It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Adults of the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) cause serious damage to coniferous seedlings and are among the most important forest pests in Europe. Seedling protection by chemicals is gradually being restricted or banned for environmental reasons, and non-chemical alternatives are therefore needed. In this 3-year study, we compared the following five treatments for protecting Norway spruce seedlings against H. abietis in the Central European mountains where the weevil is especially abundant: alpha-cypermethrin sprays (the only chemical treatment); coating with sprayed glue (Vermifix); wax coating with C and F types (Norsk Wax); and physical protection with collars. The same block design was set up at a clear-cut site and at a nursery site to compare seedling mortality and wax quality under “wild conditions” with pests and under “ideal conditions” without pests. Repeated application of alpha-cypermethrin was the most effective and least expensive method to protect seedlings against H. abietis. Among the four non-chemical methods, repeated application of glue was the most effective. Because collars were moderately effective but not cost-effective, we do not recommend the use of collars. Wax was inexpensive and environmentally safe but protected seedlings for only 1 year; the newer F type of wax performed better than the C type of wax, and perhaps the F type can be improved. In general we found that seedlings at sites with high numbers of H. abietis require protection for at least 3 years. We conclude by providing an overview of all methods currently available for managing H. abietis in forests.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia (GRID:grid.454939.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0371 4164)
2 National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia (GRID:grid.454939.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0371 4164); Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.15866.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 631X)
3 Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, Nitra, Slovakia (GRID:grid.419303.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 9405)
4 Technical University Zvolen, Faculty of Forestry, Zvolen, Slovakia (GRID:grid.27139.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 7460)
5 Research Station of TANAP, Tatranská Lomnica, Slovakia (GRID:grid.27139.3e)
6 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.15866.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 631X)