It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Native to the Americas, the invasive Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm; FAW) was reported in West Africa in 2016, followed by its chronological detection across the Old World and the hypothesis of an eastward Asia expansion. We explored population genomic signatures of American and Old World FAW and identified 12 maternal mitochondrial DNA genome lineages across the invasive range. 870 high-quality nuclear single nucleotide polymorphic DNA markers identified five distinct New World population clusters, broadly reflecting FAW native geographical ranges and the absence of host-plant preferences. We identified unique admixed Old World populations, and admixed and non-admixed Asian FAW individuals, all of which suggested multiple introductions underpinning the pest’s global spread. Directional gene flow from the East into eastern Africa was also detected, in contrast to the west-to-east spread hypothesis. Our study demonstrated the potential of population genomic approaches via international partnership to address global emerging pest threats and biosecurity challenges.
This population genomics study identifies the complex multiple introduction history of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) from the Americas, into Africa and Asia. This provides new insight into the ‘east-to-west’ directionality of gene flow, and suggests ample genomic exchange at the nuclear level.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 CSIRO Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, Australia (GRID:grid.1016.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 2719)
2 CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, Australia (GRID:grid.413322.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 8254)
3 CSIRO FD McMaster Laboratories, Armidale, Australia (GRID:grid.413322.5)
4 DGIMI, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.503158.a)
5 College of Plant Protection Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.27871.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9750 7019)
6 Gordon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
7 Universidade Federal de Goiáss, Escola de Agronomia, Goiânia, Brazil (GRID:grid.1016.6)
8 National Crops Resources Research Institute, Namulonge, Kampala, Uganda (GRID:grid.463519.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9021 5435)