It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Among animal species, the songs of male humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) are a rare example of social learning between entire populations. Understanding fine-scale similarity in song patterns and structural features will better clarify how accurately songs are learned during inter-population transmission. Here, six distinct song types (2009–2015) transmitted from the east Australian to New Caledonian populations were quantitatively analysed using fine-scale song features. Results found that New Caledonian whales learned each song type with high accuracy regardless of the pattern’s complexity. However, there were rare instances of themes (stereotyped patterns of sound units) only sung by a single population. These occurred more often in progressively changing ‘evolutionary’ songs compared to rapidly changing ‘revolutionary’ songs. Our results suggest that populations do not need to reduce complexity to accurately learn song patterns. Populations may also incorporate changes and embellishments into songs in the form of themes which are suggested to be learnt as distinct segments. Maintaining complex song patterns with such accuracy suggests significant acoustic contact, supporting the hypothesis that song learning may occur on shared feeding grounds or migration routes. This study improves the understanding of inter-population mechanisms for large-scale cultural transmission in animals.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The University of Queensland, Cetacean Ecology Group, Dunwich, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Griffith University, Southern Ocean Persistent Organic Pollutants Program, Gold Coast, Australia (GRID:grid.1022.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0437 5432); The University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
2 University of St Andrews, Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution & Sea Mammal Research Unit, School of Biology, Fife, UK (GRID:grid.11914.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0721 1626)
3 UMR ENTROPIE (Université de La Réunion, Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, CNRS, Ifremer, Laboratoire d’Excellence-CORAIL), IRD, Nouméa, New Caledonia (GRID:grid.449988.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0647 1452); Opération Cétacés, Nouméa, New Caledonia (GRID:grid.449988.0)
4 The University of Queensland, Cetacean Ecology Group, Dunwich, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)