Our moral circles—that is, the entities believed as worthy of moral concern and thus deserving moral considerations—have historically expanded beyond humans to include also nonhuman beings (Crimston et al., 2018). As a result, various emerging legal instruments around the world have been granting rights to animals. However, the inclusion of animals within moral circles is subjected to important biases, with a preference for charismatic, familiar, and beautiful vertebrates (Klebl et al., 2021). We argue that legal instruments embracing such biases may jeopardize biodiversity conservation.
FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of the known impacts of stray colony cats on biodiversity and humans. References cited for each impact category: predation (Loss et al., 2013); hybridization (Tiesmeyer et al., 2020); zoonoses (Milne et al., 2020); diseases (Chiu et al., 2019; Meli et al., 2010)
In February 2022, the Spanish government approved a draft law elaborated by the Ministry of Social Rights and 2030 Agenda to restructure most human–animal interactions (
FIGURE 2. Stray cat preying on an endemic lizard (Gallotia galloti) near a cat colony located on Tenerife, Canary Islands. Photo by Dailos Hernández-Brito
The domestic cat has been implicated in more than a quarter of contemporary bird, mammal, and reptile extinctions worldwide, and is considered the most damaging invasive predators (Doherty et al., 2016). Predation by cats is the most important cause of small mammal and bird mortality, ahead of roadkill, poisoning, or human hunters (Trouwborst et al., 2020). Contrary to popular belief, well-fed colony cats still hunt wild prey (Plimpton et al., 2021), and because of their high densities, stray-cats often exert impacts on prey populations that are several times greater than native predators (Trouwborst et al., 2020). Cat impacts are particularly severe on islands, and the Spanish law will undoubtedly hinder the conservation of endemic Canary and Balearic faunas (Figure 2). Besides predation, cats also act as vectors and reservoirs for numerous diseases that can endanger wildlife (Meli et al., 2010) and harm public health (Milne et al., 2020). Stray-cat colonies may play a particularly important role in disease dynamics due to the high density of individuals and their intense interactions within colonies and with owned and feral cats (Trouwborst et al., 2020).
It is contradictory that the same Ministry charged with meeting the goals of the 2030 Agenda, including halting biodiversity loss, is proposing the enhancement and sustainment of a powerful driver of biodiversity loss. Although the wildlife management can sometimes trigger ethical challenges, prioritizing the well-being and fates of individuals of a few favored animal species over the conservation of species, populations, ecosystem functioning, and global biodiversity will promote homogeneous impoverished biotas dominated by a handful of privileged species (Griffin et al., 2020). While attending to animal welfare issues, legal instruments should unequivocally seek to reduce the negative impacts of free-roaming cats by minimizing their numbers in the shortest time and limiting outdoor access of owned cats as much as possible.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors would like to thank all researchers who have kindly contributed to the discussion of this conservation problem in Spain.
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTThe authors declare no conflicts of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSAll authors discussed the problem and wrote the paper.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENTThe draft of the law (in Spanish) can be found at:
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
[...]various emerging legal instruments around the world have been granting rights to animals. [...]it prohibits their elimination, replacing culling (which has successfully eradicated cat populations on certain islands; Nogales et al., 2004) by fertility control (Trap-Neuter-Return/Release, TNR), which is considered more ethical. Cat impacts are particularly severe on islands, and the Spanish law will undoubtedly hinder the conservation of endemic Canary and Balearic faunas (Figure 2). Besides predation, cats also act as vectors and reservoirs for numerous diseases that can endanger wildlife (Meli et al., 2010) and harm public health (Milne et al., 2020).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain
2 Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Sevilla, Spain
3 Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
4 Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats, CSIC‐UIB, Mallorca, Spain
5 Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología, IPNA, CSIC, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain