It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Sex determination mechanisms evolve surprisingly rapidly, yet little is known in the large nematode phylum other than for Caenorhabditis elegans, which relies on chromosomal XX-XO sex determination and a dosage compensation mechanism. Here we analyze by sex-specific genome sequencing and genetic analysis sex determination in two fungal feeding/plant-parasitic Bursaphelenchus nematodes and find that their sex differentiation is more likely triggered by random, epigenetic regulation than by more well-known mechanisms of chromosomal or environmental sex determination. There is no detectable difference in male and female chromosomes, nor any linkage to sexual phenotype. Moreover, the protein sets of these nematodes lack genes involved in X chromosome dosage counting or compensation. By contrast, our genetic screen for sex differentiation mutants identifies a Bursaphelenchus ortholog of tra-1, the major output of the C. elegans sex determination cascade. Nematode sex determination pathways might have evolved by “bottom-up” accretion from the most downstream regulator, tra-1.
In most species, sex is determined by genetic or environmental factors. Here, the authors present evidence that sex determination in Bursaphelenchus nematodes is instead likely to be regulated by a random, epigenetic mechanism.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Meiji University, School of Agriculture, Kawasaki, Japan (GRID:grid.411764.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2106 7990)
2 University of Miyazaki, Division of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan (GRID:grid.410849.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0657 3887)
3 University of Miyazaki, Division of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan (GRID:grid.410849.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0657 3887); Duzce University, Forestry Vocational School, Duzce, Turkey (GRID:grid.412121.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1710 3792)
4 Academia Sinica, Biodiversity Research Center, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.28665.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 1366)
5 California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Pasadena, USA (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890)
6 Chubu University, Department of Environmental Biology, College of Bioscience & Biotechnology, Kasugai, Japan (GRID:grid.254217.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8868 2202)