It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The ability to extend the time scale of the coherent optical response from large ensembles of quantum emitters is highly appealing for applications in quantum information devices. In semiconductor nanostructures, spin degrees of freedom can be used as auxiliary, powerful tools to modify the coherent optical dynamics. Here, we apply this approach to negatively charged (In,Ga)As/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots which are considered as excellent quantum emitters with robust optical coherence and high bandwidth. We study three-pulse spin-dependent photon echoes subject to moderate transverse magnetic fields up to 1 T. We demonstrate that the timescale of coherent optical response can be extended by at least an order of magnitude by the field. Without magnetic field, the photon echo decays with T2 = 0.45 ns which is determined by the radiative lifetime of trions T1 = 0.26 ns. In the presence of the transverse magnetic field, the decay of the photon echo signal is given by spin dephasing time of the ensemble of resident electrons T2,e ∼ 4 ns. We demonstrate that the non-zero transverse g-factor of the heavy holes in the trion state plays a crucial role in the temporal evolution and magnetic field dependence of the long-lived photon echo signal.
Semiconductor nanostructures are central to the implementation of quantum communication and information technologies. The authors leveraged spin degrees of freedom in quantum dot ensembles to increase optical coherence timescales, thereby disclosing intriguing solutions for future quantum memories.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Technische Universität Dortmund, Experimentelle Physik 2, Dortmund, Germany (GRID:grid.5675.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0416 9637); Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.423485.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0548 8017)
2 Technische Universität Dortmund, Experimentelle Physik 2, Dortmund, Germany (GRID:grid.5675.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0416 9637); St. Petersburg State University, Spin Optics Laboratory, St. Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.15447.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2289 6897)
3 St. Petersburg State University, Spin Optics Laboratory, St. Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.15447.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2289 6897); St. Petersburg State University, V.A. Fock Institute of Physics, St. Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.15447.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2289 6897)
4 St. Petersburg State University, V.A. Fock Institute of Physics, St. Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.15447.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2289 6897)
5 Technische Universität Dortmund, Experimentelle Physik 2, Dortmund, Germany (GRID:grid.5675.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0416 9637)
6 Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Angewandte Festkörperphysik, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X)