It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The storage and processing of quantum information are susceptible to external noise, resulting in computational errors. A powerful method to suppress these effects is quantum error correction. Typically, quantum error correction is executed in discrete rounds, using entangling gates and projective measurement on ancillary qubits to complete each round of error correction. Here we use direct parity measurements to implement a continuous quantum bit-flip correction code in a resource-efficient manner, eliminating entangling gates, ancillary qubits, and their associated errors. An FPGA controller actively corrects errors as they are detected, achieving an average bit-flip detection efficiency of up to 91%. Furthermore, the protocol increases the relaxation time of the protected logical qubit by a factor of 2.7 over the relaxation times of the bare comprising qubits. Our results showcase resource-efficient stabilizer measurements in a multi-qubit architecture and demonstrate how continuous error correction codes can address challenges in realizing a fault-tolerant system.
Continuous quantum error correction requires less ancillary resources compared to standard QEC methods. Here, the authors demonstrate experimentally a continuous quantum error correction code in a planar superconducting architecture.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of California, Department of Physics, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of California, Center for Quantum Coherent Science, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
2 University of California, Department of Physics, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of California, Center for Quantum Coherent Science, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of Rochester, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.16416.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9174)
3 CEA, CNRS, SPEC, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535)
4 Chapman University, Institute for Quantum Studies, Orange, USA (GRID:grid.254024.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9006 1798); Chapman University, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Orange, USA (GRID:grid.254024.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9006 1798)
5 University of Rochester, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.16416.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9174); Chapman University, Institute for Quantum Studies, Orange, USA (GRID:grid.254024.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9006 1798)