Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal adult-onset motor neuron disorder affecting 3–5/100 000 individuals per year.1 The cause of pathology is likely complex with onset resulting from some combination of genetic mutations, DNA damage, environmental risk factors, viral infections, or other factors, leading to diverse cellular dysfunction such as glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity, abnormal protein aggregation, and mitochondrial disorganization and dysfunction contributing to oxidative stress (refer to Vijayakumar et al.2 and Le Gall et al.3 for review).
Not only motor neurons (MN) are affected in ALS, but also glial cells, muscle fibres,4 and immune cells,5 each of which may participate actively in ALS onset and progression. In a FUS murine model of motor neurone disease, where the FUS mutation is expressed in all tissues except the MN, motor deficits still appear at a late stage of the disease.6 In addition, when the human mutated SOD1(hSOD1) is selectively knocked-down in MN and astrocytes of newborn transgenic hSOD1 mice, their life expectancy is prolonged by only 65–70 days, and there is still significant astrogliosis and microglial activation.7 These studies support the potential role of ‘non-cell autonomous’ MN death in ALS, which could involve multiple cell types.8
Numerous cell and tissue types, including skeletal muscle, can secrete exosomes and other types of vesicle.9,10 Such extracellular vesicles may be involved in cell–cell communication in the central nervous system,11,12 where they can carry out intercellular transport of functional proteins, mRNA, miRNA, and lipids and may have key roles in spreading of proteinopathies11,12 or neurotoxic elements.13 For instance, astrocytes extracted from the SOD1 murine model of ALS secrete exosomes that contain hSOD1 and propagate this toxic protein to neighbouring MNs.14 The present study sought to determine whether vesicle secretion is affected in muscle cells of ALS subjects, and whether ALS muscle vesicles (MuVs) could be toxic when taken up by recipient motor neurons.
Material and methods Participants and ethical approvalsAn open biopsy was performed on deltoid muscles of 27 ALS patients with probable or definite ALS according to the revised El Escorial criteria,15 (who attended the Motor Neuron Diseases Center (Pitié Salpétrière, Paris). To guarantee a consistent quality of muscle tissue, deltoid samples were taken using the procedure that is consistently and routinely followed for all muscle sampling at the centre (ALS Referral Center, Pitie Salpetriere, Sorbonne University). The affectedness of each patient's deltoid muscle was assessed directly by the Manual Muscle Testing scale, against which all muscles sampled were determined to be at least at Level 3 indicating muscle movement through full range of motion against gravity. Genetic analyses were carried out on DNA extracted from blood samples for all ALS patients to screen several ALS-related genes: the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion (using gene scan and repeat primed PCR procedures described in Millecamps et al.16), ATXN2 repeat length,17 and the coding regions of SOD1, TARDBP, FUS, UBQLN2, and TBK1 (sequences of the used primers are available upon request). Thirty deltoid muscle biopsies from healthy age-matched and gender-matched subjects were obtained from the BTR (Bank of Tissues for Research, a partner in the EU network EuroBioBank) in accordance with European recommendations and French legislation. The main demographic, clinical, and genetic characteristics of the subjects are indicated in Table 1.
Table 1 Summary of the samples used from different subjects for each type of experiment
Cell culture | |||||||||||||||||
ALS/healthy | 57 subjects | Age at time of biopsy (years) | Gender | ALS/FRS | Genetics | Muscle testing | Site of onset 1 = upper limb 2 = lower limb; 3 = bulbar; 4 = respiratory | Disease duration (months) | Histology | Electron microscopy | Transcriptome | Immunostaining cell culture | RT-qPCR | MuVs for proteomic analysis | MuVs for western blot | MuVs treatment MN | MuVs treatment myotubes |
ALS | 27 ALS patients 8 F, 19 M 57.44 ± 9.47 | 50–59 | F | 38 | — | 130 | 1 | 13 | x | ||||||||
ALS | 60–69 | M | 45 | — | 146 | 2 | 25.2 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 50–59 | M | 41 | — | 140 | 2 | 26.7 | x | x | ||||||||
ALS | 50–59 | F | 39 | C9orf72 | 146 | 3 | 16.5 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 50–59 | F | 28 | C9orf72 | 119 | 3 | 6 | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
ALS | 60–69 | M | 38 | ATXN2 | 130 | 2 | 11.3 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 60–69 | M | 40 | — | 130 | 1 | 39.3 | x | x | x | x | ||||||
ALS | 70–79 | M | 37 | — | 126 | 3 | 48.3 | x | x | x | x | ||||||
ALS | 60–69 | M | 33 | — | 123 | 1 | 53.4 | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
ALS | 70–79 | M | 32 | — | 104 | 1 | 28 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 60–69 | F | 30 | — | 97 | 1 | 71.6 | x | x | ||||||||
ALS | 40–49 | M | 31 | — | 90 | 1 | 70 | x | |||||||||
ALS | 50–59 | F | 23 | — | 103 | 3 | 33 | x | x | ||||||||
ALS | 60–69 | M | 40 | — | 97 | 1 | 11 | x | x | ||||||||
ALS | 60–69 | M | 38 | — | 88 | 1 | 52 | x | x | ||||||||
ALS | 50–59 | M | 31 | — | 94 | 2 | 40 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 50–59 | M | 37 | — | No data | 0 | 101 | x | |||||||||
ALS | 30–39 | F | 32 | — | No data | 0 | 85 | x | |||||||||
ALS | 50–59 | F | 43 | — | 135 | 1 | 33.6 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 40–49 | M | 41 | — | 111 | 2 | 44.1 | x | x | x | x | ||||||
ALS | 50–59 | M | 40 | — | 130 | 2 | 17.4 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 50–59 | M | 37 | C9orf72 | 145 | 3 | 20.6 | x | x | x | x | ||||||
ALS | 60–69 | M | 41 | — | 147 | 2 | 28.7 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 50–59 | M | 36 | — | 139 | 2 | 12 | x | |||||||||
ALS | 60–69 | M | 43 | — | 149 | 1 | 12 | x | x | x | x | ||||||
ALS | 30–39 | M | 41 | — | 144 | 1 | 12 | x | x | x | |||||||
ALS | 50–59 | F | 40 | — | 98 | 3 | 14 | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 30 healthy 10 F; 20M 51.08 ± 18.40 | 60–69 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | ||||||||
Healthy | 70–79 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 60–69 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | |||||||
Healthy | 40–49 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | |||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | ||||||||
Healthy | 40–49 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | ||||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
Healthy | 40–49 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | |||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
Healthy | 70–79 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Healthy | 20–29 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 20–29 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 50–59 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 60–69 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 60–69 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 20–29 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Healthy | 30–39 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Healthy | 20–29 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
Healthy | 70–79 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 70–79 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 70–79 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 80–89 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | |||||||||
Healthy | 20–29 | M | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | ||||||||
Healthy | 60–69 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | x | ||||||||
Healthy | 40–49 | F | — | — | — | — | — | x | x |
Subject age at time of biopsy is indicated in the column ‘Age’. All amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients were confirmed to be ALS according to El Escorial. The ALSFRS-R and Muscle Testing results measured at the time of the biopsies are given. The manual muscle testing score is the sum of 30 measurements (15 muscle groups assessed once on each side of the body), each scored from 0, representing total paralysis, to 5, representing normal strength, according to the Medical Research Council Score.
The protocols (NCT01984957) and (NCT02360891) were approved by the local Ethical Committee and all subjects signed an informed consent in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Muscle stem cell extraction and cultureBriefly, muscles biopsies were dissociated mechanically as previously described in Bigot et al.18 and plated in proliferation medium [1 volume of M199, 4 volumes of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), 20% foetal bovine serum (v:v), 25 μg mL−1 Fetuin, 0.5 ng mL−1 bFGF, 5 ng mL−1 EGF, 5 μg mL−1 insulin]. The myogenic cell population was enriched using CD56 magnetic beads, and for their myogenicity using anti-desmin antibodies as described before.18 A minimum of 80% of the cell population was positive for desmin. After rinsing three times the proliferative myoblasts with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and three times with DMEM to remove any FBS residual, the human muscle stem cells were differentiated into myotubes by culturing them in DMEM for 3 days. All cell cultures were regularly checked every 3 weeks for mycoplasma test. All experiments were conducted in cells at less than 21 divisions to avoid potential cellular senescence, and thus experimental artefacts.
Muscle vesicle extraction from culture mediumFor each replicate, 7.5 × 106 primary myoblasts with less than 21 divisions were plated in 225 cm2 Flask. After 24 h, the cells were rinsed 6 times in DMEM, then differentiated into myotubes for 3 days in DMEM. All cell cultures were checked and negative for mycoplasma. Muscle vesicles were extracted from conditioned media as previously described for large-scale isolation protocol.19,20 Briefly the conditioned media were centrifuged at 260 g for 10 min at room temperature, then at 4000 g for 20 min at 4°C to remove any dead cells and cell debris, and finally at 20 000 g for 1 h at 4°C to remove microparticles. The subsequent supernatant was then filtered through 0.22 μm filter to remove any microparticles leftover. The filtered medium was then mixed with total exosome isolation reagent (Life technologies™; 2:1, v:v), incubated overnight at 4°C, and then centrifuged at 10 000 g at 4°C for 1 h. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet containing the MuVs was resuspended and rinsed three times in PBS using 100 K MWCO column. The 100 μL MuVs suspensions were kept at −80°C until needed. MuVs were either used for treating cell cultures (iPSC-derived motor neurons, or myotubes; treatments being always compared with untreated cells) or for protein content characterization. MuVs protein was extracted using 8 M Urea or NuPAGE buffer and quantified using BCA kit. Refer to Figure S2A and supporting information. The vesicles extracted using this protocol floated at similar density than when extracted by classic ultracentrifugation, 1.15–1.19 g mL−1, with a better yield was observed.20 Vesicles were positive for CD63, CD81, CD82, Flotillin, ALIX, and negative for calnexin (Figure 2 and Le Gall et al.20).
NanoSightThe MuVs pellets were resuspended in 100 μL of filtered PBS. The MuV suspension was then diluted 10× in PBS. Size and distribution of MuV secreted by primary muscle cells were evaluated by a NanoSight LM10 instrument (NanoSight) equipped with NTA analytic software (version 2.3 build 2.3.5.0033.7-Beta7). Samples were assessed three times as previously described21,22 at temperature set to 22.5°C. The minimum particle size, track length, and blur were set to ‘automatic’.
Muscle vesicles labellingThe MuVs were labelled using PKH26 kit (Sigma-Aldrich®). Briefly, after adding 100 μL of Diluent C to the MuV suspension, 100 μL of 4 μM PKH26 solution were added to the sample. After 5 min of incubation, 1 mL PBS was added, and the MuVs were washed using a 100 K concentrators, 15 000 g at 4°C for 10 min. The MuVs were washed three times in PBS using the 100 K concentrators before being mixed with the cell media for treatment. All cell cultures treated with MuVs were compared and normalized to untreated cell cultures.
Muscle vesicles added to iPSC motor neuronsThe hiPSC-derived motor neurons were obtained as previously described.23 There were 3000 MN progenitors differentiated for 9 days then plated in poly-L-ornithine (SIGMA) Laminin (Life Technologies) coated 384 well plates in differentiation medium N2B27 (DMEM F12, Neurobasal v:v, supplemented with N2, B27, Pen-Strep, βMercaptoethanol 0,1%, Glutamax) supplemented with 100 nM Rock Inhibitor (RI), 100 nM Retinoic Acid (RA), 500 nM SAG, 100 nM DAPT, 10 ng/mL BDNF and Laminin. The medium was replaced at 11 days of differentiation with N2B27 supplemented with 200 nM RA, 1 μM SAG, 20 ng/mL BDNF, and 200 nM DAPT and again at 14 days of differentiation with N2B27 supplemented with 200 nM RA, 20 ng/mL GDNF, 20 ng/mL BDNF, and 200 nM DAPT. Sixteen-days differentiated motor neurons were either treated with ALS MuVs or healthy MuVs resuspended in N2B27 differentiation medium supplemented with 20 ng/mL GDNF and 20 ng/mL BDNF. Cultures were fixed with 4% formaldehyde at 3 days of treatment. The MN were labelled for Tuj1, Islet 1/2 and analysed as described in the immuno-labelling section. MN loss was normalized to untreated MN cultures. All cell culture treated with MuVs were compared and normalized to untreated cell culture.
Muscle vesicles pre-treatment with CD63 antibodyAfter labelling 0.5 μg MuVs with PKH26 as described earlier, the MuV suspension was incubated for 2 h at RT with 0.5 μg of CD63 antibody (TS63, Life Technologies) and then added to the culture medium of hiPSC-derived motor neurons as described in the paragraph ‘Muscle vesicles added to iPSC motor neurons’. All cell cultures treated with MuVs were compared and normalized with untreated cell cultures.
Muscle vesicles added to healthy human muscle cellsLabelled MuVs were added to the differentiation medium of 200 000 control cells cultured in Ibidi 35 mm μ-Dishes. MuVs absorption occurred during the first 3 days of differentiation. The myotubes were then rinsed three times with PBS, and fresh DMEM was added to the petri-dishes. The cells were fixed with 3.6% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature at Day 3 or Day 7 of differentiation, then washed three times in PBS and stored at 4°C until subsequent analysis:
- Myonuclear domain—The myotubes were fixed and stained for DAPI and MF20 as described earlier. The myonuclear domain was calculated using the following formula: .
- Stress blebbing—Blebs were counted on live images at 4, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 168 h.
- Cell death inducing an increase in H2Ax expression level—The myotubes were fixed and stained for DAPI and H2AX as described earlier. To measure H2AX signal per myonucleus, the total area of H2AX signal was divided by the total number of myonuclei.
- Cell loss—The total number of nuclei were counted in each field using ImageJ 1.37v and summed for each well.
- Different doses tested—4 and 8 μg of MuVs were added to the culture medium of healthy myotubes. H2AX signal per myonucleus was assessed as described earlier.
Purified muscle stem cells were differentiated for 3 days into myotubes. RNA from muscle cells was extracted as described in Bigot et al.18 The quality of RNA samples was assessed with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Gene expression profiling
- mRNA gene expression profiling—Aliquots of high-quality total RNA from each sample (ALS n = 6 and healthy n = 6, muscle stem cells) were used for mRNA expression profiling using GeneChip Human Exon 1.0 ST arrays (Affymetrix) as previously described.24
- Analysis of gene expression data—refer to the supporting information.
- Immunocytochemistry: 200 000 cells or 100 000 cells were respectively plated on u-dish 35 mm high ibidiTreat or 4 wells plate ibidiTreat (ibidi®) in proliferative medium. The following day, muscle stem cells were washed with PBS and myogenic differentiation was induced by cultivating the cells in DMEM only. Muscle cells were fixed at 3 days of differentiation using 4% formaldehyde. The cells were permeabilized, blocked and stained as described.9
- Immunohistology: 8 μm muscle transverse sections were cut from human biopsies on a cryostat microtome at −20°C, permeabilized, blocked, and stained as previously described.18
Ten to twenty non-overlapping pictures were acquired in a line along the diameter of the slide with an Olympus IX70, and an Olympus UPlan FI 10×/0.30 Ph1 and an Olympus BX60 objectives equipped with a Photomatics CoolSNAP™ HQ camera. For the human muscle sections, pictures were taken with an Olympus LCPlan FI 40×/0.60 Ph2 objective. Images were acquired using Zeiss software and analysed using either Fiji or ImageJ 1.37v.
Antibody | Clone | Manufacturer, Catalogue number | Species raised, Isotype | Dilution | Application |
ALIX | 3A9 | Invitrogen, MA1-83977 | Monoclonal, IgG1 | 1:500 | WB |
Calnexin | AF18 | Life Technologies, MA3-027 | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG1 | 1:100 | WB |
Caprin (GPIP137) | Life Technologies, PA5-29514 | Polyclonal, Rabbit IgG | 1:200 | ICC | |
CD63 | BD Pharmingen | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG1 | 1:200 | IHC, ICC | |
CD63 | TS63 | Life Technologies, 10628D | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG1 | 2 μg/mL | WB |
CD81 | M38 | Invitrogen, 10630D | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG1 | 1:200 | WB |
CD82 | Invitrogen, PA5-27233 | Polyclonal, Rabbit | 1:200 | EM | |
Dystrophin | 3B7 | DSHB, MANDYS1 | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG2a | 1:200 | ICC |
Flotillin | Life Technologies, PA5-18053 | Polyclonal, Goat IgG | 0.3 μg/mL | WB | |
FUS | Bethyl, A300-302A | Polyclonal, Rabbit IgG | 1:2000 | ICC | |
FUS | Life Technologies, PA5-23696/PA5-52610 | Polyclonal, Rabbit IgG | 0.4 μg/mL | WB, ICC | |
H2AX | Cell Signalling, 763J | Monoclonal, Rabbit IgG | 1:50 | ICC | |
Isl1/2 | 39.4D5 | DSHB | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG2b | 1:100 | ICC |
Myosin Heavy Chain | MF20 | DSHB | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG2b | 10 μg/mL | ICC |
RPL5 | Life Technologies, PA5-26269/PA5-27539 | Polyclonal, Rabbit IgG | 1:500 | ICC | |
RPL5 | Cell Signaling, 14568S | Polyclonal, Rabbit IgG | 1:1000 | WB | |
SOD1 | Bethyl, A303-812A | Polyclonal, Rabbit | 0.1 μg/mL | WB | |
TDP43 | Invitrogen, PA5-17011 | Polyclonal, Rabbit | 1: 1000 | WB | |
Tsg101 | C-2 | Santa Cruz, sc-7964 | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG2a | 1:200 | ICC |
Anti-tubulin antibody, beta III isoform | TUJ1 | Millipore, MAB-1637 | Monoclonal, Mouse IgG1 | 1:250 | ICC |
Skeletal alpha-actin | Invitrogen | Polyclonal, Rabbit | 1:1000 | WB |
- Electron Microscopy for extracted MuVs—Purified vesicles were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and were counterstained with uranyl and lead citrate and analysed as previously described.10
- Electron microscopy for human myotubes—Human myotubes were plated on plastic (Thermanox, Nalge Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA) coverslips and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (v/v), pH 7.4 and further post-fixed in 2% OsO4 (w/v). They were gradually dehydrated in acetone including a 1% uranyl en-bloc staining step in 70% acetone (w/v), and embedded in Epon resin (EMS, Fort Washington, PA, USA). Ultrathin sections were counterstained with uranyl and lead citrate. Observations were made using a CM120 transmission electron microscope (Philips, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) at 80 kV and images recorded with a Morada digital camera (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Münster, Germany).
- Electron microscopy for human muscle biopsies—Human muscles biopsies were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde, 0.1 M phosphate buffer. After abundant washes and 2% OsO4 post-fixation samples were dehydrated at 4°C in graded acetone including a 1% uranyl acetate in 70° acetone step and were finally embedded in Epon resin. Thin (70 nm) sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, observed using a Philips CM120 electron microscope (Philips Electronics NV) and photographed with a digital SIS Morada camera.
Expression data were uploaded to the GEO repository at accession number GSE122261. Raw data (.CEL Intensity files) were processed using R/Bioconductor packages. Briefly, sample quality was verified by assessment of MA plots, normalized unscaled standard error (NUSE; all samples had median <1.1), and relative log expression (RLE; all sample had divergence <0.2), using the oligo package. Background-corrected normalized log2-transformed probe set signal intensities were obtained by robust multi-array averaging (RMA) using default settings. Affycoretools and huex10stprobeset.db were used to annotate probeset IDs. For gene-level analysis, probesets were retained if they had expression level >log250 in at least 15% of samples. A design matrix (~0 + condition) was created, to which Limma was used to fit a linear model to the normalized expression values, and differentially expressed genes were identified using Limma's empirical Bayes method.
For enrichment mapping, the GSEA tool (
- cDNA synthesis: RNA from 3 days differentiated muscle cells was extracted as described earlier. A 1 μg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (LifeTechologies™). Quantitative PCR was performed on LightCycler® 480 Instrument (Roche) using LightCycler® 480 DNA SYBR Green I Master (Roche).
- Housekeeping genes: Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) showed a constant expression level in all samples and was used to normalize the gene expression levels of extracellular vesicle markers.
Primers | Sequence (5′ → 3′) | |
β2M | Fw Primer | CTCTCTTTCTGGCCTGGAGG |
Rev Primer | TGCTGGATGACGTGAGTAAACC |
- Extracellular vesicle markers and FUS expression level: Quantitative PCR was performed on LightCycler® 480 Instrument (Roche) using LightCycler® 480 DNA SYBR Green I Master (Roche). Primers used are listed in table below. The amplification efficiency of the reaction was calculated using data from a standard curve using RT products from control cells as reference samples (1:20, 1:100, 1:500, and 1:2500 dilutions used). The gene expression level was estimated using the comparative Ct method—Ct representing the cycle at which the fluorescence signal crosses the threshold as previously described.18
Sequence (5′ → 3′) | ||
Primers | Rev primer | AGGAAAAGCCAGGTCCGAAC |
CD81 | Fw primer | TTCCACGAGACGCTTGACTG |
Rev primer | CCCGAGGGACACAAATTGTTC | |
CD63 | Fw primer | CAGTGGTCATCATCGCAGTG |
Rev primer | ATCGAAGCAGTGTGGTTGTTT | |
CD82 | Fw primer | GCTCATTCGAGACTACAACAGC |
Rev primer | GTGACCTCAGGGCGATTCA | |
RAB5b | Fw Primer | TCACAGCTTAGCCCCCATGTA |
Rev primer | CTTCACCCATGTCTTTGCTCG | |
TSG101 | Fw primer | GAGAGCCAGCTCAAGAAAATGG |
Rev primer | TGAGGTTCATTAGTTCCCTGGA | |
FUS | Fw primer | TGGTCTGGCTGGGTTACTTT |
Rev primer | TAACTGGTTGGCAGGTACGT |
The ALS and healthy muscle cells were differentiated for 3 days before being fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized for 1 h at RT (5% BSA; 20% FBS; 0.5% Triton X100; 0.5% Tween20). Cells were then stained with a 20 μg/mL acridine orange solution for 10 min at RT.
Muscle cell lines overexpressing wild type forms of FUS, SOD1 and TDP43Healthy human muscle cell lines were transduced with previously published plasmid coding either for a tagged form of wild-type FUS (FUS-3xFLAG,27), or wild type SOD1 (SOD1-3xFLAG, modified WT-SOD1 plasmid from28) or TDP43 (TDP43-3xFLAG, modified WT-TDP43-YFP plasmid from Johnson et al.29) and a selection was done with hygromycin. The 50 000 Cont, FUSFLAG, TDP43FLAG, and SOD1FLAG muscle cells were plated in 8 well Ibidi® plates in proliferative medium. The next day, myogenic differentiation was induced by replacing the medium with DMEM, and cells were treated with 0.5 μg of healthy and ALS MuVs. MuVs were applied for 3 days, before fresh DMEM medium was applied to the cultures. At 6 days of differentiation, cells were fixed and analysed for cell death and cell blebbing as described earlier. All cell cultures treated with MuV were compared and normalized to untreated cell cultures.
Proteomic
- The MuV pellets were re-suspended in 25 μL 8 M Urea, 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.5, and reduced with DTT for 1 h at 4°C. Protein concentrations were then quantified using Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (ThermoFisher®). MuV proteins were kept at −80°C.
- Proteome profile determined by Mass spectrometry—20 μg of MuV protein was trypsin digested using a SmartDigest column (Thermo) for 2 h at 70°C and centrifuged at 1400 rpm. Peptides were then fractionated into eight fractions using a high pH reverse phase spin column (Thermo). Fractioned peptides were vacuum dried, resuspended, and analysed by data-dependent mass spectrometry on a Q Exactive HF (Thermo) with the following parameters: Positive Polarity, m/z 400–2000 MS resolution 70 000, AGC 3e6, 100 ms IT, MS/MS resolution 17 500, AGC 5e5, 50 ms IT, Isolation width 3 m/z, and NCE 30, cycle count 15.
- Database Search and Quantification—The MS raw data sets were searched for protein identification for semi tryptic peptides against the Uniprot human database for semi tryptic peptides including common contaminants, using MaxQuant software (version 1.6.2.1) (
https://www.biochem.mpg.de/5111795/maxquant ). We used default parameters for the searches: mass tolerances were set at ±20 ppm for first peptide search and ±4.5 ppm for main peptide search, maximum two missed cleavage; and the peptide and resulting protein assignments were filtered based on a 1% protein false discovery rate (thus 99% confidence level). The 1254 proteins were detected in at least one sample. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD015736.
There were 100 000 cells plated in μ-Slide 4 Well ibiTreat (Ibibi®) one day before differentiation was induced. On Day 2 of differentiation, cells were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent with 200 nM s5401 FUS siRNA (LifeTechnologies™) and treated with a low dose of PKH26-labelled ALS MuVs. MuVs were integrated by the cells for 3 days before fresh differentiation medium was added to the 5 days differentiated cells. The cells were harvested at Day 8 of differentiation to check for RNA levels by RT-qPCR and to perform cell death analysis, immunostaining for RPL5, and distribution analysis of RNA/DNA using acridine orange staining.
Western BlottingExtracted ALS and healthy vesicles were resuspended in lysis buffer (8 M urea; 2% SDS; 10 μL/mL protease inhibitor cocktail), and protein was extracted from muscle biopsies using RIPA buffer. Extracted proteins were loaded into NuPage polyacrylamide 4–12% BisTris gels for electrophoresis under reducing conditions (Calnexin, Flotillin, ALIX, FUS, SOD1, TDP43, RPL5, and skeletal alpha-actin) and non-reducing conditions (CD63 and CD81). Transfer on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane was performed using the iBlot® Dry Blotting System (Life Technologies™) and upon transfer polyacrylamide gels were stained with Blue Coomassie Gel Code Blue Stain Reagent (LifeTechnologies™) to visualize proteins. Immunoblotting was carried out using the iBind™ Flex Western System and primary antibodies (refer to Table S2) with respective secondary antibodies (Goat anti-Mouse HRP, Donkey anti-Goat HRP, Goat anti-Rabbit HRP). The signal was detected using the Amersham ECL™ Prime Western blotting Detection Reagent and the UVP ChemiDoc-It2 Imager.
StatisticsAll values are presented as means ± SEM. Student's T test was used to compare differences between ALS and control samples for all the protein quantifications, electron microscopy quantifications, MuV integration, immunostaining (FUS, Acridine Orange, RPL5, Caprin1), FUS expression level, MuV-treated MN and myotube death, and myotube atrophy. A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to compare the distribution of number of vesicles per MVBs in ALS and healthy myotubes, the distribution of neurites branching in ALS and healthy MuV-treated MN, the distribution of H2AX expression levels in myonuclei treated with different doses of MuVs, and the distribution of myotube nuclear numbers in control myotubes treated with ALS and control MuVs. One-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's multiple comparison test was used to evaluate the differences in the in silico secretome, in the immunostaining for extracellular vesicle markers, RT-qPCR, neurites length, and MN treatments. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to evaluate dose response of MuV on MN survival, changes in bleb counts, and cell death in different cells lines (Cont, FUSFLAG, SOD1FLAG, and TDP43FLAG). Enrichment testing P values were determined by the Fisher's exact test (for enrichment testing of custom lists of FUS-binding and TDP43-binding proteins) or represent a multiple-testing adjusted value based on deviation from expected rank as calculated by the EnrichR tool (for enrichment testing across all GO Molecular Functions). Differences were considered to be statistically different at P < 0.05.
Results Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient muscle cells accumulate vesiclesTo investigate the role of vesicles secreted by ALS muscle cells, myoblasts were extracted from biopsies of confirmed ALS patients at an early stage of pathology (refer to Table 1 for patient description, and a breakdown of which samples were used in which experiment). Among the 27 sporadic ALS subjects, genetic screening identified only four with known ALS-causative mutations (three carrying the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion, one with aberrant ATXN2 repeat length). A consistent accumulation of extracellular vesicle markers CD63 (Figure 1A,B) and TSG101 (Figure S1B) in ALS myotubes was observed by immunostaining. Extracellular vesicle markers were higher by RT-qPCR (Figure 1C), and multivesicular bodies filled with exosome-like vesicles were observed by electron microscopy (Figures 1D and S1A). In vivo, ALS patient muscle biopsies presented an increased frequency of multi-vesicular bodies (MVBs) (0.017 MVBs/sarcomere in ALS muscles, vs. 0.004 MVBs/sarcomere in healthy controls; Figure S1C,D), an accumulation of extracellular vesicle markers at the periphery of the myofibres (Figure 1E,F), and an increased expression level of the vesicle marker CD63 (Figure 1G,H).
Importantly, because primary muscle stem cells have a limited number of divisions (~30), all experiments were carried out before the cells reached 21 divisions, thereby avoiding excessive population doublings which could lead to senescence and experimental artefacts.18,20,30 In both ALS and healthy vesicle extracts, exosome-like vesicles with a typical cup-shaped morphology (Figure 2A) and sizes ranging from 90 to 200 nm (Figure 2A–C) were observed. The muscle vesicles were positive for exosomal markers such as CD63, CD82, CD81, Flotillin, and ALI, and were negative for calnexin, an endoplasmic reticulum marker normally absent in the exosome fraction (Figure 2C,D). In addition, the vesicle extracts were free of albumin and other contaminants (Figure S2B, and proteomic data GSE122261). The MuV fraction secreted by ALS myotubes contained 1.7-fold more protein than that secreted by an equal number of healthy control myotubes (Figures 2E and S2B).
To test neurotoxicity, 0.5 μg of ALS or healthy MuVs were added to the culture medium of healthy human iPSC-derived motor neurons (hiPSC-MN). Because ALS myotubes secrete more MuVs than healthy myotubes, this quantity corresponded to 2 ALS myonuclei or 3.7 healthy myonuclei per MN. Following uptake of MuVs (Figure 3A), only ALS MuVs and not healthy MuVs resulted in shorter neurites (Figure 3B), with less branching (Figure 3C) and a greater cell death (Figure 3D,E) 72 h post-treatment. Cell death as a result of ALS MuVs was consistent across multiple patients (Figure 3E) and showed a dose response when different quantities of ALS MuV protein were loaded—ALS MuV toxicity was significant at all concentrations (Figure 3F). Conversely, when MuV uptake was decreased by preincubating MuVs with CD63 antibody (Figure S3A), hiPSC-MN death was dramatically decreased (Figure 3G). Similarly, when added to the culture medium of healthy human myotubes, ALS MuVs induced myotube atrophy (Figure S3B), and cell stress (Figure S3C) leading to cell death (Figure S3D–F). The quantity of cell death was decreased when less MuV protein was loaded, though ALS MuV toxicity remained greater than healthy MuV toxicity at either dose (Figure S3F), suggesting that toxicity is dependent on both the quantity and content of MuVs.
Proteomic analysis of vesicle content revealed that, of 53 peptides observed at consistently higher levels in the MuVs of ALS subjects compared with healthy controls, 21 were annotated to the RNA-binding molecular function (Figure 4A; enrichment FDR P < 1 × 10−7; Table S1). Similarly, of 453 proteins detected only in ALS and not in healthy controls, 87 were involved in RNA-binding (enrichment FDR P < 1 × 10−14; Table S2). ALS MuVs contained many known protein binding partners of the RNA-processing proteins FUS25 and TDP4326 (enrichment P < 1 × 10−6; Figure 4B), with 58% (64 of 109) of FUS binding partners being detected, along with FUS itself. Similar enrichment (P from 0.001 to <1 × 10−6) was observed against other protein lists of FUS-binding and TDP43-binding partners.31,32 FUS and RPL5—a FUS binding partner—were at a higher level in ALS MuVs by Western blotting (Figure 4C–E). Interestingly, neither SOD1 nor TDP43 were detectable in human MuVs (Figure S4).
Transcriptomic analysis of cultured myotubes suggested that genes encoding FUS-binding and TDP43-binding proteins were upregulated in the myotubes of ALS patients and that these genes were shared with many RNA-processing pathways that were similarly upregulated (Figure 5A). ALS myotubes presented a greater nuclear accumulation of RNA (Figure 5B), and mislocalization of two FUS protein binding partners, RPL5 and caprin 1, that are involved in RNA processing and stress granule formation (Figure 5C,D).25
Because a leading theory is that disruption of RNA metabolism—including RNA translation, transport, storage, and degradation—contributes to ALS physiopathology by affecting neuronal function and viability,33 and based on the results described earlier, we hypothesized an involvement of RNA processing in ALS MuV toxicity. When human iPSC-MNs derived from healthy subjects were treated with ALS MuVs, RNA accumulated in their nuclei (Figure 6A), which has been reported to induce cell death.34 Similar results were obtained when ALS MuVs were added to the cultures of human myotubes from healthy subjects (Figure S5A). We hypothesized that ALS MuV toxicity in recipient cells may be mediated through the FUS pathway. To test this, 0.5 μg of ALS or healthy MuVs were added to the culture medium of a human muscle cell line over-expressing a tagged form of wild-type FUS (FUS-FLAG; previously published27). This induced an increase in cell death from 8% to 42% (Figure 6B), accompanied with greater cellular stress (Figure S5B)—the same was not observed in cell lines that over-expressed tagged forms of wild-type TDP43 and SOD1 (Figures 6B and S5B). Conversely, when ALS MuVs were added to the culture medium of cells in which FUS was knocked down, lower proportions of nuclei with accumulated RNA (Figure 6C) and RPL5 granules (Figure 6D) were observed, and the quantity of cell death was reduced (Figure 6E). These data implicate the FUS pathway in MuV toxicity and suggest that increased levels of FUS heighten sensitivity to this toxicity, while lower levels reduce it. We note that, relative to muscle cells, high levels of FUS are observed in hiPSC-MN (Figure 6F).
Extracellular vesicles are suspected to carry toxic elements from astrocytes towards motor neurons,7 and pathological proteins have recently been identified in circulating extracellular vesicles of sALS patients.35 Here, ALS muscle vesicles are shown to be toxic to motor neurons, which establishes the skeletal muscle as a potential source of vesicle-mediated toxicity in ALS.
The accumulation and over-secretion of muscle vesicles was observed as a consistent feature of sporadic ALS patients in this cohort, including patients carrying mutations in C9orf72 or ATXN2, suggesting that this may be a common feature across many or all sporadic and familial forms of ALS. The consistent observation of a pronounced RNA processing and protein mislocalization phenotype in the ALS myotubes suggests that these cells recapitulate aspects of the disease mechanism that have been observed in motor neurons.
The observation that ALS MuVs act on RNA transport, that overexpression of wild-type FUS in MuV-recipient cells resulted in increased recipient cell death, and that RNA transport protein mislocalization is partially corrected and cell death reduced when FUS expression was knocked down in recipient cells, is consistent with a body of literature suggesting an RNA processing blockade mechanism in ALS MN.36,37 As shown, FUS expression is relatively high in iPSC MN compared with muscle cells (Figure 6F), and we also note that the cerebral cortex is among the tissues with the highest reported levels of FUS mRNA (
The observation that FUS and many of its binding partners are present in MuVs is of interest in the context of recent observations that normal function of FUS is required for normal neuromuscular junction development in mice, and that co-culture of iPSC-derived motor neurons with myotubes from FUS mutated patients resulted in impaired endplate maturation, which was proposed to be due to intrinsic FUS toxicity in both muscle and MN.39 Similar experiments, not only on the cells of patients with FUS mutations but also on sporadic ALS more generally, may help to explore the relationship of vesicle-mediated toxicity to the neuromuscular junction.
Several papers have described a muscle phenotype in ALS that occurs independently and prior to muscle denervation, such as metabolic imbalance,40,41 oxidative stress,42 and mitochondrial dysfunction.43 However, the role of muscle in ALS is unresolved. While an ALS-like phenotype was observed in mice when exogenous human mutant SOD1 expression was restricted to the skeletal muscle,42,44 other studies knocking down mutant SOD1 expression in skeletal murine muscle did not show any significant decreases in the progression of symptoms.45,46 The differences observed between these studies reveal the difficulties to assess the role of muscle in ALS, as the success of targeting whole skeletal muscle requires intravenous injection of a large amount of adeno-associated virus particles.47 The secretion of muscle cell vesicles that are toxic towards motor neurons in vitro could suggest a potential role of muscle in ALS pathology. However, further in vivo experiments in appropriate animal models are required, to test the capacity of MuVs to diffuse in vivo, and their capacity to cross the blood brain barrier or to be absorbed directly at the neuromuscular junction.
AcknowledgementsWe thank the Human Cell Culture Platform of The Institute of Myology, and the ‘Plateforme Biopuces et Séquençage de l'IGBMC’. We thank Aswini Panigrahi for help with data upload. This work was financed by Target-ALS (ViTAL consortium, PI: S Duguez), ARsLA (TEAM consortium, PI: S Duguez), European Union Regional Development Fund (ERDF) EU Sustainable Competitiveness Programme for N. Ireland, Northern Ireland Public Health Agency (HSC R&D), and Ulster University (PI: T Bjourson). L.L.G. is a recipient from ArSLA. It was also partially supported by European Community's Health Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement No. 259867 (Euro-MOTOR), INSERM, Sorbonne University, and the AFM. All research at Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health is made possible by the NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre - the views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The study was sponsored by APHP. Several samples (3) were obtained from an ongoing observational and prospective multicentric cohort (PULSE; Protocol 2013-A00969-36) sponsored by the University Hospital of Lille, conducted in 16 ALS expert centres from the clinical research networks in France (FILSLAN, ACT4ALS-MND), approved from the CPP Nord Ouest-IV Ethical Committee and registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov website (NCT02360891). We thank all the participants and their families for their cooperation. The authors are grateful for financial support of PULSE from the French ARSLA charity (Christine Tabuenca et Marie France Cazalère), support from the French clinical research networks FILSLAN and ACT4ALS-MND and the Fédération de la Recherche Clinique du CHU de Lille.
The authors of this manuscript certify that they comply with the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.48
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
The cause of the motor neuron (MN) death that drives terminal pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains unknown, and it is thought that the cellular environment of the MN may play a key role in MN survival. Several lines of evidence implicate vesicles in ALS, including that extracellular vesicles may carry toxic elements from astrocytes towards MNs, and that pathological proteins have been identified in circulating extracellular vesicles of sporadic ALS patients. Because MN degeneration at the neuromuscular junction is a feature of ALS, and muscle is a vesicle‐secretory tissue, we hypothesized that muscle vesicles may be involved in ALS pathology.
Methods
Sporadic ALS patients were confirmed to be ALS according to El Escorial criteria and were genotyped to test for classic gene mutations associated with ALS, and physical function was assessed using the ALSFRS‐R score. Muscle biopsies of either mildly affected deltoids of ALS patients (n = 27) or deltoids of aged‐matched healthy subjects (n = 30) were used for extraction of muscle stem cells, to perform immunohistology, or for electron microscopy. Muscle stem cells were characterized by immunostaining, RT‐qPCR, and transcriptomic analysis. Secreted muscle vesicles were characterized by proteomic analysis, Western blot, NanoSight, and electron microscopy. The effects of muscle vesicles isolated from the culture medium of ALS and healthy myotubes were tested on healthy human‐derived iPSC MNs and on healthy human myotubes, with untreated cells used as controls.
Results
An accumulation of multivesicular bodies was observed in muscle biopsies of sporadic ALS patients by immunostaining and electron microscopy. Study of muscle biopsies and biopsy‐derived denervation‐naïve differentiated muscle stem cells (myotubes) revealed a consistent disease signature in ALS myotubes, including intracellular accumulation of exosome‐like vesicles and disruption of RNA‐processing. Compared with vesicles from healthy control myotubes, when administered to healthy MNs the vesicles of ALS myotubes induced shortened, less branched neurites, cell death, and disrupted localization of RNA and RNA‐processing proteins. The RNA‐processing protein FUS and a majority of its binding partners were present in ALS muscle vesicles, and toxicity was dependent on the expression level of FUS in recipient cells. Toxicity to recipient MNs was abolished by anti‐CD63 immuno‐blocking of vesicle uptake.
Conclusions
ALS muscle vesicles are shown to be toxic to MNs, which establishes the skeletal muscle as a potential source of vesicle‐mediated toxicity in ALS.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Northern Ireland Center for Stratified Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Londonderry, UK; Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Association Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France
2 Northern Ireland Center for Stratified Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Londonderry, UK
3 I‐Stem, INSERM/UEVE UMR 861, I‐STEM, AFM, Paris, France
4 NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
5 Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Association Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France
6 Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ, Paris, France
7 Genetic Medicine, Children's National Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
8 The Neuroscience Institute of Montpellier, Inserm UMR1051, Univ Montpellier, Saint Eloi Hospital, Montpellier, France
9 Mécanismes Centraux et Périphériques de la Neurodégénérescence, Université de Strasbourg, INSERM UMR_S 1118, Strasbourg, France
10 Computational Neuroimaging Group, Academic Unit of Neurology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; APHP, Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Centre référent SLA, Paris, France
11 APHP, Centre de Référence des Maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile de France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris, France
12 Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
13 Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Association Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France; APHP, Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Centre référent SLA, Paris, France
14 APHP, Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Centre référent SLA, Paris, France
15 INSERM U1171, Pharmacologie Médicale & Neurologie Université, Faculté de Médecine, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
16 CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; APHP, Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Centre référent SLA, Paris, France
17 Département de Neurologie, Centre de Référence Maladies Neuromusculaires Paris‐Est, Hôpital Raymond‐Poincaré, Garches, France
18 Laboratory of Molecular Biology of the Cell, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France
19 Hôpital des Peupliers, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Paris, France
20 Northern Ireland Center for Stratified Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Londonderry, UK; CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; APHP, Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Centre référent SLA, Paris, France