It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Invasive exotic pathogens pose a threat to trees and forest ecosystems worldwide, hampering the provision of essential ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration and water purification. Hybridization is a major evolutionary force that can drive the emergence of pathogens. Phytophthora ramorum, an emergent pathogen that causes the sudden oak and larch death, spreads as reproductively isolated divergent clonal lineages. We use a genomic biosurveillance approach by sequencing genomes of P. ramorum from survey and inspection samples and report the discovery of variants of P. ramorum that are the result of hybridization via sexual recombination between North American and European lineages. We show that these hybrids are viable, can infect a host and produce spores for long-term survival and propagation. Genome sequencing revealed genotypic combinations at 54,515 single nucleotide polymorphism loci not present in parental lineages. More than 6,000 of those genotypes are predicted to have a functional impact in genes associated with host infection, including effectors, carbohydrate-active enzymes and proteases. We also observed post-meiotic mitotic recombination that could generate additional genotypic and phenotypic variation and contribute to homoploid hybrid speciation. Our study highlights the importance of plant pathogen biosurveillance to detect variants, including hybrids, and inform management and control.
Genome sequencing of isolates of the pathogen responsible for sudden oak death in the United States and sudden larch death in Europe reveal hybridisation between European and American lineages.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of British Columbia, The Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830)
2 Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Plant Laboratory, Ottawa, Canada (GRID:grid.418040.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2177 1232)
3 University of British Columbia, The Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830); Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Birmensdorf, Switzerland (GRID:grid.419754.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2259 5533)
4 New Construction Materials, FPInnovations, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.292470.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0696 4765)
5 Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.4391.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 1969)
6 Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.4391.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 1969); Horticultural Crops Research Unit, USDA ARS, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.512836.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2205 063X)