It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Global Environmental Assessments (GEAs) are in a unique position to influence environmental decision-making in the context of sustainability challenges. To do this effectively, however, new methods are needed to respond to the needs of decision-makers for a more integrated, contextualized and goal-seeking evaluation of different policies, geared for action from global to local. While scenarios are an important tool for GEAs to link short-term decisions and medium and long-term consequences, these current information needs cannot be met only through deductive approaches focused on the global level. In this paper, we argue that a more diverse set of futures tools operating at multiple scales are needed to improve GEA scenario development and analysis to meet the information needs of policymakers and other stakeholders better. Based on the literature, we highlight four challenges that GEAs need to be able to address in order to contribute to global environmental decision-making about the future: 1. anticipate unpredictable future conditions; 2. be relevant at multiple scales, 3. include diverse actors, perspectives and contexts; and 4. leverage the imagination to inspire action. We present a toolbox of future-oriented approaches and methods that can be used to effectively address the four challenges currently faced by GEAs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Kuiper, Jan J 2
; Selomane, Odirilwe 3
; Aguiar, Ana Paula D 4 ; Asrar, Ghassem R 5 ; Bennett, Elena M 6
; Biggs, Reinette 3
; Calvin, Katherine 7 ; Hedden, Steve 8 ; Hsu, Angel 9 ; Jabbour, Jason 10 ; King, Nicholas 11 ; Köberle, Alexandre C 12 ; Lucas, Paul 13 ; Nel, Jeanne 14 ; Norström, Albert V 2
; Peterson, Garry 2
; Sitas, Nadia 15
; Trisos, Christopher 16 ; van Vuuren, Detlef P 17 ; Vervoort, Joost 18
; Ward, James 19 1 Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
2 Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
3 Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
4 Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, São José dos Campos, Brazil
5 Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA
6 Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Bieler School of Environment, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
7 Joint Global Change Research Institute/Pacific Northwest National Lab, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
8 Pardee Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
9 Environmental Studies, Yale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore
10 Regional Office for North America, United Nations Environment Programme, Washington, DC, USA; Technischen Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
11 Research Unit for Environmental Assessment & Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
12 Energy Planning Program (Programa de Planejamento Energético, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
13 PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands
14 Environmental Research, Wageningen University Research, Wageningen, Netherlands; Sustainability Research Unit, Nelson Mandela University, George, South Africa
15 Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
16 SESYNC, University of Maryland, Anapolis, MD, USA; African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
17 Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands
18 Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
19 Environmental Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia




