1. Introduction
Normal brain function requires an adequate supply of blood as well as the anatomical and functional integrity of blood vessels, as they are necessary for transporting oxygen and nutrition, removing CO2 and other waste products, and thus maintaining body homeostasis [1]. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) comprises microvascular endothelial cells lining the cerebral capillaries that penetrate the brain and spinal cord, thus forming a well-developed central nervous system (CNS) [2]. Moreover it, separates the blood from the brain parenchyma and regulates the delivery of energy metabolites and nutrients to the neurons, essential for synaptic functioning [3]. Along with the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the BBB also prevents the free paracellular diffusion of water-soluble molecules via an elaborate network of complex tight junctions that interconnect the endothelial cells [4]. Furthermore, a functional BBB is characterized by several permanently active transport mechanisms, which are specifically expressed by brain capillary endothelial cells to ensure the transport of nutrients into the CNS while excluding blood-borne molecules that could be detrimental to the milieu required for neural transmission [4,5,6]. Meanwhile, if the BBB is disrupted, blood-derived neurotoxic proteins, such as fibrin, thrombin, hemoglobin, iron-containing hemosiderin, free iron, and/or plasmin (an extracellular matrix [ECM]-degrading enzyme), accumulate in the CNS. This results in progressive neurodegeneration and neuron loss mediated by direct neuronal toxicity, oxidative stress, and/or detachment of neurons from their supporting ECM [2,7].
Several cell types collaborate through continuous crosstalk to maintain the BBB and regulate cerebral blood flow (CBF) (Figure 1). Together, endothelial cells forming the inner layer of vessel walls, mural cells lining the vessels assisting and regulating the vascular tone (pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells [SMCs]), and astrocytes with end-feet covering much of the vasculature make up the neurovascular unit (NVU) [8]. The NVU also contains other glial cells, such as oligodendroglia and microglia, neurons, and peripheral immune cells, which all participate in this biological interaction [2]. At the molecular level, the integrity of the cerebrovascular system is aided by various gap junction proteins, such as claudins, occludin, zonula occludens (ZO), and connexins, and cell adhesion molecules, such as vascular endothelial cadherin and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule between endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes [8]. These gap junction proteins and cell adhesion molecules restrict the paracellular and transcellular diffusion of molecules into the CNS [5,9,10]. This property of low paracellular permeability is primarily controlled by tight junction proteins, which prevent paracellular transmission between apposing brain microvascular endothelial cells [11]. The BBB is located at the center of the NVU and consists of a monolayer of firmly sealed endothelial cells running along the vascular tree with low paracellular and transcellular permeability [9]. Under normal conditions, this mainly precludes the extravasation of any solutes (big or small) (unless particular transporters are present) as well as the migration of any type of blood-borne cell. However, BBB rupture can increase paracellular permeability, which allows leukocytes to enter the brain tissue and contributes to edema. In parallel, alterations in the endothelium pinocytotic vesicular system can result in the uptake of fluid and macromolecules and their transfer into the brain parenchyma [9]. Thus, upholding the endothelial barrier is essential for the specialized transport properties and functions of the BBB, as it also prevents potentially neurotoxic plasma components, blood cells, and infections from entering the brain [7]. Moreover, these cells express multiple transport systems required to transport nutrients, energy metabolites, and other essential molecules from the blood to the brain and transport metabolic waste products from the brain’s interstitial fluid (ISF) into the blood [7,12]. Thus, the BBB functions as a crucial nervous system homeostatic site, connecting the CNS, systemic circulation, and major body systems—such as the respiratory, renal, hepatic, and immunological systems.
As the BBB is vital to maintaining the microenvironment of the CNS, any impairment in the cellular or molecular components of the BBB can cause neurodegenerative diseases [3]. BBB disruption reduces oxygen and glucose delivery, potentially resulting in hypoxia and hypoxia-induced inflammation [13,14]. The ensuing pathological processes make the brain more vulnerable to neuronal malfunction and neurodegeneration. Thus, effective neuronal functioning and healthy aging require the management of the transport of numerous chemicals between the circulation and the brain, as well as neurotransmitter recycling [15]. The BBB assists CSF and aids in waste clearance by restricting the passage of various chemicals from the brain parenchyma while providing substrates for brain cell metabolism [15,16,17]. Both the BBB and blood-CSF barriers assist in the regulation of ionic composition (that of Na+, Cl−, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) and the volume of CSF and ISF, which is necessary for brain cells to function properly [16]. The BBB helps to preserve the ionic composition of the ISF by separating the blood in the vasculature from the ISF and cells within the brain parenchyma [15,17]. CSF fills the larger gaps within and around the CNS, while ISF surrounds the parenchymal cells of the brain and spinal cord. Any defect in the CNF outflow can limit the clearance of ISF solutes from the CNS parenchyma [15]. This may result in the entry of peripheral immune cells in the CNS parenchyma. During pathophysiological situations, they can cross the BBB, from the perivascular area through the glia limitans. This, in turn, limits the removal of ISF from the brain, potentially leading to the accumulation of toxic waste products such as amyloid-β (Aβ) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and α-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease (PD) [18,19].
However, the stage at which BBB breakdown occurs in the living human brain and whether it contributes to cognitive impairment remains elusive. In this review, we first briefly discuss the pathways that play an essential role in maintaining and regulating BBB integrity. Second, we discuss the causes, characteristics, and consequences of BBB breakdown by emphasizing the aging process, and then review the characteristic features and mechanisms of BBB breakdown associated with normal aging that further cause neurodegeneration and cognitive impairments. Next, we summarize and discuss the phenotypes and mechanisms of BBB disruption correlated with cognition decline in AD. Subsequently, we discuss the overlap between AD and vascular dementia (VaD). We also sum up biomarkers associated with BBB breakdown and various techniques to identify them. Finally, we conclude that BBB breakdown could be a novel biomarker to diagnose cognitive impairment associated with normal aging and neurodegenerative disorders such as AD.
2. Cellular and Noncellular Architecture of the BBB
The BBB was accidentally discovered in the late 19th century by a German physician named Paul Ehrlich, who found that tracer dye injected into mouse circulation infiltrated all tissues except the brain and spinal cord [20]. The meninges, which are three concentric connective tissue membrane layers, serve as a functional barrier surrounding the brain and spinal cord to protect and support the CNS [21]. The layers include pachymeninx, also called the dura mater and the leptomeninges that comprise the arachnoid and pia mater [21,22]. These layers help to safeguard the CNS by covering it with a protective layer and to establish the BBB [21].
The dura mater, which is formed of dense fibrous tissue and is approximately 1-mm thick in humans, forms the outermost layer of the meninges [23]. The outer layer projects vascular connections into the bone and is linked to the inner surface of the skull. It contains arteries, veins, and lymphatics that are distinct from the CNS. Dural capillaries are fenestrated and do not have tight junctions. Thus, they do not participate in establishing the BBB. The arachnoid mater is a 200-mm thick middle layer, which is impermeable to fluids and abuts the inner aspect of the dura, producing a border layer of cells linked by tight junctions and expressing efflux pumps [24]. The arachnoid mater acts as a real blood–CSF barrier by forming a barrier between the dura mater and the CSF-drained subarachnoid space (SAS). A one-cell-thick delicate layer of pia mater which is permeable to solutes and immune cells but not to erythrocytes protects the CNS surface [25]. The pia mater, which is reflected from the surface of the CNS and divides the SAS from the CNS and perivascular compartments, covers arteries and veins in the SAS [26]. Additionally, the surface of the CNS is coated by the glia limitans, comprising compacted astrocytic end-feet and an overlaying parenchymal basement membrane. Unlike the dura mater, the pia mater does not have tight junctions [27]. The CSF allows fluid and low-molecular-weight tracers to move readily through the glia limitans, but T-cell trafficking is restricted [28,29].
The BBB is made up of two key components that act as a barrier between the blood and the CNS parenchyma. A BBB for solutes is generated by complex tight junctions connecting specialized capillary endothelial cells with limited pinocytotic activity [5]. A BBB, controlling the immune cell access into the CNS, is found in postcapillary venules [30]. T cells must first pass the vascular endothelium and then the glia limitans to reach the CNS parenchyma from the blood [30]. The fully differentiated BBB is a complex system that comprises highly specialized endothelial cells and their underlying basement membrane (enclosing a large number of pericytes), and perivascular antigen-presenting cells, surrounded by a parenchymal basement membrane [4]. The morphological correlate of the endothelial barrier constitutes continuous belts of tight junctions between adjacent overlapping endothelial cells [20]. The intracellular gap between the overlapping endothelial cells is sealed to sufficiently prevent paracellular leakage under normal physiological conditions.
2.1. Pathways Regulating BBB Integrity
The complex cellular and non-cellular extracellular matrix components of the BBB work in concert to maintain BBB integrity, and impairments in any one of these can cause BBB malfunction and disintegration. For instance, various tight junctions and adherens junctions are vital to BBB formation and maintenance [2]. Endothelial cells prevent thrombosis and preserve permeability, homeostasis, and vascular wall integrity [7]. Meanwhile, pericytes help maintain the integrity and proper permeability of the BBB by preserving the tight junctions of endothelial cells (e.g., claudin-5, occludin, and ZO-1) and regulating transcytosis in endothelial cells [31,32,33]. Astrocytes secrete crucial BBB maintenance factors such as sonic hedgehog (Shh), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiopoietins-1 (Ang-1), angiotensin-converting enzyme-1 (ACE-1), glial-derived neurotrophic factor, and apolipoprotein (ApoE) [34]. A neural VEGF deficiency causes aberrant vascular density and other abnormalities, mainly in the cortex and retina [35]. The VEGF receptor regulates the Ras–Raf–MEK pathway (which promotes endothelial cell proliferation), the PI3K–AKT system (which promotes endothelial cell survival), and the p38 MAPK–HSP27 route (which promotes endothelial cell migration) [36]. Additionally, in CNS endothelial cells, the Wnt–β-catenin pathway regulates several genes, such as Lef1, Apcdd1, Axin2, Stra6, and Slc2a1 through β-catenin [37]. Wnt induces the expression of BBB genes, including those encoding nutrient transporters (such as Slc2a1, encoding Glut-1), which induces BBB functions [38]. Thus, an absence of the signaling elements downstream of β-catenin in CNS endothelial cells results in the failure of vessel formation and substantially disrupts the BBB [37]. According to a recent study, increased β-catenin levels in the developing brain induce the expression of the death receptors Dr6 (also known as tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 21, Tnfrsf21) and Troy (also known as Tnfrsf19), known to interact with downstream elements of the VEGF pathway and interferes with endothelial cells sprouting and BBB formation [39]. Besides, β-catenin regulates tight junction formation [38]. Furthermore, the Shh pathway, which provides a barrier-promoting effect and an endogenous anti-inflammatory balance to CNS-directed immune attacks, has been recognized as a key player in the development of BBBs [40]. Phenotypic abnormalities in Shh-knockout mice are associated with BBB formation abnormalities linked with lower occludin and claudin-5 expression levels [40]. Moreover, a low expression of these tight junction proteins was also associated with plasma protein leakage that impaired the BBB [40].
Inflammation activates microglia, the immune cells of the central nervous system, and polarizes them into the M1 (cytotoxic) or M2 (neuroprotective) phenotype; thus, microglia can harm or protect the BBB [41,42]. When activated by injury or insult to the brain, microglia proliferate, undergo morphological changes, and secrete chemokines and cytokines. Besides, ECM influences cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions inside the NVU, regulating the BBB’s shape and function [43].
2.2. BBB vs. Blood–CSF Barrier Alteration
The CNS is tightly sealed from the changeable milieu of the blood by the BBB and blood–CSF barrier. Both barriers are regarded as essential components of neurovascular coupling as well as active surveillance and coordinated immune responses [44,45]. Although in principle both barriers serve the same defensive purpose for the CNS, their distinct structures allows the exchange of various substances between the bloodstream and brain. The blood–CSF barrier is found in the choroid plexus of each ventricle of the brain, inhibiting the paracellular diffusion of water-soluble molecules [4]. The choroid plexus is a spongy, vascularized tissue linked to the ventricle walls that produces CSF. Unlike the BBB, the blood–CSF barrier is also present at the epithelial level, wherein capillaries are relatively leaky and permeable to small molecules, thereby allowing, among other processes, the rapid delivery of water through the bloodstream to the surrounding epithelial cells for CSF production in the choroid plexus [46]. These multiple transport mechanisms allow the guided transit of ions and nutrients into the CSF as well as the removal of toxic substances from the CSF, thereby maintaining the barrier and secretory function of the epithelial cells in the choroid plexus.
The blood–CSF barrier is reportedly altered in CNS pathologies, resulting in the development of edema and the migration of inflammatory cells into the CNS [27]. At steady-state, peripheral immune cells do not reach the CNS parenchyma. However, during pathophysiological situations (such as autoimmune illness, injury, stroke, or infection), they can cross the BBB, but only after acquiring the ability to travel from the perivascular area through the glia limitans.
3. Causes, Characteristics, and Consequences of BBB Breakdown
Tight junction proteins, endothelial cells, cellular transport pathways, and enzymatic machinery all work together and contribute to normal BBB maintenance, function, and integrity. However, aging, peripheral inflammation, systemic diseases, and ischemic injury can disrupt these processes, disrupting BBB function and integrity. This results in ionic imbalance, plasma proteins leaks, and microglia and astrocytes activation, producing various cytokines and chemokines. These damage mechanisms work in concert, reinforcing each other to drive the pathology in the aging brain, contributing to BBB breakdown and disruption by triggering or exacerbating other pathogenic processes. They ultimately accelerate neuronal degeneration and cognitive decline through neuronal malfunction.
3.1. Aging: The Major Culprit for BBB Disruption
Normal aging in the brain and BBB reduces age-associated physical activity without necessarily impairing cognition, but it increases the frequency of age-related disorders such as AD and PD [47]. Even in the absence of neurological diseases, BBB disintegration is a typical aspect of the aging process. Moreover, age-related BBB degradation makes the brain more susceptible to neuronal impairment and cognitive decline [48]. A study on healthy older adults who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) with an intravenously administered gadolinium-based contrast agent revealed substantial BBB leakage concentrated in the brain regions most prone to aging damage [47]. Recent studies have also demonstrated the potential of BBB breakdown as a biomarker for the aging process and to identify age-related disorders [49]. Similarly, Montagne and colleagues documented an early BBB disintegration occurrence in the aging human brain starting in the CA1 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus that may contribute to cognitive impairment [50].
The BBB breaks down as the brain ages; as a result, its permeability increases, and CBF decreases. Furthermore, the neovascularization potential and the capillary density in the brain vasculature decrease [51]. Besides, changes in ECM, which maintains BBB integrity by inducing occludin (a tight junction protein) expression, increase BBB permeability. Thus, blood-derived toxic and inflammatory substances infiltrate the brain and change the neuronal biochemical microenvironment, leading to neurodegenerative diseases [8,52,53,54]. Pericyte loss has also been observed in elderly mouse, rat, and human brains [55,56]. Furthermore, pericyte-mediated BBB disruption has been linked to high soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ) levels in the CSF [57]. The end-feet of astrocytes sheathing pericytes also plays a role in BBB formation and maintenance during aging. With age, astrocyte end-feet vascular coverage and aquaporin-4 (AQP4) expression decrease, and glial fibrillary acidic protein expression increases, thus increasing astrogliosis [58,59]. Similarly, activated microglia produce tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), proteases, nitric oxide (NO), and peroxide, which affect tight junction proteins throughout aging [60]. This change causes BBB leakage, which results in cell damage and neurodegeneration [60,61]. Besides, BBB breakdown and impairment are also caused by a decrease in the interaction of neurons with endothelial cells and astrocytes, which increase the BBB’s permeability to albumin [62].
Blood-derived proteins such as fibrinogen and plasminogen can also cross the compromised BBB and the pro-inflammatory fibrin aggregates in the brain, activating microglia, increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and activating the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase. Next, NADPH oxidase upregulates the pro-inflammatory gene expression, damaging neuronal axons and triggering a decline in cognition [63,64]. In addition, complement proteins cross the BBB, which reportedly alters the function of microglia, oligodendrocytes, and neurons, allows inflammatory cells to infiltrate the brain, and induces cytokine cascades contributing to neurodegeneration [65,66,67]. Likewise, during aging, oxidative stress upregulates the expression of various cytokines and chemokines, such as matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP3) and p16INK4A (senescence-associated secretory phenotype [SASP]) in astrocytes, inducing BBB disruption, neuroinflammation, and cognitive impairments [68,69,70]. Besides, it activates microglia, which release cytokines, chemokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α, elevating ROS and the production of reactive nitrogen species (RNS), ultimately disrupting the BBB [71]. In addition, age reduces the capability of neurons to clear ROS and RNS, resulting in BBB degradation and neurodegeneration [71]. Although BBB integrity disruptions appear multi-factorial, age-related impairments in cellular transport suggest that several functional pathways contribute to BBB deterioration. Nonetheless, animal research provides a path for investigating the relationship between aging, neurovascular disease, and neurodegeneration in humans.
3.2. Peripheral Inflammation
Peripheral inflammation is essentially an organism’s defensive response. However, excessive and dysregulated inflammation has negative consequences. For example, cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-9, IL-17, interferon-γ, TNF-α, and CCL2, can reduce the expression of claudin-5, the most important tight junction protein, responsible for the selective permeability of the BBB. In addition, the degradation of occludin, ZO-1, and ZO-2, other tight junction proteins, was also associated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation [72,73,74,75]. Since tight junctions are one of the most critical BBB components, any change in tight junction proteins expression directly impacts the BBB. Henceforth, nowadays, tight junction variations are frequently utilized as indications of BBB failure. Furthermore, LPS has a direct cytotoxic effect on the BBB endothelium by blocking the P-glycoprotein function and increasing the release of matrix metalloproteins (MMPs), resulting in membrane anomalies, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial damage, and cell death [76]. This leads to endothelial cell disintegration, and BBB damage facilitates the entry of neurotoxic chemicals into the CNS, raising the risk of neurodegenerative disease [76,77]. The upregulation of the cell adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), and E-selectin, is another effect of peripheral inflammation which allows peripheral immune cells to enter the CNS, as in aging and chronic inflammation [75]. Furthermore, IL-1β can increase the α5 integrin-dependent adhesion of endothelial cells, affecting the BBB integrity by changing the cell–cell junctions and cell–matrix adhesion [73]. In such inflammatory situations, astrocytes release VEGF-A, increasing endothelial nitric oxide synthase signaling, reducing occludin and claudin-5 expression, and facilitating the entry of peripheral lymphocytes into the CNS [78,79].
M1 microglia perform pro-inflammatory signaling through the toll-like receptor (TLR)-4, the interferon-γ receptor complex, the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor, and COX2 [80,81,82]. Besides, there is ROS production and oxidative stress involved in M1 microglia, which elevates in response to the increased expression of iNOS during peripheral inflammation, contributing to BBB disruption [83]. Peripheral inflammation also affects many transport routes: it downregulates efflux transporters of Aβ, anions, and amino acids and upregulates influx transporters of insulin, monoamines, and lysosomal enzymes [84]. Furthermore, the cerebral endothelium expresses circulating cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α, which can directly activate the endothelium and disrupt the BBB [85].
4. AD
4.1. Clinical and Neuropathological Characteristics
AD is characterized by a selective neuronal vulnerability resulting in a progressive loss of memory [86]. The symptoms of AD, such as moderate forgetfulness that affects short-term memory, resemble those of normal aging when they first arise. However, long-term memory is also impacted as the disease progresses, resulting in difficulties recalling events, activities, and names of familiar people or things, and performing daily tasks. The onset of symptoms (usually over 8–10 years) corresponds to the progression of degenerative changes in the brain, which include—(1) the formation of dystrophic neurites around a central core of amyloid beta (Aβ plaques); (2) the formation of abnormal filaments made up of a highly phosphorylated form of the microtubule-associated protein tau (neurofibrillary tangles; NFTs) in the perikaryon of certain neurons, as well as neuropil threads in axons and nerve terminals; and (3) loss of vulnerable neurons, primarily pyramidal, cholinergic, noradrenergic, and serotonergic neurons [86,87]. As the understanding of the pathological changes that occur in AD improved, research has shifted to the investigation of more specific modifications in Aβ processing, such as the cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) into Aβ peptides (Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42) and the relevance of Aβ oligomers (small aggregates of 2–12 peptides) [86,88]. The Aβ1–42 peptide aggregates more readily than the Aβ1–40 peptide, and the ratio of the two isoforms is regulated by the pattern of APP by three different secretases, namely; α, β, and γ secretases [88]. Aβ56 appears to be a peptide of particular interest because it was negatively related to cognitive decline in an APP mouse model and induced memory problems when injected into the rat brain [89].
The main component of NFTs is tau, a microtubule-associated protein. Although tau is a soluble protein, it forms insoluble aggregates during the formation of NFTs, which damage the neuronal structure and function. Tau monomers create oligomers, which organize into a β sheet before forming NFTs. Although the pathways linking Aβ and tau are not clearly understood, the amyloid cascade indicates that changes in tau and the consequent formation of NFTs are triggered by toxic concentrations of Aβ [90]. Once the filamentous tau has formed, it can spread to other parts of the brain. Apart from these classical pathological hallmarks of AD, numerous other potentially modifiable factors can contribute to the clinical manifestation of AD. For instance, aging hampers Aβ clearance or may result in the overproduction of Aβ. This, in turn, results in the deposition of Aβ in blood vessel membranes [91]. In general, excessive Aβ is extruded by BBB transporter systems such as the P-glycoprotein transporter (P-gp) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor. However, if transporters are disrupted as a result of Aβ accumulation, then microglia activation may be induced, and the release of ROS, complement proteins, and proinflammatory cytokines may be triggered [92,93]. Altogether, this induces neurotoxicity and tau hyperphosphorylation [92]. The hyperphosphorylated tau forms aggregates leading to the formation of NFTs [94].
The LDL receptor family has a strong affinity for human apolipoprotein E (APOE) and its member exhibit APOE isoform (APOE2, APOE3, and APOE4)-specific binding affinity [95]. Compared with the typical ApoE3 allele, polymorphism in the APOE gene is a major genetic risk predictor for late-onset AD, with the ApoE4 allele providing an elevated risk and the ApoE2 allele conferring a decreased risk [96]. Many Aβ-dependent and Aβ-independent pathways are differently regulated by ApoE isoforms. Accumulating evidence suggests that ApoE and LDL receptors have a functional connection that influences the risk of developing VaD and AD. Hippocampal ApoE levels positively correlate with long-term spatial memory retention in mice with human LDL receptors [95]. Moreover, ApoE apparently alters tau pathology, tau-mediated neurodegeneration, and microglial responses to AD onset. ApoE4 is either harmful or inefficient in many brain homeostatic mechanisms, including lipid transport, synaptic integrity and plasticity, glucose metabolism, and cerebrovascular function [96].
4.2. Transgenic Mouse Models of AD
Genetically modified animal models have contributed to the discovery of pathogenic pathways involved in AD and the preclinical testing of prospective treatment approaches. However, AD is currently incurable, it is important to establish and characterize appropriate animal models to aid translational research and preclinical drug development. Table 1 summarizes some of the most extensively utilized transgenic mouse strains in AD research, which are discussed in the present review.
5. The Implication of BBB Dysfunction in AD
The BBB prevents blood-derived products, pathogens, and cells from penetrating the brain, which is essential for normal neuronal functioning and information processing (Figure 2). Both post-mortem and brain imaging studies have shown BBB damage and accumulation of blood-derived proteins in the hippocampus, cortex, and cerebrospinal fluid [100,101]. Besides, experiments in murine models have shown that BBB breakdown leads to tissue accumulation of potentially neurotoxic blood-derived products (e.g., immunoglobulins, albumin, fibrinogen, thrombin, and prothrombin kringle-2) that may or may not normally enter the brain but can damage neurons with increased BBB permeability within the hippocampus [100,102,103].
5.1. Neurovascular Unit Dysfunction
The endothelium serves as one of the essential components of the NVU. And endothelium degeneration, resulting in BBB dysfunction, is one of the many causes of AD. Reports suggest a crucial role of MMP-9 in the disruption of TJ proteins, ECM degradation, activation of the immune system, and the development of neuroinflammation resulting in endothelial barrier failure [104,105]. Moreover, all these processes were associated with the insoluble Aβ levels in post-mortem human cortices [106]. Furthermore, the transcriptome profiling of endothelial cells revealed a low mesenchyme homeobox 2 (MEOX2, required for vascular differentiation) expression in AD-affected brains [107]. The authors of this report showed that restoring MEOX2 protein expression in endothelial cells from AD patients stimulated angiogenesis, transcriptionally suppressed AFX1 forkhead transcription factor-mediated apoptosis, and increased the levels of low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 (LRP-1), a major Aβ clearance receptor, at the BBB [107]. Another transcriptome study demonstrated that a pro-inflammatory response governs the generation of angiogenic endothelial cells and that endothelial cells may play a role in the altered angiogenesis and immune response in AD development [108].
In addition, astrogliosis and astrocyte degradation also occur in AD patients’ brains. According to one study, A1 astrocytes are prevalent during the early stages of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in mice with AD, and they secrete neurotoxins that cause cell death and inflammation [109]. Further, the alteration of AQP-4 may result in vascular dysfunction in AD patients [58]. Moreover, AD patients have a reduced pericyte coverage on brain capillaries, which is negatively correlated with the BBB permeability [110]. Besides, AD patients carrying ApoE4 alleles had a more severe reduction than those with ApoE3 alleles, suggesting that ApoE variants differently affect pericyte attachment to endothelial cells [111]. Moreover, in an in vitro BBB model, ApoE3 pericytes had a more potent endothelial barrier integrity reduction effect than ApoE4 pericytes [112]. These findings suggest that ApoE isoforms can alter BBB integrity by modulating the endothelial gene expression in various ways. Besides, pericytes with the ApoE4 variation lose their ability to support and regulate endothelial cells, contributing to vascular dysfunction.
5.2. Accumulation of Neurotoxic Blood-Derived Products
Tibbling and coworkers established the immunoglobulin G (IgG) index, used to assess antibody synthesis and as an index of immune function/inflammation within the CNS, and the CSF/serum albumin ratio, which indicates BBB rupture [113,114]. The CSF/serum ratios were elevated in both patients with AD and patients with multi-infarct dementia as compared to their age-matched controls [115]. Furthermore, ApoE3 negative patients also had high CSF/serum ratios [116]. Besides albumin and IgG, elevated levels of peptides related to or produced from hemoglobin were found in the cerebellum of AD patients [117]. Further, fibrin was also found to be accumulated in amyloid-positive arteries in AD brains, and fibrin removal played a role in protecting mice from neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits [118,119].
Normal brains do not produce prothrombin, but AD patients’ brains contain high prothrombin levels, indicating a leakage across a disrupted BBB [120]. This plasma glycoprotein and zymogen of thrombin is cleaved by factor Xa into prothrombin kringle-1 and 2 and active thrombin induces blood coagulation [121]. Increased active thrombin levels have been linked to hippocampus neuron degeneration [122]. The authors of this study suggested that microglial NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative stress causes thrombin-induced neurotoxicity in the hippocampus in vivo. We recently assessed the role of prothrombin kringle-2 and found elevated levels in the hippocampi of AD patients and 5XFAD mice [102]. Here, we identified a novel pathological mechanism of AD mediated by an abnormal accumulation of prothrombin kringle-2, which functions as an important pathogenic factor in the adult brain via BBB breakdown. Treating the 5XFAD mice with rivaroxaban or adding caffeine to their water supply prevented prothrombin kringle-2 upregulation and preserved the BBB. Furthermore, preventing prothrombin kringle-2 upregulation in 5XFAD animals reduced neurotoxic symptoms such as hippocampus neurodegeneration and object recognition impairment caused by neurotoxic inflammatory responses [102].
Patients with preclinical and clinical AD symptoms also suffer from cerebral microbleeds and iron buildup [123,124,125]. Recently, Wu et al. explored how lead exposure through the BBB could aggravate AD progression in mice [126]. Lead exposure raises the blood lead concentration, accelerating Aβ1–42 deposition in APP/PS1 mouse cortices and affecting ZO-1 and claudin-5 protein levels. Besides, lead exposure increases phosphorylated tau (p-tau) expression in C57BL/6J and APP/PS1 mice and decreases the mRNA and protein expression levels of LRP-1, the major peripheral Aβ-sequestering agent [126]. Recently, He and coworkers discovered that microvascular endothelial cells with altered LRP-1 and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) expression dysregulate Aβ transport across the BBB [127]. RAGE is involved in Aβ transport in the brain and spreads its toxicity. Additionally, Aβ and p-tau pathology is also influenced by white matter lesions and microhemorrhages, dyslipidemia, altered brain insulin signaling, and insulin resistance, as well as oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, inflammation, and hypoperfusion [127]. Besides, poor angiogenesis and inefficient vascular regeneration can degrade the brain endothelium in AD [128].
5.3. Accumulation of Aβ in Cerebrovasculature
Aβ is enzymatically destroyed in numerous cell types in the brain, including endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocytes, neurons, and microglia, by neprilysin, insulin-degrading enzyme, tissue plasminogen activator, and matrix metalloproteins MMPs) [129,130,131,132]. The BBB is also an underlying source of Aβ peptides, which downregulate ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-5 and increase the permeability of endothelial cells by interacting with RAGE, activating MMPs, and stimulating oxidative stress pathways [133,134]. LRP1 and/or another lipoprotein receptor are involved in the cellular clearance of the Aβ peptide by astrocytes and VSMCs [135]. In addition, microglia play a crucial role in amyloid-directed immunotherapy and lower the amyloid load in the brain by clearing amyloid aggregates [136]. Passive ISF–CSF bulk flow and subsequent CSF clearance could account for 10%–15% of total amyloid elimination [137].
Furthermore, 4-month-old Tg2576 mice had lower BBB integrity in specific parts of the cerebral cortex than their non-transgenic littermates [138]. These animals also had a higher age-related albumin uptake in their brains than non-transgenic mice [138]. This study also revealed that BBB disruption in young Tg2576 mice (aged 4 to 10 months) led to Aβ entry into the brain. In another study, researchers looked at the expression of enzymes involved in ceramide and sphingolipid metabolism, as well as the dysregulation of de novo ceramide formation and S1P metabolism in the brains of mice with hyperhomocysteinemia [139]. The hydrophobic nature of these chemicals allows them to cross the BBB, provoke neurotoxic responses, elevate pro-inflammatory cytokines, and cause neurodegeneration in progressive AD associated with metabolic failure.
Moreover, BBB breakdown in AD causes insoluble extracellular Aβ plaques accumulation along the blood vessels walls, resulting in microbleeds and hemorrhages in the brain [123,124,125]. It also causes inflammation in the NVU [8]. The low number and density of pericytes in the cortex and hippocampus of AD patients lead to the upregulation of Aβ and p-tau proteins, causing microglial activation, neuroinflammation, neuronal degeneration, and cognitive impairment [140,141]. The study also revealed that AD patients have markedly lower pericyte coverage of capillaries in the cortex and hippocampus than non-AD controls, and this was correlated with reduced BBB integrity [141]. Another study that assessed the association between soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor (sPDGFR) levels in the CSF, CSF albumin, and the CSF/serum albumin ratio, the reduced CSF Aβ42 levels, and higher CSF total tau and p-tau levels in AD, also revealed a positive correlation between pericyte injury and BBB collapse, linked to the severity of AD [101]. Besides, pericyte loss caused by faulty PDGF-β signal transduction from endothelium to PDGFR in pericytes causes BBB breakdown, CBF reductions, and hypoxia, leading to age-dependent secondary neuronal and synaptic changes associated with neuronal and synaptic dysfunction and ultimately to AD [55]. In vitro exposure to fibrillary Aβ1–42 experiments revealed an increased apoptotic activity and decreased pericyte proliferation, decreasing the overall pericyte survival [142].
Pericyte detachment from the capillary endothelium is also linked to the leakage of a variety of toxic serum proteins, endothelial cell death, capillary regression, and a decrease in regional CBF [55]. Cyclosporine A improved BBB integrity in ApoE-transgenic animals with AD by blocking an inflammatory pathway in pericytes that caused tight junction breakdown and extravasation of neurotoxic serum proteins [143]. Similarly, Sagare and coworkers showed that pericyte loss elevates Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels and accelerates amyloid angiopathy and cerebral β-amyloidosis in mice overexpressing the Aβ-precursor protein (APP) by decreasing soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 clearance from brain ISF before Aβ deposition [144]. Furthermore, the authors showed that a pericyte deficit causes tau pathology and early neuronal death, resulting in cognitive decline in APP knockout transgenic mice, but not in APP overexpressing transgenic mice. These findings imply that pericytes govern numerous steps of the AD-like neurodegenerative pathogenic cascade and could thus be a new therapeutic target for slowing the progression of AD [144].
Besides pericyte death, Aβ accumulation in the vasculature may alter astrocyte morphology, resulting in BBB dysfunction. A recent neuroimaging study on living mice with methoxy-XO4-labeled vascular amyloid revealed that vascular amyloid deposits separated astrocyte end-feet from the endothelial vessel wall [94]. The authors concluded that, while astrocytes can still emit vasoactive chemicals, vascular amyloid deposits stiffen blood arteries and decrease their dynamic range [145]. They also uncovered a novel mechanism CBF reduction in AD patients.
5.4. Accumulation of Phosphorylated Tau in the Cerebrovasculature
Another significant pathologic marker of AD is tau, which is inappropriately phosphorylated in the AD brain and accumulates to produce neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Several studies have linked tau to BBB disruption. For example, AD patients and the Tg2576 mice model displayed oligomeric tau deposits [146]. Tau depositions in blood vessels caused morphological changes, such as increased atrophic string capillaries and abnormalities on the capillary surface [147]. Aged tau-overexpressing mice (P301L transgenic mice, an AD model) display abnormal, spiraling blood vessel morphology, reduced blood vessel diameters, and increased overall blood vessel density in the cortex [148]. Furthermore, these arteries had a disrupted blood flow, with periods of restricted flow usually not seen in normal capillaries. These changes accompanied cortical atrophy and increased the expression of angiogenesis-related genes such as VEGF-a, Serpine1, and Plau in CD31-positive endothelial cells [148]. Altogether, these findings suggest that tau pathogenic alterations in neurons can affect brain endothelial cells and thus the microvasculature’s integrity [148,149].
A recent cohort study found that the degree of tau expression was inversely correlated with CBF [150]. CBF reduction is common in AD patients, and it is linked to cognitive deterioration. Tau is also linked to reduced claudin-5 and occludin levels in AD patients’ brains [151]. According to this research, NFT alters blood vessel morphology and vascular function. However, uncovering the interaction mechanisms between tau/NFT and the different BBB cell types requires more research.
5.5. Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Dementia Co-Occur
Because vascular pathology not only facilitates but also potentiates vascular deficits, the co-occurrence of AD and VaD, often known as mixed dementia, is a possibility [152]. AD and VaD have several clinical characteristics in common, including cognitive decline and neuropsychiatric symptoms linked to behavioral changes. According to a clinical study by Boyle and colleagues, only 9% of 1000 individuals with cognitive deficits had pure AD pathology. Nevertheless, AD pathology is mostly linked with vascular dysfunction or other neurodegenerative disorders [153]. Another clinical trial found that only 28% of 63 patients with mild cognitive impairment had pure AD and about 24% had mixed dementia [154]. These studies imply the existence of significant overlaps between AD and VaD. Thus, rather than separating AD from VaD, comprehensive research should be undertaken to better understand the pathophysiology of dementia and develop therapeutic strategies.
AD patients develop an early neurovascular dysfunction, progressive neurodegeneration, selective neuronal loss, and Aβ and NFT accumulation in the brain [155,156]. Vascular damage and Aβ accumulation exert a potent synergistic effect on tau hyperphosphorylation, accelerating neuronal loss [144]. Interestingly, depending on the stage of the disease, AD affects all the cell types of the NVU, including endothelial and mural cells, glia, and neurons [156]. Besides, genetics, vascular risk factors, environmental variables, and lifestyle choices can all cause vascular diseases [156]. The neurovascular theory of AD also suggests that cerebrovascular dysfunction and the disturbance of neurovascular integrity play a role in the beginning and progression of cognitive decline and that the pathogenic events leading to AD converge at cerebral blood vessels [156].
5.6. Comparing BBB Dysfunction in AD vs. Other Neurodegenerative Diseases
Across all neurodegenerative diseases, BBB dysfunction and disruption is a common hallmark that can be seen as a critical component of their pathogenesis (Table 2). For instance, BBB dysfunction is involved in the etiology of PD, the second most common neurodegenerative disease, which is characterized by the accumulation of α-synuclein and the loss of dopaminergic neuron loss in the substantia nigra [157]. In some patients, components of the peripheral immune system may have a role in disease development if the BBB is disturbed. Huntington’s disease (HD), an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease with motor, cognitive, behavioral, and metabolic disorders caused by the aggregation of the mutant Huntingtin protein, also presents BBB deficits and neurovascular abnormalities [158,159]. In addition, T-cell, B-cell, and macrophage trafficking via a faulty BBB serves pathogenic features for both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multiple sclerosis (MS) [160,161,162].
6. BBB Dysfunction as a Tool for the Identification and Prediction of Early Cognitive Decline
The physiological features of the BBB strictly control the normal microenvironment necessary for appropriate neuronal activity. Any impairment either at the cellular or molecular level results in BBB breakdown and dysfunction, which causes cognitive impairments and neurodegeneration and contributes to age-related disorders. Therefore, BBB breakdown can be utilized as a predicting mechanism for various neurological disorders, such as AD and PD.
The health of the cerebral vasculature is crucial in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, prevention interventions could focus on improving neurovascular health. Although most studies focus on removing neurotoxic proteins, early interventions maintaining BBB integrity, such as the promising work on NAD+ levels restoration, could help increase the healthy life expectancy.
MRI and other imaging techniques play an essential role in healthcare decisions. The lack of MRI facilitation during the early stages of BBB disruption, on the other hand, requires the development of new approaches to BBB breakdown detection. In this context, the identification of peripheral blood markers may be one of the most effective and readily available methods for determining the BBB status. However, the blood/CSF albumin ratio cannot distinguish between BBB and blood–CSF permeability or localize leaks, according to the existing studies. Hence, approaches that can directly identify and pinpoint these illusive permeability values are needed. Acquiring a better understanding of BBB disruption across time requires conducting studies spanning wider age ranges. Including adults between the ages of 20 and 30 could provide a baseline for BBB leaking later in life.
A recent DCE-MRI study revealed that healthy older adults had a higher BBB permeability index Ktrans than young healthy adults in the hippocampus CA1 and dentate gyrus, but not in CA3 [47]. Besides, this study showed that BBB integrity in the hippocampus deteriorated with age [47]. Another DCE-MRI study, using CSF biomarkers, found that older adults with previous cognitive impairment had higher BBB permeability than healthy people [49]. A different study used a novel MRI technique called diffusion-prepared arterial spin labeling to assess the water exchange across the BBB and detected modest BBB dysfunctions associated with reduced Aβ clearance in the CSF of healthy individuals [169]. They also reported that a decreased water exchange rate across the BBB was linked to lower cerebrospinal Aβ concentrations in various brain regions (whole brain, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, and precuneus) relevant to AD [169].
Furthermore, including novel ligands in positron emission tomography investigations has recently allowed the in vivo evaluation of unique BBB transport networks. For example, a study utilizing radiolabeled verapamil, a ligand for the P-glycoprotein BBB transport system, showed that healthy older adults exhibited lower activity than younger controls [170]. Besides, technological advances are required to evaluate if neurovascular dysfunction and BBB breakdown can be detected in the living brain before the onset of the entire spectrum of neurological symptoms.
7. Therapeutic Implications in BBB Impairment
In complex neurodegenerative disorders such as AD, the relationships between neurovascular integrity, brain structural and functional connectivity, cognitive function, and neurological symptomatology are paramount. However, they have yet to be directly explored in the most relevant in vivo context, which has only recently become possible thanks to the development of novel state-of-the-art neuroimaging and molecular biomarker approaches. Clinical research in this area will advance our knowledge and help us better grasp the link between BBB disintegration and cognitive impairment. Furthermore, a better understanding of the vascular system, promoting neurovascular health, and finding ways to maintain BBB health will also aid in the development of new, efficient cognitive impairment and neuronal loss treatments
There are numerous transporters at the BBB that could be targeted to transport drug molecules to the brain. For instance, caffeine is transported by adenosine transporter to lower the Aβ burden [171], and BBB reinforcement after caffeine supply or treatment with rivaroxaban, was shown to inhibit neurotoxic symptoms such as neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and object cognitive impairments in 5XFAD mice [102]. Antioxidants such as vitamin E, vitamin B, α-lipoic acid, and N-acetylcysteine are transported across the BBB by various transporters [172]
Glucocorticosteroids are currently the sole suitable and most extensively utilized therapeutic strategy to improve BBB integrity and regulate undesired inflammatory responses [173]. Another intriguing treatment method in clinical trials is based on a multipotent non-hematopoietic cell type called mesenchymal stromal cells; they have immunomodulatory, protective, and regenerative effects on injured tissue and are thus of interest for neurodegenerative diseases [174]. Inducing tight junction proteins production after BBB breakdown is another intriguing approach that could speed up BBB re-establishment [175,176]. Therapeutic BBB modulation has shown promising results against AD. FPS-ZM1, a RAGE antagonist, limits Aβ entrance into the brain, reducing neuroinflammation [177]. Recent studies have demonstrated that inhibiting the mammalian/mechanistic target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway with rapamycin has considerable neuroprotective effects in mouse models of AD, enhancing cerebrovascular and cognitive function. According to Van Skike et al. (2018), blocking the mTOR pathway can maintain BBB integrity via increasing the expression of tight junction proteins and decreasing the activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9, thereby restoring cognitive function [178].
Metal concentrations in the brain parenchyma of patients with AD are higher, resulting in free radical production and increased neuronal damage, and metal chelator nanoparticles that use the transferring receptor to cross the BBB can represent a treatment strategy for lowering the oxidative stress [179]. The success of such nanoparticles relies on their ability to diffuse through disrupted tight junctions for targeted delivery to the sites of pathology without any prerequisite of drug lipophilicity or drug transport system. Bana et al. (2014) also successfully created a nano-device to change Aβ’s morphology and cure AD [180]. They investigated how liposomes bifunctionalized with phosphatidic acid and a modified ApoE-derived peptide (mApoE-PA-LIP) affected the aggregation/disaggregation properties of Aβ. Experiments using dually radiolabeled LIP revealed that bifunctionalization improves radioactivity transit across the BBB both in vitro and in vivo (in healthy mice). Hence, liposomes have the potential to become clinically useful nanodevices for the treatment of AD. A recent study reported that a combination of etodolac and α-tocopherol improved BBB integrity and amyloid clearance, emphasizing the critical role of deficient BBB integrity in the pathophysiology of AD [181]. Furthermore, donepezil, an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor, has been recently reported to reduce injury-induced BBB disruption by elevating claudin-5 expression [182].
8. Limitations of Current Studies and Future Challenges
At present, lowering the risk of AD is primarily dependent on lifestyle modifications as well as the treatment and prevention of medical conditions. A molecule with good potency, selectivity, and bioavailability is not enough as a therapy to treat AD. To elicit the pharmacologic action required to produce the intended therapeutic benefit, it must also be able to cross the BBB and reach a particular concentration for a specific duration in the brain ISF. Compounds with the requisite physicochemical characteristics that enable transcellular transit by simple diffusion or appropriate pharmacophore that enable receptor-mediated endocytosis to enter the CNS. As most utilized drugs are P-gp substrates, an increase in P-gp substrates would promote the accumulation of several CNS-based drugs in the brain [183]. However, TNF-α enhances P-gp activity, which reduces the accumulation of P-gp substrates in the brain, resulting in restricted drug access to the brain [184]. This either increases or decreases drug access to the brain, making patients with AD more vulnerable to the development of delirium. This emphasizes how critical it is to consider the BBB in all neuropharmaceutical studies. The BBB lowers the entry of molecules that govern brain homeostasis and filters out the remainder to protect the brain, which limits the delivery efficacy of AD drugs. To date, over 400 compounds have been examined in several AD models [185]. Inadequate trial design and ignorance regarding the BBB are considered the key flaws in pharmacological trials [186].
Not inventing new drugs, but directing them to the brain by crossing the BBB is one of the most difficult challenges in AD treatment. A substantial research effort has resulted in the development of limited methods of exploitation. However, changes in BBB reveal indications in the beginning and during the progression of AD, affecting therapy and control measures. Hence, it is critical to maintain a balance between the discovery of novel compounds and the development of drug delivery technologies with greater specificity and efficacy in delivering drugs to the CNS of patients with AD.
9. Conclusions
Understanding which components of BBB malfunction are mending and which portions are pathogenic is an important issue to consider moving ahead. Current research should focus on determining the degree of inflammation in the brain or blood that can cause BBB dysfunction, leaks, or even destruction, and on how to protect or heal a broken BBB. Drug delivery into the CNS that can cross the BBB without disrupting function should also be considered. We anticipate that imaging techniques such as 7T MRI and other technologies will increase our ability to identify BBB abnormalities in humans and understand how they relate to blood flow changes, structural and functional brain connection changes, and cognitive and motor deficits in various populations.
C.S. and S.R.K. planned and co-wrote the manuscript. C.S. and H.W. provided the references. C.S., H.W. and S.R.K. contributed to the preparation of all figures. S.R.K. supervised manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1A2C2007954) and the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D (HI14C1135) grants funded by the Korean government.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. The cellular and molecular components required for BBB formation, maintenance, and function. Pericytes, endothelial cells, astrocytes, neurons, and microglia make up the neurovascular unit. Pericytes share a common basement membrane with the endothelium and connect with several transmembrane junction proteins. Low-level bulk-flow transcytosis and tight junction and adherens junction proteins between endothelial cells maintain the BBB integrity. Astrocytes connect with pericytes, endothelial cells, and neurons. Microglia regulate immune responses.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. The blood–brain barrier in healthy and Alzheimer’s disease-affected brains. Tight junction protein disruption, decreased transport function, increased permeability, pericyte degradation, and accumulation of toxic substances such as Aβ and tau due to impaired clearance disrupt the BBB. These events cause an accumulation of neurotoxic hemoglobin and iron in the brain, increasing ROS production and oxidative stress in neurons. Neuronal toxic blood-derived proteins, such as fibrinogen, thrombin, and plasminogen, degrade the neuronal extracellular matrix, resulting in cell death and detaching neurons. This activates microglia and promotes neuroinflammation. BBB failure can also abolish the immune privilege, leading to the production of anti-brain antibodies directed against various axonal and membrane components of neurons.
Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of transgenic mouse strains commonly used in AD research.
| Transgenic Mouse Strain | Genetic Background | Disease Status | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5XFAD | (C57BL/6 × SJL)F1 and C57BL/6 J | Amyloid plaques, accompanied by gliosis; Neuron loss occurs in multiple brain regions, beginning at approximately 6 months in the areas with the most pronounced amyloidosis; Mice display a range of cognitive and motor deficits. | [ |
| APP/PS1 | C57BL/6J | Amyloid plaque formation in the neocortex begins around 6 weeks of age. At 3–4 months, deposits are observed in the hippocampus, and at 4–5 months, deposits appear in the striatum, thalamus, and brainstem; All congophilic amyloid deposits have phosphorylated tau-positive neuritic processes. | [ |
| Tg2576 | C7BL/6;129 × 1/SvJ;129S1/Sv | Exhibit age-associated cognitive deficits such as impaired spatial learning and deficits in working memory as well as contextual fear conditioning at <6 months of age. | [ |
Representative changes in BBB in neurodegenerative diseases.
| Neurodegenerative Diseases | Representative BBB Changes | References |
|---|---|---|
| Alzheimer’s disease | Accumulation of fibrinogen, thrombin, albumin, IgG, and hemosiderin in the cortex and hippocampus; loss of pericyte capillary coverage and numbers in the cortex and hippocampus; reduced tight junction proteins; RBC extravasation and peripheral macrophage infiltration; neutophil infiltration; and increased levels of angiogenic proteins | [ |
| Parkinson’s disease | Accumulation of fibrinogen in the striatum as well as IgG and hemosiderin in the globus pallidus; microvascular degeneration, reduced and disrupted tight junctions, altered capillary basement membrane in the subthalamic nucleus; extravasation of RBCs in the striatum; increased endothelial cell numbers in the substantia nigra | [ |
| Huntington’s disease | Leakage of fibrin in the putamen; decreased and disrupted tight junction protein expression in the putamen; accumulation of Huntingtin protein aggregates in the endothelial cells | [ |
| Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis | Leakage of fibrinogen, thrombin, IgG, collagen type IV, and iron-containing proteins; loss of pericytes in the medulla; microvascular degeneration, intracellular vacuolization; reduced and disrupted tight junctions; and enlarged perivascular spaces | [ |
| Multiple sclerosis | Fibrinogen leakage; decreased and disrupted tight junctions; and leukocyte infiltration | [ |
References
1. Engelhardt, B.; Coisne, C. Fluids and barriers of the CNS establish immune privilege by confining immune surveillance to a two-walled castle moat surrounding the CNS castle. Fluids Barriers CNS; 2011; 8, 4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-8-4]
2. Obermeier, B.; Daneman, R.; Ransohoff, R.M. Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Nat. Med.; 2013; 19, pp. 1584-1596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.3407] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24309662]
3. Zlokovic, B.V. The Blood-brain barrier in health and chronic neurodegenerative disorders. Neuron; 2008; 57, pp. 178-201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18215617]
4. Engelhardt, B.; Sorokin, L. The blood–brain and the blood and dash; cerebrospinal fluid barriers: Function and dysfunction. Semin. Immunopathol.; 2009; 31, pp. 497-511. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00281-009-0177-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19779720]
5. Tietz, S.; Engelhardt, B. Brain barriers: Crosstalk between complex tight junctions and adherens junctions. J. Cell Biol.; 2015; 209, pp. 493-506. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201412147] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26008742]
6. Redzic, Z. Molecular biology of the blood-brain and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers: Similarities and differences. Fluids Barriers CNS; 2011; 8, 3. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-8-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21349151]
7. Zhao, Z.; Nelson, A.R.; Betsholtz, C.; Zlokovic, B.V. Establishment and dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier. Cell; 2015; 163, pp. 1064-1078. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.067]
8. Sweeney, M.D.; Kisler, K.; Montagne, A.; Toga, A.W.; Zlokovic, B.V. The role of brain vasculature in neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Neurosci.; 2018; 21, pp. 1318-1331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0234-x]
9. Stamatovic, S.M.; Keep, R.F.; Andjelkovic, A.V. Brain endothelial cell-cell junctions: How to “Open” the blood brain barrier. Curr. Neuropharmacol.; 2008; 6, pp. 179-192. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157015908785777210]
10. Greene, C.; Campbell, M. Tight junction modulation of the blood brain barrier: CNS delivery of small molecules. Tissue Barriers; 2016; 4, e1138017. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2015.1138017]
11. Lochhead, J.J.; Yang, J.; Ronaldson, P.T.; Davis, T.P. Structure, function, and regulation of the blood-brain barrier tight junction in central nervous system disorders. Front. Physiol.; 2020; 11, 914. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00914] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848858]
12. Winkler, E.A.; Bell, R.D.; Zlokovic, B.V. Central nervous system pericytes in health and disease. Nat. Neurosci.; 2011; 14, pp. 1398-1405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2946] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22030551]
13. Engelhardt, S.; Patkar, S.; Ogunshola, O. Cell-specific blood-brain barrier regulation in health and disease: A focus on hypoxia. Br. J. Pharmacol.; 2014; 171, pp. 1210-1230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.12489] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24641185]
14. Xiao, M.; Xiao, Z.J.; Yang, B.; Lan, Z.; Fang, F. Blood-brain barrier: More contributor to disruption of central nervous system homeostasis than victim in neurological disorders. Front. Neurosci.; 2020; 14, 764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00764]
15. Kaur, J.; Fahmy, L.M.; Davoodi-Bojd, E.; Zhang, L.; Ding, G.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chopp, M.; Jiang, Q. Waste clearance in the Brain. Front. Neuroanat.; 2021; 15, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2021.665803]
16. Hladky, S.B.; Barrand, M.A. Mechanisms of fluid movement into, through and out of the brain: Evaluation of the evidence. Fluids Barriers CNS; 2014; 11, 26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-11-26]
17. Hladky, S.B.; Barrand, M.A. Elimination of substances from the brain parenchyma: Efflux via perivascular pathways and via the blood-brain barrier. Fluids Barriers CNS; 2018; 15, 30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-018-0113-6]
18. Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Tao, C.; Xu, Z.; Chen, W.; Wang, C.; Song, L.; Zheng, J.; Gao, F. Blood-brain barrier disruption and perivascular beta-amyloid accumulation in the brain of aged rats with spontaneous hypertension: Evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Korean J. Radiol.; 2018; 19, pp. 498-507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.498]
19. Shaltiel-Karyo, R.; Frenkel-Pinter, M.; Rockenstein, E.; Patrick, C.; Levy-Sakin, M.; Schiller, A.; Egoz-Matia, N.; Masliah, E.; Segal, D.; Gazit, E. A Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) Disrupter Is Also a Potent α-Synuclein (α-syn) Aggregation Inhibitor: A novel dual mechanism of mannitol for the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). J. Biol. Chem.; 2013; 288, pp. 17579-17588. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.434787]
20. Dyrna, F.; Hanske, S.; Krueger, M.; Bechmann, I. The blood-brain barrier. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol.; 2013; 8, pp. 763-773. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11481-013-9473-5]
21. Patel, N.; Kirmi, O. Anatomy and imaging of the normal meninges. Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI; 2009; 30, pp. 559-564. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2009.08.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20099639]
22. Mack, J.; Squier, W.; Eastman, J.T. Anatomy and development of the meninges: Implications for subdural collections and CSF circulation. Pediatr. Radiol.; 2009; 39, pp. 200-210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1084-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19165479]
23. Vandenabeele, F.; Creemers, J.; Lambrichts, I. Ultrastructure of the human spinal arachnoid mater and dura mater. J. Anat.; 1996; 189, 417.
24. Yasuda, K.; Cline, C.; Vogel, P.; Onciu, M.; Fatima, S.; Sorrentino, B.P.; Thirumaran, R.K.; Ekins, S.; Urade, Y.; Fujimori, K. et al. Drug transporters on arachnoid barrier cells contribute to the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. Drug Metab. Dispos.; 2013; 41, pp. 923-931. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.050344] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23298861]
25. Hutchings, M.; Weller, R.O. Anatomical relationships of the pia mater to cerebral blood vessels in man. J. Neurosurg.; 1986; 65, pp. 316-325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1986.65.3.0316] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3734882]
26. Weller, R. Microscopic morphology and histology of the human meninges. Morphologie; 2005; 89, pp. 22-34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1286-0115(05)83235-7]
27. Mastorakos, P.; McGavern, D. The anatomy and immunology of vasculature in the central nervous system. Sci. Immunol.; 2019; 4, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aav0492]
28. Iliff, J.J.; Wang, M.; Liao, Y.; Plogg, B.A.; Peng, W.; Gundersen, G.A.; Benveniste, H.; Vates, G.E.; Deane, R.; Goldman, S.A. et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates csf flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci. Transl. Med.; 2012; 4, 147ra111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748]
29. Howell, O.; Schulz-Trieglaff, E.K.; Carassiti, D.; Gentleman, S.M.; Nicholas, R.; Roncaroli, F.; Reynolds, R. Extensive grey matter pathology in the cerebellum in multiple sclerosis is linked to inflammation in the subarachnoid space. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.; 2015; 41, pp. 798-813. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nan.12199]
30. Owens, T.; Bechmann, I.; Engelhardt, B. Perivascular spaces and the two steps to neuroinflammation. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.; 2008; 67, pp. 1113-1121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e31818f9ca8]
31. Zheng, Z.; Chopp, M.; Chen, J. Multifaceted roles of pericytes in central nervous system homeostasis and disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.; 2020; 40, pp. 1381-1401. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20911331] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32208803]
32. Daneman, R.; Zhou, L.; Kebede, A.A.; Barres, B.A. Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature; 2010; 468, pp. 562-566. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09513] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20944625]
33. Sweeney, M.; Ayyadurai, S.; Zlokovic, B.V. Pericytes of the neurovascular unit: Key functions and signaling pathways. Nat. Neurosci.; 2016; 19, pp. 771-783. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.4288] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227366]
34. Sonar, S.A.; Lal, G. Blood-brain barrier and its function during inflammation and autoimmunity. J. Leukoc. Biol.; 2018; 103, pp. 839-853. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.1RU1117-428R]
35. Haigh, J.; Morelli, P.I.; Gerhardt, H.; Haigh, K.; Tsien, J.; Damert, A.; Miquerol, L.; Muhlner, U.; Klein, R.; Ferrara, N. et al. Cortical and retinal defects caused by dosage-dependent reductions in VEGF-A paracrine signaling. Dev. Biol.; 2003; 262, pp. 225-241. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00356-7]
36. Olsson, A.-K.; Dimberg, A.; Kreuger, J.; Claesson-Welsh, L. VEGF receptor signalling? In control of vascular function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2006; 7, pp. 359-371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1911]
37. Daneman, R.; Agalliu, D.; Zhou, L.; Kuhnert, F.; Kuo, C.J.; Barres, B.A. Wnt/β-catenin signaling is required for CNS, but not non-CNS, angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2009; 106, pp. 641-646. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805165106]
38. Liebner, S.; Corada, M.; Bangsow, T.; Babbage, J.; Taddei, A.; Czupalla, C.J.; Reis, M.; Felici, A.; Wolburg, H.; Fruttiger, M. et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling controls development of the blood-brain barrier. J. Cell Biol.; 2008; 183, pp. 409-417. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200806024]
39. Tam, S.J.; Richmond, D.L.; Kaminker, J.S.; Modrusan, Z.; Martin-McNulty, B.; Cao, T.C.; Weimer, R.M.; Carano, R.A.; van Bruggen, N.; Watts, R.J. Death receptors DR6 and TROY regulate brain vascular development. Dev. Cell; 2012; 22, pp. 403-417. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.018]
40. Alvarez, J.I.; Dodelet-Devillers, A.; Kebir, H.; Ifergan, I.; Fabre, P.J.; Terouz, S.; Sabbagh, M.; Wosik, K.; Bourbonnière, L.; Bernard, M. et al. The hedgehog pathway promotes blood-brain barrier integrity and CNS immune quiescence. Science; 2011; 334, pp. 1727-1731. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1206936]
41. Ronaldson, P.T.; Davis, T.P. Regulation of blood-brain barrier integrity by microglia in health and disease: A therapeutic opportunity. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.; 2020; 40, pp. S6-S24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20951995] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32928017]
42. Haruwaka, K.; Ikegami, A.; Tachibana, Y.; Ohno, N.; Konishi, H.; Hashimoto, A.; Matsumoto, M.; Kato, D.; Ono, R.; Kiyama, H. et al. Dual microglia effects on blood brain barrier permeability induced by systemic inflammation. Nat. Commun.; 2019; 10, 5816. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13812-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31862977]
43. Reed, M.J.; Damodarasamy, M.; Banks, W.A. The extracellular matrix of the blood–brain barrier: Structural and functional roles in health, aging, and Alzheimer’s disease. Tissue Barriers; 2019; 7, 1651157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2019.1651157] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31505997]
44. Turtzo, L.C.; Jikaria, N.; Cota, M.R.; Williford, J.P.; Uche, V.; Davis, T.; MacLaren, J.; Moses, A.D.; Parikh, G.; Castro, M.A. et al. Meningeal blood-brain barrier disruption in acute traumatic brain injury. Brain Commun.; 2020; 2, fcaa143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa143]
45. Engelhardt, B.; Vajkoczy, P.; Weller, R.O. The movers and shapers in immune privilege of the CNS. Nat. Immunol.; 2017; 18, pp. 123-131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.3666]
46. Spector, R.; Snodgrass, S.R.; Johanson, C.E. A balanced view of the cerebrospinal fluid composition and functions: Focus on adult humans. Exp. Neurol.; 2015; 273, pp. 57-68. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.07.027]
47. Verheggen, I.C.M.; de Jong, J.J.A.; van Boxtel, M.P.J.; Postma, A.A.; Jansen, J.F.A.; Verhey, F.R.J.; Backes, W.H. Imaging the role of blood-brain barrier disruption in normal cognitive ageing. GeroScience; 2020; 42, pp. 1751-1764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-020-00282-1]
48. Erdő, F.; Denes, L.; de Lange, E. Age-associated physiological and pathological changes at the blood–brain barrier: A review. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.; 2017; 37, pp. 4-24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X16679420]
49. Nation, D.A.; Sweeney, M.D.; Montagne, A.; Sagare, A.P.; D’Orazio, L.M.; Pachicano, M.; Sepehrband, F.; Nelson, A.R.; Buennagel, D.P.; Harrington, M.G. et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat. Med.; 2019; 25, pp. 270-276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0297-y]
50. Montagne, A.; Barnes, S.R.; Sweeney, M.D.; Halliday, M.R.; Sagare, A.P.; Zhao, Z.; Toga, A.W.; Jacobs, R.E.; Liu, C.Y.; Amezcua, L. et al. Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown in the Aging Human Hippocampus. Neuron; 2015; 85, pp. 296-302. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.032]
51. Tarumi, T.; Zhang, R. Cerebral blood flow in normal aging adults: Cardiovascular determinants, clinical implications, and aerobic fitness. J. Neurochem.; 2018; 144, pp. 595-608. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14234] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28986925]
52. Abbott, N.J.; Patabendige, A.A.K.; Dolman, D.E.M.; Yusof, S.R.; Begley, D.J. Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol. Dis.; 2010; 37, pp. 13-25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19664713]
53. Zeevi, N.; Pachter, J.; McCullough, L.D.; Wolfson, L.; Kuchel, G. The Blood-brain barrier: Geriatric relevance of a critical brain-body interface. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.; 2010; 58, pp. 1749-1757. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03011.x]
54. Rosenberg, G.A.; Yang, Y. Vasogenic edema due to tight junction disruption by matrix metalloproteinases in cerebral ischemia. Neurosurg. Focus; 2007; 22, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3171/foc.2007.22.5.5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17613235]
55. Bell, R.D.; Winkler, E.A.; Sagare, A.P.; Singh, I.; LaRue, B.; Deane, R.; Zlokovic, B.V. Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron; 2010; 68, pp. 409-427. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.043]
56. Goodall, E.F.; Wang, C.; Simpson, J.E.; Baker, D.J.; Drew, D.R.; Heath, P.R.; Saffrey, M.J.; Romero, I.A.; Wharton, S.B. Age-associated changes in the blood-brain barrier: Comparative studies in human and mouse. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.; 2018; 44, pp. 747-748. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nan.12408] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28453876]
57. Sagare, A.P.; Sweeney, M.D.; Makshanoff, J.; Zlokovic, B.V. Shedding of soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β from human brain pericytes. Neurosci. Lett.; 2015; 607, pp. 97-101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2015.09.025]
58. Smith, A.J.; Duan, T.; Verkman, A.S. Aquaporin-4 reduces neuropathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease by remodeling peri-plaque astrocyte structure. Acta Neuropathol. Commun.; 2019; 7, 74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0728-0]
59. Duncombe, J.; Lennen, R.J.; Jansen, M.A.; Marshall, I.; Wardlaw, J.; Horsburgh, K. Ageing causes prominent neurovascular dysfunction associated with loss of astrocytic contacts and gliosis. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.; 2017; 43, pp. 477-491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nan.12375]
60. Ronaldson, P.T.; Davis, T. Blood-brain barrier integrity and glial support: Mechanisms that can be targeted for novel therapeutic approaches in stroke. Curr. Pharm. Des.; 2012; 18, pp. 3624-3644. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138161212802002625]
61. Huber, J.D.; Campos, C.R.; Mark, K.S.; Davis, T.P. Alterations in blood-brain barrier ICAM-1 expression and brain microglial activation after λ -carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol.; 2006; 290, pp. H732-H740. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00747.2005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16199477]
62. Berezowski, V.; Landry, C.; Dehouck, M.-P.; Cecchelli, R.; Fenart, L. Contribution of glial cells and pericytes to the mRNA profiles of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated proteins in an in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res.; 2004; 1018, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2004.05.092] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15262198]
63. Ryu, J.K.; Rafalski, V.A.; Meyer-Franke, A.; Adams, R.A.; Poda, S.B.; Coronado, P.E.R.; Pedersen, L.Ø.; Menon, V.; Baeten, K.M.; Sikorski, S.L. et al. Fibrin-targeting immunotherapy protects against neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Nat. Immunol.; 2018; 19, pp. 1212-1223. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41590-018-0232-x]
64. Merlini, M.; Rafalski, V.A.; Coronado, P.E.R.; Gill, T.M.; Ellisman, M.; Muthukumar, G.; Subramanian, K.S.; Ryu, J.K.; Syme, C.A.; Davalos, D. et al. Fibrinogen induces microglia-mediated spine elimination and cognitive impairment in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Neuron; 2019; 101, pp. 1099-1108.e6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737131]
65. Alexander, J.J. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the complement landscape. Mol. Immunol.; 2018; 102, pp. 26-31. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2018.06.267]
66. Jacob, A.; Alexander, J.J. Complement and blood-brain barrier integrity. Mol. Immunol.; 2014; 61, pp. 149-152. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2014.06.039]
67. Orsini, F.; De Blasio, D.; Zangari, R.; Zanier, E.R.; de Simoni, M.G. Versatility of the complement system in neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration and brain homeostasis. Front. Cell. Neurosci.; 2014; 8, 380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00380]
68. Choi, D.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Seo, J.-H.; Lee, J.; Choi, W.S.; Kim, Y.-S. Matrix metalloproteinase-3 causes dopaminergic neuronal death through nox1-regenerated oxidative stress. PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e115954. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115954]
69. Cai, Z.; Wan, C.-Q.; Liu, Z. Astrocyte and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol.; 2017; 264, pp. 2068-2074. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8593-x]
70. Bussian, T.J.; Aziz, A.; Meyer, C.F.; Swenson, B.L.; Van Deursen, J.M.; Baker, D.J. Clearance of senescent glial cells prevents tau-dependent pathology and cognitive decline. Nature; 2018; 562, pp. 578-582. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0543-y]
71. Mattson, M.P.; Magnus, T. Ageing and neuronal vulnerability. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.; 2006; 7, pp. 278-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1886] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16552414]
72. Piro, J.R.; Suidan, G.L.; Quan, J.; Pi, Y.Q.; O’Neill, S.M.; Ilardi, M.; Pozdnyakov, N.; Lanz, T.A.; Xi, H.; Bell, R.D. et al. Inhibition of 2-AG hydrolysis differentially regulates blood brain barrier permeability after injury. J. Neuroinflammation; 2018; 15, pp. 1-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1166-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29759062]
73. Labus, J.; Häckel, S.; Lucka, L.; Danker, K. Interleukin-1β induces an inflammatory response and the breakdown of the endothelial cell layer in an improved human THBMEC-based in vitro blood-brain barrier model. J. Neurosci. Methods; 2014; 228, pp. 35-45. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.03.002]
74. Tan, S.; Shan, Y.; Lin, Y.; Liao, S.; Zhang, B.; Zeng, Q.; Wang, Y.; Deng, Z.; Chen, C.; Hu, X. et al. Neutralization of interleukin-9 ameliorates experimental stroke by repairing the blood-brain barrierviadown-regulation of astrocyte-derived vascular endothelial growth factor-A. FASEB J.; 2018; 33, pp. 4376-4387. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.201801595RR]
75. Presta, I.; Vismara, M.F.M.; Novellino, F.; Donato, A.; Zaffino, P.; Scali, E.; Pirrone, K.C.; Spadea, M.F.; Malara, N.; Donato, G. Innate immunity cells and the neurovascular unit. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2018; 19, 3856. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123856] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30513991]
76. Cardoso, F.L.; Kittel, Á.; Veszelka, S.; Palmela, I.; Tóth, A.; Brites, D.; Deli, M.A.; Brito, M.A. Exposure to lipopolysaccharide and/or unconjugated bilirubin impair the integrity and function of brain microvascular endothelial cells. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e35919. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035919] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22586454]
77. Mayerhofer, R.; Fröhlich, E.E.; Reichmann, F.; Farzi, A.; Kogelnik, N.; Fröhlich, E.; Sattler, W.; Holzer, P. Diverse action of lipoteichoic acid and lipopolysaccharide on neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, and anxiety in mice. Brain Behav. Immun.; 2017; 60, pp. 174-187. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.10.011]
78. Argaw, A.T.; Gurfein, B.T.; Zhang, Y.; Zameer, A.; John, G.R. VEGF-mediated disruption of endothelial CLN-5 promotes blood-brain barrier breakdown. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2009; 106, pp. 1977-1982. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808698106]
79. Argaw, A.T.; Asp, L.; Zhang, J.; Navrazhina, K.; Pham, T.; Mariani, J.N.; Mahase, S.; Dutta, D.J.; Seto, J.; Kramer, E.G. et al. Astrocyte-derived VEGF-A drives blood-brain barrier disruption in CNS inflammatory disease. J. Clin. Investig.; 2012; 122, pp. 2454-2468. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI60842]
80. Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Duan, L.; Xiong, H.; Jiang, Y.; Liang, H. Microglia activation mediated by toll-like receptor-4 impairs brain white matter tracts in rats. J. Biomed. Res.; 2017; 32, pp. 136-144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.32.20170033]
81. Moritz, K.E.; McCormack, N.M.; Abera, M.B.; Viollet, C.; Yauger, Y.J.; Sukumar, G.; Dalgard, C.L.; Burnett, B.G. The role of the immunoproteasome in interferon-γ-mediated microglial activation. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 9365. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09715-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839214]
82. Akundi, R.S.; Candelario-Jalil, E.; Hess, S.; Hüll, M.; Lieb, K.; Gebicke-Haerter, P.J.; Fiebich, B.L. Signal transduction pathways regulating cyclooxygenase-2 in lipopolysaccharide-activated primary rat microglia. Glia; 2005; 51, pp. 199-208. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/glia.20198] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15800925]
83. Moreno, B.; Jukes, J.-P.; Vergara-Irigaray, N.; Errea, O.; Villoslada, P.; Perry, V.H.; Newman, T.A. Systemic inflammation induces axon injury during brain inflammation. Ann. Neurol.; 2011; 70, pp. 932-942. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.22550] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22190366]
84. Varatharaj, A.; Galea, I. The blood-brain barrier in systemic inflammation. Brain Behav. Immun.; 2017; 60, pp. 1-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.03.010]
85. Skelly, D.T.; Hennessy, E.; Dansereau, M.-A.; Cunningham, C. A Systematic Analysis of the Peripheral and CNS effects of systemic LPS, IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 Challenges in C57BL/6 Mice. PLoS ONE; 2013; 8, e69123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069123]
86. Ballard, C.; Gauthier, S.; Corbett, A.; Brayne, C.; Aarsland, D.; Jones, E. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet; 2011; 377, pp. 1019-1031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61349-9]
87. Palmer, A.M. Neuroprotective therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease: Progress and prospects. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.; 2011; 32, pp. 141-147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2010.12.007]
88. Hardy, J. Has the amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease been proved?. Curr. Alzheimer Res.; 2006; 3, pp. 71-73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156720506775697098]
89. Morris, R.; Mucke, L. Alzheimer’s disease: A needle from the haystack. Nature; 2006; 440, pp. 284-285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/440284a]
90. Karran, E.; Mercken, M.; De Strooper, B. The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease: An appraisal for the development of therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.; 2011; 10, pp. 698-712. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd3505]
91. Zlokovic, B.V.; Deane, R.; Sallstrom, J.; Chow, N.; Miano, J. Neurovascular pathways and alzheimer amyloid β-peptide. Brain Pathol.; 2006; 15, pp. 78-83. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2005.tb00103.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15779240]
92. Streit, W.J. Microglia and Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. J. Neurosci. Res.; 2004; 77, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20093] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15197750]
93. Banks, W.; Robinson, S.; Verma, S.; Morley, J. Efflux of human and mouse amyloid β proteins 1–40 and 1–42 from brain: Impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience; 2003; 121, pp. 487-492. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(03)00474-3]
94. Desai, B.S.; Monahan, A.J.; Carvey, P.M.; Hendey, B. Blood-brain Barrier pathology in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease: Implications for drug therapy. Cell Transplant.; 2007; 16, pp. 285-299. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3727/000000007783464731]
95. Johnson, L.A.; Olsen, R.H.; Merkens, L.S.; DeBarber, A.; Steiner, R.D.; Sullivan, P.M.; Maeda, N.; Raber, J. Apolipoprotein E–low density lipoprotein receptor interaction affects spatial memory retention and brain ApoE levels in an isoform-dependent manner. Neurobiol. Dis.; 2014; 64, pp. 150-162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2013.12.016] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24412220]
96. Yamazaki, Y.; Zhao, N.; Caulfield, T.R.; Liu, C.-C.; Bu, G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: Pathobiology and targeting strategies. Nat. Rev. Neurol.; 2019; 15, pp. 501-518. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0228-7]
97. Forner, S.; Kawauchi, S.; Balderrama-Gutierrez, G.; Kramár, E.A.; Matheos, D.P.; Phan, J.; Javonillo, D.I.; Tran, K.M.; Hingco, E.; da Cunha, C. et al. Systematic phenotyping and characterization of the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Data; 2021; 8, 270. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-01054-y]
98. Huang, H.; Nie, S.; Cao, M.; Marshall, C.; Gao, J.; Xiao, N.; Hu, G.; Xiao, M. Characterization of AD-like phenotype in aged APPSwe/PS1dE9 mice. AGE; 2016; 38, pp. 303-322. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9929-7]
99. Oddo, S.; Caccamo, A.; Shepherd, J.D.; Murphy, M.P.; Golde, T.E.; Kayed, R.; Metherate, R.; Mattson, M.P.; Akbari, Y.; LaFerla, F.M. Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease with plaques and tangles: Intracellular abeta and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron; 2003; 39, pp. 409-421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00434-3]
100. Ryu, J.K.; McLarnon, J.G. A leaky blood-brain barrier, fibrinogen infiltration and microglial reactivity in inflamed Alzheimer’s disease brain. J. Cell. Mol. Med.; 2009; 13, pp. 2911-2925. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00434.x]
101. Raven, E.P.; Lu, P.H.; Tishler, T.A.; Heydari, P.; Bartzokis, G. Increased iron levels and decreased tissue integrity in hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease detected in vivo with magnetic resonance imaging. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.; 2013; 37, pp. 127-136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-130209] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23792695]
102. Kim, S.; Moon, G.J.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, D.; Kim, J.; Nam, Y.; Sharma, C.; Leem, E.; Lee, S.; Kim, K. et al. Control of hippocampal prothrombin kringle-2 (pKr-2) expression reduces neurotoxic symptoms in five familial Alzheimer’s disease mice. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.; 2021; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15681] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34524687]
103. Squire, L.R. Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychol. Rev.; 1992; 99, pp. 195-231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.195] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1594723]
104. Brkic, M.; Balusu, S.; Libert, C.; Vandenbroucke, R.E. Friends or Foes: Matrix metalloproteinases and their multifaceted roles in neurodegenerative diseases. Mediat. Inflamm.; 2015; 2015, 620581. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/620581] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538832]
105. Brilha, S.; Ong, C.W.M.; Weksler, B.; Romero, N.; Couraud, P.-O.; Friedland, J.S. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity and a downregulated Hedgehog pathway impair blood-brain barrier function in an in vitro model of CNS tuberculosis. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 16031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16250-3]
106. Yamazaki, Y.; Shinohara, M.; Shinohara, M.; Yamazaki, A.; Murray, M.; Liesinger, A.M.; Heckman, M.G.; Lesser, E.R.; Parisi, J.E.; Petersen, R.C. et al. Selective loss of cortical endothelial tight junction proteins during Alzheimer’s disease progression. Brain; 2019; 142, pp. 1077-1092. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz011]
107. Wu, Z.; Guo, H.; Chow, N.; Sallstrom, J.; Bell, R.D.; Deane, R.; Brooks, A.I.; Kanagala, S.; Rubio, A.; Sagare, A. et al. Role of the MEOX2 homeobox gene in neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Med.; 2005; 11, pp. 959-965. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm1287]
108. Lau, S.-F.; Cao, H.; Fu, A.K.Y.; Ip, N.Y. Single-nucleus transcriptome analysis reveals dysregulation of angiogenic endothelial cells and neuroprotective glia in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2020; 117, pp. 25800-25809. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008762117]
109. Taylor, X.; Cisternas, P.; You, Y.; You, Y.; Xiang, S.; Marambio, Y.; Zhang, J.; Vidal, R.; Lasagna-Reeves, C.A. A1 reactive astrocytes and a loss of TREM2 are associated with an early stage of pathology in a mouse model of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. J. Neuroinflammation; 2020; 17, 223. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01900-7]
110. Ding, R.; Hase, Y.; Ameen-Ali, K.E.; Ndung’U, M.; Stevenson, W.; Barsby, J.; Gourlay, R.; Akinyemi, T.; Akinyemi, R.; Uemura, M.T. et al. Loss of capillary pericytes and the blood–brain barrier in white matter in poststroke and vascular dementias and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol.; 2020; 30, pp. 1087-1101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12888]
111. Halliday, M.R.; Rege, S.V.; Ma, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Miller, C.A.; Winkler, E.A.; Zlokovic, B.V. Accelerated pericyte degeneration and blood–brain barrier breakdown in apolipoprotein E4 carriers with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.; 2016; 36, pp. 216-227. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.44] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25757756]
112. Nishitsuji, K.; Hosono, T.; Nakamura, T.; Bu, G.; Michikawa, M. Apolipoprotein E regulates the integrity of tight junctions in an isoform-dependent manner in an in vitro blood-brain barrier model. J. Biol. Chem.; 2011; 286, pp. 17536-17542. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.225532] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21471207]
113. Alafuzoff, I.; Adolfsson, R.; Bucht, G.; Winblad, B. Albumin and immunoglobulin in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier function in patients with dementia of alzheimer type and multi-infarct dementia. J. Neurol. Sci.; 1983; 60, pp. 465-472. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(83)90157-0]
114. Tibbling, G.; Link, H.; Öhman, S. Principles of albumin and IgG analyses in neurological disorders. I. Establishment of reference values. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig.; 1977; 37, pp. 385-390. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365517709091496]
115. Hampel, H.; Kötter, H.U.; Möller, H.-J. Blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier dysfunction for high molecular weight proteins in alzheimer disease and major depression. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord.; 1997; 11, pp. 78-87. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002093-199706000-00004]
116. Skoog, I.; Wallin, A.; Fredman, P.; Hesse, C.; Aevarsson, O.; Karlsson, I.; Gottfries, C.G.; Blennow, K. A population study on blood-brain barrier function in 85-year-olds: Relation to Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Neurology; 1998; 50, pp. 966-971. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.50.4.966]
117. Slemmon, J.R.; Hughes, C.M.; Campbell, G.A.; Flood, D.G. Increased levels of hemoglobin-derived and other peptides in Alzheimer’s disease cerebellum. J. Neurosci.; 1994; 14, pp. 2225-2235. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-02225.1994]
118. Paul, J.; Strickland, S.; Melchor, J.P. Fibrin deposition accelerates neurovascular damage and neuroinflammation in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Exp. Med.; 2007; 204, pp. 1999-2008. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20070304]
119. Cortes-Canteli, M.; Paul, J.; Norris, E.H.; Bronstein, R.; Ahn, H.J.; Zamolodchikov, D.; Bhuvanendran, S.; Fenz, K.M.; Strickland, S. Fibrinogen and β-amyloid association alters thrombosis and fibrinolysis: A possible contributing factor to Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron; 2010; 66, pp. 695-709. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.05.014]
120. Zipser, B.; Johanson, C.; Gonzalez, L.; Berzin, T.; Tavares, R.; Hulette, C.; Vitek, M.; Hovanesian, V.; Stopa, E. Microvascular injury and blood-brain barrier leakage in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging; 2007; 28, pp. 977-986. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.05.016]
121. Davie, E.W.; Fujikawa, K.; Kisiel, W. The coagulation cascade: Initiation, maintenance, and regulation. Biochemistry; 2002; 30, pp. 10363-10370. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00107a001]
122. Choi, S.-H.; Lee, D.Y.; Kim, S.U.; Jin, B.K. Thrombin-induced oxidative stress contributes to the death of hippocampal neurons in vivo: Role of microglial NADPH oxidase. J. Neurosci.; 2005; 25, pp. 4082-4090. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4306-04.2005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15843610]
123. Freeze, W.M.; Bacskai, B.J.; Frosch, M.P.; Jacobs, H.I.; Backes, W.H.; Greenberg, S.M.; van Veluw, S.J. Blood-brain barrier leakage and microvascular lesions in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Stroke; 2019; 50, pp. 328-335. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023788] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30661497]
124. Yates, P.A.; Desmond, P.M.; Phal, P.M.; Steward, C.; Szoeke, C.; Salvado, O.; Ellis, K.A.; Martins, R.N.; Masters, C.L.; Ames, D. et al. Incidence of cerebral microbleeds in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology; 2014; 82, pp. 1266-1273. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000285] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24623839]
125. Tian, J.; Shi, J.; Smallman, R.; Iwatsubo, T.; Mann, D.M.A. Relationships in Alzheimer’s disease between the extent of Abeta deposition in cerebral blood vessel walls, as cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and the amount of cerebrovascular smooth muscle cells and collagen. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.; 2006; 32, pp. 332-340. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2006.00732.x]
126. Wu, S.; Liu, H.; Zhao, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Xia, D.; Xiao, C.; Cheng, J.; Zhao, Z.; He, Y. Environmental lead exposure aggravates the progression of Alzheimer’s disease in mice by targeting on blood brain barrier. Toxicol. Lett.; 2020; 319, pp. 138-147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.11.009]
127. He, J.-T.; Zhao, X.; Xu, L.; Mao, C.-Y. Vascular Risk Factors and Alzheimer’s Disease: Blood-brain barrier disruption, metabolic syndromes, and molecular links. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.; 2020; 73, pp. 39-58. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190764]
128. Paris, D.; Patel, N.; DelleDonne, A.; Quadros, A.; Smeed, R.; Mullan, M. Impaired angiogenesis in a transgenic mouse model of cerebral amyloidosis. Neurosci. Lett.; 2004; 366, pp. 80-85. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.017]
129. Yin, K.-J.; Cirrito, J.R.; Yan, P.; Hu, X.; Xiao, Q.; Pan, X.; Bateman, R.; Song, H.; Hsu, F.-F.; Turk, J. et al. Matrix Metalloproteinases Expressed by Astrocytes Mediate Extracellular Amyloid-beta Peptide Catabolism. J. Neurosci.; 2006; 26, pp. 10939-10948. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2085-06.2006]
130. Melchor, J.P.; Pawlak, R.; Strickland, S. The tissue plasminogen activator-plasminogen proteolytic cascade accelerates Amyloid-β (Aβ) degradation and inhibits Aβ-Induced neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci.; 2003; 23, pp. 8867-8871. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08867.2003]
131. Farris, W.; Mansourian, S.; Chang, Y.; Lindsley, L.; Eckman, E.; Frosch, M.P.; Eckman, C.B.; Tanzi, R.E.; Selkoe, D.J.; Guénette, S. Insulin-degrading enzyme regulates the levels of insulin, amyloid -protein, and the -amyloid precursor protein intracellular domain in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2003; 100, pp. 4162-4167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0230450100] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12634421]
132. Iwata, N.; Tsubuki, S.; Takaki, Y.; Shirotani, K.; Lu, B.; Gerard, N.P.; Gerard, C.; Hama, E.; Lee, H.-J.; Saido, T.C. Metabolic regulation of brain abeta by neprilysin. Science; 2001; 292, pp. 1550-1552. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1059946] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11375493]
133. Kook, S.-Y.; Hong, H.S.; Moon, M.; Ha, C.M.; Chang, S.; Mook-Jung, I. Aβ₁₋₄₂-RAGE interaction disrupts tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier via Ca2+-Calcineurin Signaling. J. Neurosci.; 2012; 32, pp. 8845-8854. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6102-11.2012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22745485]
134. Carrano, A.; Hoozemans, J.J.; van der Vies, S.M.; Rozemuller, A.J.; van Horssen, J.; de Vries, H.E. Amyloid beta induces oxidative stress-mediated blood-brain barrier changes in capillary amyloid angiopathy. Antioxid. Redox Signal.; 2011; 15, pp. 1167-1178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ars.2011.3895]
135. Bell, R.D.; Deane, R.; Chow, N.; Long, X.; Sagare, A.; Singh, I.; Streb, J.W.; Guo, H.; Rubio, A.; Van Nostrand, W. et al. SRF and myocardin regulate LRP-mediated amyloid-β clearance in brain vascular cells. Nat. Cell Biol.; 2009; 11, pp. 143-153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1819]
136. Hickman, S.E.; Allison, E.K.; El Khoury, J. microglial dysfunction and defective β-amyloid clearance pathways in aging Alzheimer’s disease mice. J. Neurosci.; 2008; 28, pp. 8354-8360. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0616-08.2008]
137. Weller, R.O.; Subash, M.; Preston, S.; Mazanti, I.; Carare, R.O. Perivascular drainage of amyloid-beta peptides from the brain and its failure in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol.; 2007; 18, pp. 253-266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00133.x]
138. Ujiie, M.; Dickstein, D.L.; Carlow, D.A.; Jefferies, W.A. Blood-brain barrier permeability precedes senile plaque formation in an alzheimer disease model. Microcirculation; 2003; 10, pp. 463-470. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.mn.7800212]
139. Stunff, H.L.; Véret, J.; Kassis, N.; Denom, J.; Meneyrol, K.; Paul, J.L.; Cruciani-Guglielmacci, C.; Magnan, C.; Janel, N. Deciphering the link between hyperhomocysteinemia and ceramide metabolism in Alzheimer-type neurodegeneration. Front Neurol.; 2019; 10, 807. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00807]
140. Iadecola, C. The pathobiology of vascular dementia. Neuron; 2013; 80, pp. 844-866. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008]
141. Sengillo, J.D.; Winkler, E.A.; Walker, C.T.; Sullivan, J.S.; Johnson, M.; Zlokovic, B.V. Deficiency in mural vascular cells coincides with blood-brain barrier disruption in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol.; 2013; 23, pp. 303-310. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23126372]
142. Schultz, N.; Brännström, K.; Byman, E.; Moussaud, S.; Nielsen, H.M.; Olofsson, A.; Wennström, M.; Bank, T.N.B. Amyloid-beta 1–40 is associated with alterations in NG2+ pericyte population ex vivo and in vitro. Aging Cell; 2018; 17, e12728. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.12728] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29453790]
143. Bell, R.D.; Winkler, E.A.; Singh, I.; Sagare, A.P.; Deane, R.; Wu, Z.; Holtzman, D.M.; Betsholtz, C.; Armulik, A.; Sallstrom, J. et al. Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nature; 2012; 485, pp. 512-516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11087] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22622580]
144. Sagare, A.P.; Bell, R.D.; Zhao, Z.; Ma, Q.; Winkler, E.A.; Ramanathan, A.; Zlokovic, B.V. Pericyte loss influences Alzheimer-like neurodegeneration in mice. Nat. Commun.; 2013; 4, 2932. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3932]
145. Kimbrough, I.F.; Robel, S.; Roberson, E.D.; Sontheimer, H. Vascular amyloidosis impairs the gliovascular unit in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain; 2015; 138, pp. 3716-3733. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv327]
146. Castillo-Carranza, D.L.; Nilson, A.N.; Van Skike, C.E.; Jahrling, J.B.; Patel, K.; Garach, P.; Gerson, J.E.; Sengupta, U.; Abisambra, J.; Nelson, P. et al. Cerebral microvascular accumulation of tau oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease and related tauopathies. Aging Dis.; 2017; 8, pp. 257-266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14336/AD.2017.0112]
147. Canepa, E.; Fossati, S. Impact of tau on neurovascular pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurol.; 2021; 11, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.573324]
148. Bennett, R.E.; Robbins, A.B.; Hu, M.; Cao, X.; Betensky, R.A.; Clark, T.; Das, S.; Hyman, B.T. Tau induces blood vessel abnormalities and angiogenesis-related gene expression in P301L transgenic mice and human Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2018; 115, pp. E1289-E1298. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710329115]
149. Michalicova, A.; Majerova, P.; Kovac, A. Tau protein and its role in blood–brain barrier dysfunction. Front. Mol. Neurosci.; 2020; 13, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2020.570045]
150. Albrecht, D.; Isenberg, A.L.; Stradford, J.; Monreal, T.; Sagare, A.; Pachicano, M.; Sweeney, M.; Toga, A.; Zlokovic, B.; Chui, H. et al. Associations between vascular function and tau PET are associated with global cognition and amyloid. J. Neurosci.; 2020; 40, pp. 8573-8586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1230-20.2020]
151. Liu, C.; Yamazaki, Y.; Heckman, M.G.; Martens, Y.A.; Jia, L.; Yamazaki, A.; Diehl, N.N.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, N.; DeTure, M. et al. Tau and apolipoprotein E modulate cerebrovascular tight junction integrity independent of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement.; 2020; 16, pp. 1372-1383. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.12104] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32827351]
152. Emrani, S.; Lamar, M.; Price, C.C.; Wasserman, V.; Matusz, E.; Au, R.; Swenson, R.; Nagele, R.; Heilman, K.M.; Libon, D.J. Alzheimer’s/Vascular spectrum dementia: Classification in addition to diagnosis. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.; 2020; 73, pp. 63-71. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190654] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31815693]
153. Boyle, P.A.; Yu, L.; Wilson, R.S.; Leurgans, S.E.; Schneider, J.A.; Bennett, D.A. Person-specific contribution of neuropathologies to cognitive loss in old age. Ann. Neurol.; 2018; 83, pp. 74-83. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25123]
154. Silbert, L.C.; Dodge, H.H.; Perkins, L.G.; Sherbakov, L.; Lahna, D.; Erten-Lyons, D.; Woltjer, R.; Shinto, L.; Kaye, J.A. Trajectory of white matter hyperintensity burden preceding mild cognitive impairment. Neurology; 2012; 79, pp. 741-747. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182661f2b]
155. Querfurth, H.W.; LaFerla, F.M. Alzheimer’s Disease. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2010; 362, pp. 329-344. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0909142]
156. Zlokovic, B.V. Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.; 2011; 12, pp. 723-738. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3114]
157. Malek, N.; Lawton, M.A.; Swallow, D.M.A.; Grosset, K.A.; Marrinan, S.L.; Bajaj, N.; Barker, R.A.; Burn, D.J.; Hardy, J.; Morris, H.R. et al. Vascular disease and vascular risk factors in relation to motor features and cognition in early Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord.; 2016; 31, pp. 1518-1526. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.26698] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324570]
158. Drouin-Ouellet, J.; Sawiak, S.; Cisbani, G.; Lagacé, M.; Kuan, W.-L.; Saint-Pierre, M.; Dury, R.J.; Alata, W.; St-Amour, I.; Mason, S.L. et al. Cerebrovascular and blood-brain barrier impairments in Huntington’s disease: Potential implications for its pathophysiology. Ann. Neurol.; 2015; 78, pp. 160-177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.24406]
159. Lin, C.-Y.; Hsu, Y.-H.; Lin, M.-H.; Yang, T.-H.; Chen, H.-M.; Chen, Y.-C.; Hsiao, H.-Y.; Chen, C.-C.; Chern, Y.; Chang, C. Neurovascular abnormalities in humans and mice with Huntington’s disease. Exp. Neurol.; 2013; 250, pp. 20-30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.08.019]
160. Winkler, E.A.; Sengillo, J.D.; Sullivan, J.S.; Henkel, J.S.; Appel, S.H.; Zlokovic, B.V. Blood–spinal cord barrier breakdown and pericyte reductions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol.; 2012; 125, pp. 111-120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-012-1039-8]
161. Friese, M.A.; Schattling, B.; Fugger, L. Mechanisms of neurodegeneration and axonal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol.; 2014; 10, pp. 225-238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.37] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24638138]
162. Gaitán, M.I.; Shea, C.D.; Evangelou, I.E.; Bs, R.D.S.; Ms, K.M.F.; Bielekova, B.; Massacesi, L.; Reich, D.S. Evolution of the blood-brain barrier in newly forming multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann. Neurol.; 2011; 70, pp. 22-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.22472] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21710622]
163. Gray, M.T.; Woulfe, J.M. Striatal blood-brain barrier permeability in Parkinson’S disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.; 2015; 35, pp. 747-750. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.32] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25757748]
164. Pienaar, I.S.; Lee, C.H.; Elson, J.L.; McGuinness, L.; Gentleman, S.M.; Kalaria, R.N.; Dexter, D.T. Deep-brain stimulation associates with improved microvascular integrity in the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis.; 2015; 74, pp. 392-405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.12.006]
165. Garbuzova-Davis, S.; Hernandez-Ontiveros, D.G.; Rodrigues, M.C.; Haller, E.; Frisina-Deyo, A.; Mirtyl, S.; Sallot, S.; Saporta, S.; Borlongan, C.; Sanberg, P.R. Impaired blood-brain/spinal cord barrier in ALS patients. Brain Res.; 2012; 1469, pp. 114-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.056]
166. Henkel, J.S.; Beers, D.R.; Wen, S.; Bowser, R.; Appel, S.H. decreased mRNA expression of tight junction proteins in lumbar spinal cords of patients with ALS. Neurology; 2009; 72, pp. 1614-1616. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a41228]
167. Miyazaki, K.; Ohta, Y.; Nagai, M.; Morimoto, N.; Kurata, T.; Takehisa, Y.; Ikeda, Y.; Matsuura, T.; Abe, K. Disruption of neurovascular unit prior to motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurosci. Res.; 2011; 89, pp. 718-728. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22594]
168. Kirk, J.; Plumb, J.; Mirakhur, M.; McQuaid, S. Tight junctional abnormality in multiple sclerosis white matter affects all calibres of vessel and is associated with blood-brain barrier leakage and active demyelination. J. Pathol.; 2003; 201, pp. 319-327. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.1434]
169. Gold, B.T.; Shao, X.; Sudduth, T.L.; Jicha, G.A.; Wilcock, D.M.; Seago, E.R.; Wang, D.J. Water exchange rate across the blood-brain barrier is associated with CSF amyloid-&β 42 in healthy older adults. Alzheimer’s Dement.; 2021; 17, pp. 2020-2029. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.12357]
170. Toornvliet, R.; Vanberckel, B.; Luurtsema, G.; Lubberink, M.; Geldof, A.A.; Bosch, T.M.; Oerlemans, R.; Lammertsma, A.A.; Franssen, E.J.; Berckel, B.N. Effect of age on functional P-glycoprotein in the blood-brain barrier measured by use of (R)-[11C] verapamil and positron emission tomography. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.; 2006; 79, pp. 540-548. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clpt.2006.02.004]
171. Cao, C.; Cirrito, J.R.; Lin, X.; Wang, L.; Verges, D.K.; Dickson, A.; Mamcarz, M.; Zhang, C.; Mori, T.; Aredash, G.W. et al. Caffeine Suppresses Amyloid-β levels in plasma and brain of alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.; 2009; 17, pp. 681-697. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2009-1071] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19581723]
172. Spector, R.; Johanson, C.E. Review: Vitamin transport and homeostasis in mammalian brain: Focus on Vitamins B and E. J. Neurochem.; 2007; 103, pp. 425-438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04773.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17645457]
173. Salvador, E.; Shityakov, S.; Förster, C. Glucocorticoids and endothelial cell barrier function. Cell Tissue Res.; 2014; 355, pp. 597-605. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-013-1762-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24352805]
174. Wu, Y.-C.; Sonninen, T.-M.; Peltonen, S.; Koistinaho, J.; Lehtonen, Š. Blood-brain barrier and neurodegenerative diseases—Modeling with iPSC-derived brain cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 7710. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147710]
175. Hue, C.D.; Cho, F.S.; Cao, S.; Dale Bass, C.R.; Meaney, D.F.; Morrison, I.B., 3rd. Dexamethasone potentiates in vitro blood-brain barrier recovery after primary blast injury by glucocorticoid receptor-mediated upregulation of ZO-1 tight junction protein. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.; 2015; 35, pp. 1191-1198. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.38]
176. Yang, Y. Angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier permeability in vascular remodeling after stroke. Curr. Neuropharmacol.; 2020; 18, pp. 1250-1265. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X18666200720173316]
177. Deane, R.; Singh, I.; Sagare, A.P.; Bell, R.D.; Ross, N.T.; LaRue, B.; Love, R.; Perry, S.; Paquette, N.; Deane, R.J. et al. A multimodal RAGE-specific inhibitor reduces amyloid β-mediated brain disorder in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J. Clin. Investig.; 2012; 122, pp. 1377-1392. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI58642]
178. Van Skike, C.E.; Jahrling, J.B.; Olson, A.B.; Sayre, N.L.; Hussong, S.A.; Ungvari, Z.; Lechleiter, J.D.; Galvan, V. Inhibition of mTOR protects the blood-brain barrier in models of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular cognitive impairment. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol.; 2018; 314, pp. H693-H703. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00570.2017]
179. Liu, G.; Garrett, M.R.; Men, P.; Zhu, X.; Perry, G.; Smith, M.A. Nanoparticle and other metal chelation therapeutics in Alzheimer disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta; 2005; 1741, pp. 246-252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2005.06.006]
180. Bana, L.; Minniti, S.; Salvati, E.; Sesana, S.; Zambelli, V.; Cagnotto, A.; Orlando, A.; Cazzaniga, E.; Zwart, R.; Scheper, W. et al. Liposomes bi-functionalized with phosphatidic acid and an ApoE-derived peptide affect Aβ aggregation features and cross the blood-brain barrier: Implications for therapy of Alzheimer disease. Nanomedicine; 2014; 10, pp. 1583-1590. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2013.12.001]
181. Elfakhri, K.H.; Abdallah, I.M.; Brannen, A.D.; Kaddoumi, A. Multi-faceted therapeutic strategy for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease by concurrent administration of etodolac and α-tocopherol. Neurobiol. Dis.; 2019; 125, pp. 123-134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2019.01.020] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30710675]
182. Ongnok, B.; Khuanjing, T.; Chunchai, T.; Kerdphoo, S.; Jaiwongkam, T.; Chattipakorn, N.; Chattipakorn, S.C. Donepezil provides neuroprotective effects against brain injury and Alzheimer’s pathology under conditions of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury. Biochim. Biophys. Acta; 2020; 1867, 165975. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165975] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956775]
183. Cirrito, J.R.; Deane, R.; Fagan, A.M.; Spinner, M.L.; Parsadanian, M.; Finn, M.B.; Jiang, H.; Prior, J.L.; Sagare, A.; Bales, K.R. et al. P-glycoprotein deficiency at the blood-brain barrier increases amyloid- deposition in an Alzheimer disease mouse model. J. Clin. Investig.; 2005; 115, pp. 3285-3290. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI25247] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16239972]
184. Bauer, B.; Hartz, A.M.S.; Miller, D.S. Tumor necrosis factor α and endothelin-1 increase P-glycoprotein expression and transport activity at the blood-brain barrier. Mol. Pharmacol.; 2007; 71, pp. 667-675. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.106.029512] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17132686]
185. Jakki, S.L.; Senthil, V.; Chandrasekar, M. The blood brain barrier and its role in Alzheimer’s therapy: An overview. Curr. Drug Targets; 2018; 19, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389450118666170612100750] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606049]
186. Becker, R.E.; Greig, N.H.; Giacobini, E. Why Do So Many Drugs for Alzheimer’s Disease Fail in Development? Time for New Methods and New Practices?. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.; 2008; 15, pp. 303-325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2008-15213]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 School of Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea;
2 Brain Science and Engineering Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, Korea;
3 School of Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea;