It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the present study, we elucidated the effect of grain-based (GB) diet containing both soluble and insoluble fibers and purified ingredients-based (PIB) diet containing only insoluble fiber, namely cellulose on mice gut microbiome using whole shotgun based metagenomic sequencing. Although the fiber content in both diet types is the same (5%) the presence of soluble fiber only in the GB diet differentiates it from the PIB diet. The taxonomic analysis of sequenced reads reveals a significantly higher enrichment of probiotic Lactobacilli in the GB group as compared to the PIB group. Further, the enhancement of energy expensive cellular processes namely, cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning, and transcription is observed in the GB group which could be due to the metabolization of the soluble fiber for faster energy production. In contrast, a higher abundance of cellulolytic bacterial community namely, the members of family Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae and the metabolism functions are found in the PIB group. The PIB group shows a significant increase in host-derived oligosaccharide metabolism functions indicating that they might first target the host-derived oligosaccharides and self-stored glycogen in addition to utilising the available cellulose. In addition to the beneficial microbial community variations, both the groups also exhibited an increased abundance of opportunistic pathobionts which could be due to an overall low amount of fiber in the diet. Furthermore, backtracing analysis identified probiotic members of Lactobacillus, viz., L. crispatus ST1, L. fermentum CECT 5716, L. gasseri ATCC 33323, L. johnsonii NCC 533 and L. reuteri 100-23 in the GB group, while Bilophila wadsworthia 3_1_6, Desulfovibrio piger ATCC 29098, Clostridium symbiosum WAL-14163, and Ruminococcaceae bacterium D16 in the PIB group. These data suggest that Lactobacilli, a probiotic community of microorganisms, are the predominant functional contributors in the gut of GB diet-fed mice, whereas pathobionts too coexisted with commensals in the gut microbiome of the PIB group. Thus at 5% fiber, GB modifies the gut microbial ecology more effectively than PIB and the inclusion of soluble fiber in the GB diet may be one of the primary factors responsible for this impact.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, BioX Centre and School of Basic Sciences, Kamand, Mandi, India (GRID:grid.462387.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1775 7851)
2 Keio University, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, Japan (GRID:grid.26091.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9959); RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Laboratory for Intestinal Ecosystem, Yokohama, Japan (GRID:grid.509459.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0267); Kanagawa Institute of Industrial Science and Technology, Gut Environmental Design Group, Kawasaki, Japan (GRID:grid.26999.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 536X); University of Tsukuba, Transborder Medical Research Center, Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.20515.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2369 4728)
3 The University of Tokyo, Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan (GRID:grid.26999.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 536X)
4 RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Laboratory for Microbiome Sciences, Yokohama, Japan (GRID:grid.509459.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0267)
5 RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Laboratory for Intestinal Ecosystem, Yokohama, Japan (GRID:grid.509459.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0267); Kanagawa Institute of Industrial Science and Technology, Gut Environmental Design Group, Kawasaki, Japan (GRID:grid.26999.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 536X)
6 Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, BioX Centre and School of Basic Sciences, Kamand, Mandi, India (GRID:grid.462387.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1775 7851); RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Laboratory for Microbiome Sciences, Yokohama, Japan (GRID:grid.509459.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0267)