It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Absence of site-specific nutrient recommendation and high spatial variability of soil fertility are major factors affecting maize response to applied nutrients in Nigeria. In this study, we assessed maize response to applied nutrients and nutrient use efficiency in different management zones (MZs), for designing site-specific nutrient management recommendations for maize in the maize belt of Nigeria. The maize belt in Nigeria was earlier delineated into four MZsMZs (MZ1 to MZ4) based on soil properties. In the current study, data from two different trials, nutrient omission trials (N = 293) and fertilizer response trial (N = 705), conducted in the years 2015–2017, were extracted for MZ1 to MZ3; to analyze maize yield responses to application of N, P and K, and secondary and micro-nutrients. Maize yield response to K application was only positive in MZ1. Responses to N and P application were positive for all MZs. However, the magnitude of maize response to P varied between the MZs, indicating a differentiation in the degree to which P is limiting maize production in the study area. Average nitrogen requirement was higher for MZ3 (138 kg ha−1), than for MZ2 and MZ1 (121 and 83 kg ha−1, respectively). Average P requirement was higher for MZ3 (45 kg ha−1) than for the other zones. Potassium requirement was 26% and 28% higher in MZ2 and MZ3 compared with MZ1 (∼15 kg ha−1). The use of the specific nutrient rates for the MZs may reduce risks and uncertainties in crop production. The delineated MZs of the maize belt of Nigeria that incorporates spatial variability in soil fertility conditions are useful for nutrient management for larger areas.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB , 5320 Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria; Department of Agronomy, Bayero University Kano , Kano 700001, Nigeria
2 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB , 5320 Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
3 Centre for Dryland Agriculture (CDA), Bayero University Kano , Kano 700001, Nigeria; Department of Soil Science, Bayero University Kano , Kano 700001, Nigeria
4 Department of Soil Science, Bayero University Kano , Kano 700001, Nigeria
5 Department of Soil Science and Environment, University of Zimbabwe , PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
6 Centre for Dryland Agriculture (CDA), Bayero University Kano , Kano 700001, Nigeria
7 Department of Agronomy, Bayero University Kano , Kano 700001, Nigeria
8 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture , PO Box 30709, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya