It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Neural mechanisms that arbitrate between integrating and segregating multisensory information are essential for complex scene analysis and for the resolution of the multisensory correspondence problem. However, these mechanisms and their dynamics remain largely unknown, partly because classical models of multisensory integration are static. Here, we used the Multisensory Correlation Detector, a model that provides a good explanatory power for human behavior while incorporating dynamic computations. Participants judged whether sequences of auditory and visual signals originated from the same source (causal inference) or whether one modality was leading the other (temporal order), while being recorded with magnetoencephalography. First, we confirm that the Multisensory Correlation Detector explains causal inference and temporal order behavioral judgments well. Second, we found strong fits of brain activity to the two outputs of the Multisensory Correlation Detector in temporo-parietal cortices. Finally, we report an asymmetry in the goodness of the fits, which were more reliable during the causal inference task than during the temporal order judgment task. Overall, our results suggest the existence of multisensory correlation detectors in the human brain, which explain why and how causal inference is strongly driven by the temporal correlation of multisensory signals.
Neural mechanisms that arbitrate between integrating and segregating multisensory information are essential for complex scene analysis. Here, the authors show the existence of multisensory correlation detectors in the human brain which explains why and how causal inference is driven by the temporal correlation of multisensory signals.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France (GRID:grid.5399.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2176 4817); Ulm University, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Ulm, Germany (GRID:grid.6582.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9748); Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DRF/Joliot, INSERM, CNRS, Gif/Yvette, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535)
2 Independent researcher, Ulm, Germany (GRID:grid.5949.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 9288)
3 Ulm University, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Ulm, Germany (GRID:grid.6582.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9748)
4 Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DRF/Joliot, INSERM, CNRS, Gif/Yvette, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535)