Vitamin D status in the active duty Navy military personnel: protocol for a systematic review

Abstract

Introduction

Vitamin D is critical for bone health and its deficiency has been linked to increased incidence and severity of multiple diseases. Even so, vitamin D inadequacy is a major public health problem worldwide. The main source of vitamin D is endogenous cutaneous synthesis through exposure to solar ultraviolet B radiation, which is influenced by several factors, including occupational. The active duty Navy military personnel may be prone to vitamin D inadequacy, but a worldwide overview of vitamin D status in this specific population is still lacking.

Methods and analysis

The CoCoPop mnemonic will be used for determining the inclusion criteria. Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed/Medline will be searched for all studies including 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of the active duty Navy military personnel. Data extraction and quality assessment (Joanna Briggs Institute’s and Downs and Black checklists) will be performed by two reviewers and data will be synthesised in narrative, tabular and map formats.

Ethics and dissemination

This study will not involve human or animal subjects and, thus, does not require ethics approval. The outcomes will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presentation at a scientific conference.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42022287057.

Correspondence to Dr Moisés Henriques; [email protected]

Strengths and limitations of this study

• This study will adhere to globally accepted systematic review methods for evidence screening, quality assessment and data analysis.

• The CoCoPop mnemonic (condition, context and population) will be used for determining the inclusion criteria.

• This study will summarise data published in full articles written in English, Portuguese, Spanish or French.

• It is anticipated that some heterogeneity will exist within the collected data, which will be acknowledged in the data analysis and discussed accordingly.

Introduction

Vitamin D is critical for bone health as it promotes dietary calcium absorption and bone mineralisation; its deficiency may cause rickets in children and osteomalacia and osteoporosis in children and adults.^1–4 Vitamin D deficiency has also been linked to increased incidence and severity of multiple diseases such as infections, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and multiple sclerosis, and cancer.^5–10 Unfortunately, vitamin D inadequacy is a major public health problem worldwide, even in low-latitude countries.^11–14

The main source of vitamin D is endogenous cutaneous synthesis through exposure to solar ultraviolet B radiation.¹⁵ This production of vitamin D is naturally dependent on several factors, namely atmospheric (eg, cloudy sky), geographical (eg, latitude), temporal (eg, season), individual (eg, skin pigmentation) and behavioural (eg, use of sunscreen).^{1 15–21} Systematic reviews and recent studies indicate that indoor and shift workers, particularly those on night shifts, are at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency.^22–28

Some studies showed that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency rises during military basic training.^{29 30} Merging high physical and psychological demands with inadequate nutrition and/or sleep disruption places the active duty Navy military personnel at high risk for vitamin D deficiency.³¹ The lack of exposure to the sun when living and working in a warship or a submarine also increases the risk of vitamin D deficiency.³² For these reasons, vitamin D levels should be routinely assessed on all active duty Navy military personnel, especially those in predeployment and postdeployment mobilisation phases.³³

Despite the adverse occupational context for vitamin D levels, a worldwide overview of vitamin D status in the active duty Navy military personnel is lacking. The main objective of this systematic review is to provide a worldwide overview of the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency and sufficiency in the active duty Navy military personnel in response to the question ‘What is the vitamin D status in the active duty Navy military personnel?’. Additionally, the Navy occupational settings will be described and, whenever the case, measures implemented to treat or prevent vitamin D inadequacy will be listed.

Methods and analysis

The methods for this systematic review, including review question, search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality assessment, are established within this protocol prior to the conduct of the review. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, within which the start and end dates are listed as 1 July and 30 September 2022, respectively. Authors will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 reporting guidelines.³⁴ This protocol has followed the PRISMA Protocols 2015 reporting guidelines.³⁵

Search strategy and selection criteria

As in systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence data, the CoCoPop mnemonic (condition, context and population) will be used in determining the inclusion criteria.³⁶ The condition will be vitamin D status (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D); vitamin D deficiency is defined as 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL or <50 nmol/L, insufficiency as 25(OH)D of ≥20 and <30 ng/mL or ≥50 nmol/L and <75 nmol/L, and sufficiency as 25(OH)D of ≥30 ng/mL or ≥75 nmol/L, according to Endocrine Society).³⁷ The context will not be delimited, as it is important to consider all space and time settings. The population will be active duty Navy military: active duty is comparable to working at a full-time job and begins when a military member reports to a duty station after completion of training (basic, officer training, tech school); active duty Navy military work for the military full time, may live on a military base and can be deployed at any time. Non-experimental and experimental studies that include 25(OH)D concentrations (baseline values in interventional studies) will be considered. If prevalence rates are not explicit in the article, they will be calculated according to available data. Furthermore, the most up-to-date and comprehensive version will be selected for studies that will report the same results in multiple articles.

The literature search will be performed using a peer-reviewed search strategy. The search strategy will be reviewed according to Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies guidelines.³⁸ Published literature will be identified by searching the following bibliographic databases from inception to 30 June 2022: Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed/Medline. The search strategy (table 1) will consist of both controlled vocabularies, such as the National Library of Medicine’s Medical Subject Headings and keywords. The main search concepts will be vitamin D and Navy military personnel. Retrieval will be limited to human studies, where possible, and no other filters will be applied. If the full texts cannot be retrieved, the papers will be excluded. Full articles written in languages other than English, Portuguese, Spanish or French will also be excluded. Studies in veterans will be excluded.

Table 1

Search strategy

Database	Expression
Scopus	(‘Vitamin D’ OR ‘Vitamin D Deficiency’ OR ‘25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2’ OR ‘Cholecalciferol’ OR ‘Ergocalciferol’ OR ‘Calcifediol’ OR ‘25-hydroxyvitamin D’ OR ‘25-hydroxy vitamin D’ OR ‘25(OH)D’ OR ‘25OHD’) AND (‘military personnel’ OR ‘military’ OR ‘Navy personnel’ OR ‘sailor*’ OR ‘marine*’ OR ‘submariner*’ OR ‘coast guard’)
Web of Science	(‘Vitamin D’ OR ‘Vitamin D Deficiency’ OR ‘25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2’ OR ‘Cholecalciferol’ OR ‘Ergocalciferol’ OR ‘Calcifediol’ OR ‘25-hydroxyvitamin D’ OR ‘25-hydroxy vitamin D’ OR ‘25(OH)D’ OR ‘25OHD’) AND (‘military personnel’ OR ‘military’ OR ‘Navy personnel’ OR ‘sailor*’ OR ‘marine*’ OR ‘submariner*’ OR ‘coast guard’)
PubMed/Medline	(‘Vitamin D’[MeSH] OR ‘Vitamin D Deficiency’[MeSH] OR ‘25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2’[MeSH] OR ‘Cholecalciferol’[MeSH] OR ‘Ergocalciferol’[MeSH] OR ‘Calcifediol’[MeSH] OR ‘25-hydroxyvitamin D’ OR ‘25-hydroxy vitamin D’ OR ‘25(OH)D’ OR ‘25OHD’) AND (‘Military Personnel’[MeSH] OR ‘military’ OR ‘Navy personnel’ OR ‘sailor*’ OR ‘marine*’ OR ‘submariner*’ OR ‘coast guard‘)

Data extraction

Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, review full texts and extract data using a standard extraction form. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus, with a third reviewer acting as arbitrator if required. Extracted data will include general information (authors; year of publication), study characteristics (research design; study setting—latitude, season and country), population characteristics (sample size; distribution by age, sex, rank or years of military service, ethnicity and other relevant variables for vitamin D status available), Navy military occupational setting (warship or submarine type; ashore vs onboard; indoor vs outdoor), vitamin D data (method/assay used for measurement of 25(OH)D; mean (SD), median (IQR) and/or range of 25(OH)D concentrations; cut-off points for vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency and sufficiency; prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency and sufficiency) and, if applicable, intervention characteristics (intervention, groups, outcome).

Risk of bias (quality) assessment

Two reviewers will independently conduct the critical appraisal of all studies. Joanna Briggs Institute’s critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data will be used for observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence.³⁹ In the case of experimental studies (randomised or non-randomised), a quality assessment will be made using the Downs and Black checklist.⁴⁰

Data synthesis

Data will be synthesised in narrative, tabular and map formats to provide a better description of the main findings, for example, sample sizes, quality assessment and vitamin D status according to world location. If data permit, subgroup analyses will be made by Navy occupational setting.

Patient and public involvement

No patients will be involved in this study.

Ethics and dissemination

This study will summarise already published data and will not involve human or animal subjects directly (secondary research study), thus will not require ethics approval. Results of the study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presentation at a scientific conference. In case of protocol amendments, the PROSPERO record will be updated with information regarding the nature and the rationale of the changes made.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not required.

Footnote

Contributors MH is the guarantor. MH developed the search strategy and drafted the manuscript. MH, DR, ES-L, SV and FS contributed to the development of the selection criteria, data extraction criteria and quality assessment strategy. MH, DR, ES-L, SV and FS read, provided feedback and approved the final manuscript.

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests None declared.

Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

¹ Webb AR, Kazantzidis A, Kift RC, et al. Meeting vitamin D requirements in white Caucasians at UK latitudes: providing a choice. Nutrients 2018; 10: 497–13. doi:10.3390/nu10040497 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29673142

² Han J, Cho Y, Jee S, et al. Vitamin D levels in patients with low-energy hip fractures. Hip Pelvis 2020; 32: 192–8. doi:10.5371/hp.2020.32.4.192 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33335867

³ Bouillon R, Marcocci C, Carmeliet G, et al. Skeletal and extraskeletal actions of vitamin D: current evidence and outstanding questions. Endocr Rev 2019; 40: 1109–51. doi:10.1210/er.2018-00126 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30321335

⁴ Uday S, Högler W. Nutritional rickets and osteomalacia in the twenty-first century: revised concepts, public health, and prevention strategies. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2017; 15: 293–302. doi:10.1007/s11914-017-0383-y http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28612338

⁵ Duarte C, Carvalheiro H, Rodrigues AM. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its predictors in the Portuguese population: a nationwide population-based study. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15: 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11657-020-0695-x

⁶ Sluyter JD, Manson JE, Scragg R. Vitamin D and clinical cancer outcomes: a review of meta-analyses. JBMR Plus 2021; 5: 1–18. doi:10.1002/jbm4.10420 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553987

⁷ Kim HA, Perrelli A, Ragni A, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and the risk of cerebrovascular disease. Antioxidants 2020; 9: 327–22. doi:10.3390/antiox9040327 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316584

⁸ Latic N, Erben RG. Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease, with emphasis on hypertension, atherosclerosis, and heart failure. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 6483–15. doi:10.3390/ijms21186483 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32899880

⁹ Branco JC, Cardoso MF, Anapaz V, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in a Portuguese cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence and relation to disease activity. GE Port J Gastroenterol 2019; 26: 155–62. doi:10.1159/000488744 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192283

¹⁰ Lopes M, Laiginhas R, Madeira C, et al. Association between serum vitamin D and diabetic retinopathy in Portuguese patients with type 1 diabetes. Acta Med Port 2020; 33: 459–65. doi:10.20344/amp.12890 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669185

¹¹ Hilger J, Friedel A, Herr R, et al. A systematic review of vitamin D status in populations worldwide. Br J Nutr 2014; 111: 23–45. doi:10.1017/S0007114513001840 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23930771

¹² Palacios C, Gonzalez L. Is vitamin D deficiency a major global public health problem? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2014; 144 Pt A: 138–45. doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.11.003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24239505

¹³ Mogire RM, Mutua A, Kimita W, et al. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Glob Heal 2020; 8: e134–42. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30457-7

¹⁴ Siddiqee MH, Bhattacharjee B, Siddiqi UR, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among the South Asian adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2021; 21: 1823. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11888-1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34627207

¹⁵ Craveiro V, Araújo J, Santos A. Vitamin D: from the pro-hormone to the biological actions. Acta Port Nutr 2019; 19: 50–4. doi:10.21011/apn.2019.1909

¹⁶ Vuistiner P, Rousson V, Henry H, et al. A population-based model to consider the effect of seasonal variation on serum 25(OH)D and vitamin D status. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 1–9. doi:10.1155/2015/168189

¹⁷ VTF V, Stankovich J, O’Brien TJ. Vitamin D status in an Australian patient population: a large retrospective case series focusing on factors associated with variations in serum 25(OH)D. BMJ Open 2020; 10: 1–10. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032567

¹⁸ Hirschler V, Molinari C, Maccallini G, et al. Vitamin D levels and cardiometabolic markers in Indigenous Argentinean children living at different altitudes. Glob Pediatr Health 2019; 6: 2333794X1882194–8. doi:10.1177/2333794X18821942 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671496

¹⁹ Leary PF, Zamfirova I, Au J, et al. Effect of latitude on vitamin D levels. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2017; 117: 433–9. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2017.089 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662556

²⁰ Hagenau T, Vest R, Gissel TN, et al. Global vitamin D levels in relation to age, gender, skin pigmentation and latitude: an ecologic meta-regression analysis. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20: 133–40. doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0626-y http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18458986

²¹ Neville JJ, Palmieri T, Young AR. Physical determinants of vitamin D photosynthesis: a review. JBMR Plus 2021; 5: 1–15. doi:10.1002/jbm4.10460 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553995

²² Sowah D, Fan X, Dennett L, et al. Vitamin D levels and deficiency with different occupations: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2017; 17: 1–25. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4436-z

²³ Coppeta L, Papa F, Magrini A. Are shiftwork and indoor work related to D3 vitamin deficiency? A systematic review of current evidences. J Environ Public Health 2018; 2018: 1–7. doi:10.1155/2018/8468742 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30275842

²⁴ Divakar U, Sathish T, Soljak M. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its associated work-related factors among indoor workers in a multi-ethnic Southeast Asian country. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 1–10. doi:10.3390/ijerph17010164

²⁵ Alefishat E, Abu Farha R, Farha RA. Determinants of vitamin D status among Jordanian employees: focus on the night shift effect. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2016; 29: 859–70. doi:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00657 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518893

²⁶ Rizza S, Pietroiusti A, Farcomeni A, et al. Monthly fluctuations in 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels in day and rotating night shift hospital workers. J Endocrinol Invest 2020; 43: 1655–60. doi:10.1007/s40618-020-01265-x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32342444

²⁷ Jeong H, Hong S, Heo Y, et al. Vitamin D status and associated occupational factors in Korean wage workers: data from the 5th Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES 2010–2012). Ann of Occup and Environ Med 2014; 26: 1–10. doi:10.1186/s40557-014-0028-x

²⁸ Itoh H, Weng Z, Saito H, et al. Association between night-shift work and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in Japanese male indoor workers: a cross-sectional study. Ind Health 2011; 49: 658–62. doi:10.2486/indhealth.MS1271 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804263

²⁹ Parsons IT, Gifford RM, Stacey MJ, et al. Does vitamin D supplementation prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in military personnel? review of the evidence. BMJ Mil Health 2021; 167: 280–6. doi:10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001686 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504571

³⁰ Ööpik V, Timpmann S, Rips L, et al. Anabolic adaptations occur in conscripts during basic military training despite high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and decrease in iron status. Mil Med 2017; 182: e1810–8. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00113 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28290964

³¹ McCarthy MS, Elshaw EB, Szekely BM, et al. A prospective cohort study of vitamin D supplementation in AD soldiers: preliminary findings. Mil Med 2019; 184: 498–505. doi:10.1093/milmed/usy393 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30901440

³² Rietjens G, Most J, Joris PJ, et al. Energy expenditure and changes in body composition during submarine deployment: an observational study “DasBoost 2-2017”. Nutrients 2020; 12: 226. doi:10.3390/nu12010226

³³ DiNicola AF, DiNicola PJ, Sanchez L. Need for routine vitamin D screening in military personnel. Mil Med 2016; 181: 1163–4. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00115 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27612370

³⁴ Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2021; 10: 89. doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781348

³⁵ Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015; 349: g7647–25. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647

³⁶ Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, et al. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13: 147–53. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26317388

³⁷ Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 1911–30. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0385 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21646368

³⁸ McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 75: 40–6. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27005575

³⁹ Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, et al. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag 2014; 3: 123–8. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.71

⁴⁰ Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 377–84. doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9764259