This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Antibiotic resistance represents a serious problem for public health [1, 2]. Despite the enormous efforts to limit this phenomenon, an increasing number of antimicrobials, which were designed to kill or arrest the growth of bacteria, viruses, or fungi, are becoming ineffective, so antibiotic-resistance-related therapeutic failure is currently a real emergence worldwide [3–6]. This condition significantly affects our ability to prevent and treat infectious diseases promptly. In the last few decades, the discovery and development of novel anti-infective drugs have represented an active research area. Concerning this, natural compounds have historically been recognized as a rich source of anti-infective drugs, which provided penicillin in 1940, tetracyclines in 1948, and glycopeptides in 1955 [7]. This evidence promoted the study of natural products, considering a valid source of bioactive molecules that could help to manage this crisis effectively. Astragalus rhizanthus subsp. Candolleanus Benth. (synonym Rudravanti) (A. candolleanus) belong to the family Fabaceae, and it is a wild-growing herb widely spread in the Himalayas from Jammu & Kashmir to Uttarakhand provinces in India [8, 9]. A. candolleanus is endowed with several health benefits, such as immune-boosting, antiaging, and anti-inflammatory effects [10, 11]. This plant has also been useful in the treatment of blood and skin diseases, tuberculosis, and joint pains and as an antidiabetic medication [12–15]. A few of the most common bacteria that can cause complicated life-threatening infections like septicemia are Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), and Kocuria rhizophila (K. rhizophila) [16]. Interestingly, a previous study showed the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of Astragalus angulosus ethanolic extract against three Gram-positive strains (Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis) and two Gram-negative strains (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) [17–19]. Albayrak and Kaya investigated the antibacterial and antifungal activities of four Astragalus species (Astragalus gummifer, Astragalus microcephalus, Astragalus talasseus, and Astragalus acmophyllus) endemic to Turkish flora. Specifically, they performed the disk diffusion assay against P. aeruginosa (low activity with respect to standard antibiotics tetracycline and oxacillin) and Candida albicans (no activity) [20]. Recently, Guo et al. demonstrated the antibacterial activity of Astragalus membranaceus ethyl acetate aerial parts extract. In particular, it was effective against the Gram-positive strain B. subtilis [21]. This activity could be related to the high concentration of flavonoids in the extract [22]. However, to date, only a few studies focused on the biological activity and chemical composition of A. candolleanus root extracts. Considering that literature data reported outstanding biological activity of the root extracts from other Astragalus species, we proposed to fill the knowledge gap on A. candolleanus by investigating the chemical profile and antimicrobial activity of its extract. After a thorough literature survey on Astragalus species with emphasis on its phytochemical screening in various parts of the plant (root, leaf, and fruit), the root extract was considerably found to be enriched with phytoconstituents [23–26]. Interestingly, it has been found that the root of Astragalus mongholicus is colonized by several bacterial species, which are able to modify the secondary metabolites of the plant. According to such a study, the biological properties and chemical features of a phytoextract can be the results of the interaction between bacteria and plants [27]. So, the present work aimed to investigate the antibacterial potential of A. candolleanus root extract against the most common bacteria involved in septicemia and, subsequently, identify the active phytoconstituents responsible for the biological activity. For this purpose, by column chromatography, the root extract was fractionated to isolate the various pure phytoconstituents. These pure components were elucidated using the mass spectrometry technique.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals
All the reagents were of analytical grade and purchased from Merck & Hi Chem Life Sciences except those mentioned elsewhere.
2.2. Plant Material
The roots of A. candolleanus were collected from Losar (32.4366°N, 77.7381°E) district of Himachal Pradesh. The plant’s identity was confirmed by an acknowledged botanist, Dr. Sunita Garg, Emeritus Scientist, CSIR-NISCAIR Raw Material Herbarium and Museum, New Delhi (RHMD). A specimen voucher (NISCAIR/RHMD/Consult/2018/3253–54) was deposited at NISCAIR.
2.3. Preparation of Plant Extract
A. candolleanus roots were dried at room temperature and reduced to a coarse powder. About 20 g of the powdered root was extracted with 200 mL of methanol-water mixture (7 : 3 v/v) by cold maceration for 5 days. Afterwards, the mixture was decanted and filtered to get the crude extract. The extract was then concentrated under reduced pressure through a rotavapor (Buchi-R100), followed by drying on a desiccator.
2.4. Preliminary Phytochemical Screening
One milligram of the powdered roots was macerated individually in volumetric flasks containing different solvents, including dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), n-hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, methylene chloride, acetone, ethyl acetate, methanol, ethanol, water, methanol : water (7 : 3 v/v), and n-butanol : acetic acid : water (BAW) (4 : 1 : 5 v/v). The powdered root extract along with different solvent systems was allowed to stand for 48 hours. After filtration, chemical tests allow the qualitative analysis of the extract [18, 28]. The presence of several chemical classes of compounds, such as alkaloids, glycosides, terpenoids, flavonoids, saponins, carbohydrates, lipids, volatile oils, steroids, phenols, tannins, gums, and mucilage, was determined. The chemical assays were conducted solely on the extracts without any hydrolysis.
2.5. Antibacterial Activity
The bacterial strains were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection Centre (ATCC) through an authorized vendor, Hi-Media Pvt. Ltd. Resources (reagents and apparatus) from the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad, and used to carry out this research. The antibacterial activity of hydro-methanolic root extract of A. candolleanus was evaluated by the cup-plate method against B. subtilis (ATCC 6633), E. coli (ATCC 9637), K. pneumoniae (ATCC 10031), K. rhizophila (ATCC 9341) P. aeruginosa (ATCC 25619), Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 1428), and S. aureus (ATCC 6538). Bacteria were cultured on nutrient agar media (Hi-media). The method of Ali et al. with some modifications was used for the antibacterial assay [19]. The 5 mm bores were made in the agar medium through sterile cork borers. 100 μL of extract (100 mg/mL) in different dilutions (from 5 to 80 μg/ml) was placed in the wells along with DMSO as a negative control. DMSO was diluted in a 1 : 100 ratio and did not affect bacterial growth. The activity of the natural extract was compared to that of the standard antibiotic gentamycin, in concentrations ranging from 5 to 40 µg/ml. The agar plates were incubated for 24 h at 30–35°C. The parameters used for observation were the estimation of the inhibition zone of bacterial growth surrounding the wells. The unit for the diameter of the inhibition zone was taken in millimetres (mm).
2.6. Isolation of Constituents from A. candolleanus Roots
A column of 400 mm length with 500 mL reservoir capacity, 30 mm internal diameter, and 40 mm outer diameter was prepared with the wet packing method using silica (100–200 mesh size) as a stationary phase. The hydro-methanolic root extract was packed into the column and was eluted in a sequence from nonpolar solvents to polar solvents to obtain different pure fractions. The similarity profile of fractions was checked by thin layer chromatography, and similar fractions were identified. Pure components could be obtained in the case of root extract eluted with 70% v/v ethanol-water. The isolated and purified compounds were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (Shimadzu, IR Affinity-1) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) (Agilent 6520).
2.7. Determination of Melting Point of the Isolated Compounds
The melting point is an intensive physical property that is characteristic of a specific compound. Thus, the melting points of the isolated compounds were determined to ensure their purity. All melting points were measured on a melting point apparatus (Accuma India Digital Melting/Boiling point apparatus).
2.8. Target Prediction of Isolated Compounds
The isolated compounds were subjected to Swiss Target Prediction (STP) (https://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/) [28] and Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances (PASS) online bioactivity score software (https://www.way2drug.com/) [29–31] to understand the probable targets of these compounds.
3. Results and Discussion
After evaporation of the solvent, the screening for active phytoconstituents in the semisolid hydro-methanolic root extract of A. candolleanus showed the presence of alkaloids, glycosides, terpenes, lipids, volatile oil, gums, and mucilage. Table 1 demonstrates the results of the phytochemical analysis: a pilot screening was performed using several solvents/solvent systems characterized by a different polarity.
Table 1
Phytochemical screening for the presence of active constituents in roots of A. candolleanus.
Solvent | Alkaloids | Glycosides | Terpenoids | Flavonoids | Saponins | Carbohydrates | Proteins | Lipids | Volatile oils | Steroids | Phenols and tannins | Gums and mucilage |
DMSO | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − |
n-Hexane | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − |
Petroleum ether | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − |
Chloroform | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − |
Methylene chloride | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
Acetone | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | + |
Ethyl acetate | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
Methanol | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
Ethanol | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
Water | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
Methanol : water (7 : 3) | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
Butanol : acetic acid : water (4 : 1 : 5) | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
+: presence; −: absence.
The hydro-methanolic root extract of A. candolleanus was able to inhibit the growth of all tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. Specifically, as reported in Table 2 and Figure 1, the extract exerted the antibacterial activity already at the concentration of 5 µg/mL; however, at the concentration of 10 µg/mL, it produced a broader inhibition zone against S. aureus (28.6 mm), S. typhimurium (25.5 mm), K. rhizophila (24.6 mm), K. pneumoniae (21.8 mm), and E. coli (22.7 mm). Besides, at this concentration, A. candolleanus extract showed a strong growth inhibition for B. subtilis (41.2 mm) and P. aeruginosa (41.6 mm). These bacteria are seen to be mainly responsible for recurrent bacterial infections. The obtained results indicated that the hydro-methanolic root extract of A. candolleanus can be considered a promising antimicrobial agent, due to its broad zone of inhibition against pathogenic bacteria. Our results revealed that the extract was more efficient in counteracting the growth of Gram-positive strains compared to the Gram-negative ones, except for P. aeruginosa. In this regard, it is worth noting that Gram-negative bacteria are generally more resistant to the natural antimicrobial agents compared to the Gram-positive ones. This condition reflects the different composition of the cell wall between the two types of bacteria [32]. The bacterial cell wall is a multilayered structure that protects microorganisms from different environmental conditions and antimicrobial stress. Besides, it confers a characteristic shape and prevents cell rupture. In particular, the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall is formed by a thick layer of peptidoglycan, which is cross-linked with long anionic polymers called teichoic acids. Conversely, Gram-negative bacteria are endowed with a thinner layer of peptidoglycan, surrounded by an outer membrane containing lipopolysaccharides, extremely selective to the passage of xenobiotics [33, 34]. This structural organization constitutes an efficient barrier against external agents, making the Gram-negative related infections very difficult to treat [35]. Concerning the molecular aspect, there are numerous mechanisms of action through which antimicrobial agents act, including inhibition of synthesis of bacterial proteins, inhibition of cell wall synthesis, damage to the bacterial cell membrane, interference with DNA replication/repair, and their metabolic pathway [36]. The characterization of phytoconstituents from the roots of A. candolleanus allows the identification of pure compounds. The isolated and purified compounds were analyzed using FTIR and LC-MS-MS techniques. The results and the inference of the characterization of A. candolleanus root by FTIR are presented in Table 3. The melting points observed for isolated compounds are 168–170°C (169°C for reference) for scillirosidin, 151–155°C (153°C for reference) for cephalotaxine, 280–288°C (287°C) for stemmadenine, and 168–172°C (169°C for reference) for myxoxanthophyll [37–40]. The FTIR spectrum of A. candolleanus root extract is shown in Figure 2.
Table 2
Antibacterial activity of A. candolleanus root extract and standard gentamycin (diameter inhibition zone expressed in mm).
Bacterial strains | DMSO | A. candolleanus extract (µg/mL) | Gentamycin (µg/mL) | |||||||
5 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 40 | ||
E. coli ATCC 9637 | 0 | 21.2 | 22.7 | 23.5 | 24.2 | 25.4 | 11.6 | 12.6 | 13.2 | 14.8 |
K. pneumoniae ATCC 10031 | 0 | 19.7 | 21.8 | — | — | — | 12.6 | 12.9 | 16.7 | 21.5 |
S. typhimurium ATCC 1428 | 0 | 23.2 | 25.5 | — | — | — | 12.8 | 13.2 | 13.8 | 15.7 |
P. aeruginosa ATCC 25619 | 0 | 38.7 | 41.6 | — | — | — | 12.3 | 13.4 | 15.9 | 17.3 |
S. aureus ATCC 6538 | 0 | 26.3 | 28.6 | 29.7 | 30.4 | 32.7 | 12.4 | 14.4 | 15.2 | 15.8 |
B. subtilis ATCC 6633 | 0 | 37.5 | 41.2 | — | — | — | 18.9 | 19.8 | 21.9 | 22.4 |
K. rhizophila ATCC 9341 | 0 | 22.0 | 24.6 | — | — | — | 13.8 | 15.5 | 17.3 | 19.5 |
—: overlapping of zones.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 3
FTIR analysis of hydro-methanolic A. candolleanus root extract.
S. no. | Expected wave number (cm−1) | Observed wave number | Characteristic functional group | Compound type |
1 | 2850–2970 | 1434.14 | C-H | Alkane |
2 | 1050–1300 | 1067.65 | C-O | Alcohol, ether, carboxylic acid, esters |
3 | 1500–1570 | 1316.47 | NO2 | Nitro |
4 | 1610–1680 | 1628.95 | C=C | Alkenes |
5 | 1690–1760 | 1736.97 | C=O | Aldehyde, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters |
6 | 3200–3600 | 3240.55 | O-H | Phenols, hydrogen- bonded alcohols |
7 | 3500–3650 | 3515.42 | O-H | Monomeric carboxylic acids |
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
With the help of data and spectrum obtained from the LC-MS-MS technique, phytoconstituents present in the root extract of A. candolleanus have been identified. Four compounds have been isolated and identified using the data of peaks of mass spectral analysis (Figure 3): the terpenoid stemmadenine, the alkaloid cephalotaxine, the glycosides scillirosidin, and myxoxanthophyll (Figure 4).
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Results of LC-MS-MS of A. candolleanus root extract are displayed in Tables 4–7. The LC-MS-MS spectra are given in Figure 3 and Figures 5–8. The compound identified from peak 1 is a glycoside—scillirosidin (molecular weight: 458.55 and empirical formula: C26H34O7). The compound identified from peak 3 is an alkaloid—cephalotaxine (molecular weight: 315.369 and empirical formula: C18H21NO4). The compound identified from peak 4 is a terpenoid—stemmadenine (molecular weight: 354.45 and empirical formula: C21H26N2O3). The compound identified from peak 5 is a myxol glycoside—myxoxanthophyll (molecular weight: 747.026 and empirical formula: C46H66O8).
Table 4
Mass spectral interpretation of peak 1 from LC-MS-MS done on A. candolleanus root extract.
S. no | Mass | Ion | Product ion and composition of neutral particle lost | Substructure or compound type | Specific m/z ratio |
1. | 1 | − | [M − 1]− | Fragmented ion as base peak (hydride transfer peak occurs moderately basic and acidic compounds) | 457.19 |
Table 5
Mass spectral interpretation of peak 3 from LC-MS-MS done on A. candolleanus root extract.
S. no | Mass | Ion | Product ion and composition of neutral particle lost | Substructure or compound type | Specific m/z ratio |
1. | 1 | − | [M − 1]− | Fragmented ion as peak | 314.15 |
2. | 2 | − | [M − 2]− | − | 313.15 |
Table 6
Mass spectral interpretation of peak 4 from LC-MS-MS done on A. candolleanus root extract.
S.No | Mass | Ion | Product ion and composition of neutral particle lost | Substructure or compound type | Specific m/z ratio |
1. | 1 | M+ | [M − 1]− | Molecular ion fragmented ion as base peak | 354.14 |
2. | 23 | Na+ | [M − 23]− | Organic Na + salts | 353.14 |
3. | 41 | C3H5+ | [M − 41]+ | Alicyclics (especially poly alicyclics) alkenes | 331.16 |
CH3CN+ | 2-Methyl-N-aromatics-N-methyl anilines | 313.15 |
Table 7
Mass spectral interpretation of peak 5 from LC-MS-MS done on A. candolleanus root extract.
S.No | Mass | Ion | Product ion and composition of neutral particle lost | Substructure or compound type | Specific m/z ratio |
1. | — | M+ | — | Molecular ion | 747.40 |
2. | 1 | — | [M + 1]+ | Proton transfer ion | 748.411 |
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
According to earlier studies, terpenoids are found to be more effective against Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria due to their lipophilic properties. Monoterpenes preferentially affect the membrane structures by enhancing the permeability as well as changing the structural arrangement of proteins, producing interference inside the respiratory chain [41]. The natural or synthetic quinolone alkaloids have been found to block the action of topoisomerase enzymes, especially type-II variants, thus preventing nuclear replication [42]. Furthermore, it has been reported that some of the phenols can inhibit the enzymatic activity of the bacterial DNA gyrase by interacting with its ATP site [43]. Concerning the four pure components, stemmadenine, scillirosidin, cephalotaxine, and myxoxanthophyll, isolated from the roots of A. candolleanus, further studies should be conducted on these microorganisms to confirm their effectiveness as well as to elucidate the mechanism of action through which they exert the antibacterial activity. In response to bacterial infection, high levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) were often found in infected patients. A decrease in IL-6 was associated with a better prognosis instead, and overproduction of IL-10 is considered the main predictor of severity and fatal outcome. In bacterial infections, proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines are a double-edged sword: on the one hand, they are essential for eradicating the pathogen, but their overproduction can cause tissue and organ damage [44, 45]. The isolated compounds were subjected to STP and PASS analysis to determine the probable biological activities of the substance. Table 8 shows the predictive targets of the bioactive compounds, isolated from A. candolleanus, identified through the STP software. Out of the four compounds tested, we found that scillirosidin and stemmadenine inhibited MAP kinase p38 alpha and beta pathways, responsible for an inflammatory imbalance during bacterial infections, whereas myxoxanthophyll and scillirosidin also target interleukin-8-receptor A and B, which are the major proinflammatory cytokines that get elevated in such patients. The PASS online predictivity scores for bioactive compounds isolated from the roots of A. candolleanus are reported in Table 9. The possibility that a chemical compound to be active (Pa) or inert (Pi) on a biological target is calculated using the PASS online software. The compounds having a Pa score of greater than 0.7 are considered highly active, while those having a Pa score greater than 0.3 are moderately active. Interestingly, the PASS analysis of the bioactive compounds (stemmadenine, myxoxanthophyll, cephalotaxine, and scillirosidin) revealed that myxoxanthophyll and cephalotaxine were predicted as apoptosis agonists, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory with a Pa score above 0.7, for each biological activity (Table 9). Taken together, our results highlighted the prominent role of the isolate myxoxanthophyll which was found highly bioactive and therefore can be considered a promising candidate for drug design studies. From the overall results of drug design, we found that myxoxanthophyll is a promising bioactive isolate with high bioactivity.
Table 8
Swiss Target Prediction for the bioactive isolate.
S. no. | Name of the compound | Target | Common name | UNIPROT ID | CHEMBL ID | Target class | Probability | Known active (3D/2D) |
1 | Scillirosidin | MAP | MAPK14 | Q16539 | CHEMBL260 | Kinase | 0.100634432184 | 158/0 |
MAP Kinase | MAPK11 | Q15759 | CHEMBL 3961 | Kinase | 0.100634432184 | 176/0 | ||
Interleukin-8 receptor B | CXCR2 | P25025 | CHEMBL 2434 | Family AG-protein coupled receptor | 0.100634432184 | 108/0 | ||
2 | Cephalotaxine | Inhibitor of apoptosis protein 3 | X1AP | P98170 | CHEMBL 4198 | Other cytosolic proteins | 0.0 | 16/0 |
3 | Stemmadenine | Inhibitor of apoptosis protein 3 | X1AP | P98170 | CHEMBL 4198 | Other cytosolic proteins | 0.109339753231 | 116/0 |
4 | Myxoxanthophyll | Interleukin-2 (IL-2) | IL-2 | P60568 | CHEMBL5880 | Secreted protein | 0.428381527054 | 0/1 |
Interleukin-8 receptor | CXCR1 | P25024 | CHEMBL4029 | Family AG-protein coupled receptor | 0.0 | 0/2 |
Table 9
PASS online predictivity score for bioactive compounds.
S. no | Name of isolated phytoconstituent | PASS (activity)/(inactivity) prediction score Pa | Key mechanism of bioactivity | |
1 | Scillirosidin (moderately active) | 0.43200.33900. | 0.0590.0460. | Apoptosis agonist |
2 | Cephalotaxine (high activity) | 0.92300.19100.0660 | 0.0600.0040.058 | Antioxidants |
3 | Stemmadenine (moderately active) | 0.37900.34200.35500.0970 | 0.830.621.190.87 | Apoptosis agonistMAP3K5 inhibitorAnti-inflammatoryMAP kinase inhibitor |
4 | Myxoxanthophyll (high activity) | 0.86600.82700.71700.21900.1230 | 0.050.0030.0140.0160.031 | Apoptosis agonist |
4. Conclusions
The antibacterial activity of A. candolleanus extract was tested against several microbial strains, including B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, and K. rhizophila, and results showed a broad inhibition zone against bacterial species. The activity may be a cumulative effect of all the constituents present in the plant. In our study, we have isolated four compounds that were identified as scillirosidin, cephalotaxine, stemmadenine, and myxoxanthophyll using FTIR and LC-MS-MS techniques. These compounds will be further tested individually against bacterial strains. We also performed computational studies to predict the most active constituent amongst all four compounds. The results of STP as well as PASS online predictivity score software testing showed that, among the four compounds, myxoxanthophyll was the most active molecule, revealing a predicted activity as an apoptosis agonist, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory compound, with a Pa score above 0.7. However, this study can be considered a preliminary investigation of the chemical composition and biological activities of A. candolleanus. Further studies are required to validate the activity of these identified compounds using antimicrobial and docking studies.
Authors’ Contributions
Kandasamy Nagarajan and Roma Ghai contributed equally to the work RG and KN conceptualized the study; GV, TP, and MK contributed to methodology; KN, RG1, RG2, and PG investigated the study;RG1, RG2, and PG took part in data curation; GV, RG1, and RG2 prepared the original draft; CG, FDA, and PG reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank director Dr. (Col) A. Garg and joint director Dr. Manoj Goel, KIET Group of Institutions, Ghaziabad, for their motivation and support. Thanks are due to Mr. Piyush Kumar (pharmacopeial associate) and Ms. Pooja Gupta (pharmacopeial associate) of the Microbial Division of Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad, India, for providing the technical support to carry out the microbial testing.
[1] C. L. Ventola, "The antibiotic resistance crisis Part 1 causes and threats," PT, vol. 40 no. 4, pp. 277-283, 2015.
[2] P. Nordberg, D. L. Monnet, O. Cars, "Antibacterial drug resistance options for concerted action world health organ," Deparment Medical Policy Standed, vol. 48, 2005.
[3] S. Norrby, C. Nord, R. Finch, "Lack of development of new antimicrobial drugs a potential serious threat to public health," The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 5 no. 2, pp. 115-119, DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70086-4, 2005.
[4] D. G. J. Larsson, C.-F. Flach, "Antibiotic resistance in the environment," Nature Reviews Microbiology,DOI: 10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x, 2021.
[5] E. Giacomini, V. Perrone, D. Alessandrini, D. Paoli, C. Nappi, L. Degli Esposti, D. Alessandrini, D. Paoli, C. Nappi, L. Degli Esposti, "Evidence of antibiotic resistance from population—based studies a narrative review," Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 14, pp. 849-858, DOI: 10.2147/idr.s289741, 2021.
[6] S. E. Rossiter, M. H. Fletcher, W. M. Wuest, "Natural products as platforms to overcome antibiotic resistance," Chemical Reviews, vol. 117 no. 19, pp. 12415-12474, DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00283, 2017.
[7] D. Vijnana, "Materia medica vegetable drugs: english sanskrit: part i: a-j by gyanendra pandey: as new hardbound," 2002. https://www.abebooks.com/Dravyaguna-Vijnana-Materia-Medica-Vegetable-Drugs/893083709/bd
[8] L. B. Chaudhary, K. K. Anand, R. K. Srivastava, "Taxonomic study of endemic species of Astragalus L (Fabaceae) of India," Taiwania, vol. 52 no. 3, pp. 216-237, 2007.
[9] D. Podlech, "Taxonomic and phytogeographical problems in Astragalus of the old world and south-west asia," Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh—Section B Biological Sciences, vol. 89, pp. 37-43, DOI: 10.1017/s0269727000008885, 1986.
[10] V. P. Bhatt, G. C. S. Negi, "Ethnomedicinal plant resources of jaunsari tribe of garhwal himalaya Uttaranchal," Indian J Tradit Know, vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 331-335, 2006.
[11] S. Goel, D. Arya, O. R. Sha, "Review on rudanti an imperative drug mentioned in ayurveda as rasayana for chronic ailments," Int Ayurvedic Med, vol. 5 no. 8, pp. 2920-2926, 2017.
[12] P. Sharma, U. Devi, "Ethnobotanical uses of biofencing plants in Himachal Pradesh northwest himalaya," Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 16 no. 24, pp. 1957-1963, DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.1957.1963, 2013.
[13] L. B. Chaudhary, T. S. Rana, K. K. Anand, "Current status of the systematics of Astragalus L (Fabaceae) with special reference to the himalayan species in India," Taiwania, vol. 53 no. 4, pp. 338-355, 2008.
[14] C. P. Kala, "Medicinal and aromatic plants of tons watershed in Uttarakhand himalaya," Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, vol. 3 no. 1, pp. 16-21, 2015.
[15] B. E. E. Cleven, M. Palka-Santini, J. Gielen, S. Meembor, M. Krönke, O. Krut, "Identification and characterization of bacterial pathogens causing bloodstream infections by DNA microarray," Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44 no. 7, pp. 2389-2397, DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02291-05, 2006.
[16] H. Kanaan, M. ElMestrah, A. Sweidan, F. Assadi, A. Bazzal, A. Chokr, "Screening for antibacterial and antibiofilm activities in Astragalus angulosus," Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology, vol. 6 no. 1,DOI: 10.5455/jice.20161018101720, 2017.
[17] J. B. Harborne, Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis, pp. 54-84, 1998.
[18] D. Katiyar, V. Singh, S. J. Gilani, R. Goel, P. Grover, A. Vats, "Hypoglycemic herbs and their polyherbal formulations a comprehensive review," Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 24 no. 1,DOI: 10.1007/s00044-014-1080-3, 2015.
[19] V. Singh, D. Katiyar, D. Katiyar, M. Ali, "Comparative study of volatile constituents and antimicrobial activities of leaves and fruit peels of Citrus sinensis Linn," The Journal of Phytopharmacology, vol. 4 no. 2, pp. 102-105, DOI: 10.31254/phyto.2015.4208, 2015.
[20] S. Albayrak, O. Kaya, "Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of four Astragalus species growing wild in Turkey," Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 43 no. 4, pp. 425-434, DOI: 10.1515/tjb-2017-0241, 2018.
[21] L. Guo, Y. Sun, X. Ping, J. Liu, X. Wang, N. Qin, "Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of ethyl acetate extract of Astragalus membranaceus aerial parts," Journal of Food Safety, vol. 42 no. 1,DOI: 10.1111/jfs.12947, 2021.
[22] J. Ghasemian-Yadegari, S. Hamedeyazdan, H. Nazemiyeh, F. Fathiazad, "Evaluation of phytochemical antioxidant and antibacterial activity on Astragalus chrysostachys boiss Roots," Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International Journal of Physics and Research, vol. 18 no. 4, pp. 1902-1911, DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.1100855, 2019.
[23] S. Zheng, Z. Wang, "Chemical constituents of the roots of Astragalus membranace (Fisch) Bge var mongholicus (Bge) hisao," Shanghai Zhongyiyao Daxue Xuebao, vol. 25, pp. 89-94, 2011.
[24] A.-C. Mitaine-Offer, T. Miyamoto, N. Semmar, M. Jay, M.-A. Lacaille-Dubois, "A new oleanane glycoside from the roots of Astragalus caprinus," Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 44 no. 7, pp. 713-716, DOI: 10.1002/mrc.1809, 2006.
[25] V. Santoro, V. Parisi, M. D’Ambola, C. Sinisgalli, M. Monné, L. Milella, R. Russo, L. A. Severino, N. D. Tommasi, "Chemical profiling of Astragalus membranaceus roots (Fish) Bunge herbal preparation and evaluation of its bioactivity," Natural Product Communications, vol. 15 no. 5,DOI: 10.1177/1934578x20924152, 2020.
[26] A. Movafeghi, D. Djozan, J. A. Razeghi, T. Baheri, "Identification of volatile organic compounds in leaves roots and gum of astragalus compactus Lam using solid phase microextraction followed by GC—MS analysis," Natural Product Research, vol. 24 no. 8, pp. 703-709, DOI: 10.1080/14786410802361446, 2010.
[27] Y. Li, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, Y. Yang, G. Wei, Z. Li, "The composition of root-associated bacteria and fungi of Astragalus mongholicus and their relationship with the bioactive ingredients," Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 12,DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.642730, 2021.
[28] F. Mayr, G. Möller, U. Garscha, J. Fischer, P. Rodríguez Castaño, S. G. Inderbinen, V. Temml, B. Waltenberger, S. Schwaiger, R. W. Hartmann, C. Gege, "Finding new molecular targets of familiar natural products using in silico target prediction," International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19 no. 19,DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197102, 2020.
[29] D. A. Filimonov, V. V. Poroikov, "PASS: computerized prediction of biological activity spectra for chemical substances," Bioactive Compound Design: Possibilities for Industrial Use, pp. 47-56, 1996.
[30] Y. V. Borodina, D. A. Filimonov, V. V. Poroikov, "Computer-aided prediction of prodrug activity using the PASS system," Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, vol. 30 no. 12, pp. 760-763, DOI: 10.1007/bf02218831, 1996.
[31] D. A. Filimonov, V. V. Poroĭkov, E. I. Karaicheva, R. K. Kazarian, A. P. Budunova, E. M. Mikhaĭlovskiĭ, A. V. Rudnitskikh, L. V. Goncharenko, I. V. Burov, "The computerized prediction of the spectrum of biological activity of chemical compounds by their structural formula: the PASS system prediction of activity spectra for substance," Eksperimental’naya I Kilnicheskaya Farmakologiya, vol. 58 no. 2, pp. 56-62, 1995.
[32] A. M. Amer, "Antimicrobial effects of egyptian local chicory cichorium endiviasubsp pumilum," International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2018,DOI: 10.1155/2018/6475072, 2018.
[33] M. Mathelié-Guinlet, A. T. Asmar, J.-F. Collet, Y. F. Dufrêne, "Bacterial cell mechanics beyond peptidoglycan," Trends in Microbiology, vol. 28 no. 9, pp. 706-708, DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.04.013, 2020.
[34] G. K. Auer, D. B. Weibel, "Bacterial cell mechanics," Biochemistry, vol. 56 no. 29, pp. 3710-3724, DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00346, 2017.
[35] N. Caporarello, M. Olivieri, M. Cristaldi, M. Scalia, M. A. Toscano, C. Genovese, A. Addamo, M. Salmeri, G. Lupo, C. D. Anfuso, "Blood-brain barrier in a Haemophilus influenzae type a in vitro infection: role of adenosine receptors A2A and A2B," Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 55 no. 6, pp. 5321-5336, DOI: 10.1007/s12035-017-0769-y, 2018.
[36] B. Khameneh, M. Iranshahy, V. Soheili, B. S. Fazly Bazzaz, "Review on plant antimicrobials: a mechanistic viewpoint," Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 8 no. 1, pp. 118-146, DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0559-6, 2019.
[37] M. J. Pascual-Villalobos, "Anti-insect activity of bufadienolides from Urginea maritima," Trends in new crops and new uses, vol. 1, 2002.
[38] M. Rajamanickam, "Isolation and characterizations of new alkaloid 3-deoxy-3 11-epoxy cephalotaxine from clitoria ternatea," Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, vol. 9, pp. 458-462, DOI: 10.22270/jddt.v9i4-a.3472, 2019.
[39] N. K. Mariee, A. A. Khalil, A. A. Nasser, M. M. Al-Hiti, W. M. Ali, "Isolation of the antimicrobial alkaloid stemmadenine from Iraqi Rhazya stricta," Journal of Natural Products, vol. 51 no. 1, pp. 186-187, DOI: 10.1021/np50055a036, 1988.
[40] M. Nováková, T. Fábryová, D. Vokurková, I. Dolečková, J. Kopecký, P. Hrouzek, L. Tůmová, J. Cheel, "Separation of the glycosylated carotenoid myxoxanthophyll from Synechocystis salina by HPCCC and evaluation of its antioxidant, tyrosinase inhibitory and immune-stimulating properties," Separations, vol. 7 no. 4,DOI: 10.3390/separations7040073, 2020.
[41] R. Paduch, M. Kandefer-Szerszeń, M. Trytek, J. Fiedurek, "Terpenes substances useful in human healthcare," Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, vol. 55 no. 5, pp. 315-327, DOI: 10.1007/s00005-007-0039-1, 2007.
[42] N. S. Mone, S. A. Bhagwat, D. Sharma, M. Chaskar, R. H. Patil, P. Zamboni, N. N. Nawani, S. K. Satpute, "Naphthoquinones and their derivatives emerging trends in combating microbial pathogens," Coatings, vol. 11 no. 4,DOI: 10.3390/coatings11040434, 2021.
[43] H. Gradišar, P. Pristovšek, A. Plaper, R. Jerala, "Green tea catechins inhibit bacterial DNA gyrase by interaction with its ATP binding site," Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 50 no. 2, pp. 264-271, DOI: 10.1021/jm060817o, 2007.
[44] H. Chaudhry, J. Zhou, Y. Zhong, M. M. Ali, F. McGuire, P. S. Nagarkatti, M. Nagarkatti, "Role of cytokines as a double-edged sword in sepsis," In Vivo, vol. 27 no. 6, pp. 669-684, 2013.
[45] A. Asghar, Y. C. Tan, M. Zahoor, S. A. Zainal Abidin, Y.-Y. Yow, E. Khan, C. Lahiri, "A scaffolded approach to unearth potential antibacterial components from epicarp of Malaysian Nephelium lappaceum L," Scientific Reports, vol. 11 no. 1,DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92622-0, 2021.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2022 Kandasamy Nagarajan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance represents one of the biggest challenges, and there is an urgent need for plant-based antimicrobial agents that enable managing this crisis effectively. In this work, we aimed to investigate the antibacterial activity of Astragalus candolleanus (A. candolleanus) hydromethanolic root extract against Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Kocuria rhizophila) strains by the cup-plate method. The root was powdered and extracted with 70% methanol by cold maceration for 5 days. Preliminary phytochemical screening was performed with different solvents in the order of increasing polarity. Pure compounds were isolated by column chromatography and were characterized through liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Targeted predictions of the isolated compounds were also studied using Swiss Target prediction software and prediction of activity spectra for substances. The extract showed a broad zone of inhibition against pathogenic bacteria. Four pure compounds were isolated, of which a novel terpenoid compound has been identified as stemmadenine along with scillirosidin, cephalotaxine, and myxoxanthophyll. The structures of the isolated phytoconstituents were elucidated by spectral analysis. The four pure components isolated from the roots of A. candolleanus are suggested to be effective against tested pathogens. Overall results of drug design suggest that myxoxanthophyll is a promising bioactive compound endowed with antibacterial activity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 KIET School of Pharmacy, KIET Group of Institutions, Delhi-NCR, Ghaziabad 201206, India
2 Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, “Kore” University of Enna, Contrada Santa Panasia, Enna 94100, Italy; Nacture S.r.l, Spin-off University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, Catania 95123, Italy
3 Department of Human Sciences and Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele Roma Open University, Via di Val Cannuta 247, Rome 00166, Italy
4 Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Sector-23, Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad 201002, India