression attenuates the proinflammatory phenotype of PHD2ΔTreg mice.
(a) Representative gross autopsy of spleens and colon length summarized in (b) of Foxp3cre, PHD2ΔTreg, PHD2-HIF1αΔTreg, PHD2-HIF2αΔTreg, and PHD2-HIF1α-HIF2αΔTreg (TKO) mice. (c) Representative merged (n = 15) t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot after dimensionality reduction and unsupervised clustering of flow cytometry data from CD4-expressing spleen cells. Relative distributions of CD4+ lymphocyte subsets are shown as doughnut charts. (d–g) Lymphoid cells from spleen, mesenteric (mLN), peripheral (pLN) lymph nodes, or the small intestine lamina propria were collected from Foxp3cre, PHD2ΔTreg, PHD2-HIF1αΔTreg mice, PHD2-HIF2αΔTreg and PHD2-HIF1α-HIF2αΔTreg (TKO) male and female mice and the relative frequency and phenotype of Foxp3-positive and Foxp3-negative, conventional T lymphocytes determined by flow cytometry. (d) Frequency of effector-like (CD44hi CD62Llo) conventional T lymphocytes in the indicated lymphoid organs. (e) Frequency of IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T cells after in vitro stimulation. (f) Frequency of Foxp3-expressing cells among CD4-positive T lymphocytes. (g) Ratio of the Foxp3 MFI of PHD2-KO, PHD2-HIF1αKO, PHD2-HIF2αKO, or TKO splenic Tregs to Foxp3cre splenic Tregs. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments with n = 15 per groups. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD and were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (b, g) or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (d–f). Only significant differences are indicated as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.
Treg-selective HIF1α or HIF2α deficiency does not affect immune homeostasis in naive mice.
(a) Splenic Treg cells were purified by cell sorting from Foxp3cre (n = 3), PHD2ΔTreg (n = 2), PHD2-HIF1αΔTreg (n = 2), PHD2-HIF2αΔTreg (n = 3), PHD2-HIF1α-HIF2αΔTreg (TKO) (n = 3), HIF1αΔTreg (n = 3), and HIF2αΔTreg (n = 3) male mice and their genotype verified by qPCR on the extracted total RNA fraction. (b) Representative gross autopsy findings revealing normal spleen and colon size (summarized in panel c) in 12-week-old male and female mice. (d) Frequency of CD4+ Foxp3- CD44hi CD62Llo cells in lymphoid organs. (e) Frequency of CD4+ lymphocytes producing IFN-γ upon in vitro stimulation. (f) Frequency of Foxp3+ cells in the indicated lymphoid organs. (g) Ratio of the Foxp3 MFI of HIF1αKO or HIF2αKO splenic Tregs to Foxp3cre splenic Tregs. Data are representative of three independent experiments with n = 10. Values are presented as the mean ± SD and were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (c, g) or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (d–f). No statistical differences were found between groups.
Transcriptomic analysis identifies cell survival, response to chemokines, and STAT1-mediated signaling as target pathways of the PHD2-HIF2α axis in Tregs
Collectively, the previous observations suggest that the PHD2-HIF2α regulatory axis confers to Tregs the capacity to control the spontaneous, type 1-like, activity of conventional T cells. To identify PHD2-dependent signaling pathways operating in Tregs, splenic Foxp3-expressing cells were purified from all mouse strains described in this article and their transcriptome analyzed following bulk RNA-seq. A set of 532 genes were found differentially expressed between WT and PHD2-deficient Tregs (Figure 7) (a summary list of upregulated and downregulated pathways in PHD2ΔTreg mice vs. Foxp3cre mice is provided in Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Differential gene expression analysis between all mouse strains studied identified 1868 genes differentially expressed between groups. An unsupervised clustering of the differentially expressed genes led to the identification of 20 clusters, as shown in Figure 7a. To identify the gene clusters that were specifically involved in the immune homeostatic control of naive mice, the RNA-seq data were filtered and grouped by k-means clustering. We next searched for sets of genes whose expression best correlated with an arbitrary inflammatory index, established based on previously described findings (mostly colon length, splenomegaly, and spontaneous conventional T cell activation status) and summarized in Figure 7b. In particular, while concomitant deletion of HIF1α expression worsened the inflammatory status of PHD2ΔTreg mice, loss of HIF2α expression mitigated most inflammatory-related parameters at rest. We therefore clustered genes according to a ‘gradient of disease severity’ and grouped them in sets of gene whose expression decreased (cluster 10, Figure 7c) or increased (cluster 11, Figure 7d) accordingly. Gene Ontology analysis of these clustered gene sets revealed the following. Reduced expression of cell death-related and gain of survival-associated gene expression correlated with the increased frequency of Tregs in the corresponding mouse strains (Figure 7c and d). Not surprisingly, the expression of genes associated with anti-inflammatory responses was gradually lost according to the same severity gradient. Finally, genes, associated with T cell migration, including several chemokine receptors, also displayed an ordered loss of expression along the same gradient (Figure 7c). For comparison purposes, genes whose expression was restored to control levels upon combined deletion of PHD2 and HIF1α were also examined. As expected from previously published findings, these HIF1α-dependent biological pathways included glycolysis and angiogenesis (Figure 7e).
Figure 7.
Anti-inflammatory response, response to chemokines, and cell survival pathways represent targets of the PHD2-HIF2α axis in Tregs.
Splenic Treg cells were purified by cell sorting from Foxp3cre (n = 3), PHD2ΔTreg (n = 2), PHD2-HIF1αΔTreg (n = 2), PHD2-HIF2αΔTreg (n = 3), and PHD2-HIF1α-HIF2αΔTreg (TKO) (n = 3) male mice, and total RNA was extracted and sequenced by RNA-sequencing (Illumina). (a) Heatmap of genes differentially expressed. Values are represented as log2 fold change (FC) obtained from median of each gene and are plotted in red-blue color scale with red indicating increased expression and blue indicating decreased expression. Hierarchical clustering of genes (k-means clustering) shows 20 clusters. (b) Classification of mouse strains according to their spontaneous inflammation severity. (c) Heatmap of genes downregulated when PHD2 and PHD2-HIF1α are deleted and whose expression is restored to a control level (close to Foxp3cre Treg) following deletion of HIF2α (cluster 10, 181 genes). (d) Heatmap of genes upregulated when PHD2 and PHD2-HIF1α are deleted and whose expression is restored to a control level following deletion of HIF2α (cluster 11, 66 genes). (e) Heatmap of genes upregulated when PHD2 and PHD2-HIF2α are deleted and whose expression is restored to a control level following deletion of HIF1α (cluster 3, 98 genes). Cluster 3, 10, and 11 were subjected to functional annotations and regulatory network analysis in the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. Data were analyzed using DESeq2, a gene is differentially expressed when log2FC > 0.5 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1.
Signaling pathways affected by loss of PHD2 expression in Treg.
(a) Top: significantly downregulated pathways in PHD2-deficient Tregs compared to Tregs from Foxp3cre mice. (b) Top: significantly upregulated pathways in PHD2-deficient Tregs compared to Tregs from Foxp3cre mice. Affected pathways were determined by over-representation analysis (ORA analysis) in R program after DESeq2 analysis. Dot color and size represent respectively false discovery rate (FDR) and the number of genes affected in a given pathway.
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was performed in order to identify possible upstream regulators affecting expression of downstream genes identified in clusters 10 and 11. This analysis led to the identification of STAT1 as a putative upstream transcription factor regulating the expression of a set of genes whose expression was altered in PHD2-deficient Tregs (Figure 8a). Since
Figure 8.
Identification of STAT1-mediated signaling as a target of the PHD2-HIF2α axis in Tregs.
(a) Upregulated and downregulated genes (clusters 10 and 11 in Figure 6c and d) were imported into the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software and were subjected to Upstream Regulator Analysis (URA) prediction algorithms. STAT1 was predicted as an upstream regulator of downregulated genes with a p-value=3 × 10–12. Phosphorylated form of STAT1 (pSTAT1 [Tyr701]) was assessed by flow cytometry after brief in vitro stimulation (30 min) of splenic CD4+ T lymphocytes with recombinant IFN-γ. (b) Representative histogram of pSTAT1 MFI for conventional CD4+ T cells (Tconv) and Treg cells of Foxp3cre, PHD2ΔTreg, and PHD2-HIF2αΔTreg male mice. Mean value expression (represented by MFI) of (c) pSTAT1 or (d) STAT1 total protein by splenic Treg of Foxp3cre, PHD2ΔTreg, and PHD2-HIF2αΔTreg mice. (e) Frequency of Treg cells expressing the CXCR3 receptor. Data are representative of three independent experiments with n = 9 (b–d) or n = 12 (e) per groups. Values are presented as the mean ± SD and were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. Only significant differences are indicated as follows: **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 8—figure supplement 1.
Gating strategy for identification of YFP+ cells.
Representative flow cytometry dot plots displaying the gating strategy for the identification of YFP-positive populations in the (a) spleen, (b) mesenteric lymph node (mLN), (c) thymus, and (d) liver. Although the majority of YFP-expressing cells also expressed Foxp3, a minor population (from 1% to 3% depending on the organ considered) of YFP cells lacked expression of both CD45 and Foxp3, suggesting a possible expression of the Cre-recombinase in nonhematopoietic cells in PHD2ΔTreg mice.
Discussion
This study highlights the important role of the prolyl-hydroxylase PHD2 in the regulation of Treg development and function. Deletion of PHD2 in developing Tregs led to the accumulation of the subset of Treg precursor characterized by low expression of Foxp3 at the expenses of the mature Foxp3+CD25+ Treg population (Figure 2c). PHD2-deficient Tregs were nevertheless found in increased numbers in vivo at steady state (Figure 2a), albeit with an altered phenotype. In particular, the expression of molecules known to be associated with optimal suppressive activity (such as Foxp3, ICOS ,and CD25) (Lu et al., 2017; Fontenot et al., 2003; Redpath et al., 2013) was marginally decreased, while the expression of PD-1, a marker associated with altered functional activity of many immune cells including Tregs (Lowther et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2021), was augmented. Of note, other molecules known to play an important role in Treg function were expressed at optimal levels (cf. CTLA4 and IL-10).
Although we have not specifically addressed the role of PHD2 in thymic vs. peripherally induced Tregs, it is noteworthy that lack of PHD2 expression altered Treg thymic development without any major effect on the generation of iTreg in vitro, suggesting a more pronounced role of PHD2 on thymic vs. peripherally generated Tregs, although this conclusion should be strengthened by additional studies.
Mice selectively lacking PHD2 expression in Treg displayed a proinflammatory phenotype (with early manifestations of gastrointestinal tract inflammation) associated to an elevated hematocrit, enhanced vascular permeability, and an altered homeostatic profile of splenic conventional T cells. In marked contrast to WT Tregs, PHD2-deficient Tregs express relatively high levels of
Based on the notion that hypoxia-induced factors represent major substrates of PHD2, we generated a series of mouse strains to evaluate the relative role of HIF1α and HIF2α in regulating Treg phenotype and function. The combined loss of PHD2 and HIF2α, but not HIF1α, corrected some, but not all, abnormalities found in the PHD2ΔTreg mouse strain. To uncover the mechanism whereby the PHD2-HIF2α axis regulates the capacity of Tregs to exert a homeostatic control over conventional T cells, a large transcriptomic analysis was undertaken. To be able to isolate genes specifically involved in the control of Treg activity in naive animals, we took advantage of the graded proinflammatory status of the mouse strain generated (based on colon length and spontaneous activation of Tconv cells, see Figure 6) to identify the gene clusters whose expression correlated with Treg-mediated immune homeostasis. This analysis led us to identify the important pathways providing mechanistic insights into the role of the PHD2-HIF2α axis in Treg biology. In particular, loss of PHD2 led to an altered expression of genes coding for chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules, suggesting a potential role of this oxygen sensor in chemotaxis and traffic. This conclusion is of particular interest in light of two observations described in this study. As previously discussed, PHD2ΔTreg mice displayed a selective expansion of Th1-prone effectors in all lymphoid organs examined (Figure 1). Accordingly, ubiquitous loss of IFN-γ expression strongly attenuated the pro-inflammatory phenotype of mice with PHD2-deficient Tregs (Figure 5—figure supplement 2), thus suggesting a specific role for PHD2 in endowing Tregs to control Th1-like immune responses in vivo. Secondly, the IPA conducted on the transcriptomic data led to the identification of STAT1 as a potential common regulator of many genes whose expression was under the control of the PHD2-HIF2α axis, including in particular CXCR3 (Hall et al., 2012; Koch et al., 2009). Based on the well-described role for Treg-expressed CXCR3 in modulating Th1-like responses in vivo (Levine et al., 2017; Littringer et al., 2018) and the reduced expression of this chemokine receptor described in this study (Figure 8e), it is tempting to speculate that the reduced capacity of PHD2-deficient Tregs to control Th1 responses is a consequence of an altered STAT1 signaling pathway, leading to reduced CXCR3 expression. It is noteworthy that response to CXCR3 ligands has been recently shown to determine the precise positioning of effector and memory CD8 cells in peripheral lymph nodes (Duckworth et al., 2021). Further studies would be required to identify the precise mechanism at work since the expression of many potential chemokine receptors (including CXCR4, known to exert inhibitory function over other chemokine receptors; Biasci et al., 2020) and adhesion molecules (such as Ly6a or CD44) appears under the control of the PHD2-HIF2α axis in Tregs. Whether altered positioning of Tregs within lymphoid organs represents an important factor contributing to the proinflammatory phenotype of PHD2ΔTreg mice remains, however, to be thoroughly examined. Similarly, the potential mechanistic link between HIF2α and STAT1 activation remains to be firmly established by further investigations.
Collectively, the observations reported in this study demonstrate a nonredundant role for PHD2 in controlling survival, phenotype, and the capacity of Tregs to control Th1-like responses. These biological responses appear under the control of HIF2α and are largely independent of HIF1α-regulated metabolic pathways. Although the role of the PHD2-HIF2α axis has been previously highlighted by Yamamoto and colleagues using an alternative shRNA-based approach (Yamamoto et al., 2019), our observations do not fully concur with the previous study on two grounds. First, in contrast to PHD2 knockdown (PHD2-KD) cells, PHD2-genetically deficient Tregs retained full suppressive capacities in vitro. Secondly, no sign of reversal to an effector state was found in PHD2-KO regulatory T cells, whereas downregulation of PHD2 expression led to an increased expression of T-bet, GATA-3, and TNFα. Notably, PHD2-KD Tregs were able to induce skin-graft rejection in the absence of bona fide effector cells, suggesting a possible acquisition of effector function by these cells. Although these observations are compatible with a possible gene-dosage effect of PHD2 on Treg biology, further studies are needed to identify the mechanism at work in these two experimental models.
In any events, both studies concur in identifying a possible deleterious role of HIF2α overactivation in the control of regulatory T cell function. These findings appear at odds with a recent publication by Tzu-Sheng Hsu and colleagues in which deletion of HIF2α, but not HIF1α, expression was found to negatively affect Treg function (Hsu et al., 2020). Of note, concomitant deletion of both HIF1α and HIF2α restored the suppressive activity of Tregs (Hsu et al., 2020). An elegant hypothesis, put forward by these authors, may help reconcile some of these apparently contradictory observations. Most experimental evidence concurs with a dual role of HIF1α in Treg differentiation and stability. In the setting of suboptimal Treg-inducing conditions, HIF1α may promote adequate expression of Foxp3 by differentiating Tregs. Once the Treg phenotype has been fully acquired, HIF1α protein expression is reduced following interaction with Foxp3 (Clambey et al., 2012), thus explaining the relative lack of influence of HIF1α on differentiated Tregs. As a consequence, HIF1α-KO Tregs retain full suppressive activity (Hsu et al., 2020). The interaction between HIF1α and Foxp3 can, however, also lead to Foxp3 protein degradation, and thus Treg instability. Therefore, forced stabilization of HIF1α (such as observed in triple PHD KOs [Clever et al., 2016] or pVHL-deficient Tregs [Lee et al., 2015a]) leads to loss of Foxp3 expression and Treg identity and acquisition of proinflammatory functions. Inflammation observed in these mouse strains can be largely attributed to the proinflammatory influence of ex-Tregs. As discussed for HIF1α, HIF2α also appears to regulate Treg stability, albeit in a different direction. Despite a normal phenotype at rest, mice displaying HIF2α-deficient Tregs were largely defective in suppressing inflammation in the gut and lungs (Hsu et al., 2020). This proinflammatory phenotype was largely explained by the HIF1α-dependent reprogramming of HIF2α-deficient Tregs into IL-17-secreting cells. Collectively, the available literature points to a central role for HIF1α in determining Treg stability and function in vivo. Depending on the biological pathway leading to its increased expression and/or protein stabilization, HIF1α promotes the differentiation of Tregs into IFN-γ (in triple PHD KOs or pVHL-deficient Tregs) or IL-17 (in HIF2α-deficient Tregs) secreting cells. Although the mechanism underlying the acquisition of Th1 vs. Th17-like profiles in these models remains to be established, the induction of a glycolytic metabolism is probably instrumental in mediating Treg instability (Shi and Chi, 2019).
In the present study, loss of HIF1α expression did not revert the phenotype of PHD2-HIF2α-deficient Tregs, despite re-establishing a control-like expression of pro-glycolytic genes (Figure 7e). Accordingly, PHD2-deficient Tregs did not acquire the capacity to produce proinflammatory cytokines (Figure 1—figure supplement 1) nor displayed any significant loss of Foxp3 expression upon in vitro culture (Figure 2k and l) or in vivo transfer (Figure 4e). Thus, the available evidence suggests that in PHD2-sufficient cells HIF2α allows adequate Treg function by negating the influence of HIF1α on Foxp3-expression, while overactivation of HIF2α activity secondary to the loss of PHD2 expression leads to altered Treg phenotype, most probably via a STAT1-dependent pathway.
Considering the specific role of PHD2, it is worth mentioning that both the transcriptomic data and our own unpublished observations (indicating an increased sensitivity of triple PHD2-HIF1α-HIF2α Tregs-specific KO mice to chemical induced colitis) suggest that while the capacity of Tregs to control tissue homeostasis in the naive state is under the predominant control of the PHD2-HIF2α axis, other non-HIF PHD2-substrates (Meneses and Wielockx, 2016; Mikhaylova et al., 2008; Chan et al., 2009; Romero-Ruiz et al., 2012; Huo et al., 2012; Xie et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015b; Guo et al., 2016) probably play an important role in Treg biology under strong inflammatory settings. Finally, this study suggests that some caution should be exerted in the administration of PHD inhibitors presently considered for the treatment of renal anemia (Gupta and Wish, 2017), inflammatory bowel diseases (Marks et al., 2015), as well as Parkinson’s disease (Li et al., 2018) as these compounds may display some proinflammatory effects via the alteration of Treg phenotype and function in vivo.
Materials and methods
Key resources table
| Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic reagent ( | C57BL/6 | Envigo | RRID:MGI:5658455 | Horst, The Netherlands |
| Genetic reagent ( |
| The Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_NM-CKO-2100497 | P. Carmeliet (VIB-KULeuven) |
| Genetic reagent ( | PMID:18387831 | RRID:IMSR_JAX:016959 | A. Liston (KULeuven) | |
| Genetic reagent ( | The Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_JAX:007561 | F. Bureau (Liege University) | |
| Genetic reagent ( | The Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_JAX:008407 | J.A. Lopez (Madrid University) | |
| Genetic reagent ( |
| The Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_CARD:178 | Bar Harbor, ME |
| Genetic reagent ( | CD45.1 (B6.SJL-Ptprca Pepcb/BoyJ) | The Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_JAX:002014 | Bar Harbor, ME |
| Genetic reagent ( |
| The Jackson Laboratory | RRID:IMSR_JAX:008449 | Bar Harbor, ME |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD278 (Icos)-biotin (C398.4A, mouse monoclonal) | eBioscience | 13-9949-82 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD27-PeCy7 (LG.7F9, mouse monoclonal) | eBioscience | 25-0271-82 | (1:250) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse Foxp3-FITC (FJK-16s, mouse monoclonal) | eBioscience | 71-5775-40 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse RORγt-PE (B2D, mouse monoclonal) | eBioscience | 12-6981-82 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse T-bet-PE (4B10, mouse monoclonal) | eBioscience | 12-5825-82 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse PD1-PECF594 (J43, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 562523;RRID:AB_2737634 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CXCR3-APC (CXCR3-173, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 562266;RRID:AB_11153500 | (3:500) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD24-PECF594 (M1/69, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 562477;RRID:AB_11151917 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD25-BB515 (PC61, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 564424;RRID:AB_2738803 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD44-PECy7 (IM7, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 560569;RRID:AB_1727484 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD4-A700 (RM4-5, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 557956;RRID:AB_396956 | (3:500) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD8-A700 (53-6.7, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 557959;RRID:AB_396959 | (3:500) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD4-PB (RM4-5, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 558107;RRID:AB_397030 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse CD62L-A700 (MEL-14, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 560517;RRID:AB_1645210 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse GATA3-PE (L50-823, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 560074;RRID:AB_1645330 | (1:10) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse RORγt-PECF594 (Q31-378, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 562684;RRID:AB_2651150 | (1:200) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse STAT1 (pY701)-A488(4a, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 612596;RRID:AB_399879 | (1:10) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse IFNγ-PE (XMG1.2, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 554412;RRID:AB_395376 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse IL-10-APC (JES5-16E3, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 554468;RRID:AB_398558 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-mouse IL-17-PerCP-Cy5.5 (N49-653, mouse monoclonal) | BD Biosciences | 560799;RRID:AB_2033981 | (1:100) |
| Antibody | Anti-CD3 antibody (2c11, mouse monoclonal) | BioXCell | 145-2c11 | 20 μg/mouse |
| peptide, recombinant protein | Streptavidin-PECy7. | BD Biosciences | 557598;RRID:AB_10049577 | (1:100) |
| peptide, recombinant protein | IFN-γ protein | PeproTech | 315-05 | 50 ng/ml |
| Chemical compound, drug | Evans blue | Sigma | 314-13-6 | 0.5% |
| Chemical compound, drug | Brefeldin-A | eBioscience | 00-4506-51 | (1:1000) |
| Chemical compound, drug | Dextran sodium sulfate, colitis grade (36,000–50,000 Da) | MP Biomedical | 160110 | 2% |
| Commercial assay or kit | LIVE/DEAD kit | Invitrogen | L10119 | (1:1000) |
| Commercial assay or kit | Anti-CD90.2 beads MACS | Miltenyi | 130-121-278 | (1:5) |
| Commercial assay or kit | Anti-CD4 beads MACS | Miltenyi | 130-117-043 | (1:3) |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | AGGCTATGTCCGTCACGTTG |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | TACCTCCACTTACCTTGGCG |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | TCACGTGGACGCAGTAATCC |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | CGCCATGCACCTTAACATCC |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | AGGCAATGGTGGCTTGCTAT |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GACCCCTCCGTGTAACTTGG |
| Sequence-based reagent | This paper | PCR primers | CATCAGTTGCCACTTCCCCA | |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GGCATCCAGAAGTTTTCTCACAC |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | ACGGAGGTCTTCTATGAGTTGGC |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GTTATCCATTTGCTGGTCGGC |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | TGCCAAGTTTGAGGTCAACA |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GAATCAGCAGCGACTCCTTT |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | CCTCAGTTTGGCCAGGGTC |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | CAGGTTTCGGGACTGGCTAAG |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | CCTGGGTGAGAAGCTGAAGA |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GCTCCACTGCCTTGCTCTTA |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | ATCCCTCAAAGCTCAGCGTGTC |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GGGTCTTCATTGCGGTGGAGAG |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | CAAGCTTCCTTGTGCAAGTG |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | AGGTGGCATTTCACAGTTGA |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | ATGCACGGAGATGGATGTG |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | AATATGCGAAGCACCTTGGA |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GTTCTCTGGGAAATCGTGGA |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GCAAGTGCATCATCGTTGTT |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | ACATCGGTTATGGGAGCAAC |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | TCCAGCTCCTTGACATTGT |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GCCTCCCTCTCATCAGTTCTA |
| Sequence-based reagent |
| This paper | PCR primers | GCTACGACGTGGGCTACAG |
| Sequence-based reagent | This paper | PCR primers | ATGTGTCCTCAGAAGCTAACC | |
| Sequence-based reagent | This paper | PCR primers | CTAGGATCGGACCCTGCAGGGAAC | |
| Software, algorithm | Prism 6 | GraphPad | RRID:SCR_002798 | Version 6.0 |
Mice
C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Envigo (Horst, The Netherlands).
Antibodies, intracellular staining, and flow cytometry
The following monoclonal antibodies were purchased from eBioscience: CD278 (ICOS)-biotin, CD27-PeCy7, Foxp3-FITC, RORγt-PE, T-bet-PE; or from BD Biosciences: PD1-PECF594, CXCR3-APC, CD24-PECF594, CD25-BB515, CD44-PECy7, CD4-A700, CD8-A700, CD4-PB, CD62L-A700, GATA3-PE, RORγt-PECF594, STAT1 (pY701)-A488, IFNγ-PE, IL-10-APC, IL-17-PerCP-Cy5.5, streptavidin-PECy7. Live/dead fixable near-IR stain (Thermo Fisher) was used to exclude dead cells. For transcription factor staining, cells were stained for surface markers, followed by fixation and permeabilization before nuclear factor staining according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Foxp3 staining buffer set from eBioscience). For cytokine staining, cells were stimulated in media containing phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich), ionomycin (250 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich), and brefeldin-A (1/100, eBioscience) for 3 hr. After stimulation, cells were stained for surface markers, followed by fixation and permeabilization before intracellular staining according to the manufacturer’s protocol (cytokine staining buffer set from BD Biosciences). For phosphorylation staining, cells were stimulated with IFN-γ (50 ng/ml, PeproTech) for 30 min, fixed with formaldehyde, and permeabilized with methanol before staining. Flow cytometric analysis was performed on a Canto II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
T cell cultures
After removal of Peyer’s patches and mesenteric fat, intestinal tissues were washed in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) 3% fetal calf serum (FCS) and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cut in small sections, and incubated in HBSS 3% FCS containing 2.5 mM EDTA and 72.5 µg/ml DTT for 30 min at 37°C with agitation to remove epithelial cells, and then minced and dissociated in RPMI containing liberase (20 µg/ml, Roche) and DNase (400 µg/ml, Roche) at 37°C for 30 min. Leukocytes were collected after a 30% Percoll gradient (GE Healthcare). Lymph nodes and spleens were mechanically disrupted in culture medium. CD4+ T cells were positively selected from organ cell suspensions by magnetic-activated cell sorting using CD4 beads (MACS, Miltenyi) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and purified as CD4+ CD44loCD62LhiCD25− or CD4+ CD44lo CD62Lhi YFP− by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. T cells were cultured at 37°C in RPMI supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen), 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen), 500 U/ml penicillin/500 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), and 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich). To generate iTreg cells, cells were cultured in 24-well plates coated with 5 µg/ml anti-CD3 (BioXCell, clone 145-2C11) at 37°C for 72 hr. The culture was supplemented with anti-CD28 (1 µg/ml, BioXCell, clone 37.51), TGF-β (3 ng/ml, eBioscience), and IL-2 (10 ng/ml, PeproTech) for optimal iTreg cell polarization.
Treg cell suppression assays
In vitro assay
CD4+ CD44loCD62Lhi CD25− naive T cells were isolated from the spleen of CD45.1+ mice by cell sorting after positive enrichment for CD4+ cells using MACS LS columns (Miltenyi) and labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE, Thermo Fisher). CD4+YFP+ Treg cells were isolated from the spleen of Foxp3cre or PHD2ΔTreg mice by cell sorting. Splenocytes from wild-type B6 mice were depleted in T cells (anti-CD90.2 beads, MACS, Miltenyi) using MACS LS columns (Miltenyi) and used as feeder cells. 4 × 104 CFSE-labeled naive T cells were cultured for 72 hr with feeder cells (1 × 105) and soluble anti-CD3 (0,5 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of various numbers of Treg cells as indicated.
In vivo assay
Rag2-/- mice were injected i.v. with a mixture of naive, CFSE-labeled, CD4+ T cells (CD45.1+ CD4+ CD44lo CD62Lhi CD25−) (1 × 106) and splenic Treg from Foxp3cre or PHD2ΔTreg mice (3.3 × 105). Six days after the injection,
DSS-induced colitis
Foxp3cre or PHD2ΔTreg mice were provided with 2% DSS (MP Biomedical, 160110) in tap water for 5 days. On day 5, the DSS-containing water was replaced with normal drinking water and mice were followed during 14 days for body weight, survival, and colitis severity. Colitis severity score was assessed by examining weight loss, feces consistency, and hematochezia (Hemoccult SENSA, Mckesson Medical-Surgical, 625078) as described in Kim et al., 2012. Colon samples were washed with PBS and rolled from the distal to proximal end, transected with a needle and secured by bending the end of the needle and fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight and further subjected to routine histological procedures for embedment in paraffin and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Tissues were analyzed and scored in a blinded fashion by an independent histopathologist, and representative images were subsequently chosen to illustrate key histological findings.
Toxoplasma infection
ME-49 type II
Anti-CD3 mAb-induced enteritis
Mice were injected i.p. with a CD3-specific antibody (clone 145-2C11, BioXCell 20 μg/mouse) on days 0 and 2 and weighted daily. Mice were sacrificed on day 3 and cytokine production evaluated by qPCR as indicated in the figure legend.
Hematological analysis
Mice blood was obtained from the submandibular vein and collected into heparin-prefilled tubes. Blood samples were analyzed using a Sysmex KX-21 N Automated Hematology Analyzer.
Evans blue assay
Blood vessel permeability was assessed as previously described (Radu and Chernoff, 2013). Briefly, 200 μl of a 0.5% sterile solution of Evans blue (Sigma) in PBS was i.v. injected in mice. After 30 min, organs were collected, weighted, and were put in formamide. After 24 hr in a 55°C water bath, absorbance was measured at 600 nm.
RT-qPCR
RNA was extracted using the TRIzol method (Invitrogen) and reverse transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed using the SYBR Green Master mix kit (Thermo Fisher). Primer sequences were as follows:
RNA-sequencing and analysis
All RNA-seq analyses were performed using ≥2 biological replicates. Total RNA was prepared from purified splenic Treg cells using the TRIzol method (Invitrogen). 200 ng of total RNA was subsequently used to prepare RNA-seq library by using TruSeq RNA sample prep kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Paired-end RNA-sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina) (BRIGHTcore joint facility, ULB-VUB, Brussels, Belgium). Sequenced reads were aligned to the mouse genome (NCBI37/mm9), and uniquely mapped reads were used to calculate gene expression. Data analysis was performed using R program (DESeq2 package). Differentially expressed genes are considered significant when the false discovery rate (FDR or adjusted p-value) < 0.05 and the log2 fold change (FC) > 0.5. Upstream regulators analysis was performed following IPA. IPA predicts functional regulatory networks from gene expression data and provides a significance score (p-value) for each network according to the fit of the network to the set of genes in the database.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software). Statistical difference between two groups was determined by an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022, Ajouaou et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The oxygen sensor prolyl hydroxylase domain 2 (PHD2) plays an important role in cell hypoxia adaptation by regulating the stability of HIF proteins (HIF1α and HIF2α) in numerous cell types, including T lymphocytes. The role of oxygen sensor on immune cells, particularly on regulatory T cell (Treg) function, has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of PHD2 in the regulation of Treg phenotype and function. We demonstrate herein that selective ablation of PHD2 expression in Treg (PHD2ΔTreg mice) leads to a spontaneous systemic inflammatory syndrome, as evidenced by weight loss, development of a rectal prolapse, splenomegaly, shortening of the colon, and elevated expression of IFN-γ in the mesenteric lymph nodes, intestine, and spleen. PHD2 deficiency in Tregs led to an increased number of activated CD4 conventional T cells expressing a Th1-like effector phenotype. Concomitantly, the expression of innate-type cytokines such as
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer




