It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In glacier-fed streams, ecological windows of opportunity allow complex microbial biofilms to develop and transiently form the basis of the food web, thereby controlling key ecosystem processes. Using metagenome-assembled genomes, we unravel strategies that allow biofilms to seize this opportunity in an ecosystem otherwise characterized by harsh environmental conditions. We observe a diverse microbiome spanning the entire tree of life including a rich virome. Various co-existing energy acquisition pathways point to diverse niches and the exploitation of available resources, likely fostering the establishment of complex biofilms during windows of opportunity. The wide occurrence of rhodopsins, besides chlorophyll, highlights the role of solar energy capture in these biofilms while internal carbon and nutrient cycling between photoautotrophs and heterotrophs may help overcome constraints imposed by oligotrophy in these habitats. Mechanisms potentially protecting bacteria against low temperatures and high UV-radiation are also revealed and the selective pressure of this environment is further highlighted by a phylogenomic analysis differentiating important components of the glacier-fed stream microbiome from other ecosystems. Our findings reveal key genomic underpinnings of adaptive traits contributing to the success of complex biofilms to exploit environmental opportunities in glacier-fed streams, which are now rapidly changing owing to global warming.
In glacier-fed streams, ecological windows of opportunity allow complex microbial biofilms to develop and transiently form the basis of the food web. Using metagenomics, this study reveals the metabolic strategies and key genomic underpinnings of adaptive traits that enable these biofilms to exploit environmental opportunities.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 University of Luxembourg, Systems Ecology Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg (GRID:grid.16008.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2295 9843)
2 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), River Ecosystems Laboratory, Center for Alpine and Polar Environmental Research (ALPOLE), Lausanne, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5333.6) (ISNI:0000000121839049)
3 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.45672.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 1926 5090)
4 University of Luxembourg, Systems Ecology Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg (GRID:grid.16008.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2295 9843); University of Luxembourg, Department of Life Sciences and Medicine, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg (GRID:grid.16008.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2295 9843)