Rationale of using the dual chemokine receptor CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor cenicriviroc for the treatment of COVID-19

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has created a global pandemic infecting over 230 million people and costing millions of lives. Therapies to attenuate severe disease are desperately needed. Cenicriviroc (CVC), a C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) and C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) antagonist, an agent previously studied in advanced clinical trials for patients with HIV or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), may have the potential to reduce respiratory and cardiovascular organ failures related to COVID-19. Inhibiting the CCR2 and CCR5 pathways could attenuate or prevent inflammation or fibrosis in both early and late stages of the disease and improve outcomes of COVID-19. Clinical trials using CVC either in addition to standard of care (SoC; e.g., dexamethasone) or in combination with other investigational agents in patients with COVID-19 are currently ongoing. These trials intend to leverage the anti-inflammatory actions of CVC for ameliorating the clinical course of COVID-19 and prevent complications. This article reviews the literature surrounding the CCR2 and CCR5 pathways, their proposed role in COVID-19, and the potential role of CVC to improve outcomes.

Introduction

In late 2019, health authorities first detected an infection caused by a novel coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); this rapidly transmissible virus would go on to create a global pandemic, known as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), infecting over 438 million people and causing over 5.9 million deaths at the time of writing [1]. SARS-CoV-2 is within the same family of betacoronaviruses as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [2]. SARS-CoV-2 infection has a heterogenous clinical presentation, ranging from asymptomatic infection to severe disease and death [2]. Approximately 5% to 10% of individuals develop symptoms of respiratory failure marked by pneumonia and hypoxia [2,3]. This can further develop into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multisystem organ failure, and death. Although the initial symptoms and course of disease are a consequence of viral replication, progressive COVID-19 pneumonia appears to be a consequence more of an aberrant immune response to the virus and less due to the viral replication itself [4].

At the time of writing, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had issued approval or emergency use authorization (EUA) for the mRNA vaccines, Comirnaty (BNT162b2; Pfizer-BioNTech), Spikevax (mRNA-1273; Moderna), and the adenoviral vaccine JNJ-7843673 (Janssen) [5]. Other regional and country regulatory authorities have approved additional vaccines (e.g., AZD1222/ChAdOx1 nCov-19, Sputnik-5, and BBIBP-CorV) following successful clinical trials. FDA-approved small-molecule antiviral therapies include Veklury (remdesivir—Gilead Sciences) [6], an IV viral RNA polymerase inhibitor for hospitalized patients; and more recently issued EUA for oral treatments of mild to moderate disease, Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir), for inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease [7]; and Lagevrio (molnupiravir), for induction of viral RNA error catastrophe [8]. The FDA has also approved or issued EUA for monoclonal antibodies that bind to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 to prevent host cell entry. This includes bamlanivimab plus etesevimab, casirivimab and imdevimab, sotrovimab, and bebtelovumab, although activity of these antibodies against emerging dominant variants (especially Omicron) has been reported to be much impaired, with the exception of sotrovimab and bebtelovumab [9–11], to the extent that bamlanivumab use has since been FDA rescinded and bamlanivumab plus etesevimab as well as casirivimab and imdevimab have had their uses limited by the FDA [12]. For preexposure prophylaxis, the monoclonal antibody combinations of tixagevimab plus cilgavimab also have an EUA from the FDA for populations who are immunocompromised and with limited expected response to vaccination [13]. This is important because unvaccinated and immunocompromised patients are at most risk for severe COVID-19 including ARDS [14–18].

Immunomodulators either approved, authorized, or in guidelines for COVID-19 include dexamethasone, a steroidal anti-inflammatory, tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, and baricitinib, a janus kinase inhibitor [19–22]. Although the list of agents is growing, efficacy remains limited, and further agents to improve outcomes by targeting the pathological mechanisms of COVID-19 are desperately needed. In addition to new drug therapies in development, existing drug or clinical development candidates are also being examined for their potential role in SARS-CoV-2 treatment, including antiviral agents and immunomodulators. Identifying potential targets that mediate the immune response to regulate the respiratory and vascular sequelae could have a profound impact in reducing the severity of disease in SARS-CoV-2 patients; in severe disease, respiratory failure is universally present and may result from excessive cytokine (including chemokine) release from activated immune cells [23,24]. One such drug therapy that can modulate cytokine activity is cenicriviroc (CVC), a C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) and C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) antagonist, previously studied in clinical trials for consequential antiviral activity against HIV-1 due to inhibiting the CCR5-mediated HIV entry into T cells [25,26]. CVC has also been examined in clinical trials for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), in which inflammation and hepatocyte injury occur leading to liver fibrosis [27–29]. As inflammation and cytokine (including chemokine) release can occur via similar receptor pathways in pulmonary injury and SARS-CoV-2, we reviewed the literature surrounding the CCR5 and CCR2 pathways and the rationale for CVC as a potential agent in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 [26,30]. COVID-19 may be characterized by pathologies induced by the separate waves of infection caused by distinct variants, including those seen for the Omicron variant that became predominant at an alarming rate across many geographic areas due to its relative increased infectivity. Early research indicates this variant may be associated with reduced disease severity and ARDS, although significant virulence is still apparent [31,32], indicating current interventional mechanisms to reduce disease severity are likely to still be valid for many. Unvaccinated populations are overwhelmingly the most affected by disease severity and ARDS, as are those with compromised immunity and limited immune response to vaccine and infection (e.g., cancer patients), [33,34] making therapeutic interventions particularly important for this population, even in light of likely reduced disease severity associated with the Omicron variant. Therapeutic interventions may become increasingly important due to reduced vaccine-mediated immune susceptibility (especially humoral) of this variant in light of extensive epitope changes [35,36]. CCR2 and CCR5 are widely reported to enable trafficking and signaling of immune-dampening myeloid suppressor cells [37–39] and reduce vaccine immune responses [40–43]. Considering this and aberrant myeloid trafficking, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells being a signature of COVID-19 [44,45], CVC use as a vaccine adjuvant may have some specific merit for further research.

Chemokines and their coreceptors: CCR2 and CCR5

Chemokines, a family of cytokine leukocyte chemoattractants, are a group of immunoregulatory mediators that can direct leukocyte infiltration, positioning, and activation by acting at specific receptors [2]. Chemokines play an important role in trafficking cells during an immune response [46]. During a respiratory virus infection, inflammatory cytokines and chemokines are induced. Inflammatory cells and leukocytes are recruited into local tissue; in SARS-CoV, elevated cytokine and chemokine expression are found in SARS-CoV–infected cells [47].

One such chemokine is C-C chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), a potent cognate agonist of CCR2 [48]. Monocytes, macrophages, vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells can secrete CCL2 [49]. In turn, monocytes are the main leukocyte population expressing CCR2 that are being recruited to sites of inflammation via CCL2 [50]. CCL2 thus induces a positive feedback loop by promoting inflammation, thereby releasing additional inflammatory mediators [49,51]. CCL2 is associated with several inflammatory disorders of the lung, including ARDS, the syndrome associated with severe COVID-19, as well as adverse cardiovascular outcomes (Fig 1) [47,52–56].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. CCR2 mediated recruitment of aberrant myeloid compartment and high CCR2 and CCR5 ligands.

Left: Diagrammatic summary representation of CCR2- and CCR5-mediated recruitment of aberrant myeloid compartment via elevated airway CCR2 and CCR5 agonist ligand expression in airways of patients with severe COVID-19 infection. Right: Heatmap showing inflammatory mediators in airway samples from 14 COVID-19 patients (x axis) highlighting specifically elevated CCR2 and CCR5 cognate ligands MCP-1 [CCL2], MIP-1α [CCL3], and MIP-1β [CCL4] levels (average elevation relative to uninfected controls graded in purple as per key). Reprinted from Immunity, 54 (4), Szabo PA, et al. Longitudinal profiling of respiratory and systemic immune responses reveals myeloid cell-driven lung inflammation in severe COVID-19. 797–814. Copyright (2021), with permission from Elsevier et al. CCL, chemokine-chemokine ligand; CCR, chemokine-chemokine receptor; COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP, monocyte inflammatory protein.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1010547.g001

CCR5 and its cognate agonist ligands (CCL3, CCL4, CCR3L1, and CCL5) have long been associated with airway inflammation in both allergic and infectious settings [57]. CCR5 is expressed on several cell types, including T cells, macrophages, vascular cells, and dendritic cells [58,59]. Last, CCR5 is a coreceptor for HIV cell entry (with CD4 being the primary receptor), which underpins its efficacy in HIV infection.

Association of CCR2 and CCR5 in adverse sequelae associated in COVID-19

Pulmonary sequelae

Multiple studies have reviewed the roles of CCR2 and CCR5 in mediating respiratory and vascular sequelae across various diseases including COVID-19. Lung injury in ARDS associated with COVID-19 may be associated with dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines, similar to SARS-CoV [60,61]. The Genetics of Mortality in Critical Care (GEnOMICC) genome-wide association study evaluated 2,244 critically ill patients with COVID-19 from 208 United Kingdom intensive care units where high expression of CCR2 was found to be associated with severe COVID-19 via transcriptome-wide association in lung tissue [62]. In SARS-CoV–infected mouse model studies, enhanced production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, IL-6, CCL2, chemokine-chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5), and other chemokines were observed and correlated with the lung migration of macrophages and plasmacytoid dendritic cells [63]. Enhanced cytokine production observed in the lungs including CCL2 and CCL5 along with pneumonitis observed by day 7 [63]. CCL2 is up-regulated early in the stages of acute infection. As the disease progresses, both CCL2 and CCL5 are up-regulated. A similar breakdown of the infection and cytokine elevation longitudinal patterns in humans with SARS CoV-2 infection was reported by Lu and colleagues [64], which proposed 3 stages of infection and cytokine-mediated sequalae, of which the CCR2 and CCR5 cognate agonistic ligands played a significant part. Based on these findings, inhibiting the CCR2 and CCR5 pathways could benefit patients in both early and late stages of infection; optimal administration of CVC during several phases of the SARS-CoV-2 infection may attenuate or prevent inflammatory consequences of COVID-19 and prove beneficial by avoiding excessive monocyte recruitment (Fig 2) [63,64].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Three stages of immunological pathway leading to mortality in COVID-19: Stage I (Initiation), with early induction of predominant chemokines upon SARS-CoV-2 infection and viral sepsis.

Treatment at this stage with CVC (highlighted in blue text and arrows) is postulated to maintain normalized myeloid compartmentalization at early stage of infection, or block aberrant myeloid infiltration upon CCL2, 3, and 5 signaling following SARS-CoV-2 infection and consequent cytokine amplification (Stage II), and subsequent tissue damage and eventual death (Stage III—consummation). Lu L, et al. Preventing Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: Which Cytokine to Target in a Raging Storm? Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00677. CCL, chemokine-chemokine ligand; CCR, chemokine-chemokine receptor; COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019; CVC, cenicriviroc; IL, interleukin; IP, interferon gamma-induced protein; SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1010547.g002

As the SARS-CoV-2–infected epithelial cells and macrophages in the airways express high levels of CCL5, one pilot study including 10 patients evaluated leronlimab (Pro-140), a monoclonal antibody CCR5 inhibitor, to disrupt the CCL5-CCR5 axis associated with the immune cell infiltration and associated cytokine storm and subsequently the pulmonary sequelae caused by pro-inflammatory leukocytes [65,66]. Although initial data indicated a possible association between CCR5 blockade and reduction in disease markers in uncontrolled studies, more comprehensive clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a clear medical benefit with this antibody in patients with severe disease [65,67]. Localized vasoconstricor responses to elevated chemokine–chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4) via CCR5 agonism may be important in also restricting respiratory function due to SAR-CoV-2 infection, and blockade of this by CCR5 antagonists has been demonstrated [68]. Leronlimab and maraviroc are monoclonal antibody and small-molecule ligands of CCR5, respectively, which are approved drugs for the treatment of HIV infection and operate by blocking CCR5-tropic HIV entry into CD4+ host cells [69,70]. Maraviroc is being investigated for efficacy in various COVID-19 clinical studies (hospitalized patients; see NCT04441385, NCT04475991, NCT04435522, and NCT04710199) by virtue of being a functional antagonist of the CCR5 receptor, postulated to disrupt the associated cognate chemokine-mediated adverse immune-pathophysiology of infection, as discussed later in this manuscript. Results from these studies are awaited. Leronlimab has also been studied in COVID-19 clinical trials, but the largely unfavorable efficacy outcomes in studies may be a consequence of leronlimab being a potent CCR5 ligand and HIV entry inhibitor, but with limited functional antagonistic properties against cognate ligand signaling [71–73]. Like maraviroc, CVC is a potent small-molecule inhibitor of HIV entry/replication on the basis of high affinity binding to CCR5, to block HIV gp120 binding, but also cognate ligand (chemokine) binding and functional signaling [74]. However, unlike maraviroc, CVC possesses additional potent functional antagonistic properties against CCR2 [75] to block additional immune-pharmacologies that are implicated in COVID-19 disease pathology, as detailed in this manuscript. Indeed, CCR5 and CCR2 have interrelated pharmacologies in immune signaling, particularly for the inhibitory myeloid compartment, which may overcome potential interreceptor redundancy or enable a synergistic effect in limiting COVID-19 adverse immunopathology [76–78]. Given this, investigations into CVC as a dual CCR2/5 functional antagonist offer a unique rationale for the potential treatment of COVID-19.

Cardiovascular sequelae

In addition to respiratory involvement, patients afflicted with COVID-19 often experience cardiovascular complications or have an exacerbation of underlying cardiac disease [79]. While the exact mechanism of this has not been fully elucidated, current evidence points toward an inflammatory response underpinning the adverse cardiovascular outcomes in COVID-19 patients. In a cross-sectional cohort study of 130 patients (ranging in severity of COVID-19) where peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed, surface proteome, T/B lymphocyte antigen receptors, and single-cell transcriptome analyses revealed nonclassical monocytes were largely expanded and expressed complement transcripts (CD16 + C1QA/B/C+) that sequestered platelets and were predicted to replenish the alveolar macrophage pool in COVID-19 [80]. Other research, including in vitro and in vivo studies, has shown that biomarkers of inflammation such as IL-6, IL-8, C-reactive protein, and CCL2 are associated with thrombus development along with leukocytes [81].

Chemokines such as CCL2 and CCL5, along with their coreceptors CCR2 and CCR5, respectively, have long been associated with vascular disease [78,82,83]. CCL2/CCR2 and CCL5/CCR5 recruit monocytes to migrate to sites of inflammation including atherosclerotic plaques; circulating monocytes can trigger tissue factor expression via the release of cytokines from activated platelets and endothelial cells. A signature marker of COVID-19–associated coagulopathy is the presence of neutrophil extracellular traps, which recruit myeloid cells to the culprit site via CCL2 [84–86]. Early recruitment of neutrophil and monocytes trigger factor XII-dependent coagulation and tissue factor delivery thus contributing to the formation of a thrombus [87]. In one study, deep vein thrombosis was induced in wild-type and growth-arrest–specific 6 (Gas6)-deficient mice [81]. Gas6 promoted the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes via CCL2/CCR2. Inflammatory monocyte recruitment via these pathways also occurs in other cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infarction [49]. A study, examining the expressions of CCL2 and CCR2 in the plasma, found that in 80 STEMI (ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) patients with platelet high response, patients had higher expressions of CCL2 or CCR2 than those patients with a platelet normal response. Exogenous recombinant human CCL2 increased platelet aggregation and granule secretions in vitro; these were abolished by a CCR2 inhibitor or a CCL2 neutralizing antibody [49]. These studies further support the theory that the CCL2/CCR2 pathway is vital in cardiovascular events. Given the adverse cardiovascular-related events seen in COVID-19, blockade of CCR2 could potentially reduce these adverse outcomes by decreasing the amount of circulating and infection site accumulation of inflammatory monocytes and other myeloid populations [79,81,88,89].

Mechanism of action of CVC

CVC is an orally bioavailable, small-molecule chemokine receptor antagonist with similar in vitro potency against cognate ligand binding to both CCR2 and CCR5 receptors (IC50 = 2 to 6 nM) [26,74]. It is an immunomodulator that can decrease the transmigration of immune cells through the blockade of CCR2 and CCR5, thereby preventing monocytes (that differentiate into inflammatory tissue macrophages) and lymphocytes from penetrating lung tissue [90]. The mechanisms of monocyte recruitment to injured lungs and their contribution to inflammatory macrophages appear to be very conserved across tissues, because similar (monocyte-derived) macrophage tissue phenotypes can be observed and mediate inflammation in models of lung injury, as well as, for example, liver injury [91–93].

CVC was initially developed as an anti-HIV drug by Takeda and then Tobira, prior to acquisition by Allergan for investigation in liver disease, namely liver fibrosis with NASH (Allergan subsequently acquired by AbbVie). CVC displays potent, selective anti–HIV-1 activity via binding to CCR5 as a coreceptor of HIV-1 and to prevent virus entry into the cell [25,26]. CVC is efficacious in treating HIV infection with HIV-suppressive activity at doses associated with a highly favorable safety profile as demonstrated in a comprehensive Phase 2b clinical study compared with the then standard of care (SoC) comparator efavirenz [25]. High-level dual receptor blockade was demonstrated as highlighted by the high levels of viral suppression (not achievable without 100% CCR5 occupancy) and dose-dependent increases of CCL2 [25,94]. Elevation of CD4 count was numerically greater in the CVC arms than SoC comparator arms (no statistical analysis reported), and the myeloid inflammatory marker sCD14 was reduced in the CVC arms, but elevated in the SoC arms, with this difference being statistically significant [25]. Despite this encouraging profile as a direct-acting antiviral candidate agent for HIV infection, it was not further developed as an HIV clinical candidate following its acquisition by Allergan, but investigated instead for potential therapy of NASH with liver fibrosis, due to the pharmacologies associates with CCR2 and CCR5 in this disease [27,28]. In a Phase 2b study, CVC showed an improvement in liver fibrosis compared to placebo after 1 year of therapy with similar safety profiles between both CVC and placebo groups. It was also associated with reduced levels of markers of cardiovascular outcomes such as C-reactive protein and fibrinogen and biomarkers of inflammation such as IL-6 and IL-1β [27,28]. Despite mechanistically associated evidence of efficacy, the AURORA Phase 3 study was terminated early due to lack of efficacy based on the results of the planned interim analysis of Part 1 data. While no efficacy data for CVC in animal models of SARS-CoV-2 infection exist, there is evidence from preclinical in vivo models (in mice) that CCR2/CCR5 inhibition by means of CVC administration suppresses the inflammatory-mediated organ injury [95–97]. In models of acute liver injury to mice (by acetaminophen or the hepatotoxin carbon tetrachloride), CCR2 specifically inhibits the recruitment of monocytes into injured liver that give rise to inflammatory monocyte-derived tissue macrophages [96]. Of note, the number of Kupffer cells in the liver (tissue-residing macrophages), remains unaltered upon CVC administration, suggesting that only freshly recruited inflammatory cells are blocked, with preservation of basic homeostatic functions of tissue phagocytes (such as defense against bacteria or other infectious threats). In longer-term injury preclinical in vivo models reflecting NASH, treatment with CVC prevents fibrosis in the liver [95].

These same receptors that play a role in inflammation in hepatic injury may also play a vital role in the immune response that occurs in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 infections. In one study, CVC was studied for its inhibitory effect on the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures [26]. CVC was found to be a selective but fairly weak inhibitor of the viral replication (IC50 for virus-induced cell destruction and viral RNA levels were 19.0 and 2.9 μM, respectively). Such low levels of potency may not be sufficient for a direct antiviral effect, but the potent blockade of key immune populations, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells may increase the effector B and T cell lymphoid populations for indirect immune-based antiviral activity as seen in other viral infections [37,98–100]. We therefore predict that each of the CCR2 and CCR5 receptors has a complementary role in infection-associated inflammation and tissue sequelae in COVID-19 with CCR2/CCL2 seen in both early and late stages of infection and CCR5/CCL5 seen later in the infectious process [63]. Blockade of both may also disable inter-receptor compensatory mechanisms of these 2 closely related G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs): CCR2 and CCR5 are key mediators of myeloid cell trafficking and migration into tissues and lymphoid regulation. By blocking the CCR2 and the CCR5 pathways, it is anticipated that the administration of CVC may be beneficial in potentially preventing or reversing the pulmonary and vascular sequelae associated with COVID-19.

Safety of CVC

CVC is a well-tolerated oral formulation with most adverse events considered mild or moderate; the most common side effects reported are nausea, headache, and diarrhea [25,28]. CVC should be administered with food for optimal absorption. There were no major safety signals in over 2,000 patients exposed to CVC, including vulnerable patient populations such as patients with HIV-1 or patients with liver cirrhosis in CVC clinical trials [25,27,28,101]. CVC does not have apparent dose or exposure-related safety signals, and there is no evidence of promoting (bacterial) infections, including in HIV–positive patients. In preclinical models, CVC inhibited functioning of monocytes and macrophages but other immune cell populations such as neutrophils or lymphoid cells were not adversely affected [102]. Functional blockade of CCR5 by maraviroc and CCR2 by clinical candidate agents to date has met with a fairly benign safety profile in patients across a range of indications. The homozygous Δ32 mutation of CCR5 has been reported as less prevalent in COVID-19 patients, with transcript levels higher in patients versus controls [103,104], although disease course has been reported with no association [105]. However, of particular note is the strong association of the Δ32 CCR5 genotype with increased susceptibility to West Nile virus infection [106,107]. In areas of high West Nile Virus prevalence, the potential utility of maraviroc or CVC for the treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19 would need significant consideration. A higher dose than what has been used in NASH could potentially be advantageous in COVID-19 patients, as this might ensure faster CCR2 and CCR5 inhibition (i.e., target engagement) of CVC. There is potential for drug-drug interactions with strong cytochrome P450 (CYP 450) 3A4 inhibitors; while remdesivir is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 in vitro, the clinical relevance of these in vitro findings has not been established [108]. To this end, although CVC as a direct-acting anti-HIV agent was no longer pursued following its acquisition from Tobira by Allergan, and the limited efficacy observed in Phase 3 for NASH with liver fibrosis during its tenure with Allergan and now AbbVie, the pharmacologies and safety profile of this clinical candidate made a case for its evaluation in COVID-19.

Conclusions

The worldwide spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the associated morbidity and mortality have led to an urgent need for additional therapies to mitigate, including pulmonary and vascular complications of COVID-19. This review describes the role of the CCL2/CCR2 and CCL5/CCR5 chemokine pathways associated with amplification of inflammatory responses in COVID-19 and the role of CVC in inhibiting this pathway [109]. CCL2/CCR2 are critical for monocyte and macrophage migration, a potential mechanism may be monocyte infiltration into the lungs via airway specific expression of CCL2/CCR2 in patients with severe COVID-19 [3,47]. CCL2 contributes to monocyte recruitment in acute lung injury (and subsequent neutrophil-mediated tissue injury) as demonstrated in multiple animal studies [2,63]. CCL2 is up-regulated into the lungs of patients with ARDS, which then induces the migration of circulating CCR2 positive inflammatory cells into the alveoli; airways of patients with COVID-19 express pro-inflammatory mediators, including CCL2; airway myeloid cells propagating inflammatory responses in COVID-19 is further supported by the excessive CCL2 levels found in airways, but not blood in COVID-19 patients versus healthy controls [3,110]. Targeting airway-derived cytokines, such as CCL2, via a CCR2 antagonist may be effective in reducing lung damage and preventing further respiratory sequelae in severe COVID-19 [3]. CCL5 was also expressed >100-fold in SARS-CoV patients with a return to baseline of inflammatory markers such as IL-6 with the administration of leronlimab, further supporting that both CCR2 and CCR5 receptors play a role in the inflammatory airway processes [65]. Cardiovascular studies have demonstrated higher expression of CCL2/CCR2 increased the risk for higher platelet response, atherosclerosis, and thrombus formation [49,81,88]. CCR2 and CCR5 may be potential targets for inhibiting airway and cardiovascular inflammatory processes and reducing lung and cardiovascular damage in those inflicted with SARS-CoV-2 [3].

CVC, a dual, potent CCR2 and CCR5 inhibitor, has demonstrated its effect on mitigating inflammatory pathways in both HIV-1 patients and patients with NASH along with decreasing HIV-1 RNA [25,27,28]. It is theorized that CVC could potentially have a similar effect with respect to reducing adverse inflammatory effects associated with COVID-19. By inhibiting both the CCR2 and CCR5 receptors, CVC may decrease the migration of circulating immune cells early in the infectious process as well as inhibiting tissue-based immune cells at later stages, with subsequent effects of decreasing both pulmonary and vascular sequelae associated with the increased of inflammatory markers. Cell culture studies have demonstrated that CVC is a modest inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, although indirect antiviral activity may be more likely a consequence of CVC-dependent block of immunosuppressor cell infiltration to infection sites, such as CCR2- and CCR5-dependent myeloid suppressor cells [26,38,99,100]. CVC has been studied at doses of 100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg and found to be well tolerated with most adverse events mild to moderate in severity [25,27,28].

Further research is needed to determine the utility of CVC in treating patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. At the time of publication drafting, there are currently 3 ongoing studies of CVC in COVID-19 patients: I-SPY/COVID Clinical Trial (NCT04488081), ACTIV-1/NIAD/NIH Consortium Study (NCT04593940), and the single-center Charité trial of CVC treatment for COVID-19 patients in Germany (NCT04500418) [111–113]. The I-SPY trial discontinued testing of CVC as it met the predefined futility criterion, defined as at least 90% probability that the hazard ratio for time to recovery is less than 1.5 compared with the control arm [114]. It should be noted that dexamethasone was included in the treatment and participants in this study were critically ill. The other trials include less severe infection in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Given the benign safety profile of CVC, the oral bioavailability, and the multimodal pharmacologies that align with disrupting COVID-19 pathology, investigating CVC in early infection, mild disease, and in the post-acute COVID-19 populations also have merit.

Citation: Files DC, Tacke F, O’Sullivan A, Dorr P, Ferguson WG, Powderly WG (2022) Rationale of using the dual chemokine receptor CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor cenicriviroc for the treatment of COVID-19. PLoS Pathog 18(6): e1010547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1010547

References

1. John Hopkins University COVID-19 Resource Center. Available at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed on March 2, 2022.

2. Majumdar S, Murphy PM. Chemokine Regulation During Epidemic Coronavirus Infection. Front Pharmacol 2020;11:600369. Epub 2021/02/23. pmid:33613280; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7890195.

3. Szabo PA, Dogra P, Gray JI, Wells SB, Connors TJ, Weisberg SP, et al. Longitudinal profiling of respiratory and systemic immune responses reveals myeloid cell-driven lung inflammation in severe COVID-19. Immunity 2021:1–18. Epub 2021/03/26. pmid:33765436; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7951561.

4. van Eijk LE, Binkhorst M, Bourgonje AR, Offringa AK, Mulder DJ, Bos EM, et al. COVID-19: immunopathology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment options. J Pathol 2021;254(4):307–31. Epub 2021/02/16. pmid:33586189; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8013908.

5. US Food and Drug Administration. COVID-19 Vaccines. Available at https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-19-vaccines. Accessed on March 2, 2022.

6. Gottlieb RL, Vaca CE, Paredes R, Mera J, Webb BJ, Perez G, et al. Early Remdesivir to Prevent Progression to Severe Covid-19 in Outpatients. N Engl J Med 2022;386(4):305–15. Epub 2021/12/23. pmid:34937145; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8757570.

7. US Food and Drug Administration. Fact Sheet For Healthcare Providers: Emergency Use Authroization for PaxlovidTM. Available at https://www.fda.gov/media/155050/download. Accessed March 2, 2022.

8. Jayk Bernal A, Gomes da Silva MM, Musungaie DB, Kovalchuk E, Gonzalez A, Delos Reyes V, et al. Molnupiravir for Oral Treatment of Covid-19 in Nonhospitalized Patients. N Engl J Med 2022;386(6):509–20. Epub 2021/12/17. pmid:34914868; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8693688.

9. Liu L, Iketani S, Guo Y, Chan JF, Wang M, Liu L, et al. Striking antibody evasion manifested by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2022;602(7898):676–81. Epub 2022/01/12. pmid:35016198.

10. US Food and Drug Administration. Emergency Use Authorization 111. Bebtelovimab. Available at https://www.fda.gov/media/156151/download. Accessed March 2, 2022.

11. Westendorf K, Wang L, Žentelis S, Foster D, Vaillancourt P, Wiggin M, et al. LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab) potently neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants. bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology. 2022. Epub 2021/05/12. pmid:33972947; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8109210.

12. US Food and Drug Administration. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Certain Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat COVID-19 Due to the Omicron Variant. Available at https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-limits-use-certain-monoclonal-antibodies-treat-covid-19-due-omicron. Accessed March 2, 2022.

13. US Food and Drug Administration. Fact Sheet For Healthcare Providers: Emergency Use Authorization For EvusheldTM (tixagevimab co-packaged with cilgavimab). Available at https://www.fda.gov/media/154701/download. Accessed March 2, 2022.

14. Verma A, Kumar I, Singh PK, Ansari MS, Singh HA, Sonkar S, et al. Initial comparative analysis of pulmonary involvement on HRCT between vaccinated and non-vaccinated subjects of COVID-19. Eur Radiol. 2022;1–9. pmid:35022810.

15. Busic N, Lucijanic T, Barsic B, Luksic I, Busic I, Kurdija G, et al. Vaccination provides protection from respiratory deterioration and death among hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Differences between vector and mRNA vaccines. J Med Virol 2022. Epub 2022/02/22. pmid:35187697.

16. Peyneau M, Granger V, Wicky P-H, Khelifi-Touhami D, Timsit J-F, Lescure F-X, et al. Innate immune deficiencies are associated with severity and poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2022;12 (1):638. pmid:35022495

17. du Plessis M, Davis T, Loos B, Pretorius E, de Villiers WJS, Engelbrecht AM. Molecular regulation of autophagy in a pro-inflammatory tumour microenvironment: New insight into the role of serum amyloid A. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2021;59:71–83. pmid:33727011

18. Suárez-García I, Perales-Fraile I, González-García A, Muñoz-Blanco A, Manzano L, Fabregate M, et al. In-hospital mortality among immunosuppressed patients with COVID-19: Analysis from a national cohort in Spain. PLoS ONE 2021;16(8):e0255524. Epub 2021/08/04. pmid:34343222; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8330927.

19. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, Mehta AK, Zingman BS, Kalil AC, et al. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19—Final Report. N Engl J Med 2020;383(19):1813–26. Epub 2020/05/24. pmid:32445440; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7262788.

20. Kalil AC, Patterson TF, Mehta AK, Tomashek KM, Wolfe CR, Ghazaryan V, et al. Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021;384(9):795–807. Epub 2020/12/12. pmid:33306283; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7745180.

21. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines National Institute of Health2021 [cited 2021 23 July]. Available from: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/.

22. An EUA for sotrovimab for treatment of COVID-19. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2021;63(1627):97–xx8. Epub 2021/06/29. pmid:34181630.

23. Fajgenbaum DC, June CH. Cytokine Storm. N Engl J Med 2020;383(23):2255–73. Epub 2020/12/03. pmid:33264547; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7727315.

24. Attaway AH, Scheraga RG, Bhimraj A, Biehl M, Hatipoglu U. Severe covid-19 pneumonia: pathogenesis and clinical management. BMJ 2021;372:n436. Epub 2021/03/12. pmid:33692022.

25. Thompson M, Saag M, DeJesus E, Gathe J, Lalezari J, Landay AL, et al. A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus. AIDS 2016;30(6):869–78. Epub 2015/12/05. pmid:26636929; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4794136.

26. Okamoto M, Toyama M, Baba M. The chemokine receptor antagonist cenicriviroc inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antivir Res 2020;182:104902. Epub 2020/08/03. pmid:32739404; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7392080.

27. Friedman SL, Ratziu V, Harrison SA, Abdelmalek MF, Aithal GP, Caballeria J, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cenicriviroc for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with fibrosis. Hepatology 2018;67(5):1754–67. Epub 2017/08/24. pmid:28833331; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5947654.

28. Ratziu V, Sanyal A, Harrison SA, Wong VW, Francque S, Goodman Z, et al. Cenicriviroc Treatment for Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis: Final Analysis of the Phase 2b CENTAUR Study. Hepatology 2020;72(3):892–905. Epub 2020/01/17. pmid:31943293.

29. Anstee QM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Wong VW, Abdelmalek MF, Younossi ZM, Yuan J, et al. Cenicriviroc for the treatment of liver fibrosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: AURORA Phase 3 study design. Contemp Clin Trials 2020;89:105922. Epub 2019/12/28. pmid:31881392.

30. Merad M, Subramanian A, Wang TT. An aberrant inflammatory response in severe COVID-19. Cell Host Microbe 2021;29(7):1043–7. Epub 2021/07/16. pmid:34265243; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8279571.

31. Suzuki R, Yamasoba D, Kimura I, Wang L, Kishimoto M, Ito J, et al. Attenuated fusogenicity and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Nature. 2022. pmid:35104835

32. Nealon J, Cowling BJ. Omicron severity: milder but not mild. Lancet (London, England). 2022;399(10323):412–3. Epub 2022/01/23. pmid:35065007; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8769661 area of work commented on here. JN was previously employed by, and owns shares in, Sanofi, outside the area of work commented on here. We thank Julie Au for technical assistance.

33. Han S, Zhuang Q, Chiang J, Tan SH, Chua GWY, Xie C, et al. Impact of cancer diagnoses on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022;12(2):e044661. Epub 2022/02/09. pmid:35131810; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8822543.

34. Schmidt AL, Labaki C, Hsu CY, Bakouny Z, Balanchivadze N, Berg SA, et al. COVID-19 vaccination and breakthrough infections in patients with cancer. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 2022;33(3):340–6. Epub 2021/12/28. pmid:34958894; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8704021.

35. Li M, Lou F, Fan H. SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron: currently the most complete "escapee" from neutralization by antibodies and vaccines. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022;7(1):28. Epub 2022/01/30. pmid:35091532; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8795721.

36. Dejnirattisai W, Huo J, Zhou D, Zahradník J, Supasa P, Liu C, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-B.1.1.529 leads to widespread escape from neutralizing antibody responses. Cell. 2022;185(3):467–84.e15. Epub 2022/01/27. pmid:35081335; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8723827.

37. Ugel S, De Sanctis F, Mandruzzato S, Bronte V. Tumor-induced myeloid deviation: when myeloid-derived suppressor cells meet tumor-associated macrophages. J Clin Invest 2015;125(9):3365–76. Epub 2015/09/02. pmid:26325033; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4588310.

38. Grossman JG, Nywening TM, Belt BA, Panni RZ, Krasnick BA, DeNardo DG, et al. Recruitment of CCR2(+) tumor associated macrophage to sites of liver metastasis confers a poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2018;7(9):e1470729. Epub 2018/09/20. pmid:30228938; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6140580.

39. Mitchell LA, Hansen RJ, Beaupre AJ, Gustafson DL, Dow SW. Optimized dosing of a CCR2 antagonist for amplification of vaccine immunity. Int Immunopharmacol 2013;15(2):357–63. Epub 2012/12/19. pmid:23246255; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3875337.

40. Green WR, O’Connor MA. HIV vaccines: Unmasking myeloid derived suppressor cells. EBioMedicine 2020;61:103063. Epub 2020/10/11. pmid:33038766; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7553988.

41. Sui Y, Hogg A, Wang Y, Frey B, Yu H, Xia Z, et al. Vaccine-induced myeloid cell population dampens protective immunity to SIV. J Clin Invest 2014;124(6):2538–49. Epub 2014/05/20. pmid:24837435; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4038576.

42. Yaseen MM, Abuharfeil NM, Darmani H. The impact of MDSCs on the efficacy of preventive and therapeutic HIV vaccines. Cell Immunol 2021;369:104440. Epub 2021/09/25. pmid:34560382.

43. Vaccari M, Fourati S, Brown DR, Silva de Castro I, Bissa M, Schifanella L, et al. Myeloid Cell Crosstalk Regulates the Efficacy of the DNA/ALVAC/gp120 HIV Vaccine Candidate. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1072. Epub 2019/05/30. pmid:31139193; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6527580.

44. Rowlands M, Segal F, Hartl D. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells as a Potential Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in COVID-19. Front Immunol 2021;12:697405. Epub 2021/07/06. pmid:34220859; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8250151.

45. Koushki K, Salemi M, Miri SM, Arjeini Y, Keshavarz M, Ghaemi A. Role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in viral respiratory infections; Hints for discovering therapeutic targets for COVID-19. Biomed Pharmacother 2021;144:112346–. Epub 10/15. pmid:34678727.

46. Lau YL, Peiris JS. Association of cytokine and chemokine gene polymorphisms with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Hong Kong Med J 2009;15 Suppl 2:43–6. Epub 2009/09/23. pmid:19258635.

47. Chen IY, Chang SC, Wu HY, Yu TC, Wei WC, Lin S, et al. Upregulation of the chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 via a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike-ACE2 signaling pathway. J Virol 2010;84(15):7703–12. Epub 2010/05/21. pmid:20484496; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2897593.

48. Yamamoto M, Ikezu T. CCR2 Chemokine Receptor. In: Enna SJ, Bylund DB, Elsevier Science, editors. XPharm: the comprehensive pharmacology reference. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier; 2007. p. 1–7.

49. Liu D, Cao Y, Zhang X, Peng C, Tian X, Yan C, et al. Chemokine CC-motif ligand 2 participates in platelet function and arterial thrombosis by regulating PKCalpha-P38MAPK-HSP27 pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol basis Dis. 2018;1864(9 Pt B):2901–12. Epub 2018/06/05. pmid:29864522.

50. Tacke F, Randolph GJ. Migratory fate and differentiation of blood monocyte subsets. Immunobiology 2006;211(6–8):609–18. Epub 2006/08/22. pmid:16920499.

51. Verweij SL, Duivenvoorden R, Stiekema LCA, Nurmohamed NS, van der Valk FM, Versloot M, et al. CCR2 expression on circulating monocytes is associated with arterial wall inflammation assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res 2018;114(3):468–75. Epub 2017/12/01. pmid:29186373.

52. Lin SJ, Lo M, Kuo RL, Shih SR, Ojcius DM, Lu J, et al. The pathological effects of CCR2+ inflammatory monocytes are amplified by an IFNAR1-triggered chemokine feedback loop in highly pathogenic influenza infection. J Biomed Sci 2014;21:99. Epub 2014/11/20. pmid:25407417; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4243311.

53. Lin KL, Sweeney S, Kang BD, Ramsburg E, Gunn MD. CCR2-antagonist prophylaxis reduces pulmonary immune pathology and markedly improves survival during influenza infection. J Immunol 2011;186(1):508–15. Epub 2010/11/26. pmid:21098218; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3723340.

54. Cui TX, Brady AE, Fulton CT, Zhang YJ, Rosenbloom LM, Goldsmith AM, et al. CCR2 Mediates Chronic LPS-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation and Hypoalveolarization in a Murine Model of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Front Immunol 2020;11:579628. Epub 2020/10/30. pmid:33117383; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7573800.

55. Suzuki T, Sato Y, Yamamoto H, Kato T, Kitase Y, Ueda K, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells stably transduced with an inhibitor of CC chemokine ligand 2 ameliorate bronchopulmonary dysplasia and pulmonary hypertension. Cytotherapy 2020;22(4):180–92. Epub 2020/03/07. pmid:32139242.

56. Shen Y, Wang D, Wang X. Role of CCR2 and IL-8 in acute lung injury: a new mechanism and therapeutic target. Expert Rev Respir Med 2011;5(1):107–14. Epub 2011/02/26. pmid:21348591.

57. Hogaboam CM, Carpenter KJ, Schuh JM, Proudfoot AA, Bridger G, Buckland KF. The therapeutic potential in targeting CCR5 and CXCR4 receptors in infectious and allergic pulmonary disease. Pharmacol Ther 2005;107(3):314–28. Epub 2005/07/13. pmid:16009428.

58. Gómez JC-LE, Albaiceta GM, García-Clemente M, López-Larrea C, Amado-Rodríguez L, et al. The CCR5-delta32 variant might explain part of the association between COVID-19 and the chemokine-receptor gene cluster. medRxiv. 2020.

59. Amsellem V, Lipskaia L, Abid S, Poupel L, Houssaini A, Quarck R, et al. CCR5 as a treatment target in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2014;130(11):880–91. Epub 2014/07/06. pmid:24993099; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4160408.

60. Rabaan AA, Al-Ahmed SH, Muhammad J, Khan A, Sule AA, Tirupathi R, et al. Role of Inflammatory Cytokines in COVID-19 Patients: A Review on Molecular Mechanisms, Immune Functions, Immunopathology and Immunomodulatory Drugs to Counter Cytokine Storm. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(5). Epub 2021/05/06. pmid:33946736; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8145892.

61. Mortaz E, Tabarsi P, Varahram M, Folkerts G, Adcock IM. The Immune Response and Immunopathology of COVID-19. Front Immunol 2020;11:2037. Epub 2020/09/29. pmid:32983152; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7479965.

62. Pairo-Castineira E, Clohisey S, Klaric L, Bretherick AD, Rawlik K, Pasko D, et al. Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19. Nature 2021;591(7848):92–8. Epub 2020/12/12. pmid:33307546.

63. Chen J, Lau YF, Lamirande EW, Paddock CD, Bartlett JH, Zaki SR, et al. Cellular immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection in senescent BALB/c mice: CD4+ T cells are important in control of SARS-CoV infection. J Virol 2010;84(3):1289–301. Epub 2009/11/13. pmid:19906920; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2812346.

64. Lu L, Zhang H, Zhan M, Jiang J, Yin H, Dauphars DJ, et al. Preventing Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: Which Cytokine to Target in a Raging Storm? Front Cell Dev Biol 2020;8:677. Epub 2020/08/09. pmid:32766256; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7379422.

65. Patterson BK, Seethamraju H, Dhody K, Corley MJ, Kazempour K, Lalezari JP, et al. Disruption of the CCL5/RANTES-CCR5 Pathway Restores Immune Homeostasis and Reduces Plasma Viral Load in Critical COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020. Epub 2020/06/09. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7277012. pmid:32511656

66. Patterson BK, Seethamraju H, Dhody K, Corley MJ, Kazempour K, Lalezari J, et al. CCR5 inhibition in critical COVID-19 patients decreases inflammatory cytokines, increases CD8 T-cells, and decreases SARS-CoV2 RNA in plasma by day 14. Int J Infect Dis 2021;103:25–32. Epub 2020/11/14. pmid:33186704; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7654230.

67. US Food and Drug Administration. Statement on Leronlimab. Website: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/statement-leronlimab. Last updated: May 17, 2021. Accessed March 2, 2022.

68. Maguire JJ, Jones KL, Kuc RE, Clarke MC, Bennett MR, Davenport AP. The CCR5 chemokine receptor mediates vasoconstriction and stimulates intimal hyperplasia in human vessels in vitro. Cardiovasc Res 2014;101(3):513–21. Epub 2013/12/11. pmid:24323316; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3928001.

69. Thompson MA. The return of PRO 140, a CCR5-directed mAb. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2018;13(4):346–53. Epub 2018/05/01. pmid:29708899.

70. Van Der Ryst E. Maraviroc—A CCR5 Antagonist for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection. Front Immunol 2015;6:277. Epub 2015/06/23. pmid:26097475; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4456946.

71. Dhody K, Pourhassan N, Kazempour K, Green D, Badri S, Mekonnen H, et al. PRO 140, a monoclonal antibody targeting CCR5, as a long-acting, single-agent maintenance therapy for HIV-1 infection. HIV Clin Trials 2018;19(3):85–93. Epub 2018/04/21. pmid:29676212.

72. Olson WC, Rabut GE, Nagashima KA, Tran DN, Anselma DJ, Monard SP, et al. Differential inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fusion, gp120 binding, and CC-chemokine activity by monoclonal antibodies to CCR5. J Virol 1999;73(5):4145–55. Epub 1999/04/10. pmid:10196311; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC104194.

73. Trkola A, Ketas TJ, Nagashima KA, Zhao L, Cilliers T, Morris L, et al. Potent, broad-spectrum inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by the CCR5 monoclonal antibody PRO 140. J Virol 2001;75(2):579–88. Epub 2001/01/03. pmid:11134270; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC113953.

74. Baba M, Takashima K, Miyake H, Kanzaki N, Teshima K, Wang X, et al. TAK-652 inhibits CCR5-mediated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in vitro and has favorable pharmacokinetics in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49(11):4584–91. Epub 2005/10/28. pmid:16251299; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1280155.

75. Byron MM, D’Antoni M, Premeaux T, Lefebvre E, Ndhlovu L. Dual CCR2/CCR5 antagonism by Cenicriviroc efficiently inhibits both MCP-1 and RANTES induced chemokine receptor internalization in murine pro-inflammatory monocytes (CCR6P.221). J Immunol 2015;194(1 Supplement):187.8–.8.

76. Karin N, Razon H. The role of CCR5 in directing the mobilization and biological function of CD11b(+)Gr1(+)Ly6C(low) polymorphonuclear myeloid cells in cancer. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy: CII 2018;67(12):1949–53. Epub 2018/09/21. pmid:30232521.

77. Dyer DP, Medina-Ruiz L, Bartolini R, Schuette F, Hughes CE, Pallas K, et al. Chemokine Receptor Redundancy and Specificity Are Context Dependent. Immunity. 2019;50(2):378–89.e5. Epub 2019/02/21. pmid:30784579; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6382461.

78. Zhao Q. Dual targeting of CCR2 and CCR5: therapeutic potential for immunologic and cardiovascular diseases. J Leukoc Biol 2010;88(1):41–55. Epub 2010/04/03. pmid:20360402.

79. Bansal M. Cardiovascular disease and COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020;14(3):247–50. Epub 2020/04/05. pmid:32247212; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7102662.

80. Stephenson E, Reynolds G, Botting RA, Calero-Nieto FJ, Morgan MD, Tuong ZK, et al. Single-cell multi-omics analysis of the immune response in COVID-19. Nat Med 2021;27(5):904–16. Epub 2021/04/22. pmid:33879890; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8121667.

81. Laurance S, Bertin FR, Ebrahimian T, Kassim Y, Rys RN, Lehoux S, et al. Gas6 Promotes Inflammatory (CCR2(hi)CX3CR1(lo)) Monocyte Recruitment in Venous Thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2017;37(7):1315–22. Epub 2017/04/30. pmid:28450294.

82. Schober A. Chemokines in vascular dysfunction and remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28(11):1950–9. Epub 2008/09/27. pmid:18818421.

83. Li R, Frangogiannis NG. Chemokines in cardiac fibrosis. Curr Opin Physiol 2021;19:80–91. Epub 2020/11/17. pmid:33195890; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7665080.

84. Ondracek AS, Lang IM. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps as Prognostic Markers in COVID-19: A Welcome Piece to the Puzzle. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2021;41(2):995–8. Epub 2021/05/07. pmid:33955780; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7837687.

85. Hofbauer TM, Ondracek AS, Mangold A, Scherz T, Nechvile J, Seidl V, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Induce MCP-1 at the Culprit Site in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020;8:564169. Epub 2020/11/27. pmid:33240874; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7680894.

86. Tacke F, Alvarez D, Kaplan TJ, Jakubzick C, Spanbroek R, Llodra J, et al. Monocyte subsets differentially employ CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1 to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest 2007;117(1):185–94. Epub 2007/01/04. pmid:17200718; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1716202.

87. Englert H, Rangaswamy C, Deppermann C, Sperhake JP, Krisp C, Schreier D, et al. Defective NET clearance contributes to sustained FXII activation in COVID-19-associated pulmonary thrombo-inflammation. EBioMedicine 2021;67:103382. Epub 2021/05/18. pmid:34000623; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8120108.

88. Henke PK, Pearce CG, Moaveni DM, Moore AJ, Lynch EM, Longo C, et al. Targeted deletion of CCR2 impairs deep vein thombosis resolution in a mouse model. J Immunol 2006;177(5):3388–97. Epub 2006/08/22. pmid:16920980.

89. Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol 2020;5(7):811–8. Epub 2020/03/29. pmid:32219356; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7101506.

90. D’Antoni ML, Mitchell BI, McCurdy S, Byron MM, Ogata-Arakaki D, Chow D, et al. Cenicriviroc inhibits trans-endothelial passage of monocytes and is associated with impaired E-selectin expression. J Leukoc Biol 2018;104(6):1241–52. Epub 2018/08/09. pmid:30088682; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6258344.

91. Conlon TM, John-Schuster G, Heide D, Pfister D, Lehmann M, Hu Y, et al. Inhibition of LTbetaR signalling activates WNT-induced regeneration in lung. Nature 2020;588(7836):151–6. Epub 2020/11/06. pmid:33149305; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7718297.

92. Krenkel O, Tacke F. Liver macrophages in tissue homeostasis and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2017;17(5):306–21. Epub 2017/03/21. pmid:28317925.

93. Cheng P, Li S, Chen H. Macrophages in Lung Injury, Repair, and Fibrosis. Cell. 2021;10(2). Epub 2021/03/07. pmid:33670759; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7923175.

94. Rosario MC, Jacqmin P, Dorr P, van der Ryst E, Hitchcock C. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic disease model to predict in vivo antiviral activity of maraviroc. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78(5):508–19. Epub 2005/12/03. pmid:16321617.

95. Krenkel O, Puengel T, Govaere O, Abdallah AT, Mossanen JC, Kohlhepp M, et al. Therapeutic inhibition of inflammatory monocyte recruitment reduces steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. Hepatology 2018;67(4):1270–83. Epub 2017/09/25. pmid:28940700.

96. Mossanen JC, Krenkel O, Ergen C, Govaere O, Liepelt A, Puengel T, et al. Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2-positive monocytes aggravate the early phase of acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury. Hepatology 2016;64(5):1667–82. Epub 2016/10/22. pmid:27302828.

97. Puengel T, Krenkel O, Kohlhepp M, Lefebvre E, Luedde T, Trautwein C, et al. Differential impact of the dual CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor cenicriviroc on migration of monocyte and lymphocyte subsets in acute liver injury. PLoS ONE 2017;12(9):e0184694. Epub 2017/09/15. pmid:28910354; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5598992.

98. Dorhoi A, Du Plessis N. Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Chronic Infections. Front Immunol 2017;8:1895. Epub 2018/01/23. pmid:29354120; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5758551.

99. Zhang ZN, Yi N, Zhang TW, Zhang LL, Wu X, Liu M, et al. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Associated With Disease Progression in Primary HIV Infection: PD-L1 Blockade Attenuates Inhibition. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;76(2):200–8. Epub 2017/06/02. pmid:28570288.

100. Sammicheli S, Kuka M, Di Lucia P, de Oya NJ, De Giovanni M, Fioravanti J, et al. Inflammatory monocytes hinder antiviral B cell responses. Sci Immunol. 2016;1(4). Epub 2016/11/22. pmid:27868108; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5111729.

101. Lefebvre E, Gottwald M, Lasseter K, Chang W, Willett M, Smith PF, et al. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and CCR2/CCR5 Antagonist Activity of Cenicriviroc in Participants With Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment. Clin Transl Sci 2016;9(3):139–48. Epub 2016/05/14. pmid:27169903; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5351328.

102. Tacke F. Cenicriviroc for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2018;27(3):301–11. Epub 2018/02/17. pmid:29448843.

103. Cuesta-Llavona E, Gómez J, Albaiceta GM, Amado-Rodríguez L, García-Clemente M, Gutiérrez-Rodríguez J, et al. Variant-genetic and transcript-expression analysis showed a role for the chemokine-receptor CCR5 in COVID-19 severity. Int Immunopharmacol 2021;98:107825–. Epub 06/02. pmid:34116286.

104. Hubacek JA, Dusek L, Majek O, Adamek V, Cervinkova T, Dlouha D, et al. CCR5Delta32 deletion as a protective factor in Czech first-wave COVID-19 subjects. Physiol Res. 2021;70(1):111–5. Epub 2021/03/18. pmid:33728925; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8820511.

105. Bernas SN, Baldauf H, Wendler S, Heidenreich F, Lange V, Hofmann JA, et al. CCR5Δ32 mutations do not determine COVID-19 disease course. Int J Infect Dis 2021;105:653–5. Epub 2021/03/06. pmid:33667698; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7923852.

106. Lim JK, Louie CY, Glaser C, Jean C, Johnson B, Johnson H, et al. Genetic deficiency of chemokine receptor CCR5 is a strong risk factor for symptomatic West Nile virus infection: a meta-analysis of 4 cohorts in the US epidemic. J Infect Dis 2008;197(2):262–5. Epub 2008/01/09. pmid:18179388.

107. Glass WG, McDermott DH, Lim JK, Lekhong S, Yu SF, Frank WA, et al. CCR5 deficiency increases risk of symptomatic West Nile virus infection. J Exp Med 2006;203(1):35–40. Epub 2006/01/19. pmid:16418398; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2118086.

108. Veklury (remdesivir) Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences, Inc.; 2021.

109. Schulte-Schrepping J, Reusch N, Paclik D, Bassler K, Schlickeiser S, Zhang B, et al. Severe COVID-19 Is Marked by a Dysregulated Myeloid Cell Compartment. Cell 2020;182(6):1419–40 e23. Epub 2020/08/19. pmid:32810438; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7405822.

110. Merad M, Martin JC. Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: a key role for monocytes and macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 2020;20(6):355–62. Epub 2020/05/08. pmid:32376901; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7201395.

111. QuantumLeap Healthcare Collaborative. I-SPY COVID-19 trial: an adaptive platform trial for critically ill patients Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine; July 2020 - [cited 2021]. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00417417.]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04488081.

112. Benjamin D. Immune modulators for treating COVID-19 (ACTIV-1 IM). Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine; October 2020 - [cited 2021]. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04593940]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04593940.

113. Tacke F. Charité Trial of Cenicriviroc (CVC) Treatment for COVID-19 Patients Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine; August 2020 - [cited 2021]. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04500418]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04500418.

114. Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative. Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative Concludes Cenicriviroc Not Likely to Reduce Time to Recovery or Mortality in Critically Ill Patients in I-SPY COVID Trial Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative28 April 2021 [cited 2021 2 September]. Available from: https://www.quantumleaphealth.org/media/quantum-leap-healthcare-collaborative-concludes-cenicriviroc-not-likely-to-reduce-time-to-recovery-or-mortality-in-critically-ill-patients-in-i-spy-covid-trial.