It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The quality of Learning Objects (LOs) is currently being promoted by certain tools which consider specific criteria for their evaluation; however, there is no existing methodology that considers both the value assigned to the LO itself and the percentage related to the number of evaluators who have compared the quality of resources. As in the case of various products offered through the Internet backed by an assessment of users in a unified ranking, the purpose of this paper is to suggest a proposal for the automated assessments of experts who can clearly see the best or worst aspects in LO quality.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer