It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Low biological productivity causes ecosystem energy deficiency. Sansha Bay is an important spawning and nursery ground for migratory fish in the East China Sea (ECS). There is significant mariculture in this area, but stock enhancement programs and seasonal fishery closures have failed to recover populations of the commercially important species, Larimichthys crocea. We want to figure out the potential reason of unsuccessful L. crocea resource in recent 30 years. In this study, the trophic status of L. crocea, the food source proportions of L. crocea and zooplankton, and the food web structure and functioning of Sansha Bay was analyzed. A high nutrient low chlorophyll phenomenon was observed: this prevented harmful algal blooms, and phytoplankton growth was restrained by intensive macroalgal culture, resulting in a low abundance of zooplankton in Sansha Bay. Phytoplankton was the most important food source of zooplankton, and zooplankton was the greatest food source of juvenile L. crocea. Analyzed L. crocea suffered from starvation. Crucially, most of the phytoplankton was not used efficiently in the Sansha Bay ecosystem. This study suggests that trophic bottleneck, caused by food limitation, is a potential reason for unsuccessful fishery recovery in enclosed bay with macroalgal culture.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen China; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Ecology and Environmental Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen China
2 Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen China; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Ecology and Environmental Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen China; Guangxi Key Lab of Mangrove Conservation and Utilization, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Beihai China