It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Clouds limit the potential use of optical images. Proper clouds and cloud shadows detection are necessary steps for optical image applications. Few algorithms are flexible in detecting clouds in images with a limited number of bands, such as the Wide-Field Imager (WFI) sensor on board the China-Brazil Earth Resources Satellite (CBERS-4), which has four spectral bands (blue, green, red, and near-infrared). Therefore, this work aims to assess the accuracy of two cloud detection algorithms: CMASK and ATSA, and evaluate the influence of the ATSA configuration parameters. We selected four regions in Brazil for our analysis. In all cases, ATSA presented overall accuracy (OA) superior to CMASK. While the ATSA obtained OA greater than 0.91 for all analyzes, the OA from CMASK did not exceed 0.84. CMASK presented commission errors for the No Clear class (combination of Cloud and Cloud shadow) and inclusion errors for the Clear class close to zero. However, many errors of omission of clouds misclassified as the Clear class was observed. The ATSA algorithm presented a better balance between inclusion errors and omission errors. Our results can be used as guidance for choosing a cloud mask algorithm for the CBERS-4 WFI images and for analysis considering the images from WFI on board CBERS-4A and Amazonia-1, as they have similar characteristics.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Earth Observation and Geoinformatics Division, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José Dos Campos-SP, Brazil; Earth Observation and Geoinformatics Division, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José Dos Campos-SP, Brazil
2 Université Catholique de Louvain, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Place Louis Pasteur 3, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; Université Catholique de Louvain, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Place Louis Pasteur 3, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium