It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Climate change may disrupt species–species interactions via phenological changes in one or both species. To predict and evaluate the influence of climate change on these interactions, long-term monitoring and sampling over large spatial areas are required; however, funding and labor constraints limit data collection. In this study, we predict and evaluate the plant–insect interactions with limited data sets. We examined plant–insect interaction using observational data for development of the crop plant rice (Oryza sativa) and an effective accumulated temperature (EAT) model of two mirid bugs (Stenotus rubrovittatus and Trigonotylus caelestialium). We combined 11 years of records monitoring rice phenology and the predicted phenology of mirid bugs using spatially–explicit EAT models based on both spatially and temporally high resolutions temperature data sets, then evaluated their accuracy using actual pest damage records. Our results showed that the predicted interactions between rice and mirid bugs explained rice damage to some degree. Our approach may apply predicting changes to plant–insect interactions under climate change. As such, combining plant monitoring records and theoretical predictions of insect phenology may be effective for predicting species–species interactions when available data are limited.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Tokyo Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Urban Environmental Sciences, Hachiouji, Japan (GRID:grid.265074.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 2030)
2 NARO, Division of Agro-Environment Research, Tohoku Agricultural Research Center, Morioka, Japan (GRID:grid.482892.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2220 7617)
3 Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Fuchu, Japan (GRID:grid.136594.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0689 5974)
4 Akita Plant Protection Office, Akita, Japan (GRID:grid.136594.c)
5 NARO, Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.416835.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2222 0432)
6 National Institute for Environmental Studies, Fukushima Regional Collaborative Research Center, Miharu, Japan (GRID:grid.140139.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0746 5933)
7 Chuo University, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.443595.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2323 0843)