1. Introduction
The use of medicinal plants has been a constant since ancient times, to such a degree that the World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes its important value. Nowadays, it is calculated that 80% of the world population makes use of these types of plants to treat illnesses and diseases [1]. Of the nearly 250,000–500,000 species of plants on earth, 20,000 have medicinal properties and function as a drug source [2], while 60–70% of the total worldwide number of medicinal plants are found in Latin America [3].
Mexico possesses 10% of the global flora, and its southeast region is endowed with a profound bio-cultural wealth, being the richest region of the country with more than 8000 species of vascular plants employed for medicinal purposes [4]. The major part of the Mexican tropical forest that possesses most of the flora and fauna species, including those under protection, is located in this area.
These tropical areas represent 11% of the total land of Mexico and point to the southeast as the most suitable area for the study of active compounds based on natural products [4,5].
In Mexico, between 15 and 20 million people use traditional medicine, highlighting its prolonged use in the southern region, where around 10 million indigenous people and 56 ethnic groups live, allowing an extended knowledge of the use of natural medicinal plants [6]. The southeast of Mexico is associated with unique vegetation, such as the Lacandon jungle, located in the Chiapas state, where many ethnic groups still reside, such as Choles, Chujes, Lacandones, Mames, Mochos, Jacaltecos, Tzeltales, Tojolabales, Tzotziles and Zoques [7]. Those ethnic groups keep their traditions and folklore along with their ancient herblore.
On the other hand, infectious diseases are one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in half of the developing countries. In Mexico, the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) points out that around 20% of deaths in the Mexican south are due to infections [8]. However, the death rate increases when people have chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus (DM). According to the information of herbal treatments, most of the diseases that are treated with medicinal plants in the country are those with symptoms related to bacterial and parasitic affections, including diarrhea, abdominal pain, dysentery, and parasites [9]. This epidemiologic profile is consistent with the reports of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), relating the prevalence of infectious diseases to the indigenous areas of the country. Furthermore, the incidence of DM has increased due to globalization, modernization, and changes in human lifestyle. It is estimated that around 530 million people between 20 and 79 years of age are affected by diabetes in the world. In Mexico, more than 15% of the adult population suffers from this disease, which still has no cure [10,11].
One of the most common treatments applied in patients with DM is the use of postprandial carbohydrate absorption inhibitors. These drugs inhibit some enzymes, such as α-glucosidase but with undesirable side effects [12]. As a result, the potential of medicinal plants for this purpose has already been evaluated [13]. Furthermore, another prevention measure, along with a balanced diet and moderate exercise, is the supplementation of antioxidants in the diet, helping to reduce the presence of free radicals in the system, given that the close relationship between diabetes and oxidative stress is already well known [14]. Based on the above, the use of medicinal plants could contribute to the complementary treatment of DM, both by slowing the absorption of carbohydrates and providing antioxidants that protect the body from damage caused by oxidant agents.
During the last 20 years, the research in the field of natural products has re-emerged due to the discovery and development of new molecules with pharmaceutical interest based on the ethno-medical knowledge; more than 90% of the vegetal species have not been studied exhaustively yet [15]. For this reason, further studies in this area are needed.
Therefore, based on epidemiological data and empirical knowledge, we studied medicinal plants that are commonly used by ethnic groups from southeast Mexico to probe their efficacy and corroborate their medicinal properties.
2. Results
2.1. Medicinal Plants
Seven medicinal plants used in Chiapas, Mexico, to treat gastrointestinal affections were collected. Table 1 provides specific information on each medicinal plant.
2.2. Yield of Extraction and Phytochemical Screening
The obtained percent of yield extraction by a maceration technique and a mixture of CH2Cl2:MeOH (1:1) ranged between 1.17 for T. oliviformis and 5.92 for G. odorata. The phytochemical screening in the seven extracts showed the presence of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, phenolic compounds, coumarins, alkaloids and steroids. Results for each extract are shown in Table 2.
2.3. Antimicrobial Activity
Seven bacteria strains were used to determine the MIC. Extracts from G. odorata, H. angiospermum, J. spicigera, T. nelsonii and T. oliviformis demonstrated inhibitory effects against E. faecalis (Table 3). It was observed that T. nelsonii inhibits the growth of E. cloacae, E. aerogenes and P. aeuroginosa but also J. spicigera, and T. oliviformis inhibited this last strain. None of the analyzed extracts inhibit the growth of K. neumoniae or E. coli. The extracts from C. dodecandra and L. collinsii did not show any antibacterial activity by this assay.
2.4. Antioxidant, Antihemolytic, Anti-α-Glucosidase and Toxicity Activities
The antioxidant activity related to the DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging effect of the extracts was compared with Trolox. Samples with an EC50 ≤ 50 μg/mL were considered with relevant antioxidant activity. J. spicigera, L. collinsii and T. nelsonii exhibited the greatest antioxidant effect. On the other hand, AAPH was used to form peroxyl radicals and induce oxidation in human erythrocytes. The anti-hemolytic effect was observed for extracts of H. angioespermum, L. collinsii, J. spicigera and T. nelsonii, where the last two had the greatest effect with mean inhibitory concentration values of 13.5 ± 4 and 9.2 ± 2 μg/mL, respectively. For the anti-α-glucosidase activity test, T. nelsonii extract exhibited a significant glucosidase enzymatic inhibition with an IC50 value of 193 ± 20 μg/mL with respect to acarbose (120 ± 20 μg/mL).
Regarding toxicity, the lethal dose (LD50) for an extract to be considered non-toxic is ≤1000 μg/mL, those between 1000 and 500 μg/mL are considered slightly toxic, between 500 and 100 μg/mL are moderately toxic, and between 100 and 10 μg/mL are considered highly toxic [30]. According to these criteria, G. odorata, J. spicigera and L. collinsii with LD50 of 780.9 ± 11 μg/mL, 841.2 ± 27 μg/mL and 820.5 ± 40 μg/mL, respectively, are slightly toxic; C. dodecandra (310.5 ± 15 μg/mL) and H. angiospermum (430.2 ± 20 μg/mL) are moderately toxic, and T. nelsonii with an LD50 of 14 μg/mL is highly toxic, with lower values than the positive control (K2Cr2O7), with LD50 of 18 μg/mL. All these biological activities are shown in Table 4.
3. Discussion
With the aim to contribute to the studies and knowledge of the Mexican ethnopharmacognosy, the present study evaluated some of the biological and chemical properties of seven native plants from the southeast of the country that are used traditionally for medicinal purposes.
For the extraction of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants, organic solvents are commonly used since they allow greater extraction of the compounds and easier handling of the extracts obtained due to the high point of evaporation of water, as well as the low extraction of compounds from moderate to low polarity [31]. Related to this, it has already been shown that the extraction mixture of CH2Cl2:MeOH (1:1) allows the extraction of a wide diversity of compounds, such as terpenes, flavonoids, iridoids, and saponins [32,33,34,35,36], with different biological activities (antibacterial, antifungal, cytotoxic, antioxidant, etc.). Moreover, a higher efficiency in the extraction of bioactive withanolides has been observed using this mixture of CH2Cl2:MeOH (1:1) solvents, instead of using dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, hexane, and methanol separately [37], allowing us to have in this way a more efficient investigation of the active extracts obtained from medicinal plants.
Regarding MIC results, it is considered that the strains with minimal inhibitory concentrations of 0.06 mg/mL or less are sensitive to the extracts, and those strains with a MIC between 0.12 and 2 mg/mL have a medium sensitivity, but those over 2 mg/mL are highly resistant [38]. According to these results and with the aforementioned information, E. faecalis (Gram-positive) is sensitive to the extracts of H. angiospermum, J. spicigera and T. oliviformis, highly resistant to the extracts of C. dodecandra and L. collinsii, and presents a medium sensitivity to the rest of the plants. The methanolic extract of T. nelsonii was previously reported with an MIC of 100 mg/mL against P. mirabilis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and C. albican [39]. The mixture of solvents used in the extraction of bioactives from T. nelsonii could have contributed to the fact that a greater biological effect was observed in our study. The bactericidal activity of J. spicigera and T. oliviformis was previously demonstrated against E. coli and S. aureus [40,41]. It is important to mention the effect of T. nelsonii, J. spicigera and T. oliviformis against P. aeuroginosa, considering that it is an important cause of infection, and there is an increasing antibiotic resistance for this strain [42]. Therefore, the extract of J. spicigera with an MIC of 0.5 mg/mL could open an opportunity to find interesting bioactive compounds.
G. odorata shows moderate activity against S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. aerogenes and E. cloacae, and the presence of ursolic acid could be related to this effect, as it was previously reported as the active compound of G. odorata against S. aureus [43]. H. angiospermum exhibited potent activity against E. faecalis; the effect of the ethanolic extract has already been demonstrated on S. aureus, S. epidermidis, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae [44], pointing out that active compounds of this species are polar in nature, which could explain the differences to our data when the polarity decreased when mixing methanol and dichloromethane.
To demonstrate the antiradical/antioxidant effect, the hydrogen-donating potential of samples was evaluated by DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging activity. The extracts from J. spicigera, L. collinsii and T. nelsonii could be considered to have powerful antioxidant activity, with J. spicigera being the one showing the best antioxidant results in both analysis; however, none of them had a similar effect to the positive control. However, the Trolox is a pure compound as opposed to extracts that have an unknown number. Antioxidant studies [45,46] from the genera Tagetes report an EC50 under 50 μg/mL and thus support the present results. Flavonoids and monoterpenoids found in these plant extracts could be responsible for their antioxidant activity, while previous reports indicate that quercetin and kaempferol are flavonoid compounds allowing this biological activity [47]. An analysis of J. spicigera in different states: fresh, dry and storage, shows that the phenolic compounds found in the plant provide the antioxidant activity, hence indicating that the best ABTS radical scavenging activity was traced in the fresh extract; according to this, we can suggest that we may be able to improve our results if fresh material is used in further studies [48].
Although free radicals used in in vitro assays are useful for demonstrating the antioxidant potential of a sample, it has recently been suggested that there is a need to show the effects in a more complex physiological system in more detail; thus, the powerful antioxidant effect shown by some species using the AAPH radical-induced hemolysis protection assay in human erythrocytes was confirmed since this system is considered as an ex vivo model [49]. The inhibitory activity of extracts against peroxyl radicals induced by an AAPH hemolytic agent was found as Tagetes nelsonii (IC50 9.2 ± 2 μg/mL) > J. spicigera (IC50 13.5 ± 42 μg/mL) > L. collinsii (IC50 60.8 ± 172 μg/mL) where ascorbic acid, a standard antioxidant agent, displayed IC50 of 297 μg/mL ± 30. The antihemolytic activity of polar extracts of 30 plants was reported by Sangkitikomol in 2012. Plants such as Mexican marigold (Tagetes erecta), Guaje (Leucaena leucocephala), Guava (Psidium guajava), Rose (Rosa domescena), and Green tea (Camellia sinensis) showed enhanced protection, increasing the time required to reach 50% hemolysis above 210 min, compared to 120 min observed for the APPH agent. The protective role was attributed to the polyphenol content of the plant as these compounds interact with the erythrocyte membrane components through hydrogen bonds, which in turn prevents the oxidation of proteins and lipids of the membrane [49].
Antioxidants present in medicinal plants are considered important due to their numerous health benefits, as they contain a wide variety of molecules that scavenge free radicals, such as phenolic, alkaloids, and terpenoids [50]. On the other hand, free radicals may also be related to the development and complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) [51]. DM is a public health problem that is characterized by high blood glucose levels. The usual therapy for the treatment of diabetes is to postpone the absorption of glucose by inhibiting carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes, such as α-glucosidase. Acarbose is the most extensively used α-glucosidase inhibitor but has gastrointestinal side effects [52]. As medicinal plants are potential sources of drugs, α-glucosidase inhibitors screened from plants have been studied intensively in recent years [53]. In this investigation, Tagetes nelsonii extract showed remarkable α-glycosidase inhibitory effects with EC50 = 193 ± 20 μg/mL, although lower activity than the hydrophilic extract of Tagetes erecta flower with EC50 = 60 μg/mL. This flower extract has rich phenolic acids (sinapic, ferulic, and p-coumaric acids) and flavonoids (kaempferol and myricetin), which are the most abundant compounds and the most enzymatic inhibitors possible [54].
One of the main objectives of research groups involved in the study of medicinal plants has been to develop and use cheap, reproducible, and easy-to-use assays. Within this group of bioassays, the lethality test on Artemia spp larvae stands out. [55,56]. This test is used to determine the general toxicity of samples (extracts, fractions and/or compounds). The correlation between the results reported on Artemia salina and mice has already been established [57]. All tested species except T. nelsonii showed moderate to low toxicity in the Artemia assay, and it is interesting to note that in our study J. spicigera (LD50 = 841.2 ± 27 μg/mL) did not exhibit severe toxicity, whereas Vega et al. [58] reported the cytotoxicity (ED50 < 20 μg/mL) of ethanolic extract against T47D and HeLa cancer cell lines, this difference may be due to the type of the analyzed extracts. Likewise, and based on the obtained results, T. nelsonii has the potential for the development of anticancer compounds due to the correlation between the Artemia assay with human solid tumor cell lines [51,59]. In relation to the above, 7-methoxycoumarin and 6,7-dimethoxycoumarin were isolated from the hexane leaf extract of Tagetes lucida, showing high cytotoxicity to A. salina, with LC50 values of 28 and 238 μg/mL [60].
On the other hand, some compounds present in the studied species (Table 1) have shown interesting biological activities. For instance, C. dodecandra, in which the cordiaquinone, menaquinone, quercetin, and rosmrinic acid have been studied for the design of antimicrobial and antineoplastic agents [61,62,63,64]. The amyrins and b-sitosterol reported in H. angiospermum have shown an important antioxidant and cytotoxic effect [65,66]. Likewise, preclinical studies of kaempferol have already been carried out in a wide range of pharmacological activities, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer, and antidiabetic properties [67], and this compound has also been reported in J. spicigera. Moreover, the monoterpenes dihydrotagetone, E-β-tagetone and ocimenones, present in the volatile fraction of T. nelsonii, have been reported to have an antifungal and antibacterial effect [68,69]. In our study, we observed that T. nelsonii has cytotoxic and antihyperglycemic compounds with high antioxidant capacity that merits further studies for the development of DM and cancer therapies.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Collections and Identification
Fresh plants were collected in Tuxtla Gutierrez, San Fernando and Zinacantan, State of Chiapas, Mexico. Samples were identified at the species level by the Botanic department at the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Specimens were deposited in the herbarium of the College of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León under the following voucher numbers; Gaultheria odorata (025884), Cordida dodecandra (025879), Heliotropium angiospermum (025880), Talisia oliviformis (025881), Leucaena collinsii spp. Collinsii (025882), Tagetes nelsonii (025883) and Justicia spicigera (25114). Table 1 provides the specific information about each plant.
4.2. Extraction
Different aerial parts were used for the extractions. For G. odorata and H. angiospermum, the leaves, stems and flowers were used; for L. collinsii and T. oliviformis, we used the seeds and leaves, respectively; for C. dodecandra only the bark and for T. nelsonii and L. collinsii exclusively stems and leaves were used.
In each case, 30 g of the finely ground air-dried plants was extracted through the maceration technique with a mix of solvents dichloromethane: methanol (1:1). Afterward, three successive extractions by sonication for 20 min each were performed [37]. Extracts were filtered and concentrated using a rotary evaporator (Yamato Model RE2000). The extracts were weighed, and the percentage yields were calculated. The obtained extracts were stored at 4 °C until use.
Phytochemical Assay
The organic extracts were assessed for phytochemical screening using the methodology proposed by Harborne [70]. A colorimetric reaction, the appearance of solids or foam during the identification reactions, allows a semi-quantitative evaluation of the presence of secondary metabolites. All solvents and chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA).
4.3. Antimicrobial Activity
4.3.1. Test Organisms
Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeuroginosa were tested. A bacterial suspension was prepared using 24 h cultures of the above-mentioned microorganisms, and turbidity was adjusted to 1.0 McFarland standard, which corresponded to 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL.
4.3.2. Antibacterial Activity Assay
The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each extract was determined in 96-well microplates by the broth microdilution method. The concentration of the extracts that caused complete inhibition of growth after 24 h of incubation was considered active [71]. Samples were dissolved in Mueller–Hinton medium (purchased from BD GmbH, Heidelberg/Germany) with 10% DMSO and 100 µL was added per well, making serial dilutions of each extract (0.016 to 2 mg/mL). Gentamycin was used as a positive control (16–0.063 × 10−3 mg/mL). Then, 5 µL of inoculum containing each microorganism was added to each well. All assays were performed in triplicate.
4.4. Antioxidant/Antiradical Activities
4.4.1. Antiradical Assays
DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging activity was determined by mixing 100 µL of extracts dissolved in methanol (from 100 to 6.25 μg/mL) and 100 µL of DPPH aqueous solution (2 mg/L) in a 96-well microplate. The decrease in absorbance at 517 nm was measured in a microplate reader; mean values were obtained from triplicate experiments [72]. To evaluate ABTS (2,2’-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonic acid)) radical scavenging activity, the free radical was prepared by mixing 10 mM ABTS stock solution with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate and leaving the mixture for 16 h. Then, the ABTS solution was diluted with ethanol to absorb 0.7 ± 0.05 at 734 nm. The assay was conducted by adding 200 µL of ABTS solution and 20 µL of the extract samples; measurements were taken at 734 nm after 6 min in darkness [72]. Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) was used as control. The percentage of inhibition was calculated by: % inhibition = [(Abs control − Abssample)/Abscontrol] × 100, where: Abscontrol: control absorbance, and Abssample: sample absorbance. Half effective concentration (EC50) was calculated from the dose–response curve obtained. The EC50 is the concentration (or dose) effective in producing 50% of the maximal response.
4.4.2. Antihemolytic Assay
The AAPH (2-2-Azobis (2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride) was used to form peroxyl radicals and induce oxidation in red blood cells. The antihemolytic assay was performed according to the methodology proposed by Monroy-García et al. with slight modifications [73]. The approval to work with human blood was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Departamento de Quimica de la FCB: UANL-CA-180-2019) with previous informed consent. A total of 5 mL from a healthy male donor was collected by venipuncture in tubes with anticoagulant (EDTA). Then, the blood was centrifuged to separate erythrocytes from plasma at 1500 rpm for 12 min at 25 °C and washed three times with 10 mL of PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4) pH 7.4. After that, erythrocytes were suspended in 8 mL of PBS to achieve a density of 8 × 109 cells/mL. For the inhibition of hemolysis assay, the erythrocytes suspension was mixed with the extracts dissolved in PBS at serial dilution concentrations of 8 to 500 μg/mL and 300 mM AAPH in PBS (1:1:1 v/v/v). The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 3 h with agitation. Afterward, the mixture was diluted with eight volumes of PBS and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The absorbance (A) of the supernatant was recorded at 540 nm. Percent inhibition was calculated by the following equation: % Inhibition = [AAAPH − As]/[AAAPH × 100], where AAAPH is the absorbance of AAPH at 540 nm and As is the absorbance of the extracts at 540 nm. Half inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated from the dose–response curve obtained by plotting the percentage of hemolysis inhibition versus the extract concentration.
4.5. Anti-α-Glucosidase Assay
The enzymatic inhibition activity was evaluated according to the chromogenic method described in the literature [73]. All enzymes and chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The glucosidase solution (0.8 U/mL on PBS pH 6.8) was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Then, a 1:1 mixture of extracts (dissolved on PBS pH 6.8) and α-glucosidase were incubated in 96-well plates at 37 °C for 15 min. Later, 50 µL of 625 mM p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (PNPG) solution was added to each well and incubated for another 15 min. Finally, the reaction was stopped by adding 100 µL of 0.2 M Na2CO3. The absorbance was read at 405 nm. An acarbose solution was used as a control. The assay was performed in triplicate, and the data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were determined through a probit regression. The percentage of inhibition was calculated using the following equation:
% inhibition = [(Abs control − Abssample)/Abscontrol] × 100
4.6. Toxic Activity Assay
The brine shrimp (Artemia salina) lethality bioassay was performed to detect the potential toxic activity of each plant, according to Meyer et al. [55]. A. salina cysts were obtained from Prodac-México, hatched and cultivated in the laboratory, and after 48-h incubation in a warm room, nauplii were exposed to three different sample concentration (1000, 500, 300, 100, 50 and 10 μg/mL) containing 10 organisms/5 mL and incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. Vials were then examined, the number of living and dead shrimp nauplii were counted, and the median lethal dose (LD50) was calculated. Sea water, DMSO (1%) and K2Cr2O7 were used as controls.
4.7. Statistical Analysis
The values were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). The differences among means were performed using a one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s comparison of means. The statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS (version 18) program. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.
5. Conclusions
The present study makes several noteworthy contributions to Mexican ethnopharmacology since this is the first report of biological properties and preliminary phytoscreening for C. dodecandra and L. collinsii, endemic species from the tropical regions of the Mexican southeast. T. oliviformis showed the best bactericidal effect against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and did not show toxicity on A. salina nauplii. Furthermore, this is the first study to investigate the toxicity of T. nelsonii as a good candidate for possible cytotoxic and antihyperglycemic compounds with high antioxidant capacity, leaving a potential area for future research. Our findings provide valuable contributions and validate the common use of some of the plants used in southeast Mexico.
Bioassays, L.D.L.C.-J. and M.A.H.-T.; conceptualization, L.D.L.C.-J. and E.V.-V.; antibacterial methodology supervision, C.R.-M. and M.J.V.-S.; antioxidant and enzymatic inhibition assays supervision, I.N.M.-G. and E.V.-V.; toxic methodology supervision, V.G.-V.; project administration, E.V.-V., L.D.L.C.-J., I.N.M.-G. and E.V.-V. writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Departamento de Quimica de la FCB: UANL-CA-180-2019.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
The original contributions generated for this study are included in the article; the data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Author M.A.H.-T. thanks CONACyT (Mexico) for his doctoral scholarship no. 809104, MEXICO.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Scientific and common name, useful part, uses, and chemical compounds reported in the analyzed medicinal plants.
| Scientific Name | Common Name | Collected Part | Traditional Application | Chemical Compounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cordia dodecandra | Cupapé | Cortex | Diarrhea [ |
Cordiaquinone, menaquinone, rosmarinic acid, allantoin, quercetin, syringin, salvianolic acid B [ |
| Gaultheria odorata | Arrayán | Flora, folia and caulis | Fever, diarrhea, stomach pain [ |
Not Reported |
| Heliotropium angiospermum | Cola de alacrán | Flora, folia and caulis | Gastroenteritis, stomach pain, diarrhea [ |
1α-2α-epoxy-1β-hydroxymethyl-8α-pyrrolizidine, α-amyrin, β-amyrin y β-sitosterol, A-blumenol, B-blumenol, loliolide, putrescine, spermine, turneforcidine, platynecine [ |
| Justicia spicigera | Muicle | Folia and caulis | Diarrhea, stomach pain, dysentery, anticancer properties [ |
Allantoin, Kaempferitrin, kaempferol, β-glucosyl-O-sitosterol, Cryptoxanthin [ |
| Leucaena collinsii | Guash | Semina | Anthelmintic [ |
Not Reported |
| Tagetes nelsonii | Chilchahua | Folia and caulis | Diarrhea, parasites, abdominal pain [ |
Dihydrotagetone, E-β-tagetone, Z-β-tagetone, cis-tagetone, limonene, trans-β-ocimene, α-terpineol,9-epi-(E)-cariofilene, cis-muurola-4(14),5-diene, γ-gurjunene, γ-himachelene, γ-morfene [ |
| Talisia oliviformis | Guaya | Folia | Abdominal pain, fever, diarrhea [ |
Not Reported |
Yield of extraction and phytochemical screening of the medicinal plant extracts.
| Extract Plant | Yield (%) | Alk | Coum | Flav | Phen | RS | Ter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. dodecandra | 1.59 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| G. odorata | 5.92 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| H. angiospermum | 3.72 | + | − | − | − | + | + |
| J. spicigera | 1.92 | ++ | − | + | + | + | + |
| L. collinsii | 2.11 | − | + | − | − | + | + |
| T. nelsonii | 5.04 | + | − | ++ | ++ | + | ++ |
| T. oliviformis | 1.17 | − | + | − | + | + | + |
Alk: alkaloid, Coum: coumarins, Flav: flavonoids, Phen: phenolics, RS: reducing sugars, Ter: triterpenoids; (++): abundant, (+): present, (−)absent.
Antimicrobial activity of the medicinal plant extracts.
| Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (mg/mL) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract Plant | S. aureus | E. faecalis | E. coli | P. aeuroginosa | E. aerogenes | K. neumoniae | E. cloacae |
| C. dodecandra | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 |
| G. odorata | 1 | 0.5 | >2 | >2 | 1 | >2 | 1 |
| H. angiospermum | 1 | 0.06 | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 |
| J. spicigera | 0.5 | 0.06 | >2 | 0.5 | 1 | >2 | >2 |
| L. collinsii | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 | >2 |
| T. nelsonii | >2 | 0.13 | >2 | 1 | 1 | >2 | 0.5 |
| T. oliviformis | 1 | 0.06 | >2 | 1 | 0.5 | >2 | 1 |
| * Control | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.001 |
* Gentamicin was used as positive control; n = 3.
Antioxidant, antihemolytic, anti-α-glucosidase and toxicity activities of the medicinal plant extracts.
| Effective Doses or Median Lethal (μg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract Plant | DPPH | ABTS | AAPH | α- Glucosidase | Toxicity |
| C. dodecandra | >100 | >100 | >500 | >500 | 310.5 ± 15 c |
| G. odorata | >100 | >100 | >500 | >500 | 780.9 ± 11 a |
| H. angiospermum | >100 | 75.6 ± 11 a | 351. 4 ± 65 a | >500 | 430.2 ± 20 b |
| J. spicigera | 35.8 ± 3.5 b | 15.7 ± 0.8 d | 13.5 ± 4 c | 268 ± 15 b | 841.2 ± 27 a |
| L. collinsii | 42.5 ± 2.5 a,b | 39.7 ± 4.9 b | 60. 8 ± 17 b | 323 ± 50 a | 820.5 ± 40 a |
| T. nelsonii | 47.7 ± 3.3 a | 28.2 ± 1.7 c | 9.2 ± 2 c | 193 ± 20 c | 14 ± 1 d |
| T. oliviformis | >100 | >100 | >500 | >500 | >1000 |
| * Control | 7.3 ± 2.5 c | 5.4 ± 0.2 e | 297 ± 30 a | 120 ± 20 d | 18 ± 3 d |
* K2Cr2O7 was used as positive control in toxicity assays; Trolox on DPPH and ABTS antioxidant assays; ascorbic acid and acarbose were used for AAPH-induced hemolysis assay and inhibition of α-Glucosidase assays, respectively; n = 3, p < 0.05.
References
1. Muhammad, A.; Akash, T.; Roqaia, B.; Sakina, M.; Bibi, F.; Nawab, A.; Rahman, H.; Shinwari, Z.K. Traditional medicines and their in-vitro proof against Staphylococcus aureus in Pakistan. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med.; 2018; 11, pp. 355-368. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1995-7645.234763]
2. Fabricant, D.; Farnsworth, N. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug Discovery. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2011; 11, (Suppl. S109), pp. 69-75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s169]
3. Sasidharan, S.; Chen, Y.; Saravanan, D.; Sundram, K.M.; Yoga, L. Extraction, isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds from plant’s extracts. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement Altern. Med.; 2011; 8, pp. 1-10. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22238476]
4. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/semarnat/articulos/bosques-tropicales-ecosistemas-con-gran-riqueza-de-especies?idiom=es (accessed on 24 June 2022).
5. Arias, J. Del indiocidio al consumo de las indignidades o ¿indiofagia?. Rev. Difusión Científica Tecnológica Hum.; 1993; 3, 14.
6. Fierro, A. Plantas medicinales: Un complemento vital para la salud de los mexicanos. Rev. Digit. Universia; 2009; 10, pp. 1-9.
7. De la Cruz-Jiménez, L.; Guzmán-Lucio, M.; Viveros-Valdez, E. Traditional medicinal plants used for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in Chiapas, México. World Appl. Sci. J.; 2014; 31, pp. 508-515. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.31.04.8381]
8. Sharma, A.; Flores-Vallejo, R.; Cardoso-Taketa, A.; Villarreal, M.L. Antibacterial activities of medicinal plants used in Mexican traditional medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2017; 208, pp. 264-329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.04.045]
9. Freyermuth, G. Médicos Tradicionales y Médicos alópatas. Un encuentro difícil en los Altos de Chiapas; Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social: Mexico City, México, 1993; pp. 26-28.
10. Sharma, B.; Xie, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, W.; Zhou, Q.; Xiang, M.; Zhou, S.; Lv, W.; Jia, Y.; Pokhrel, L. et al. Recent advance on PTP1B inhibitors and their biomedical applications. Eur. J. Med. Chem.; 2020; 199, pp. 1-14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112376]
11. International Diabetes Federation. Global picture. In IDF Diabetes Atlas; 10th ed. Boyco, E.J.; Magliano, D.J.; Karuranga, S.; Piemonte, L.; Riley, P.; Saeedi, P.; Sun, H. International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2021; pp. 34-62.
12. Djeujo, F.M.; Ragazzi, E.; Urettini, M.; Sauro, B.; Cichero, E.; Tonelli, M.; Froldi, G. Magnolol and Luteolin Inhibition of α-Glucosidase Activity: Kinetics and Type of Interaction Detected by In Vitro and In Silico Studies. Pharmaceuticals; 2022; 15, 205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15020205]
13. Kasabri, V.; Afifi, F.U.; Hamdan, I. In vitro and in vivo acute antihyperglycemic effects of five selected indigenous plants from Jordan used in traditional medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2011; 133, pp. 888-896. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.11.025]
14. Zhang, P.; Li, T.; Wu, X.; Nice, E.C.; Huang, C.; Zhang, Y. Oxidative stress and diabetes: Antioxidative strategies. Front. Med.; 2020; 14, pp. 583-600. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11684-019-0729-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32248333]
15. Estrada, L. La importancia de las ciencias químico- biológicas en la medicina tradicional. Memorias del primer coloquio de “medicina tradicional” ¿Un saber en extinción?; Escuela Nacional de Estudios Profesionales Zaragoza: México, Ciudad de México, 2007; pp. 112-115.
16. Biblioteca Digital de la Medicina Tradicional Mexicana. Available online: http://www.medicinatradicionalmexicana.unam.mx/apmtm/index.html (accessed on 24 June 2022).
17. Indalí, R.; Sánchez, A.; Ayora, T.; Ventura, L.; Abud, M. Actividad antimicrobiana y citotoxicidad celular de extractos metanólicos de cupapé (Cordia dodecandra). VI International Congress of Biochemistry Engineering, VIII Scientific Conferences of Biomedicine and Molecular Biotechnology; División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, ITECH: Chihuahua, México, 2010.
18. Sánchez-Recillas, A.; Rivero-Medina, L.; Ortiz-Andrade, R.; Araujo-León, J.A.; Flores-Guido, J.S. Airway smooth muscle relaxant activity of Cordia dodecandra A. DC. mainly by cAMP increase and calcium channel blockade. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2019; 229, pp. 280-287. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2018.10.013] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342193]
19. Aguilar-Vázquez, R.; Quijano, L. Compuestos químicos del extracto metanólico en tallos de Cordia dodecandra. Revista Latinoamericana de Química; Navarrete, A. MIXIM: Estado de México, México, 2016; Volume 44, 98.
20. Brent, B. La Herbolaria Medica Tzeltal Tzotzil en Los Altos de Chiapas; 1st ed. PROCOMITH: Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, México, 1990; pp. 43-45.
21. Zeng, Y.; Tang, Z.; Wang, Q.; He, P.; Fang, Y. Simultaneous Determination of Active Ingredients in Ethnomedicine Gaultheria leucocarpa var. yunnanensis and its Medicinal Preparation by Capillary Electrophoresis with Electrochemical Detection. J. Chromatogr. Sci.; 2007; 45, pp. 610-615. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/45.9.610] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17988450]
22. Erosa-Rejón, G.; Peña-Rodriguez, L.; Sterner, O. Secondary Metabolites from Heliotropium angiospermum. J. Mex. Chem. Soc.; 2009; 53, pp. 44-47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v53i2.1004]
23. Birecka, H.; Frohlich, M.W.; Glickman, L.M. Free and esterified necines in Heliotropium species from mexico and Texas. Phytochemistry; 1983; 22, pp. 1167-1171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(83)80214-3]
24. Correa-Geone, M.; Alcantara-Antonio, F.C. Chemical constituents and biological activities of species of Justicia: A review. Braz. J. Pharm.; 2012; 22, pp. 220-238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2011005000196]
25. Gomez-Verja, R.C.R.; Aguilar, M.I. Chemistry and pharmacology of selects Asian and American Medicinal species of Justicia. Bioactive Phytochemicals. Perspective for Modern Medicine; 1st ed. Daya Publishing House: New Delhi, India, 2012; Volume 1, pp. 455-473.
26. Euler, K.L.; Alam, M. Isolation of kaempferitrin from Justicia spicigera. J. Nat. Prod.; 1982; 45, pp. 220-221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np50020a020]
27. Aderibigbe, S.A.; Adetunji, O.A.; Odeniyi, M.A. Antimicrobial and pharmaceutical properties of the seed oil of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) De Wit (Leguminosae). Afr. J. Biomed. Res.; 2011; 14, pp. 63-68.
28. Maroti, M.; Piccaglia, R.; Biavati, B.; Marotti, I. Characterization and yield evaluation of Essentials oil from different Tagetes Species. J. Essent. Oil Res.; 2004; 16, pp. 440-444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2004.9698767]
29. Cruz-Flores, O.; Espinoza-Ruiz, M.; Santiesteban-Hernández, A.; Cruz-López, L. Caracterización química de los volátiles de Tagetes nelsonii. Polibotonica; 2021; 51, pp. 203-211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18387/polibotanica.51.13]
30. Sánchez, L.; Neira, A. Bioensayo General de Letalidad en Artemia Salina a las fracciones del extracto etanólico de Psidium guajava L. y Psidium guineense. Cult. Científica; 2007; 3, pp. 40-45.
31. Stéphane, F.F.; Jules, B.K.; Batiha, G.E.; Ali, I.; Bruno, L.N. Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Medicinal Plants and Herbs. Natural Medicine Plants; El-Shemy, H. IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98602]
32. Wächter, G.A.; Hoffmann, J.J.; Furbacher, T.; Blake, M.E.; Timmermann, B.N. Antibacterial and antifungal flavanones from Eysenhardtia texana. Phytochemistry; 1999; 52, pp. 1469-1471. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00221-6]
33. Woldemichael, G.M.; Singh, M.P.; Maiese, W.M.; Timmermann, B.N. Constituents of antibacterial extract of Caesalpinia paraguariensis Burk. Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung C J. Biosci.; 2003; 58, pp. 70-75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/znc-2003-1-213] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12622230]
34. Zhang, H.; Samadi, A.K.; Rao, K.V.; Cohen, M.S.; Timmermann, B.N. Cytotoxic oleanane-type saponins from Albizia inundata. J. Nat. Prod.; 2011; 74, pp. 477-482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np100702p]
35. Khera, S.; Woldemichael, G.M.; Singh, M.P.; Suarez, E.; Timmermann, B.N. A novel antibacterial iridoid and triterpene from Caiophora coronata. J. Nat. Prod.; 2003; 66, pp. 1628-1631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np030314a]
36. Njomen, G.B.; Kamgang, R.; Oyono, J.L.; Njikam, N. Antioxidant potential of the methanol-methylene chloride extract of Terminalia glaucescens leaves on mice liver in streptozotocin-induced stress. Indian J. Pharmacol.; 2008; 40, pp. 266-270. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.45153]
37. Cao, C.M.; Kindscher, K.; Gallagher, R.J.; Zhang, H.; Timmermann, B.N. Analysis of Major Withanolides in Physalis longifolia Nutt. by HPLC-PDA. J. Chromatogr. Sci.; 2015; 53, pp. 1044-1047. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmu162]
38. Llor, C.; Boada, A.; Pons-vigues, M.; Grenzner, E.; Juvé, R.; Almeda, J. Antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae in healthy carrier individuals in primary care in Barcelona area. Atención primaria; 2018; 1, pp. 4-52. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2016.12.008]
39. Espinoza-Ruiz, M.; Palomeque-Rodas, M.A.; Salazar-Sandoval, I.; Domínguez-Arrevillaga, S.; Canseco-Ávila, L.M. Análisis preliminar de la actividad antimicrobiana de la planta medicinal Chik chawa (Tagetes nelsonii Greenm). Rev. Cuba. De Plantas Med.; 2009; 14, lil-575626.Available online: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1028-47962009000400007 (accessed on 18 May 2022).
40. Melendez, P.A.; Capriles, V. Antibacterial properties of tropical plants from Puerto Rico. Phytomedicine; 2006; 13, pp. 227-236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2004.11.009]
41. Jacobo-Salcedo, M.R.; Alonso-Castro, A.J.; Salazar-Olivo, L.A.; Carranza-Álvarez, C.; González-Espíndola, L.A.; Domínguez, F.; Maciel-Torres, S.P.; García-Lujan, C.; González-Martínez, M.; Gómez-Sánchez, M. et al. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of Mexican medicinal plants. Nat. Prod. Commun.; 2011; 6, pp. 1925-1928. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1100601234]
42. Bodí, M.; Garnacho, J. Pseudomonas aeuroginosa: Tratamiento combinado frente a monoterapia. Med. Intensiva; 2007; 31, pp. 82-87. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0210-5691(07)74780-0]
43. Tokuda, H.; Ohigashi, H.; Koshimizu, K.; Ito, Y. Inhibitory effects of ursolic and oleanolic acid on skin tumor promotion by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. Cancer Lett.; 1986; 33, pp. 279-285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3835(86)90067-4]
44. Cervantes-Ceballos, L.; Sánchez-Hoyos, F.; Gómez-Estrada, H. Antibacterial activity of Cordia dendata Poir, Heliotropium indicum Linn and Momordica charantia Linn from the Northern Colombian East. Rev. Colomb. Quím. Farm; 2017; 46, pp. 143-159. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/rcciquifa.v46n2.67933]
45. Segovia, K.; Suárez-de la Cruz, L.; Castro, A.J.; Suárez, S.; Ruiz, Q. Composición química del aceite esencial de Tagetes elliptica Smith “chincho” y actividades antioxidante, antibacteriana y antifúngica. Ciencia e investigación; 2010; 13, pp. 81-86. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15381/ci.v13i2.3231]
46. Valyova, M.; Stoyanov, S.; Markovska, Y. Evaluation of in Vitro antioxidant activity and free radical scavenging potential of variety of Tagetes erecta L. Flowers growing in Bulgaria. Int. J. Appl. Res. Nat. Prod.; 2012; 5, pp. 19-25.
47. Ortiz-Andrade, R.; Cabañas-Wuan, A.; Arana-Argáez, V.E.; Alonso-Castro, A.J.; Zapata-Bustos, R.; Salazar-Olivo, L.A.; Dominguez, F.; Chavez, M.; Carranza-Álvarez, C.; García-Carrancá, A. Antidiabetic effects of Justicia spicigera Schltdl (Acanthaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2012; 143, pp. 455-462. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.06.043]
48. Baqueiro-Peña, I.; Guerrero-Beltrán, J. Physicochemical and antioxidant characterization of Justicia spicigera. Food Chem.; 2017; 1, pp. 305-312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.078]
49. Sangkitikomol, W. Antioxidants in Thai Herb, Vegetable and Fruit Inhibit Hemolysis and Heinz Body Formation in Human Erythrocytes. Oxidative Stress—Environmental Induction and Dietary Antioxidants; Lushchak, V. InTech: Shanghai, China, 2012; pp. 289-306.
50. Dkhil, M.A.; Delic, D.; El-Enshasy, H.A.; Abdel-Moneim, A.E. Medicinal Plants in Therapy: Antioxidant Activities. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.; 2016; 2016, 1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7468524]
51. Maritim, A.C.; Sanders, R.A.; Watkins, J.B., 3rd. Diabetes, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: A review. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol.; 2003; 17, pp. 24-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbt.10058]
52. Coniff, R.F.; Shapiro, J.A.; Seaton, T.B.; Bray, G.A. Multicenter, placebo-controlled trial comparing acarbose (BAY g 5421) with placebo, tolbutamide, and tolbutamide-plus-acarbose in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Med.; 1995; 98, pp. 443-451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80343-X]
53. Alam, F.; Shafique, Z.; Amjad, S.T.; Bin-Asad, M.H.H. Enzymes inhibitors from natural sources with antidiabetic activity: A review. Phytother. Res.; 2019; 33, pp. 41-54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6211] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30417583]
54. Kaisoon, O.; Konczak, I.; Siriamornpun, S. Potential health enhancing properties of edible flowers from Thailand. Food Res. Int.; 2012; 46, pp. 563-571. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.016]
55. Meyer, B.N.; Ferrigni, N.R.; Putnam, J.E.; Jacobsen, L.B.; Nichols, D.E.; McLaughlin, J.L. Brine shrimp: A convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta Med.; 1982; 45, pp. 31-34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-971236] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17396775]
56. Pino-Pérez, O.; Jorge-Lazo, F. Artemia bioassay: Useful working tool for ecotoxicologists and chemists of natural products. Rev. Protección Veg.; 2010; 25, pp. 34-43.
57. Logarto-Parra, A.; Silva-Yhebra, R.; Guerra-Sardiñas, I.; Iglesias-Buela, L. Comparative study of the assay of Artemia salina L. and the estimate of the medium lethal dose (LD50 value) in mice, to determine oral acute toxicity of plant extracts. Phytomedicine; 2001; 8, pp. 395-400. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0944-7113-00044]
58. Vega-Ávila, E.; Espejo-Serna, A.; Alarcón-Aguilar, F.; Velazco-Lezama, R. Cytotoxic Activity of Four Mexican Medicinal Plants. Proc. West. Pharmacol. Soc.; 2009; 52, pp. 78-82.
59. Pimentel-Monthaner, A.; Pizzolatti, M.; Costa-Brighente, M. An Application of the Brine Shrimp Bioassay for General Screening of Brazilian Medicinal Plants. Acta Farm. Bonaer.; 2002; 21, pp. 175-178.
60. Mejía-Barajas, J.; Del Rio, R.; Martínez-Muñoz, R.; Flores-García, A.; Martínez-Pacheco, M. Cytotoxic activity in Tagetes lucida Cav. Emir. J. Food Agric.; 2012; 24, pp. 142-147.
61. Paudel, A.; Hamamoto, H.; Panthee, S.; Sekimizu, K. Menaquinone as a potential target of antibacterial agents. Drug Discov. Ther.; 2016; 10, pp. 123-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2016.01041]
62. Ioset, J.R.; Marston, A.; Gupta, M.P.; Hostettmann, K. Antifungal and larvicidal cordiaquinones from the roots of Cordia curassavica. Phytochemistry; 2000; 53, pp. 613-617. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00604-4]
63. Hitl, M.; Kladar, N.; Gavarić, N.; Božin, B. Rosmarinic Acid-Human Pharmacokinetics and Health Benefits. Planta Med.; 2021; 87, pp. 273-282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1301-8648] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285594]
64. Rauf, A.; Imran, M.; Khan, I.A.; Ur-Rehman, M.; Gilani, S.A.; Mehmood, Z.; Mubarak, M.S. Anticancer potential of quercetin: A comprehensive review. Phytother. Res.; 2018; 32, pp. 2109-2130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6155]
65. Viet, T.D.; Xuan, T.D.; Anh, H. α-Amyrin and β-Amyrin Isolated from Celastrus hindsii Leaves and Their Antioxidant, Anti-Xanthine Oxidase, and Anti-Tyrosinase Potentials. Molecules; 2021; 26, 7248. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237248] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885832]
66. Bin Sayeed, M.S.; Ameen, S.S. Beta-Sitosterol: A Promising but Orphan Nutraceutical to Fight Against Cancer. Nutr. Cancer; 2015; 67, pp. 1214-1220. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2015.1087042] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26473555]
67. Calderón-Montaño, J.M.; Burgos-Morón, E.; Pérez-Guerrero, C.; López-Lázaro, M. A review on the dietary flavonoid kaempferol. Mini Rev. Med. Chem.; 2011; 11, pp. 298-344. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138955711795305335] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21428901]
68. Gálvez, C.E.; Jiménez, C.M.; De los A Gómez, A.; Lizarraga, E.F.; Sampietro, D.A. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oils from Senecio nutans, Senecio viridis, Tagetes terniflora and Aloysia gratissima against toxigenic Aspergillus and Fusarium species. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2020; 34, pp. 1442-1445. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1511555] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456990]
69. Senatore, F.; Napolitano, F.; Mohamed, M.A.H.; Harris, P.J.C.; Minkeni, P.N.S.; Henderson, J. Antibacterial activity of Tagetes minuta L. (Asteraceae) essential oil with different chemical composition. Flavour Fragr. J.; 2004; 19, pp. 574-578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1358]
70. Harborne, J.B. Phytochemical Methods; 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1984; pp. 49-188.
71. Viveros-Valdez, E.; Rivas-Morales, C.; Oranday-Cardenas, A.; Verde-Star, M.J.; Carranza-Rosales, P. Antimicrobial activity of Hedeoma drummondii against opportunistic pathogens. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.; 2011; 14, pp. 305-307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2011.305.307]
72. Viveros-Valdez, E.; Rivas-Morales, C.; Carranza-Rosales, P.; Mendoza, S.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G. Free Scavengers from Mexican Herbal Tea “Poleo” (Hedeoma drummondii). Z. Naturforsch; 2008; 63, pp. 341-346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/znc-2008-5-606]
73. Monroy-García, I.N.; Carranza-Torres, I.E.; Carranza-Rosales, P.; Oyón-Ardoiz, M.; García-Estévez, I.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; Morán-Martínez, J.; Viveros-Valdez, E. Phenolic Profiles and Biological Activities of Extracts from Edible Wild Fruits Ehretia tinifolia and Sideroxylon lanuginosum. Foods; 2021; 10, 2710. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112710] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828991]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Seven medicinal plants from Chiapas, Mexico, used by Native Americans were analyzed, aiming to improve the understanding of their medicinal properties through the evaluation of various biological activities, i.e., bactericidal, antioxidant, α-glucosidase inhibition, and toxicity, to provide a scientific basis for the management of infectious and hyperglycemic diseases in the Mexican southeast. Plant extracts were obtained from Cordia dodecandra, Gaultheria odorata, Heliotropium angiospermum, Justicia spicigera, Leucaena collinsii spp. collinsii, Tagetes nelsonii, and Talisia oliviformis through maceration techniques using methanol and chloroform (1:1). Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was employed to determine the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter faecalis, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeuroginosa. The antiradical/antioxidant activity was determined by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assays and antihemolytic activity using the 2,2’-Azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride radical (APPH). The anti-α-glucosidase activity was evaluated in vitro through the chromogenic PNPG assay. The toxicity was assessed using the brine shrimp lethality assay. The highest antimicrobial activity was displayed by T. nelsonii, mainly against E. faecalis and P. aeuroginosa. The extracts of L. collinsii, J. spicigera, and T. nelsonii possess antioxidant properties with EC50 < 50 μg/mL. J. spicigera and T. nelsonii extracts showed the highest antihemolytic activity with IC50 < 14 μg/mL. T. nelsonii exhibited a remarkable inhibitor effect on the α-glucosidase enzyme and the greatest toxic effect on Artemia salina with IC50 = 193 ± 20 μg/mL and LD50 = 14 ± 1 μg/mL, respectively. According to our results, G. odorata, J. spicigera, T. nelsonii, and T. oliviformis extracts contained active antimicrobial compounds. At the same time, T. nelsonii stands to be a possible source of effective antineoplastic and antihyperglycemic compounds.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Hernández-Torres, Mario Alberto 1 ; Monroy-García, Imelda N 2 ; Rivas-Morales, Catalina 1 ; Verde-Star, María Julia 1 ; Gonzalez-Villasana, Vianey 3 ; Viveros-Valdez, Ezequiel 1
1 Department of Chemistry, College of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Av. Pedro de Alba S/N, San Nicolás de los Garza 66450, Nuevo León, Mexico;
2 Department of Chemistry, College of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Av. Pedro de Alba S/N, San Nicolás de los Garza 66450, Nuevo León, Mexico;
3 Department of Cellular Biology and Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Av. Pedro de Alba S/N, San Nicolás de los Garza 66450, Nuevo León, Mexico;