It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The quantum Cramér–Rao bound sets a fundamental limit on the accuracy of unbiased parameter estimation in quantum systems, relating the uncertainty in determining a parameter to the inverse of the quantum Fisher information. We experimentally demonstrate near saturation of the quantum Cramér–Rao bound in the phase estimation of a solid-state spin system, provided by a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. This is achieved by comparing the experimental uncertainty in phase estimation with an independent measurement of the related quantum Fisher information. The latter is independently extracted from coherent dynamical responses of the system under weak parametric modulations, without performing any quantum-state tomography. While optimal parameter estimation has already been observed for quantum devices involving a limited number of degrees of freedom, our method offers a versatile and powerful experimental tool to explore the Cramér–Rao bound and the quantum Fisher information in systems of higher complexity, as relevant for quantum technologies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, School of Physics, International Joint Laboratory on Quantum Sensing and Quantum Metrology, Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.33199.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7223)
2 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, School of Physics, International Joint Laboratory on Quantum Sensing and Quantum Metrology, Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.33199.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7223); Universität Ulm, Institut für Quantenoptik & IQST, Albert-Einstein Allee 11, Ulm, Germany (GRID:grid.6582.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9748)
3 Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.419560.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2154 3117)
4 Tohoku University, Advanced Institute for Materials Research, Sendai, Japan (GRID:grid.69566.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 6943); RIKEN, Wako, Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences Program (iTHEMS), Saitama, Japan (GRID:grid.7597.c) (ISNI:0000000094465255)
5 Université Libre de Bruxelles, Center for Nonlinear Phenomena and Complex Systems, Brussels, Belgium (GRID:grid.4989.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2348 0746)
6 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, School of Physics, International Joint Laboratory on Quantum Sensing and Quantum Metrology, Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.33199.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7223); East China Normal University, State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.22069.3f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0369 6365); Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.33199.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7223)