It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Humans make eye-contact to extract information about other people’s mental states, recruiting dedicated brain networks that process information about the self and others. Recent studies show that eye-contact increases the synchronization between two brains but do not consider its effects on activity within single brains. Here we investigate how eye-contact affects the frequency and direction of the synchronization within and between two brains and the corresponding network characteristics. We also evaluate the functional relevance of eye-contact networks by comparing inter- and intra-brain networks of friends vs. strangers and the direction of synchronization between leaders and followers. We show that eye-contact increases higher inter- and intra-brain synchronization in the gamma frequency band. Network analysis reveals that some brain areas serve as hubs linking within- and between-brain networks. During eye-contact, friends show higher inter-brain synchronization than strangers. Dyads with clear leader/follower roles demonstrate higher synchronization from leader to follower in the alpha frequency band. Importantly, eye-contact affects synchronization between brains more than within brains, demonstrating that eye-contact is an inherently social signal. Future work should elucidate the causal mechanisms behind eye-contact induced synchronization.
Friends making eye-contact have higher inter-brain synchronization than strangers. Eye-contact affects neural synchronization between brains more than within a brain, highlighting that eye-contact is an inherently social signal.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of London, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.4464.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 2573)
2 University of London, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.4464.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 2573); Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5590.9) (ISNI:0000000122931605)
3 National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Athens, Greece (GRID:grid.4241.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2185 9808)
4 Queen Mary University of London, School of Mathematical Sciences, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.4868.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 1133)
5 Queen Mary University of London, School of Mathematical Sciences, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.4868.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 1133); Università di Catania and INFN, Dipartimento di Fisica ed Astronomia, Catania, Italy (GRID:grid.8158.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 1969); The British Library, The Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.36212.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 1542); Complexity Science Hub, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.484678.1)