It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
To date, no information has been published on the effectiveness of inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccines plus heterologous booster against symptomatic infection and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) during the dominance of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant period. We evaluated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 booster during the period of dominance of the Omicron variant in Brazil (January to April 2022). Using a test-negative design, we analysed data for 2,471,576 individuals tested during the Omicron variant’s dominant period using a nationally linked database from Brazil. Compared to unvaccinated, vaccinees maintained protection against severe outcomes, with an estimated VE of 84.1% (95% CI:83.2–84.9) at more than 120 days after BNT162b2 booster. Furthermore, while we detected a high level of protection against severe outcomes for individuals up to 79 years old, waning was observed for individuals aged ≥80 years, with VE decreasing from 81.3% (95% CI:77.9–84.2) at 31–60 days to 72.9% (95% CI:70.6–75.1) at 120 days or more after the booster dose. However, no significant protection against symptomatic infection was observed at this time period. In conclusion, except for individuals aged ≥80 years, CoronaVac plus a BNT162b2 booster dose offered high and durable protection against severe outcomes due to Omicron.
Primary CoronaVac vaccination followed by a BNT162b2 booster dose confers protection against some SARS-CoV-2 variants but its effectiveness against Omicron is unknown. Here, the authors show that this combination confers a high level of protection against severe outcomes for up to 120 days, with evidence of waning for those aged 80 or older.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fiocruz, LIB and LEITV Laboratories, Salvador, Brazil (GRID:grid.418068.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0723 0931); Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil (GRID:grid.8399.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 8259)
2 Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil (GRID:grid.8399.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 8259); Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fiocruz, Center for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Salvador, Brazil (GRID:grid.418068.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0723 0931)
3 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.8991.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0425 469X)
4 Universidade de Brasília. Escola Fiocruz de Governo, Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Fiocruz, Brazil (GRID:grid.7632.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 5157)
5 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.412211.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 5267); Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.8536.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 473X)