Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are important in all aspects of health care and academia, but especially in biomedical publishing. JACEP Open is committed to promoting DEI efforts by widening the diversity of its editors, peer reviewers, and authors to better reflect our readers around the globe. We intend to do this by increasing the transparency of our recruitment, retainment, and review processes.
Why are diversity, equity, and inclusion important? DEI in scientific thought is critical for continuing creativity and innovation. Medical research needs to take advantage of a diverse workforce to address the various challenges and problems of the modern medical system for the betterment of the health of our fellow human beings. Considerations for DEI are multifaceted and involve active attention to groups that are underrepresented in academic publishing due to gender, ethnicity, and race as well as geography.1,2 These groups are also underrepresented among principal investigators in grant applications and awards that may present additional barriers to publication.3 It is time to actively challenge these biases because research that is conducted by diverse teams is cited more often and more likely to be published in prestigious journals.4,5
We intend that our DEI practices not only be focused on our staff, editorial board, and reviewers but also promote inclusivity across the entire publication process. We plan to continue our current DEI practices such as blinding our reviewers to the names and institutions of the authors as well as continuing to actively and purposively recruiting a more diverse peer reviewer and editorial pool. Because JACEP Open has an international scope and focus, we hope to increase our visibility among our international readers and to recruit more international authors. We also plan to survey the demographics of our editors, reviewers, and authors.
We hope that the entire scientific and medical publishing will join our call to action. Attention to DEI is critical to giving equal voice to all stakeholders and ensuring that the science reflects society.
Authors: DEI Task Force on behalf of the entire JACEP Open Editorial Board
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 Division of Emergency Medicine/Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Toxicology/Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
2 School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
3 Division of Emergency Services, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, Greenvile, South Carolina, USA