It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The discovery of two-dimensional magnets has initiated a new field of research, exploring both fundamental low-dimensional magnetism, and prospective spintronic applications. Recently, observations of magnetic skyrmions in the 2D ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2 (FGT) have been reported, introducing further application possibilities. However, controlling the exhibited magnetic state requires systematic knowledge of the history-dependence of the spin textures, which remains largely unexplored in 2D magnets. In this work, we utilise real-space imaging, and complementary simulations, to determine and explain the thickness-dependent magnetic phase diagrams of an exfoliated FGT flake, revealing a complex, history-dependent emergence of the uniformly magnetised, stripe domain and skyrmion states. The results show that the interplay of the dominant dipolar interaction and strongly temperature dependent out-of-plane anisotropy energy terms enables the selective stabilisation of all three states at zero field, and at a single temperature, while the Dzyaloshinksii-Moriya interaction must be present to realise the observed Néel-type domain walls. The findings open perspectives for 2D devices incorporating topological spin textures.
Fe3GeTe2, known as FGT, is a van der Waals magnetic material that was recently shown to host magnetic skyrmions. Here, Birch et al using both X-ray and electron microscopy to study the stability of skyrmions in FGT, revealing how the sample history can influence skyrmion formation
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart, Germany (GRID:grid.419534.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 6533)
2 Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Stuttgart, Germany (GRID:grid.419552.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 6736)
3 University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
4 University of Cambridge, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
5 Durham University, Department of Physics, Durham, UK (GRID:grid.8250.f) (ISNI:0000 0000 8700 0572)
6 Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart, Germany (GRID:grid.419534.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 6533); Kongju National University, Department of Physics Education, Gongju, South Korea (GRID:grid.411118.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0647 1065)
7 Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Institut Nanospektroskopie, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.424048.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 3682)