It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Tau tangle neuropathology can be visualized in living individuals using radioligands that bind specifically to aggregated tau. MTBR243 is a biomarker that has been found to be strongly associated with the presence of tau tangles in the brain. In this analysis we compared MTBR243 measured in CSF to Tau PET and clinical variables.
Method
MTBR243 was analyzed in 200 baseline CSF samples from study participants from two clinical trials in early and mild‐to‐moderate Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) (Tauriel, NCT03289143 and Lauriet, NCT03828747), including 182 participants who also had Tau PET data using [18F]GTP1 tau PET tracer. All subjects were amyloid positive per study inclusion criteria. Tau PET results were analyzed as continuous variable using the Temporal Meta ROI SUVR and dichotomized as low/high based on Temporal Meta ROI SUVR of 1.33. Clinical measures at baseline included CDR‐SB, ADAS‐Cog11, ADCS‐ADL, and MMSE.
Result
The CSF MTBR243 concentration had high correlation with Tau PET SUVR (Spearman’s ρ = 0.69, 95% CI 0.60‐0.76). 69.8% were classified as high Tau PET in the participants who were analyzed for MTBR243 in CSF. The AUC‐ROC of CSF MTBR243 for identifying Tau PET positivity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84‐0.94). We found that both Tau PET and CSF MTBR243 correlated with all 4 clinical measures at baseline as well as change from baseline. The correlations for the two biomarkers with clinical measures were very similar.
Conclusion
CSF MTBR243 correlates well with Tau PET in this amyloid positive population and discriminates well between low and high Tau PET patients. Tau PET and CSF MTBR243 have similar correlations to clinical variables, suggesting that CSF MTBR243 could be a suitable candidate as a fluid surrogate biomarker for Tau PET.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 C2N Diagnostics LLC, St. Louis, MO, USA
2 C2N Diagnostics, LLC, Saint Louis, MO, USA
3 Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
4 Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
5 Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA, F. Hoffmann‐LaRoche AG, Basel Switzerland and Genentech Inc. a member of the Roche Group, South San Francisco, CA, USA
6 C2N Diagnostics, LLC, St. Louis, MO, USA





