Direct admission vs. secondary transfer for mechanical thrombectomy: long-term clinical outcomes from a single Polish Comprehensive Stroke Centre

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare 3-month clinical outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients transferred directly to a comprehensive stroke centre (‘mothership’, MS) to the outcomes of patients transferred secondarily from primary stroke centres (‘drip-and-ship’, DAS) in Lubelskie province, the third largest province in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective stroke registry, all patients with large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation admitted within six hours of onset and treated with MT between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients was evaluated: 267 treated with the MS approach and 133 with the DAS approach. Time from stroke onset to groin puncture was shorter in the MS group. There was a significant difference in 3-month excellent clinical outcomes (mRS 0–1) between these two groups (32.9% of MS patients vs. 22.5% of DAS patients, p < 0.05), but there was no difference if the 3-month endpoint was expressed as mRS ≤ 2 (42.3% of MS vs. 34.5% of DAS patients, p = 0.13). The rate of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and mortality was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that direct admission to a comprehensive stroke centre resulted in more patients achieving excellent treatment outcomes (mRS 0–1). At the same time, the superiority of the MT model over the DAS model in obtaining mRS 0–2 was not unequivocally demonstrated. Further studies are needed to determine the best stroke model for patients potentially eligible for MT.