1. Introduction
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and subsequent meta-analyses have identified hundreds of loci that associate with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in various populations [1,2,3,4,5]. Most of the identified loci appear to impact T2D via an effect on insulin secretion and many associated SNPs map to enhancers that are active in pancreatic islets [6,7,8,9]. In American Indians from the southwestern region of the United States, the strongest T2D signal identified to date maps to intron 15 of KCNQ1 [10]. Among normal glucose tolerant American Indians, variants that increase risk for T2D show a strong association with insulin secretory responses to either oral glucose or an intravenous glucose bolus indicating that KCNQ1 variants impact T2D risk via an effect on insulin secretion [10]. These associations have a strong parent-of-origin effect, whereby only maternal inheritance of the risk allele associated with increased risk for T2D and a lower insulin secretion in response to a glucose challenge [10]. Variation at the KCNQ1 locus has also been shown to associate with T2D in diverse ethnic groups [10,11,12,13,14,15] with studies proposing that the diabetes risk effects are mediated during early development [16]. However, the effector gene mediating this phenotype and the pathomechanism by which these SNPs affect T2D risk remain elusive, in part due to a lack of a biological model system.
The KCNQ1 locus is located in an imprinted, gene rich region. Many genes in this region, including CDKN1C, TRPM5, IGF2, TH, H19, and INS, are known to be important for pancreatic-islet development and function. Imprinting in this region is controlled by two distinct imprinting control regions (ICR). One ICR is immediately 5′ to H19 and the other ICR is in intron 10 of KCNQ1 which controls the imprinting of genes including KCNQ1, KCNQ1OT1, CDKN1C and TRPM5 [17]. A previous study in adult islet and fetal pancreas found evidence of imprinting for KCNQ1 and KCNQ1OT1 only in fetal pancreas. In contrast CDKN1C was imprinted in both adult islet and fetal pancreas, whereas PHLDA2, SLC22A18 and SLC22A18AS were biallelically expressed in both fetal and adult pancreas. This led to the suggestion that KCNQ1, KCNQ1OT1 or CDKN1C is the probable effector gene at this locus. This study also identified correlation between a representative T2D SNP (rs2237895) at this locus and methylation at three sites (CTCF and PLAGL1 binding sites and a diagnostic differentially methylated region used for diagnosis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome) at different developmental stages leading the authors to suggest that the diabetes risk effects may be mediated during early development [16].
Recent advances in the generation of pancreatic beta-like cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) provide an ideal model system to study the developmental stage-specific effect of T2D associated variants at the KCNQ1 locus [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Pancreatic beta-like cells generated from genome edited, isogenic hiPSCs differing only at the SNPs of interest will advance our understanding of the biologic impact of these variants. However, a challenge for these studies is the high linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the lead variant at this locus and several nearby variants, which may be the true causal variant for the observed functional effect. This uncertainty of the causal variant at this locus necessitates multiple edits in the same cell line to generate isogenic hiPSCs. In addition, the KCNQ1 locus has a particularly strong association with T2D in Southwestern American Indians [10,24]; therefore, to better understand the physiologic processes that connect variation at this locus to risk of T2D in this specific ethnic group, SNPs should be studied in the context of the genomic background of Southwestern American Indians. In this report, we describe the use of allele-specific guide RNAs to target the KCNQ1 region and establishment of isogenic cell lines generated using hiPSCs procured from Southwestern American Indians that differ only at multiple T2D associated KCNQ1 intronic SNPs. As a proof of concept, we also provide evidence that the targeted region has developmental stage specific regulatory function by differentiating an isogenic hiPS cell line with a hemizygous deletion towards pancreatic beta-like cells. We plan to use our established isogenic hiPSCs with targeted edits at the T2D associated SNPs in future studies to examine the pathomechanism by which these SNPs affect T2D risk in American Indians.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derivation and Culture
hiPSCs were derived as a part of a project to study diabetic kidney diseases in American Indians. These subjects were previously clinically studied, and their DNA had undergone whole-exome sequencing and genome-wide SNP genotyping. hiPSCs used in this study were derived from female subjects who were obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) and were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. hiPSCs were derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, collected at the clinical center, which were then reprogrammed into hiPSCs at the NIH-NHLBI iPSC core facility using a Sendai virus based reprogramming kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The hiPSCs were initially expanded using mTeSR1 medium (cat. No. 85850, Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) and Matrigel (cat. No. 354227, Corning, Corning, NY, USA). Sendai virus free and mycoplasma negative hiPSCs were then adapted (5 passages) and expanded using DEF-CS 500 culture system (cat No. Y30010, Takara Bio, San Jose, CA, USA), a chemically defined, feeder free system for the expansion of hiPSCs in a 2D-monlayer format. Upon reaching dense confluency, the cells were passaged every three days using TrypLE select (cat. No. 12563011, Thermo Fisher). These hiPSCs were further characterized for pluripotency, differentiation potential and genetic stability as detailed below (Figure S1).
2.2. Differentiating hiPSCs to Beta-like Cells
Detailed methods used for differentiation of hiPSCs to beta-like cells is provided below. Briefly, two different protocols were used for generating beta-like cells from hiPSCs. Protocol 1 utilized a slightly modified hybrid adherent/air-liquid interphase culture system described by Rezania et al. [18]. Protocol 1 was used in our early studies which measured expression levels for KCNQ1 and neighboring genes and assessed allele-specific expression during beta-like cell differentiation from hiPSCs. Although protocol 1 generated beta-like cells and resulted in proper expression of markers during different stages of differentiation, this protocol resulted in highly variable differentiation efficiency (Figure S2) and generated lower numbers of beta-like cells from our American Indian hiPSCs. Therefore, a second protocol (Protocol 2) was optimized for our hiPSCs and was used for all other differentiations. Protocol 2 followed a hybrid adherent/3D culture system (Figure S3A) and was developed based on previously published protocols [20,21,22,23].
The main features of protocol 2 are (1) the use of iMatrix-511 (highly purified and refined laminin-511 E8 fragments, cat. No. NP892-012, Stemgent, Cambridge, MA, USA) as the basement membrane matrix, (2) the use of a WNT signaling inhibitor (cat. No. 72122, IWP2, Stem Cell Technologies) and a shorter duration (48 h vs. 72 h) for the generation of definitive endoderm, (3) the use of Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF, cat. No. 236-EG-200, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for the generation of pancreatic progenitors, and (4) the use of N-acetyl Cysteine (cat. No. A9165-25G, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) during the early endocrine progenitor stage. This optimized differentiation protocol consistently generated high quality definitive endoderm cells after two days of differentiation and >80% PDX1/NKX6-1 double positive pancreatic progenitor cells after 10 days of differentiation as an adherent monolayer (Figure S3B,C). Further differentiation as 3D clusters generated monohormonal insulin (beta-like cells) positive cells co-expressing beta-cell transcription factors such as NKX6-1 and PDX1 (Figure S3D–F). This modified protocol leads to consistent generation of >50% monohormonal INS/NKX6-1 double positive beta-like cells (functional beta-like cells) after 34 days of differentiation (Figure S3G,H) that respond to a high glucose challenge by increasing insulin secretion during a static glucose-stimulated insulin secretion assay (Figure S3I).
Protocol 1: Modified from Rezania et al. [18].
hiPSCs maintained in DEF-CS 500 culture system were seeded in iMatrix-511 (Stemgent) coated plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/cm2. Differentiation was initiated after 48 h. using Growth Differentiation Factor-8 (GDF8, cat. No. 120-00, Peprotech, Cranbury, NJ, USA) and the WNT signaling activator CHIR99021 (cat. No. S2924, Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA) to generate definitive endoderm cells (day 3). These cells were then differentiated towards pancreatic progenitors (day 10) using a combination of ascorbic acid (cat. No. A4544, Sigma), FGF7 (cat. No. 251-KG-01M, R & D Systems), LDN193189 (cat. No. 04-0074-02, Stemgent), SANT-1 (cat. No. S4572, Sigma), TPPB (cat. No. 5343, Tocris, Bristol, UK), retinoic acid (cat. No. R2625, RA, Sigma) and EGF (R and D systems). On day 10, cells were harvested using TrypLE select (Thermo Fisher) and resuspended at a density of 5 × 107 cells/mL. Five microliters of cells were then spotted on a Falcon cell culture insert (cat. No. 353102, 1.0 µm pore size, Corning) and were further differentiated at an air/liquid interphase towards immature beta-like cells (Day 20) using a combination of γ-Secretase Inhibitor XX (cat. No. 565789, GSiXX, MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA), ALK5 inhibitor II (cat. No. ALX-270-445-M005, Enzo life sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA) and 3,3′,5-Triiodo-L-thyronine (cat. No. T6397, T3, Sigma). Finally, mature beta-like cells (Day 35) were generated using ALK5 inhibitor II, 3,3′,5-Triiodo-L-thyronine, N-acetyl cysteine (Sigma), Trolox (cat. No. 648471, Sigma) and R428 (cat. No. S2841, Selleckchem).
Protocol 2: Optimized seven-stage differentiation protocol.
hiPSCs maintained in DEF-CS 500 culture system were seeded at a density of 7.0 × 104 cells/cm2 into iMatrix coated T-75 flasks (cat. No. 0030711114, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Differentiation was initiated after 72 h. (Day 0). Cells were rinsed with dPBS (on day 0 and day 2) and DEF-CS medium was replaced with the following media on the respective days. Media was changed every day unless otherwise noted. Day 0—Basal Differentiation Media 1 (BDM1) + 100 ng/mL Activin A (cat. No. 338-AC-050, R & D Systems) + 3 μM CHIR99021 (Selleckchem) + 100 nM PI103 (cat. No. S1038, Selleckchem). Day 1—BDM1 + 100 ng/mL Activin A + 2.5 μM IWP2 (Stem Cell Technologies). Day 2 and 3—BDM1 + 0.25 mM ascorbic acid (Sigma) + 50 ng/mL FGF7 (R & D Systems). Day 4—BDM2 + 50 ng/mL FGF7 + 100 nM LDN193189 (Stemgent). After 4 h.—BDM2 + 50 ng/mL FGF7 + 100 nM LDN193189 + 0.25 μM SANT-1 (Sigma) + 250 nM TPPB (Tocris) + 2.0 μM RA (Sigma). Day 5—BDM2 + 50 ng/mL FGF7 + 0.25 μM SANT-1 + 250 nM TPPB + 2.0 μM RA. Day 6–9—BDM2.1 + 2 ng/mL FGF7 + 0.25 μM SANT-1 + 125 μM TPPB+ 0.1 μM RA + 50 ng/mL EGF (R & D Systems). Day 10—BDM2.1 + 2 ng/mL FGF7 + 0.25 μM SANT-1 + 125 nM TPPB + 0.1 μM RA + 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 μM Y-27632 (cat. No. 72304, Stem cell technologies). After 4 h. the cells were harvested using TrypLE select (1.5 mL/T75 flask for 15 min at 37 °C) and were resuspended in BDM3.1 containing 0.1 μM RA + 20 ng/mL betacellulin (cat. No. 261-CE-050, R & D Systems) + 1 μM T3 (Sigma) + 0.25 μM SANT1 + 1 μM GSiXX (MilliporeSigma) + 10 μM ALK5 Inhibitor II (Enzo Life Sciences) + 100 nM LDN193189 + 10 μM Y-27632 + 1.0 μM Latrunculin A (cat. No. 10010630, Cayman chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) at a density of 4 × 106 cells/mL. 5 mL of cells were then added to ultra-low attachment 6-well plates (cat. No. CLS3471-24EA, Corning) and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 rotating on a shaker at 100 rpm. On day 11 the aggregates were collected using a 70 micron reversible cell strainer (cat. No. 27260, Stem Cell Technologies) and were transferred to a new ultra-low attachment 6-well plate. Thereafter, media was changed every day by removing 4.5 mL and adding 4.5 mL of new media. Day 11 and 12—BDM3 + 0.1 μM RA + 20 ng/mL betacellulin + 1 μM T3 + 0.25 μM SANT1 + 1 μM GSiXX + 10 μM ALK5 inhibitor II + 100 nM LDN193189 + 10 μM Y-27632. Day 13–17—BDM3.1 + 25 nM RA + 20 ng/mL betacellulin + 1 μM T3 + 1 μM GSiXX + 10 μM ALK5 inhibitor II + 1 mM N-acetyl cysteine. Day 18—Immature islet clusters were collected in 15 mL centrifuge tubes and were washed once with dPBS. Clusters were then incubated in TrypLE Select for 15–20 min at 37 °C. After incubation the cells were gently triturated using a wide bore 1 mL pipette to obtain a single cell suspension. TrypLE was removed by washing with BDM4 and the cells were resuspended in BDM4 containing 1 μM T3 and 1 mM N-acetyl cysteine (islet maturation media) at a concentration of 1.25 × 106 cells/mL. 4 mL of cells were then added to ultra-low attachment 6-well plates and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 rotating on a shaker at 100 rpm. Day 19—Immature islet clusters were collected using a 70 micron reversible cell strainer and added to a new ultra-low attachment 6-well plate containing 3.5 mL maturation media. Thereafter, media was changed every day by removing 3 mL and adding 3 mL of fresh maturation media until day 27.
Basal Differentiation Media composition.
Basal Differentiation Media 1 (BDM1)—MCDB131 (cat. No. 10372019, Thermo Fisher) + 1.5 g/L NaHCO3 (cat. No. S8761, Sigma) + 1X Glutamax (cat. No. 35050061, Thermo Fisher) + 10 mM final glucose (cat No. G8769, Sigma) + 0.5% fatty acid free BSA (cat. No. G8769, Proliant Biologicals, Ankeny, IA, USA).
Basal Differentiation Media 2 (BDM2)—MCDB131 + 2.5 g/L NaHCO3 + 1X Glutamax + 10 mM final glucose + 2% fatty acid free BSA + 1: 200 ITS-X (cat. No. 51500056, Thermo Fisher) + 0.25 mM ascorbic acid.
Basal Differentiation Media 2.1 (BDM2.1)—MCDB131 + 2.5 g/L NaHCO3 + 1X Glutamax + 10 mM final glucose + 2% fatty acid free BSA + 1: 200 ITS-X + 0.25 mM ascorbic acid + 10 mM Nicotinamide (cat. No. N0636, Sigma).
Basal Differentiation Media 3 (BDM3)—MCDB131 + 2.5 g/L NaHCO3 + 1X Glutamax + 25 mM final glucose + 2.0% FAF BSA +1:200 ITS-X + 10 μg/mL Heparin (cat. No. H3149, Sigma) + 10 μM ZnSO4 (cat. No. Z0251, Sigma) + 0.25 mM ascorbic acid + 1X penicillin/streptomycin (cat. No. 15140148, Thermo Fisher).
Basal Differentiation Media 3.1 (BDM3.1)—MCDB131 + 2.5 g/L NaHCO3 + 1X Glutamax + 25 mM final glucose + 2.0% FAF BSA +1:200 ITS-X + 10 μg/mL Heparin + 10 μM ZnSO4 + 0.25 mM ascorbic acid + 1X penicillin/streptomycin + 1X MEM non-essential amino acids (cat. No. 11140050, NEAA, Thermo Fisher).
Basal Differentiation Media 4 (BDM4)—MCDB131 + 1.5 g/L NaHCO3 + 1X Glutamax + 8 mM final glucose + 2.0% FAF BSA + 10 μg/mL Heparin + 1 μM ZnSO4 + 1X penicillin/streptomycin + 1X MEM non-essential amino acids + 1X Trace elements A (cat No. MT99182CI, Corning) + 1X Trace elements B (cat. No. MT99175CI, Corning).
2.3. RNA Sequencing
RNA sequencing and subsequent bioinformatic analysis was done at SeqMatic (Fremont, CA, USA). Sequencing was done using Novaseq with dual index, 2 × 100 bp run parameter and S1 200 cycle reagent kit from Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA). Greater than 90% bases had a Quality (Q) score ≥ 30. Raw reads were trimmed of adapter sequences and low-quality bases using cutadapt. Clean reads were aligned to Human Genome Reference GRCh38 using HISAT2 resulting in >92% alignment to the genome. The software featureCounts was used to count the number of reads mapping to known genes as defined by Ensembl gene annotations. A time course study was performed using DESeq2. Normalized counts from DeSeq2 were log2 transformed and used for generating a heatmap showing differential expression of select genes during different stages (days).
2.4. Guide RNA Generation, CRISPR and Single Cell Cloning
sgRNA generation, hiPSC editing, and single cell cloning was done using the Cellartis iPSC rCas9 Electroporation and Single-Cell Cloning System (cat. No. 632643, Takara Bio) following manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a DNA template was generated by PCR using the Guide-it Scaffold template and a primer containing the T7 promoter sequence, the target sequence (20 base pairs upstream of the protospacer adjacent motif, NGG). The DNA template was in-vitro transcribed using Guide-it T7 polymerase mix to generate the sgRNA. The sgRNA was subsequently digested with DNase I and purified using the Guide-it IVT RNA clean-up kit and quantified using a QIAexpert system (cat. No. 9002340, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The sgRNA was then used to create a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex along with Guide-it recombinant CAS9 and was used for editing hiPSCs maintained in the DEF-CS 500 culture system by electroporation using a Neon transfection system (cat. No. MPK5000, Thermo Fisher). Electroporated hiPSCs were plated in a 48-well plate coated with COAT-1 from the DEF-CS 500 single cell cloning system (Takara) and allowed to recover for 4–5 days. Cells were harvested once they became confluent (but not dense) using TryPLE Select and single cell cloning was done using limiting dilution (0.5 cells/well of a 96-well plate). Colonies were expanded in 96 well-plates (cat. No. 2231730119, Eppendorf) for 10–14 days until ready for passaging. All wells were screened to ensure a single colony and these cells were passaged to a 48-well plate (cat. No. 2231723112, Eppendorf) using TrypLE select. Residual cells left in the 96-well plate after passaging were used for DNA isolation using QuickExtract DNA extraction solution (cat. No. QE09050, Lucigen, Middleton, WI, USA) and the DNA was screened for successful edits using Sanger sequencing. The clonal cell lines identified to contain the desired edits were expanded and frozen.
2.5. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy plus micro kit (cat. No. 74034, Qiagen) and quantified by nanodrop (Thermo Fisher). 2 μg of total RNA was used for cDNA conversion using the high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (cat. No. 4387406, Thermo Fisher). Real-time PCR was done using TaqMan probes (Thermo Fisher) for KCNQ1, CDKN1C, IGF2, SLC22A18 and KCNQ1OT1 (Data for Figure 3). For all others, real-time PCR was done using gene specific primers (Table S1), and PowerUP SYBR green master mix (cat No. A25777, Thermo Fisher). A dissociation curve analysis was done to ensure amplification of a single product. Expression levels were normalized to the expression of TBP, and relative expression was analyzed using 2–∆∆Ct method. Results were compared using an unpaired t-test.
2.6. Copy Number Assay
Custom TaqMan copy number assays (Thermo Fisher) were designed to detect potential deletions in the CRISPR edited regions (Table S2). Genomic DNA samples were all normalized to 5 ng/μL. The custom copy number assays were run simultaneously with a copy number reference assay (either TaqMan Copy Number Reference Assay, human, TERT or RNaseP) in a duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. The real-time PCR results were then analyzed using CopyCaller software v2.0 (Thermo Fisher).
2.7. Bisulphite Sequencing
500 ng of genomic DNA was bisulfite converted for methylation analysis using the EpiJET bisulfite conversion kit (cat No. K1461, Thermo Fisher) following manufacturer’s instructions. The bisulfite converted DNA was used to amplify regions of the KCNQ1OT1 promoter using the following target specific primers: FR1-F—TAGGATTTTGTTGAGGAGTTTTTTGGAG, FR1-R—AAACCAATCTAAACCCRAATAACATCAA, FR2-F—GAGTTGGAGATAYGGGTTAGTTTTTTG, FR2-R—CACAACAATAAAAACTTCAAAACATCCC. The amplicons were then used for TA cloning and subsequent transformations using TOPO TA Cloning Kit for Sequencing and One Shot TOP10 Chemically Competent E. coli (cat No. K457501, Thermo Fisher). Twenty-four bacterial colonies were then selected for colony PCR and sequencing using either the T3 or T7 primers. Cloned amplicons were analyzed to identify methylated CpG sites (methylated cytosines will not be converted to thymine following bisulfite treatment). Methylation at each CpG site was calculated as the percentage of bacterial colony with a cytosine residue at that site. For each fragment, methylation was calculated as the average methylation across the CpG sites (FR1, 23 CpG sites, chr11:2699936-2700124 and FR2, 26 CpG sites, chr11: 2700337-2700613).
2.8. Genomic Stability
hiPSCs from the last passage prior to freezing were screened for genomic abnormalities by G-band karyotyping at WiCell (Madison, WI, USA). Only frozen cells from this passage with no clonal abnormality was used in further experiments.
2.9. Pluripotency and Differentiation Potential
Pluripotency and differentiation potential (directed differentiation towards pancreatic progenitors) was assessed by flow cytometry for stage specific markers (TRA-160 and SSEA4 for pluripotency, CXCR4 and CD117 for definitive endoderm and, PDX1 and NKX6-1 for pancreatic progenitors). RNA from the pluripotent stage and definitive endoderm stage was also used for hPSC scorecard assays done using TaqMan hPSC scorecard panel (cat. No. A15870, Thermo Fisher). The hPSC scorecard panel measures gene expression of a set of markers specific for pluripotency and the three germ layers (ectoderm, endoderm, and mesoderm) and compares this expression to that measured in undifferentiated established human embryonic stem cells in the form of an algorithmic score. The hPSC scorecard data was analyzed using the hPSC scorecard analysis software v 1.3 (Thermo Fisher,
2.10. Off-Target Effect Analysis
CCTop—CRISPR/Cas9 target online predictor tool (
2.11. Flow Cytometry
For staining of surface antigens, cells were harvested using TrypLE select as a single cell suspension, washed twice with dPBS, and resuspended in stain buffer (cat. No. 554656, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). For each test, 1 × 106 cells were then incubated with fluorophore conjugated primary antibodies or isotype control antibodies for 45 min at room temperature. The cells were then washed twice with stain buffer and resuspended in 500 uL of stain buffer and analyzed using Accuri C6 plus flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For intracellular staining, cells were harvested as a single cell suspension using TrypLE select (Thermo Fisher) and washed with cold dPBS. One million cells were used for each test and the cells were stained using LIVE/DEAD Fixable Red stain (cat. No. L23102, Thermo Fisher) following manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were then washed once with cold dPBS and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (cat No. 28908, Thermo Fisher) for 30 min on ice. The cells were then washed once with PBS and incubated in blocking and permeabilization buffer (PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100 + 5% donkey serum) for 1hr at 4 °C. The blocking buffer was removed, and cells were incubated in primary antibody or isotype control antibody diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4 °C. Cells were then washed twice in blocking buffer and incubated in fluorophore conjugated secondary antibody diluted in blocking buffer for 2 h at 4 °C. Cells were washed 3 times in sorting buffer (PBS + 0.5% BSA) and resuspended in 500 uL sorting buffer, filtered using Flowmi cell strainers (cat No. H13680-0070, SP Bel-Art, Wayne, NJ, USA) and analyzed using Accuri C6 plus flow cytometer. Data were analyzed using Flowjo software v 10.6.1 (BD Biosciences). Dead cells were excluded during analysis and isotype control antibodies were used to determine gating. Gating strategy is shown in Figure S4. List of antibodies and isotype controls is given in Table S4.
2.12. Immunocytochemistry
For adherent cultures, cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were then washed twice with PBS and once with wash buffer (PBS + 0.1% BSA) and incubated in permeabilization and blocking buffer (PBS + 0.3% triton-x-100 + 10% normal serum from the host animal for the secondary antibody) for 45 min at room temperature. Cells were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with diluted primary antibody (Table S4) (dilution buffer- PBS + 1% BSA + 0.3% triton-x-100, 0.01% sodium azide + 1% normal serum from the host animal for the secondary antibody). The cells were washed three times with wash buffer and incubated with secondary antibody diluted in dilution buffer for 1hr protected from light. Secondary antibody was removed by washing three times with wash buffer and cells were counterstained using NucBlue fixed cell ready probe (cat. No. R37606, Thermo Fisher). For immunostaining of 3D clusters, the clusters were dissociated into single cells using TrypLE select. Cells were then deposited as a monolayer on Shandon cytoslides (cat. No. 5991056, Fisher Scientific) using a cytospin 4 centrifuge (cat. No. A78300003, Fisher Scientific). Slides were fixed, permeabilized and stained using primary and secondary antibodies (Table S4) as described above. The slides were counterstained using NucBlue fixed cell ready probe and mounted and cured using prolong gold antifade mountant (Thermo Fisher) before imaging. All images were captured using an EVOS FL cell imaging system (cat. No. AMF4300, Thermo Fisher) with built in image acquisition software.
2.13. Glucose Stimulated Insulin Secretion Assay
For static glucose stimulated insulin secretion assay, 25–30 islet-like clusters were rinsed twice using KRB buffer (128 mM NaCl + 5 mM KCl + 2.7 mM CaCl2 + 1.2 mM MgSO4 + 1 mM Na2HPO4 + 1.2 mM KH2PO4 + 5 mM NaHCO3 + 10 mM HEPES + 0.1% BSA, pH 7.4 with NaOH) and incubated in KRB buffer containing 2 mM glucose for 1hr for equilibration. The KRB buffer was replaced with fresh 2 mM glucose KRB and incubated for 1hr. The buffer was saved, and the clusters were washed once with KRB buffer and then incubated in 20 mM glucose KRB for 1hr. The buffer was retained, and the clusters were washed once with KRB buffer and then incubated in 30 mM KCl for 30 min. The buffer was retained, and the clusters were placed in acidified ethanol (75% ethanol + 1.5% HCl + 0.1% triton-X-100) and stored at −20 °C for 72 h. with vortexing every 24 h. Extracted insulin was collected as a supernatant by a brief centrifugation and used to normalize insulin secretions. The retained buffer was then used to quantify insulin secretion using Human Insulin Elisa (cat. No. 10-1113-01, Mercodia, Winston Salem, NC, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Differences in Gene Expression and Imprinting Status of KCNQ1, CDKN1C and TRPM5 during Pancreatic Beta-like Cell Differentiation from American Indian hiPSCs
hiPSCs from 3 different American Indian donors, whose DNA had been previously densely genotyped, were differentiated into pancreatic beta-like cells (Differentiation Protocol 1). Stage specific upregulation/downregulation in expression of genes important for pluripotency and pancreatic-beta cell development and function confirmed proper differentiation (Figure 1A). Profiling of expression levels for genes located in a 1.1 Mb region surrounding KCNQ1 during different days of differentiation showed that several genes, including H19, IGF2, IGF2-AS, INS, TH, ASCL2, KCNQ1OT1, CDKN1C and SNORA54 were dynamically regulated with peak expression seen during different stages of differentiation (Figure 1B and Table S5). In contrast, KCNQ1 expression was consistent during all stages of differentiation (Figure 1B, C). Previously identified heterozygous exonic variants in KCNQ1, CDKN1C and TRPM5 (which is known regulate glucose stimulated insulin secretion) were used to assess mRNA expression from both chromosomes during each stage of differentiation to identify gene-specific imprinting. KCNQ1OT1 was not assessed since there were no heterozygous exonic variants in this gene. Expression of these 3 genes, as well as the nearby non-imprinted gene TH which served as a control, was verified using real-time PCR (Figure 1C) and Sanger sequencing of the cDNA was used to determine whether the genes were bi-allelically or mono-allelically expressed during each stage of differentiation (Figure 1D). Sequencing of the hiPSC genomic DNA confirmed the heterozygous state of the selected exonic SNPs for all four genes. CDKN1C had mono-allelic expression during all stages of differentiation. KCNQ1 had mono-allelic expression during the iPSC stage (day 0), and early stages of differentiation while there was a gradual loss of imprinting in the immature beta-like cell stage (day 20) and mature beta-like cell stage (day 26 and day 35, Figure 1D). TRPM5 was not detected in hiPSCs and started losing imprinting during the pancreatic progenitor stage and bi-allelic expression was seen during later stages. As expected, bi-allelic expression was found during all stages for the non-imprinted TH gene.
3.2. Generation of Genome-Edited Isogenic hiPSCs
3.2.1. SNP Selection and Allele-Specific Guide RNA Design for CRISPR/CAS9 Editing at the KCNQ1 Locus
The lead SNP, rs2299620, at the KCNQ1 locus is in a region of very high linkage disequilibrium (Figure 2A). Preliminary data from our prior in-vitro studies provided evidence that a region containing the lead SNP and three other SNPs rs2237896, rs2237897 and rs74046911 may have a functional effect [25]. This finding is supported by ENCODE and Islet regulome databases which map putative strong enhancers to these SNPs with multiple epigenetic marks and transcription factor binding sites. We hypothesized that targeting this region using CRISPR and allele-specific guide RNAs (sgRNAs) in an hiPS cell line heterozygous for these variants and subsequent single cell cloning will generate isogenic hiPSCs that will differ at multiple SNP sites. Utilizing allele-specific sgRNA eliminates the need for donor DNA as a template for homology directed repair (HDR), and instead introduces a double strand break in only one chromosome at the specific site of interest such that the intact chromosome containing the other allele is used as the template, thereby changing the heterozygous SNP to a homozygous SNP as well as leading to edits at nearby SNPs (Figure 2B). To validate this technique and identify the most robust sgRNA sequences to target the 4 SNPs, 10 sgRNAs were designed such that the SNP mapped within the PAM site (protospacer adjacent motif; a 3 bp DNA sequence that follows the DNA region targeted for cleavage by spCas9) or within 6 bp of the PAM site (Figure 2C). These sgRNAs were tested for efficiency (data not shown) and analysis of the resulting edits by Sanger sequencing led to the selection of sgRNAs rs2237896-G-1 (sg1), rs2237896-A (sg2), rs74046911-C-2 (sg3), rs2237897-C (sg4) and rs2237897-T (sg5) for further experiments.
3.2.2. Generation of Isogenic Cells Lines Using Allele Specific CRISPR sgRNAs
An American Indian hiPSC line heterozygous for the above variants was nucleofected with the RNP complex containing one of the selected sgRNAs and after subsequent recovery and expansion, single cell cloning was performed. A total of 490 single cell colonies were screened for the desired edits; among the 115 which were subsequently expanded and sequenced across the 4 targeted SNPs, 23 had no edits (i.e., all four SNPs were still heterozygous) and 71 had an indel at the CRISPR site. The remaining 21 cell lines had evidence of editing by HDR (Figure 2D, representative image showing two edited clonal cell lines). The genotypes of the 4 SNPs in all of the 21 edited cell lines were in accordance with the allele-specific sgRNA used in nucleofection.
3.3. Characterization of Genome-Edited Isogenic hiPSCs
3.3.1. Extended Genotyping and Identification of Large Deletions in the Established Isogenic Cell Lines
The extent of homozygosity in the 21 cell lines with evidence of HDR was determined by genotyping (via sequencing) 15 SNPs spanning a 20 kb region (Figure 3A). The unedited parental cell line was heterozygous for all 15 SNPs whereas varying stretches of homozygosity was seen in the clonal cell lines (Figure 3A). In 7 of the 21 clonal cell lines, the edits were limited to the 4 SNPs in the putative functional region (2 clones, sg5-C2 and sg5-C3, with only 3 edited SNPs). Four clones had edits that covered all 7 SNPs in strong LD (r2 ≥ 0.95) with each other and the lead SNP (Figure 3A). Seven cell lines had evidence of HDR beyond the LD block (Figure 3A, blue blocks). The stretch of homozygosity extended as far as 11.5 kb upstream (Figure 3A, e.g., sg3-C1) and 8.9 kb downstream of the targeted site (Figure 3A, e.g., sg3-C11).
CRISPR also leads to on-target large deletions and complex rearrangements in edited cells [26,27]. These deletions, when hemizygous, give the appearance of homozygosity when the edited region is sequenced due to primer limitations. To identify any clonal cell lines which carry a hemizygous deletion, we performed copy number variation (CNV) analyses using 3 different custom Taqman CNV probes that map to the targeted region and 2 custom CNV probes that map upstream of the targeted region. Using the unedited parental cell line as the 2 copies reference, 6 of the 21 cell lines had a predicted copy number of 1 for one or more CNV probes, indicating that large deletions had occurred in one of the chromosomes (Figure 3B). We also observed complex repair events that resulted in 2 clonal cell lines (sg3-C12 and C13, Figure 3A) homozygous for the risk allele (red squares) and homozygous for the non-risk alleles at different SNP sites.
3.3.2. Identification of Clonal Cell Lines with Hypomethylation at the KCNQ1OT1 Promoter Region Resulting in Downregulation of KCNQ1 Expression
Regulation of gene expression at the KCNQ1 region is affected by methylation at the KCNQ1OT1 promoter, which is maternally methylated and paternally unmethylated. To test whether the process of single cell cloning following CRISPR could result in the expansion of clonal cell lines hypomethylated in this region, which in turn may affect gene expression irrespective of the genotype, we compared expression of KCNQ1, CDKN1C and SLC22A18 (genes regulated by the imprinting control region (ICR) in intron 10 of KCNQ1) and IGF2 (regulated by the ICR 5′ of H19) by real-time PCR in parental vs. established clonal cell lines. This identified downregulation of KCNQ1 and CDKN1C expression in 2 clonal cell lines while no difference was seen in the expression of SLC22A18 and IGF2 (Figure 4A). This finding was verified by analyzing gene expression of KCNQ1, CDKN1C and KCNQ1OT1 in 5 clonal cell lines and the parental cell line from three different passages which identified significant downregulation of KCNQ1 expression and upregulation of KCNQ1OT1 expression not entirely attributable to their genotypes (Figure 4B).
Bisulphite sequencing of 49 CpG sites across the promoter of KCNQ1OT1 (FR1, chr11:2699936-2700124 and FR2, chr11: 2700337-2700613, Figure 4C) confirmed that the difference in expression was due to differences in methylation at the KCNQ1OT1 promoter (Figure 4D). In the parental and clonal cell lines (sg3-C10 and sg3-C3) with no differences in the expression of KCNQ1 and KCNQ1OT1, the average methylation across the 49 CpG sites were 36.4%, 37.6% and 46.5% respectively. In contrast, in clonal cell lines (sg5-C1 and sg3-C7) with significant downregulation of KCNQ1 and upregulation of KCNQ1OT1 expression compared to the parental cell line, the average methylation ranged from 0.28–0.53% (Figure 4D).
3.3.3. Genomic Stability, CRISPR-cas9 Off-Target Effects, and Pluripotency in the Established Isogenic Cell Lines
The parental and 12 clonal cell lines with no edits outside the LD block and no complex rearrangement were selected for further characterization by G-banded karyotyping. This identified two cell lines with genomic abnormalities (sg2-C5 and sg3-C6). Seven of the remaining clonal cell lines with normal karyotypes, no large deletions, and KCNQ1 expression similar to the parental cell line were further examined for CRISPR off-target effects. The top 10 predicted off-target regions were sequenced for each of the 7 clonal cell lines, only 1 clone had an off-target effect located in an intergenic region (Table 1). These 7 clonal cell lines were further assessed for pluripotency using an hPSC scorecard panel as described in the methods. The algorithmic score in all clonal cell lines were comparable to the scores in established human embryonic stem cells for pluripotency (Table 1).
3.4. Functional Characterization of a Clonal Cell Line with a CRISPR-Induced Hemizygous Deletion in KCNQ1
3.4.1. A 2.3 kb Deletion in KCNQ1 That Spans the 4 Putative Functional SNPs Affects Gene Expression of CDKN1C and H19
To confirm that the region containing the lead T2D-associated SNP and 3 neighboring SNPs (rs2299260, rs2237896, rs2237897 and rs74046911) is functionally important, we selected a clonal cell line (sg3-C10, from now on called the deletion cell line) with a CRISPR-induced hemizygous deletion (Figure 5A) and assessed its role in pancreatic islet development. Using a combination of long PCR and nested sequencing primers, we determined that the deletion (chr11:2836837-chr11:2839122) is approximately 2.3 kb, spans the 4 SNPs and is located in the chromosome carrying the diabetes risk haplotype (Figure 5B,C). The deletion carrying clonal cell line has a normal karyotype (Figure 5D), no CRISPR off-target edits and methylation at the KCNQ1OT1 promoter is comparable to the parental cell line (Figure 4D). Pluripotency and differentiation potential of the parental and deletion cell lines were confirmed using the hPSC scorecard assay (Figure S5), and flow cytometry for pluripotency markers (SSEA4 and TRA-1-60), definitive endoderm markers (CXCR4 and CD117), and pancreatic progenitor markers (PDX1 and NKX6-1) following directed differentiation (Figure S5). Similar differentiation efficiencies were observed for both cell lines.
The parental and deletion cell lines were differentiated to generate pancreatic islet-like cells (Figure 5E) using the optimized seven-stage differentiation protocol. RNA was isolated from both cell lines and relative expression of genes in the 1.1 Mb region surrounding KCNQ1 in the deletion cell line was compared to parental cell line at specific differentiation stages (day 0—iPSC, day 10—pancreatic progenitors, day 13 and day 16—endocrine progenitors, day 18—immature islet-like cells and day 27—mature islet-like cells). This identified 2 genes, CDKN1C and H19, as significantly differentially expressed between the 2 cell lines on day 13 (early endocrine progenitors) and day 16 (late endocrine progenitors), respectively (Figure 5F and Table S2). Comparison of expression changes over time (temporally) during differentiation relative to the parental hiPSC (D0) showed a similar pattern; there was an approximately 2X greater fold change in CDKN1C expression on day 13 and 50% lower fold change of H19 expression on day 16 in the cells with the deletion (Figure 5G,H). In contrast, there was no significant difference in KCNQ1 expression during any stage of differentiation between the two cell lines (Figure S6). The gene expression patterns during differentiation for the other genes are shown in Figure S6. Differentiation efficiency was monitored by analyzing the gene expression of stage specific differentiation markers and was found to be comparable for the parental and deletion cell lines (Figure S7).
3.4.2. Differential Expression of INS in Day 27 Islet-like Cells Derived from the hiPSC with the 2.3 kb Hemizygous Deletion
The effect of the 2.3 kb hemizygous deletion on expression of 18 genes important for islet development and function was examined in hiPSC derived mature islet-like cells (day 27). A nominal but significant (p = 0.009) increase in INS, which maps ~675 kb upstream of the KCNQ1 T2D locus, and a modest decrease in SST (p = 0.02) gene expression was observed in the islet-like cells with the deletion (Figure 6A). There were no significant differences in expression of the other 16 genes, although there was a trend towards decreased expression for the alpha-cell gene GCG and increased expression for beta-cell specific genes PDX1 and NKX6-1 and insulin processing genes PCSK1 and PCSK2 in the islet-like cells with the deletion (Figure 6A). Further analysis of INS and GCG gene expression, the two main islet hormones, over the course of differentiation (Figure 6B,C) identified a relatively higher fold increase in expression of INS (113964-fold vs. 27821-fold, p = 0.0001) and GCG (356329-fold vs. 171513-fold, p = 0.007) in day 10 pancreatic progenitor cells generated using the parental cell line. However, endocrine commitment and robust increase in INS and GCG expressing cells during differentiation occurs only after the pancreatic progenitor stage. Analysis of INS and GCG expression during later stages of islet-like cell development relative to expression in pancreatic progenitors (day 10) showed that the fold increase in INS was significantly higher during the endocrine specification stage (day 11 to day 16) in the cells with the deletion. Relative to pancreatic progenitors (day 10), there was a 44.4-fold and 139.8-fold increase in INS expression during the endocrine progenitor stage (day 13 and day 16 respectively) in the parental cells, whereas there was a 106.7-fold and 763.3-fold increase in the cells with the deletion (p = 0.002 and p = 0.005, respectively, Figure 6D). In comparison, there was no significant difference in fold increase in the expression of INS during the islet maturation stage (day 27) relative to the endocrine progenitor stage (day 16). No significant differences in fold increase in GCG expression was seen on day 13 and only a nominal difference was seen on day 16 relative to day 10 (Figure 6D). This suggests that the difference in INS gene expression in day 27 islet-like cells shown in Figure 6A is due to differences in beta-like cell specification during the endocrine progenitor stages, which coincides with differences in CDKN1C and H19 expression during this stage. Flow cytometry analysis also detected a higher number of functional (INS+/NKX6-1+) beta-like cells in day 27 islet-like cells generated from hiPSCs with the deletion (Figure 6E). There was no difference in the percentage of monohormonal GCG positive (INS−/GCG+) cells, whereas there were lower number of polyhormonal (INS+/GCG+) cells in the islet-like cells with the hemizygous deletion (Figure 6E).
4. Discussion
T2D is a common polygenic disease whose prevalence varies between different ethnic groups; among the hundreds of variants that associate with this disease, many are common to different populations with notable exceptions. For example, variation in TCF7L2 has a strong effect on T2D in several ethnic groups except for Southwestern American Indians [28]. In contrast, variation in the imprinted KCNQ1 gene has a particularly strong parent-of-origin effect for T2D in Southwestern American Indians [10,24]. Therefore, to fully understand how genetic variants at the KCNQ1 locus influence the development of T2D in this group of American Indians, it is important to study the variants using cell lines with the appropriate genomic background. The current study details our efforts to generate American Indian specific isogenic hiPSCs for studying the effects of KCNQ1 variation during differentiation to pancreatic islet-like cells. We show that these hiPSCs retain imprinting at the KCNQ1 locus and that CDKN1C and KCNQ1 had monoallelic expression at different stages of differentiation to pancreatic islet-like cells which is consistent with a previous report in fetal pancreas and adult islets [16]. Therefore, our American Indian hiPSC are an appropriate cell line for studying the T2D associated variants in the imprinted KCNQ1 locus to understand their effect on the pathomechanism of T2D.
Most GWAS SNPs map to intronic or intergenic regions including the T2D associated variants in KCNQ1. These non-coding variants are often in high linkage disequilibrium with nearby SNPs and can exert their effects as a haplotype. Studying the molecular effects of a haplotype will require multiple edits in the same cells using CRISPR/CAS9. Using CRISPR to edit non-coding variants poses a particular challenge. During CRIPSR/CAS9 editing, donor DNA with the desired edits serves as a template to repair the CRISPR induced cleavage resulting in the insertion of the desired edits into the chromosome. The donor template usually contains a disrupted PAM site (NGG, the site recognized by SpCAS9) to prevent CAS9 from cleaving the edited DNA. If the GWAS variant being studied happens to disrupt the PAM site it can be edited by targeted CRISPR/CAS9 without unwanted cleavage. However, if the GWAS intronic variant is not in a PAM site, a second PAM-disrupting mutation must be introduced which could potentially confound interpretation of which variant caused an observed effect. We addressed this issue by not using donor DNA to insert the desired edits, but instead we used allele-specific guide RNAs targeting the region of interest and allowing homology directed repair to fix (edit) the cleaved region using the other intact chromosome as the template. Using this genome-editing strategy in a hiPSC heterozygous for the variants of interest, we were able to establish isogenic clonal cell lines with different combinations (haplotypes) of SNPs located in the LD block encompassing the putative functional variants with no CRISPR induced genomic abnormalities and proper methylation status. These established clones will be used in future studies to examine the effects of the T2D associated variants in KCNQ1.
Characterization of the isogenic hiPSCs identified clonal cell lines that were hypomethylated compared to the parental cell line. In any given cell line, individual cells can differ in their methylation status. Single cell cloning and expansion of a cell which is hypo- or hypermethylated compared to the parental cell line may result in a clonal cell line that differs in methylation status which in turn can affect gene expression. This is of particular concern when the target region is known to affected by methylation (e.g., KCNQ1 locus). Therefore, studies using single cell cloning to derive isogenic hiPSCs for comparative analysis should ensure comparable methylation at the regulatory regions of the target loci. Our study also confirmed that CRISPR can cause undesired on-target mutagenesis (e.g., large deletions) which, when hemizygous, cannot be detected by routine sequencing. Therefore, careful screening using CNV probes targeting the edited region is important to ensure that homozygous cell lines are truly homozygous and are not actually hemizygous. In the current study, we identified a clone with a hemizygous deletion in intron 15 of KCNQ1 which spans the four putative functional SNPs and utilized this aberrant clone to demonstrate the feasibility of using our edited isogenic hiPSC to study the effects of the KCNQ1 variants on islet cell development and function. We show that the deletion effects the expression of CDKN1C and H19, with the strongest differences in expression seen during the endocrine progenitor stage. CDKN1C, which codes for the cell cycle inhibitor p57kip2, and H19, a long non-coding RNA, are known to inhibit and promote cell division, respectively [29,30,31]; and both of these genes have been implicated in regulation of pancreatic beta cell mass [30,32,33]. It has also been suggested that CDKN1C may be the effector gene at this T2D locus and that the SNPs may be exerting their effects during early pancreatic islet development [16]. Our results support these observations.
Our data also show that during the development of islets from hiPSCs, the expression of CDKN1C peaks during the endocrine progenitor stage and decreases thereafter. Studies of mouse islet development and maturation support this observation [34]. It has been proposed that the PDX1 expressing pancreatic progenitor cells that continue receiving notch signaling undergo self-renewal resulting in expansion of progenitor mass whereas the progenitor cells that do not receive notch signaling express NGN3 and p57, exit cell cycle, and undergo terminal differentiation [35]. Our data support that an increase in CDKN1C (p57) expression at this stage will favor exit of the endocrine progenitor cells from cell cycle resulting in terminal differentiation to a beta-cell fate. In endocrine progenitor cells with the hemizygous deletion, we observed a significant increase in CDKN1C expression concomitant with a modest increase in INS and NKX6-1 (beta-cell specific transcription factor) gene expression. These results were supported by flow cytometry which showed that there was an increase in INS/NKX6-1 co-expression (indicative of functional beta-like cells) in the islets carrying the deletion. These observations indicate that the deletion of the KCNQ1 region which contains that T2D risk haplotype affects beta-cell mass; therefore, it is possible that the T2D risk allele(s) decrease CDKN1C expression during the endocrine progenitor stage resulting in reduced pancreatic beta-cell mass.
5. Conclusions
In summary, we demonstrated that the intronic region in KCNQ1 containing the T2D and insulin secretion associated variants is potentially important for islet development. However, the main limitation of our study is that the 2.3 kb deletion utilized in this study could include regulatory elements that regulate CDKN1C and H19 expression independent of the SNPs. Therefore, future studies will use our established American Indian isogenic hiPSCs homozygous for either the T2D risk or non-risk haplotypes to examine the effects of the T2D risk alleles on pancreatic islet development and function and to detect any potential ethnic-specific pathomechanism underlying the development of T2D in American Indians.
Conceptualization, C.B. and L.J.B.; data curation, A.K.N.; formal analysis, A.K.N.; funding acquisition, C.B. and L.J.B.; investigation, A.K.N., M.T., J.R.S., Y.L.M., E.D.G., and L.S.; methodology, A.K.N.; project administration, A.K.N.; resources, R.G.N. and L.J.B.; supervision, L.J.B.; validation, A.K.N. and M.T.; visualization, A.K.N. and M.T.; writing—original draft, A.K.N.; writing—review and editing, A.K.N., M.T., Y.L.M., R.G.N., C.B. and L.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (protocol code 13-DK-N151 and date of initial approval—26 February 2023, date of last Continuing Review approval—18 May 2021).
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
The RNA sequencing data used in
The authors thank the volunteers who participated in these studies. We are grateful for the technical expertise of Jeanette Beers and Jizhong Zou in NHLBI iPSC Core who generated the hiPSCs and thank Jennifer Harder (University of Michigan) for the initial expansion of the American Indian hiPSCs.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Gene expression and imprinting at the KCNQ1 locus during beta-like cell development from hiPSCs. (A,B). Heatmap showing average deseq2 normalized counts from RNA sequencing of different stages of beta-like cell differentiation from three different American Indian hiPSCs for (A) selected stage specific differentiation markers and (B) genes in a 1.1 mb region at the KCNQ1 locus. (C). Expression of KCNQ1, CDKN1C, TRPM5 and TH during different stages of beta-like cell differentiation relative to the expression of TBP (housekeeping gene) from the same stage (n = 2). (D). Chromatograms showing a heterozygous coding SNP (arrow) in KCNQ1, CDKN1C, TRPM5 and TH in genomic DNA (G.DNA) from hiPSCs and either monoallelic or biallelic expression (as seen by either one peak or two peak) in cDNA from different stages of differentiation. D0—iPSCs, D10—Pancreatic progenitors, D14 and D16—Endocrine progenitors, D20—immature beta-like cells, D26 and D35—mature beta-like cells.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Experimental design and generation of genome-edited isogenic hiPSCs with edits at multiple SNPs. (A). Linkage disequilibrium at the T2D associated KCNQ1 locus in Southwestern American Indians. Selected SNPs in strong LD with the T2D associated lead SNP (rs2299620) at the KCNQ1 locus identified using whole-genome sequencing data from 296 American Indian subjects. (B). A representative example showing allele-specific guide RNA design to target the T2D associated rs74046911 SNP (highlighted in red) at the KCNQ1 locus. DNA repair following CRIPSR will lead to loss of heterozygosity at nearby SNPs as well. Red—SNP, underline—PAM site, Italics—20 bp target sequence upstream of the PAM site. (C). Allele-specific Guide RNA design showing the targeted SNPs, target sequence (protospacer) and the PAM site. SNP site is indicated in red. (D). Generation of isogenic cells lines using allele specific CRISPR sgRNAs. Chromatograms showing successful edits at the four putative functional SNPs (arrows) from two representative clonal cell lines compared to the parental cell line.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Extended genotyping of the clonal cell lines and identification of CRISPR induced large deletions. (A). Extended genotyping of the established clonal cell lines by sequencing to identify stretch of homozygosity. Parental cell line was heterozygous (12) for all of the SNPs. Red—homozygous for risk allele, green—homozygous for the non-risk allele, no fill—heterozygous (no edit), blue—homozygosity outside the LD block, yellow—deletion. The lead SNP is indicated in red. (B). CNV assay for identification of large deletions. Results of CNV assay using multiple probes in clonal cell lines. Results from the parental cell line was used as the calibrator for analysis. Y-axes represent the calculated copy number. Grey bars indicate a copy number of 1 suggestive of a hemizygous deletion. Assays were done in triplicate and the error bars indicate calculated copy number range.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Identification of clonal cell lines with hypomethylation at the KCNQ1OT1 promoter region resulting in downregulation of KCNQ1. (A). Heat map showing expression (logFC) of KCNQ1, CDKN1C, IGF2 and SLC22A18 in the clonal cell lines relative to expression in the parental cell line. Data is using RNA from a single passage. Arrows heads show cell lines with downregulation of KCNQ1. (B). Relative expression of KCNQ1, CDKN1C and KCNQ1OT1 in selected clonal cell lines. Clones sg3-C10 and sg5-C1 had hemizygous deletions in different alleles and of different size and clones sg3-C3 and sg3-C7 had edits resulting in homozygous non-risk alleles at the KCNQ1 locus. Relative expression was normalized to the expression of TBP. RNA from three different passages were used for the experiment. Error bars show SD and results were compared using t-test, * p < 0.05. (C). Layered H3K27Ac marks in 7 cell lines from ENCODE in the region captured by FR1 and FR2 used for bisulfite sequencing to analyze methylation at the KCNQ1OT1 promoter. (D). Average methylation across 49 CpG sites in the KCNQ1OT1 promoter region assessed by bisulphite sequencing. Two different regions were assessed, FR1 (23 CpG sites) and FR2 (26 CpG sites). Error bars show SD.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Stage specific differential expression of CDKN1C and H19 in cells with a 2.3 kb hemizygous deletion in KCNQ1 intron 15 that spans the four putative functional SNPs. (A–D). Characterization of a clonal cell line with a 2.3 kb hemizygous deletion at the KCNQ1 locus. (A). Copy number assay (CNV) showing hemizygous deletion in sg3-C10 (deletion cell line). TR probes—CNV probes mapping to the CRISPR targeted region. UR probes—CNV probes mapping to the upstream region. Data shown is part of Figure 3B. (B). Figure showing the 2.3 kb deletion in the allele with the risk haplotype for the four putative functional SNPs at the KCNQ1 locus. (C). Confirmation of the hemizygous deletion by agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR amplicon generated by long PCR using primers spanning the deletion. P = parental cell line, D = deletion cell line (sg3-C10). (D). Karyotyping by G-banding of the parental and deletion cell line. (E). Representative flow cytometry data of islet-like cells generated by differentiating the deletion cell line using differentiation protocol 2 showing staining for INS (C-peptide) and the beta cell transcription factor NKX6-1. IC—isotype control. Data also shown in Figure S4. (F–H). Stage specific differential expression of CDKN1C and H19 during islet-like cell differentiation from hiPSCs. (F). Statistical significance and fold difference in the expression of 20 genes at the KCNQ1 locus in the cells with the deletion relative to the parental cells during days 0, 10, 13, 16, 18 and 27 of differentiation. The x-axis shows the fold difference in expression and the y-axis show the -log(p-value). The dashed horizontal line indicates a p = 0.05. Results are from four independent differentiations and expression was calculated relative to expression in the parental cells from experiment 1 from the respective days. Results were compared using t-test. (G,H). Fold change in the expression of CDKN1C and H19 during differentiation of the deletion cell line and the parental cell line to pancreatic islet-like cells relative to the expression in hiPSCs. Results are from four independent differentiations; the error bars show SD and results were compared using t-test. Expression was calculated relative to expression in parental hiPSC from experiment 1. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0005.
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. Stage specific differential increase in INS gene expression in cells with the 2.3 kb hemizygous deletion (A). Expression of islet specific genes in day 27 islet-like cells generated from hiPSC with the deletion relative to expression in day 27 islet-like cells generated from the parental hiPSC. Results are from four independent differentiations and the error bars show SD. Expression was calculated relative to expression in islet-like cells generated from the parental hiPSC in experiment 1 and results were compared using t-test. (B,C). Fold increase in the expression of INS and GCG expression during differentiation of the deletion iPS cell line and the parental iPS cell line towards pancreatic islet-like cells relative to the expression in hiPSCs. Results are from four independent differentiations and the error bars show SD. Expression was calculated relative to expression in parental hiPSC from experiment 1 and results were compared using t-test. (D). Fold increase in INS and GCG expression during the endocrine progenitor stage (day 13 and 16) relative to expression in pancreatic progenitors (day 10) from the parental and deletion cell lines. (E). Flow cytometry analysis of day 27 islet-like cells. Results are from two independent differentiations and error bars show SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Genomic Stability, CRISPR-cas9 off-target effects, and pluripotency in the established isogenic cell lines.
| hPSC Scorecard Scores (X) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell line ID | Haplotype | Karyotype | Off-Target Edit | Pluripotency | Ectoderm | Mesoderm | Endoderm |
| Parental Cell line | MRRYRYY | 46, XX | Reference | −0.2 | −0.67 | −0.73 | −1.15 |
| sg2-C3 | CGGCGCC | 46, XX | None detected | −0.5 | −0.38 | −0.6 | −0.83 |
| sg5-C2 | MRRCGCY | 46, XX | Intergenic Indel | −0.37 | −0.62 | −0.99 | −1.22 |
| sg5-C3 | MRRYGCC | 46, XX | None detected | −0.22 | −0.54 | −0.58 | −1.14 |
| sg3-C2 | AAATATT | 46, XX | None detected | 0.08 | −0.62 | −0.72 | −1.28 |
| sg3-C5 | AAATATT | 46, XX | None detected | 0.27 | −0.56 | −0.72 | −1.18 |
| sg3-C8 | MRRTATT | 46, XX | None detected | 0.26 | −0.49 | −0.69 | −1.05 |
| sg3-C9 | MRRTATT | 46, XX | None detected | 0.29 | −0.62 | −0.6 | −1.28 |
Haplotype, karyotype, off-target edit and hPSC scorecard assay result in the established clonal cell lines and the parental cell line. Haplotypes refers to 7 SNPs in strong LD with the lead T2D variant at the KCNQ1 locus; rs2237895 (C > A), rs60808706 (A > G), rs234864 (A > G), rs2299620 (T > C), rs2237896 (A > G), rs2237897 (T > C) and rs74046911 (T > C). One clonal cell line had an intronic indel in the IQCJ-SCHIP1 locus. hPSC scorecard assay results are shown as an algorithmic score derived using expression of pluripotency markers and the markers specific for the three germ layers. Scores (X) relative to the reference standard (expression in established human embryonic stem cell line) X > 0.5 (upregulated), −0.5 ≤ X ≤ 0.5 (comparable), X < −0.5 (downregulated).
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Morris, A.P.; Voight, B.F.; Teslovich, T.M.; Ferreira, T.; Segrè, A.V.; Steinthorsdottir, V.; Strawbridge, R.J.; Khan, H.; Grallert, H.; Mahajan, A. et al. Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet.; 2012; 44, pp. 981-990. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2383]
2. Spracklen, C.N.; Horikoshi, M.; Kim, Y.J.; Lin, K.; Bragg, F.; Moon, S.; Suzuki, K.; Tam, C.H.T.; Tabara, Y.; Kwak, S.-H. et al. Identification of type 2 diabetes loci in 433,540 East Asian individuals. Nature; 2020; 582, pp. 240-245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2263-3]
3. Suzuki, K.; Akiyama, M.; Ishigaki, K.; Kanai, M.; Hosoe, J.; Shojima, N.; Hozawa, A.; Kadota, A.; Kuriki, K.; Naito, M. et al. Identification of 28 new susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes in the Japanese population. Nat. Genet.; 2019; 51, pp. 379-386. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0332-4]
4. Adeyemo, A.A.; Zaghloul, N.A.; Chen, G.; Doumatey, A.P.; Leitch, C.C.; Hostelley, T.L.; Nesmith, J.E.; Zhou, J.; Bentley, A.R.; Shriner, D. et al. ZRANB3 is an African-specific type 2 diabetes locus associated with beta-cell mass and insulin response. Nat. Commun.; 2019; 10, 3195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10967-7]
5. Hanson, R.L.; Muller, Y.L.; Kobes, S.; Guo, T.; Bian, L.; Ossowski, V.; Wiedrich, K.; Sutherland, J.; Wiedrich, C.; Mahkee, D. et al. A Genome-Wide Association Study in American Indians Implicates DNER as a Susceptibility Locus for Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes; 2014; 63, pp. 369-376. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db13-0416]
6. Mahajan, A.; Taliun, D.; Thurner, M.; Robertson, N.R.; Torres, J.M.; Rayner, N.W.; Payne, A.J.; Steinthorsdottir, V.; Scott, R.A.; Grarup, N. et al. Fine-mapping type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps. Nat. Genet.; 2018; 50, pp. 1505-1513. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0241-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30297969]
7. Dimas, A.S.; Lagou, V.; Barker, A.; Knowles, J.W.; Mägi, R.; Hivert, M.-F.; Benazzo, A.; Rybin, D.; Jackson, A.U.; Stringham, H.M. et al. Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Variants on Quantitative Glycemic Traits Reveals Mechanistic Heterogeneity. Diabetes; 2014; 63, pp. 2158-2171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db13-0949] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296717]
8. Wood, A.R.; Jonsson, A.; Jackson, A.U.; Wang, N.; van Leewen, N.; Palmer, N.D.; Kobes, S.; Deelen, J.; Boquete-Vilarino, L.; Paananen, J. et al. A Genome-Wide Association Study of IVGTT-Based Measures of First-Phase Insulin Secretion Refines the Underlying Physiology of Type 2 Diabetes Variants. Diabetes; 2017; 66, pp. 2296-2309. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db16-1452]
9. Pasquali, L.; Gaulton, K.; Rodriguez-Segui, S.A.; Mularoni, L.; Miguel-Escalada, I.; Akerman, I.; Tena, J.J.; Morán, I.; Gómez-Marín, C.; van de Bunt, M. et al. Pancreatic islet enhancer clusters enriched in type 2 diabetes risk-associated variants. Nat. Genet.; 2014; 46, pp. 136-143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2870]
10. Hanson, R.L.; Guo, T.; Muller, Y.L.; Fleming, J.; Knowler, W.C.; Kobes, S.; Bogardus, C.; Baier, L.J. Strong Parent-of-Origin Effects in the Association of KCNQ1 Variants with Type 2 Diabetes in American Indians. Diabetes; 2013; 62, pp. 2984-2991. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db12-1767] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630301]
11. Kong, A. DIAGRAM Consortium Steinthorsdottir, V.; Masson, G.; Thorleifsson, G.; Sulem, P.; Besenbacher, S.; Jonasdottir, A.; Sigurdsson, A.; Kristinsson, K.T. et al. Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature; 2009; 462, pp. 868-874. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08625] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20016592]
12. Unoki, H.; Takahashi, A.; Kawaguchi, T.; Hara, K.; Horikoshi, M.; Andersen, G.; Ng, D.P.K.; Holmkvist, J.; Borch-Johnsen, K.; Jørgensen, T. et al. SNPs in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in East Asian and European populations. Nat. Genet.; 2008; 40, pp. 1098-1102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.208] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18711366]
13. Yasuda, K.; Miyake, K.; Horikawa, Y.; Hara, K.; Osawa, H.; Furuta, H.; Hirota, Y.; Mori, H.; Jonsson, A.; Sato, Y. et al. Variants in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Genet.; 2008; 40, pp. 1092-1097. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.207] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18711367]
14. Meitinger, T.; Shriner, D.; Chen, B.H.; Lindgren, C.; Chen, W.-M.; Guo, X.; Liu, J.; Bielinski, S.J.; Yanek, L.R.; Nalls, M.A. et al. Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies in African Americans Provides Insights into the Genetic Architecture of Type 2 Diabetes. PLoS Genet.; 2014; 10, e1004517. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004517]
15. The SIGMA Type 2 Diabetes Consortium. Sequence variants in SLC16A11 are a common risk factor for type 2 diabetes in Mexico. Nature; 2014; 506, pp. 97-101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12828]
16. Travers, M.E.; Mackay, D.J.; Nitert, M.D.; Morris, A.P.; Lindgren, C.M.; Berry, A.; Johnson, P.R.; Hanley, N.; Groop, L.C.; McCarthy, M.I. et al. Insights into the Molecular Mechanism for Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility at the KCNQ1 Locus from Temporal Changes in Imprinting Status in Human Islets. Diabetes; 2013; 62, pp. 987-992. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db12-0819] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23139357]
17. Azzi, S.; Habib, W.A.; Netchine, I. Beckwith-Wiedemann and Russell-Silver Syndromes: From new molecular insights to the comprehension of imprinting regulation. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes.; 2014; 21, pp. 30-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000037] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24322424]
18. Rezania, A.; Bruin, J.; Arora, P.; Rubin, A.; Batushansky, I.; Asadi, A.; O’Dwyer, S.; Quiskamp, N.; Mojibian, M.; Albrecht, T. et al. Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2014; 32, pp. 1121-1133. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3033] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25211370]
19. Pagliuca, F.W.; Millman, J.; Gürtler, M.; Segel, M.; Van Dervort, A.; Ryu, J.H.; Peterson, Q.; Greiner, D.; Melton, D.A. Generation of functional human pancreatic β cells in vitro. Cell; 2014; 159, pp. 428-439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.040] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303535]
20. Hogrebe, N.J.; Augsornworawat, P.; Maxwell, K.G.; Velazco-Cruz, L.; Millman, J.R. Targeting the cytoskeleton to direct pancreatic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2020; 38, pp. 460-470. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0430-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32094658]
21. Velazco-Cruz, L.; Song, J.; Maxwell, K.; Goedegebuure, M.M.; Augsornworawat, P.; Hogrebe, N.; Millman, J.R. Acquisition of Dynamic Function in Human Stem Cell-Derived β Cells. Stem Cell Rep.; 2019; 12, pp. 351-365. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.12.012]
22. Veres, A.; Faust, A.L.; Bushnell, H.; Engquist, E.; Kenty, J.H.-R.; Harb, G.; Poh, Y.-C.; Sintov, E.; Gürtler, M.; Pagliuca, F.W. et al. Charting cellular identity during human in vitro β-cell differentiation. Nature; 2019; 569, pp. 368-373. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1168-5]
23. Nair, G.; Liu, J.S.; Russ, H.A.; Tran, S.; Saxton, M.S.; Chen, R.; Juang, C.; Li, M.-L.; Nguyen, V.Q.; Giacometti, S. et al. Recapitulating endocrine cell clustering in culture promotes maturation of human stem-cell-derived β cells. Nat. Cell Biol.; 2019; 21, pp. 263-274. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0271-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30710150]
24. Hanson, R.L.; Rong, R.; Kobes, S.; Muller, Y.L.; Weil, E.J.; Curtis, J.M.; Nelson, R.G.; Baier, L.J. Role of Established Type 2 Diabetes-Susceptibility Genetic Variants in a High Prevalence American Indian Population. Diabetes; 2015; 64, pp. 2646-2657. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db14-1715] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667308]
25. Muller, Y.L.; Day, S.E.; Kobes, S.; Knowler, W.C.; Hanson, R.L.; Bogardus, C.; Baier, L.J. 1715-P: Identifying Potentially Functional Variants in Regulatory Regions in KCNQ1 that Associate with Type 2 Diabetes in American Indians. Diabetes; 2019; 68, (Suppl. 1), 1715-P. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db19-1715-P]
26. Adikusuma, F.; Piltz, S.; Corbett, M.A.; Turvey, M.; McColl, S.R.; Helbig, K.; Beard, M.R.; Hughes, J.; Pomerantz, R.T.; Thomas, P.Q. Large deletions induced by Cas9 cleavage. Nature; 2018; 560, pp. E8-E9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0380-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30089922]
27. Kosicki, M.; Tomberg, K.; Bradley, A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2018; 36, pp. 765-771. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4192] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30010673]
28. Guo, T.; Hanson, R.L.; Traurig, M.; Muller, Y.L.; Ma, L.; Mack, J.; Kobes, S.; Knowler, W.C.; Bogardus, C.; Baier, L.J. TCF7L2 Is Not a Major Susceptibility Gene for Type 2 Diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes; 2007; 56, pp. 3082-3088. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db07-0621] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17909099]
29. Ma, L.; Tian, X.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Du, C.; Xie, X.; Kornmann, M.; Yang, Y. The long noncoding RNA H19 promotes cell proliferation via E2F-1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol. Ther.; 2016; 17, pp. 1051-1061. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2016.1219814] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573434]
30. Sanchez-Parra, C.; Jacovetti, C.; Dumortier, O.; Lee, K.; Peyot, M.-L.; Guay, C.; Prentki, M.; Laybutt, D.R.; Van Obberghen, E.; Regazzi, R. Contribution of the Long Noncoding RNA H19 to β-Cell Mass Expansion in Neonatal and Adult Rodents. Diabetes; 2018; 67, pp. 2254-2267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db18-0201]
31. Sherr, C.J.; Roberts, J.M. CDK inhibitors: Positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev.; 1999; 13, pp. 1501-1512. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.12.1501] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10385618]
32. Georgia, S.; Soliz, R.; Li, M.; Zhang, P.; Bhushan, A. p57 and Hes1 coordinate cell cycle exit with self-renewal of pancreatic progenitors. Dev. Biol.; 2006; 298, pp. 22-31. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.036] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16899237]
33. Asahara, S.-I.; Etoh, H.; Inoue, H.; Teruyama, K.; Shibutani, Y.; Ihara, Y.; Kawada, Y.; Bartolome, A.; Hashimoto, N.; Matsuda, T. et al. Paternal allelic mutation at the Kcnq1 locus reduces pancreatic β-cell mass by epigenetic modification of Cdkn1c. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2015; 112, pp. 8332-8337. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422104112] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26100882]
34. Qiu, W.-L.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Feng, Y.; Li, L.-C.; Yang, L.; Xu, C.-R. Deciphering Pancreatic Islet β Cell and α Cell Maturation Pathways and Characteristic Features at the Single-Cell Level. Cell Metab.; 2017; 25, pp. 1194-1205.e4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.003]
35. Dhawan, S.; Georgia, S.; Bhushan, A. Formation and regeneration of the endocrine pancreas. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.; 2007; 19, pp. 634-645. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2007.09.015] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18061427]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Muller, Yunhua L; Grellinger, Emma D; Saporito, Lucas; Nelson, Robert G; Bogardus, Clifton; Baier, Leslie J