It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Following the first detection in the United Kingdom of Usutu virus (USUV) in wild birds in 2020, we undertook a multidisciplinary investigation that combined screening host and vector populations with interrogation of national citizen science monitoring datasets to assess the potential for population impacts on avian hosts. Pathological findings from six USUV-positive wild passerines were non-specific, highlighting the need for molecular and immunohistochemical examinations to confirm infection. Mosquito surveillance at the index site identified USUV RNA in Culex pipiens s.l. following the outbreak. Although the Eurasian blackbird (Turdus merula) is most frequently impacted by USUV in Europe, national syndromic surveillance failed to detect any increase in occurrence of clinical signs consistent with USUV infection in this species. Furthermore, there was no increase in recoveries of dead blackbirds marked by the national ringing scheme. However, there was regional clustering of blackbird disease incident reports centred near the index site in 2020 and a contemporaneous marked reduction in the frequency with which blackbirds were recorded in gardens in this area, consistent with a hypothesis of disease-mediated population decline. Combining results from multidisciplinary schemes, as we have done, in real-time offers a model for the detection and impact assessment of future disease emergence events.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Zoological Society of London, Institute of Zoology, Regent’s Park, London, UK (GRID:grid.20419.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 7273)
2 British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, Norfolk, UK (GRID:grid.423196.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 8108)
3 Natural History Museum, London, UK (GRID:grid.35937.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2270 9879)
4 Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, UK (GRID:grid.422685.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1765 422X)
5 UK Health Security Agency, Medical Entomology and Zoonoses Ecology group, Salisbury, UK (GRID:grid.422685.f)
6 Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, UK (GRID:grid.20419.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 7273)
7 UK Health Security Agency, Medical Entomology and Zoonoses Ecology group, Salisbury, UK (GRID:grid.20419.3e)