1. Introduction
Snakebite is a significant public health issue, as more than 5.4 million people are bitten annually, resulting in as many as 1.8 million envenoming incidents and 138,000 deaths, which primarily affect impoverished communities in the rural tropics and subtropics across Africa, the Middle East, Americas, Asia and Australasia [1,2,3]. Since 2017, snakebite has been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a neglected tropical disease [4], and in 2018 the WHO outlined a global roadmap with the goal of halving snakebite mortality by 2030 [5].
Because the toxin composition of venomous snakes varies extensively among species [6,7], the pathological patterns of envenoming also vary, though these can be broadly classified into three major categories: neurotoxic, cytotoxic and haemotoxic [2,8]. Haemotoxicity is one of the most common critical signs observed in envenomed snakebite victims and is particularly common following bites by viperid snakes. Haemotoxic envenoming can result in local and/or systemic haemorrhage, including overt bleeding, such as from the gums or the bite site, and internal bleeding, such as intracranially [2,8]. Such envenoming can also cause coagulopathy, defined ultimately by defibrinogenation, and known as venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC). Coagulopathy can contribute extensively to the severity of envenoming by rendering victims particularly vulnerable to haemorrhage [2,8,9,10].
Snakebite coagulopathy is the consequence of certain venom toxins consuming and/or increasing the abnormal activation of key clotting factors (e.g., Factor V, X, II [prothrombin]), ultimately leading to a loss of clotting capability [11,12,13]. Although in vitro such ‘procoagulant’ venom toxins cause rapid clot formation, their cumulative effects lead to severe and rapid factor consumption in vivo, characterised by depletion of fibrinogen and accompanied by a consequent increased risk of bleeding in victims [10,14]. Many potent procoagulant toxins act by directly activating Factor V, X or II, though others act directly on fibrinogen in a fibrinogenolytic manner [11], and thus contribute towards the consumption of fibrinogen (hypofibrinogenaemia). Many such venom toxins are known as thrombin-like enzymes (TLEs), because these proteins are capable of cleaving the α-chain and/or β-chain of fibrinogen in a manner analogous to thrombin [15]. However, cleavage by TLEs does not result in the liberation of active fibrin (unlike that caused by thrombin), and thus serves to deplete circulating fibrinogen [15]. The TLEs are members of the snake venom serine protease (SVSP) gene family, an important toxin class, particularly in viperid venoms [16]. This multi-locus gene family typically encodes multiple related isoforms in the venom gland of each snake species, and these toxins can exhibit distinct functional activities other than those associated with fibrinogenolysis [6,8].
Serum-derived, polyclonal antibody-based antivenoms remain the gold standard therapeutic option for treating snakebite envenoming [17]. Despite antivenoms being life-saving therapeutics, they are also associated with several limitations restricting their utility. First, antivenom antibodies are derived from venom-immunised animals, and thus come with the risk of stimulating adverse reactions, which can range from vomiting, urticaria and/or generalised rash to anaphylaxis [18,19,20,21]. Antivenoms also typically exhibit limited cross-snake species efficacy, as the direct result of variation in venom composition among medically important snake species [6,22]. Thus, antivenoms are typically only effective against snake species whose venoms are highly similar to those included in the immunising mixture. In addition, one major problem with the majority of current antivenoms is that only a relatively small proportion of the active components are typically specific to the venom immunogens (i.e., 10–20% of the IgG or IgG-fragment antibodies) [23]. In terms of implementation, antivenoms (i) have to be delivered intravenously and thus require a clinical environment for patient care (also due to the management of potential adverse reactions), and (ii) are often unaffordable or unavailable to the patient in low or middle-income countries, where treatment courses have been reported to cost between $60–$640 USD [24], an expense that can push many victims further below the poverty line [25,26].
As a result of the aforementioned limitations, several attempts have been made to improve the cross-reactivity and dose efficacy of snakebite treatments over recent years, both via the optimisation of conventional polyclonal antivenoms (e.g., optimisation of venom immunogen mixtures, use of recombinant proteins or epitopes as immunogens) [25,26,27] and the exploration of new treatment formats, including monoclonal and oligoclonal antibodies and small molecule drugs [28,29]. While the latter approaches show great promise for the long-term future of snakebite therapy, there is a pressing need to improve the efficacy of conventional therapy in the short term. This study explores the potential tractability of using recombinantly expressed snake venom proteins, specifically SVSP toxins, as immunogens for generating focused toxin-specific antibody responses.
The expression of recombinant proteins has been historically undertaken in a wide variety of different host systems, including bacteria, yeast, plant, insect and mammalian cells. Several snake venom proteins, including ancrod from Calloselasma rhodostoma venom [30], acutin from Deinagkistrodon acutus [31], batroxobin from Bothrops atrox [32], and factor V activator from Macrovipera lebetina [33] have previously been expressed in either bacteria (e.g., E. coli) or yeast (e.g., Pichia pastoris). However, some snake venom toxins can be challenging to successfully express in such systems because of the frequency of cysteine residues and disulfide bonds, resulting in significant obstacles relating to correct protein folding, solubility and yield [23,34], even under conditions intended to favour disulfide bond formation [35,36]. Further, E. coli lack glycosylation apparatus, limiting their use if effector functions are needed [37], while expression in yeast may result in different glycosylation patterns in comparison with the native protein [30]. Consequently, over the past decade, the use of transient mammalian expression systems has increased, and has been applied to produce recombinant snake venom toxins, such as the SVSP gyroxin (found in native form in Crotalus durissus terrificus venom) [38]. Mammalian expression systems offer several desirable characteristics for the expression of vertebrate venom toxins (i.e., native protein folding and post-translational modifications) [39,40,41], and Human Embryonic Kidney 293F (HEK293F) cells in particular offer ease of transfection, high expression yields and native human glycosylation amenable for such work.
In this study, three fibrinogenolytic SVSPs sourced from distinct medically important viperid snake venoms (ancrod from Calloselasma rhodostoma, batroxobin from Bothrops atrox and RVV-V from Daboia russelii) were expressed in HEK293F mammalian cells for use as immunogens to generate experimental antivenoms. To this end, following functional validation of the resulting recombinantly expressed toxins in fibrinogenolysis experiments, a murine immunisation regimen was undertaken to generate polyclonal antibodies against each of these three toxins. Thereafter, we explored the in vitro immunological recognition and inhibitory capability of the resulting antibodies against the different recombinant toxin immunogens and a panel of crude snake venoms. Our findings demonstrated that polyclonal antibodies generated against specific venom toxins exhibited broad in vitro cross-reactivity with a geographically diverse array of native snake venoms and were capable of inhibiting certain toxin functional activities, including fibrinogenolysis and the prolongation of plasma clotting times. More broadly, our findings suggest that the recombinant expression of key, functionally important, snake venom toxins, could be a valuable approach to generate new pathology-specific antivenoms against snakebite or to enhance existing antivenoms via increasing antibody titres against specific pathogenic toxins.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Selection of SVSPs Toxins for Expression
Three SVSP toxins were selected for recombinant expression due to their prior characterisation as biologically active and functionally relevant components of distinct viper venoms, specifically: ancrod from C. rhodostoma (Genbank: L07308.1) [42], batroxobin from B. atrox (Genbank: J02684.1) [43] and RVV-V from D. russelii (Genbank: MF289120.1) [34]. Coding sequences were sourced from the GenBank database of the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (
2.2. Vector and Insert Restriction Digests
For the generation of plasmid vectors containing the toxin-encoding DNA inserts, we used commercially available pFUSE-hlgG1-Fc2 Plasmids (4194 bp) (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Restriction digests were performed using 5 µg of the pFUSE-hlgG1-Fc2 vector, 10 µL of 10× buffer 2.1 (New England BioLabs®Inc., Hitchin, UK), 5 µL of each restriction enzyme EcoRI (20,000 U/mL; cut site: 5′-GAATTC-3′) and NheI (10,000 U/mL; cut site: 5′-GCTAGC-3′) (New England BioLabs®Inc., UK) and 100 μL of nuclease-free water, followed by incubation for one hour at 37 °C in a water bath. Following brief centrifugation, dephosphorylation of the resulting digested vector was performed by the addition of 20 µL of shrimp alkaline phosphatase (1000 U/mL, New England BioLabs®Inc., Hitchin, UK), 20 µL of 10× CutSmart buffer (New England BioLabs®Inc., Hitchin, UK) and 60 mL nuclease-free water, followed by a further one-hour incubation step at 37 °C. Thereafter, samples were briefly centrifuged again and incubated for 30 min at 65 °C to deactivate the alkaline phosphatase. DNA inserts (ancrod, batroxobin and RVV-V) (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Belgium) were prepared using 500 ng of insert, 10 µL of 10× buffer 2.1: (50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2 and 100 µg/mL BSA pH 7.9), 5 µL of the EcoRI (20,000 U/mL) and NheI (10,000 U/mL) restriction enzymes, and 100 mL of nuclease-free water, followed by incubation for one hour at 37 °C in a water bath and brief centrifugation thereafter.
Digests for both vector and inserts were examined on 0.8% agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) in 1× TBE buffer (0.089 M Tris-Borate, 0.002 M Ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), pH 8.3). The solution was heated in a microwave until fully dissolved before the addition of 9 µL of ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) and polymerisation in a Bio-Rad gel system. Gels were immersed in 1× TBE buffer prior to the loading of 50 μL and 200 μL of vector and insert, respectively, alongside 10 μL (0.5 μg) of 1 kb DNA ladder (New England BioLabs®Inc., Hitchin, UK). The running conditions were 50 V, 240 mA for 80 min, with downstream visualisation using a Gel Doc EZ Gel Documentation System (Bio-Rad).
2.3. Plasmid DNA Purification
Plasmid DNA was purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Manchester, UK), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting insert and vector DNA concentrations were quantified by Nanodrop and the samples stored at −20 °C until downstream use.
2.4. Plasmid Ligation, Amplification and Purification
The inserts were ligated into the vector using a 3:1 molar ratio. The necessary volumes of each insert for ligation with 1 µL of vector were calculated (
Next, ligated DNA was transformed using TOP10 E. coli competent cells (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Altrincham, UK), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Thereafter, bacteria were streaked onto LB plates (6 g LB Broth (Luria low salt) (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK), 4.5 g agar (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK), 300 mL water, pH 7.5–7.8, containing 75 µL Zeocin (25 µg/µL, InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA) before incubation at 37 °C overnight. A single bacterial colony for each sample was then selected and used to inoculate 5 mL of LB media, before shaking incubation at 37 °C for 6–8 h at 220 rpm. Erlenmeyer flasks (125 mL) were prepared with 50 mL of LB media supplemented with 12.5 µL Zeocin (25 µg/µL, InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA). A total of 1 mL of resulting bacteria was added to each flask before shaking incubation at 37 °C and 220 rpm overnight. Thereafter, glycerol stocks were prepared using a 300 µL aliquot of the overnight bacterial culture mixed with 700 µL sterile 50% glycerol before storage at −80 °C. After that, overnight cultures were centrifuged at 6000× g for 10 min at room temperature and plasmid DNA was purified using the Hi-Speed Plasmid Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. To determine the resulting DNA yield, DNA concentrations were measured via Nanodrop (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Altrincham, UK). DNA plasmids were then commercially sequenced via Sanger sequencing (Source Bioscience, Nottingham, UK) to confirm insert fidelity.
2.5. Expression in HEK293F Cells
For protein expression, we used HEK293F cells and the Freestyle 293 Expression System (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Altrincham, UK). Cells were maintained in suspension, in Freestyle serum-free media, with culture conditions of 37 °C, 125 rpm and 8% CO2. Cells were originally seeded at 2 × 105/mL and grown over three days to 1–2 × 106/mL. Cell cultures were counted and checked for at least 90% viability using a Luna II automated cell counter (Labtech, Heathfield, UK). The cells were seeded at 7 × 105/mL for transfection, equivalent to 2.1 × 107 cells total in 30 mL medium. Cells were left to grow for 16–24 h, then 30 µg of DNA was placed into a sterile Eppendorf tube for each Erlenmeyer flask (125 mL). An equivalent volume of Freemax transfection reagent was added to a separate tube, and the volumes of each made up to 600 mL with Optipro SFM transfection medium (Gibco). Both 600 mL aliquots were mixed together and incubated for 12 min at room temperature. The mixture was then added to swirling cells in the Erlenmeyer flasks (125 mL), and the cells were left to grow for seven days at 37 °C, 8% CO2 on a shaking platform. After seven days, cell cultures were pooled and centrifuged at 500× g for five minutes to pellet the cells. Supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 µm pore membrane and stored at 4 °C before protein purification. Proteins were purified by hydrophobic affinity chromatography using an ÄKTA pure protein purification system (GE Healthcare). Supernatant was loaded onto a 1 mL HiTrap™ Chelating Sepharose™ Nickel column (GE Healthcare) in 40 mM imidazole in Na phosphate buffer 20 mM with 150 mM NaCl pH 7.4 and eluted with 500 mM imidazole, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4. The proteins were eluted into 2 mL fractions, which were pooled and dialysed in Slide-A-Lyzer G2 Dialysis Cassettes (1–30 mL) 2 K molecular weight cut-offs (MWCOs) (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK). This step was performed via three changes of 1× PBS (pH 7), first for two hours at room temperature, secondarily at room temperature overnight and then for two hours at room temperature again. Finally, the protein was concentrated using 30 K MWCOs concentrator tube (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK) and centrifuged at 1684× g for 15–30 min. Protein concentrations were quantified by Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, Watford, UK) by using 96-well flat-bottomed plates (NUNC) and a LabTech LT-4500 microplate absorbance reader at 595 nm.
2.6. Murine Immunisations
Next, we used each recombinantly expressed snake venom toxin in immunisation experiments. Prior to immunisation, we performed quality control experiments on the recombinant toxins, namely SDS-PAGE gel electrophoretic assessments of purity, and fibrinogenolytic and clotting time assessments of functional activity, using the methods outlined in full below. The murine immunisation experiments were undertaken with the approval of The Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Boards of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and the University of Liverpool, under project license (#P58464F90) granted from the UK Home Office, and in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.
Murine immunisation experiments broadly followed a recently outlined approach [44]. Experimental animals were housed in Techniplast GM500 cages with Lignocel bedding and zigzag fibres nesting material (Sizzlenest), and kept at approximately 22 °C at 40–50% humidity, with 12/12 h light cycles. Experimental animals were kept in specific-pathogen-free facilities with ad libitum access to certified reference materials, including irradiated food and reverse osmosis water (in an automatic water system). All cages were changed every two weeks. Animals were monitored twice per week throughout the course of immunisation for signs of adverse reactions (e.g., reduced activity, physiological impairment, pallor, ulceration following immunisation) and general health (e.g., loss of body weight), and no animals were culled due to weight loss or behavioural endpoints being met.
Experimental animals were allowed to acclimatise for one week, and thereafter groups of five female CD-1 mice (initial weight 25–30 g; Charles River, UK; randomised to groups) were immunised with either: (i) recombinant ancrod, (ii), recombinant batroxobin, (iii) recombinant RVV-V, (iv) a 1:1:1 mixture of the three recombinant toxins, or (v) a positive control group consisting of a 1:1:1 mixture of three crude snake venoms sourced from Calloselasma rhodostoma (captive bred), Daboia russelii (Sri Lanka) and Bothrops atrox (Brazil). Lyophilised snake venoms were sourced from the historical venom collection stored in the herpetarium of the Centre for Snakebite Research and Interventions (CSRI) at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. All experimental animals received 1 µg of toxin/venom at each immunisation (except for the batroxobin group, which received 2 µg for the third and fourth immunisation followed interim evaluation of serological responses), with the groups receiving the mixture of recombinant toxins or venoms receiving equal amounts (1:1:1 ratio, i.e., 0.33 µg per toxin/venom, 1 µg total) of the different toxins/venoms per contributing sample. All immunogens were prepared in sterile PBS and mixed in a 1:1 ratio with the Sigma Adjuvant System (Sigma-Aldrich, UK), to a final injection volume of 40 µL.
Each experimental animal was immunised a total of five times, with secondary immunisations occurring two, four, eight and twelve weeks after primary immunisation. For immunisation, animals were briefly anaesthetised with an inhalational anaesthetic (isoflurane, 5% for induction of anaesthesia and 1.5 to 3% isoflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia). Whilst under anaesthesia, the dorsal fur was shaved at the injection site, and all animal groups were subcutaneously injected with 1 µg immunogen in a total volume of 40 µL, with the first two immunisations delivered to a single injection site and thereafter split across two sites (i.e., 20 µL/site). The exception to this was the batroxobin immunogen group, for which the immunogen dose was increased during immunisation (due to poor initial immunological responses) and mice received 2 µg at the third and fourth immunisations (weeks 8th and 12th). Interim blood samples to profile immune responses were collected via tail tip sampling on weeks three, six, ten and a terminal sample was collected following euthanasia at week 14. All blood samples were allowed to clot for a minimum of two hours at room temperature and centrifuged at 23,548× g for 10 min. The resulting sera were stored at −20 °C until further use.
2.7. IgG Purification
The terminal murine serum obtained for each group were pooled and then IgG purified to produce the resulting experimental antivenoms (anti-ancrod, anti-batroxobin, anti-RVV-V, anti-toxin mix, antivenom mix). Pre-immunisation serum samples were processed in an identical manner to serve as the negative control (i.e., non-immunised). IgG was purified from pooled mice serum [27] using 14-weeks (terminal) blood samples, which were first diluted with 0.90% saline (1:1 ratio), before the slow (drop by drop) addition of caprylic acid (Octanoic acid; Sigma-Aldrich, UK) with stirring to a final concentration of 6%. Subsequently, non-immunoglobulin proteins were precipitated by vigorous stirring for 60 min, followed by centrifugation at 12,800× g for 60 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant from each sample was dialysed separately using 35 mm 3.5 K MWCO SnakeSkin Dialysis Tubing (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK) and sodium citrate buffered saline (SCS, pH 6.0), with two changes of SCS, first at room temperature for one hour, and then secondarily at 4 °C overnight. Following dialysis, the final IgG samples were lyophilised using a Labogene lyophiliser and stored at 4 °C prior to reconstitution in PBS.
2.8. In Vitro Immunological and Characterisation Assays
2.8.1. SDS-PAGE Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting
In addition to the immunogens (the three recombinantly expressed SVSP toxins and corresponding snake venoms), an additional ten snake venoms (see Supplementary Table S1 for details), sourced from a wide geographical and taxonomic diversity of snake species known to cause potent haemotoxicity in snakebite victims, were also used for SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and western blotting experiments. These venoms were sourced from animals maintained under controlled environmental and dietary conditions in the UK Home Office licensed and inspected CSRI herpetarium at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine or from the CSRI historical venom collection. Lyophilised venoms were stored at 4 °C and reconstituted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) to 1 mg/mL prior to use.
For gel electrophoresis, 15 well 15% SDS-PAGE gels were hand-cast, using the following approach: resolving gel, 3.75 mL H2O, 2.5 mL 1.5 M Tris pH 8.8, 3.75 mL 40% bis-acrylamide, 100 µL 10% SDS, 60 µL 10% ammonium persulfate (APS) and 7 µL tetra-methyl-ethylene-diamine (TEMED); stacking gel, 2.5 mL H2O, 1 mL 1 M Tris pH 6.8, 350 µL 40% bis-acrylamide, 30 µL 10% APS and 5 µL TEMED. Next, 10 µL of each recombinant toxin or venom (1 mg/mL) was mixed 1:1 volume/volume with reducing buffer (2 × PLOB; 3.55 µL H2O, 1.25 mL 0.5 M Tris pH 6.8, 2.50 mL glycerol, 2.0 mL 10% SDS, 1.50 mL saturated bromophenol blue and 150 µL β-mercapto-ethanol) and heated for 10–15 min at 100 °C. Thereafter, 10 µL was loaded onto the gel, alongside 5 µL of broad molecular mass protein marker (Broad Range Molecular Marker, Promega), and the samples were run at 200 volts for 55 min using a Mini-PROTEAN Electrophoresis System (Bio-Rad, UK). The resulting gels were then stained at a final concentration of 0.1% (w/v) Coomassie blue R350 (0.4 g of Coomassie blue R350 in 200 mL of 40% [v/v] methanol in H2O, 10% (v/v) glacial acetic acid and 20% (v/v) methanol) overnight at room temperature. Gels were destained (4:1:5 methanol: glacial acetic acid: H2O) for at least 120 min at room temperature and images captured using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc EZ Gel Documentation System.
For immunoblotting experiments, SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis was performed as described above, except with the use of pre-stained protein marker (10–225 kDa) (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK) and, instead of Coomassie staining, proteins in the gel were transferred onto 0.2 µm nitrocellulose membranes using a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad, UK). Following confirmation of the transfer by reversible Ponceau S staining, membranes were blocked for non-specific binding using 5% non-fat dried milk in TBST (0.15 M NaCl; 0.01 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.5; 1% Tween 20), and left overnight at 4 °C on a rocker set at slow speed. Subsequently, blots were washed three times over 15 min with TBST, before the addition of primary antibodies (anti-ancrod, anti-batroxobin, anti-RVV-V, anti-toxin mix, antivenom mix, and normal mouse control; all at 1 mg/mL) diluted to 1:5000 in 5% non-fat dried milk in 50 mL TBST for two hours at room temperature. The immunoblots were then washed in triplicate with TBST as described above and incubated for two hours at room temperature with appropriate secondary antibodies (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated Rabbit anti-mouse IgG; Sigma-Aldrich, UK) diluted 1:2000 in 50 mL PBS. The immunoblots were then rewashed with TBST and developed by adding DAB substrate (50 mg 3,3′- 222 diaminobenzidine, 100 mL PBS and 0.024% hydrogen peroxide, Sigma-Aldrich, UK) by placing the membrane into the substrate for 30 s before washing with deionised water.
2.8.2. SDS-PAGE Gel Electrophoresis of Deglycosylated Recombinant Toxins
To analyse the changes in molecular masses of glycosylated/deglycosylated recombinant toxins, we treated each recombinant protein with PNGase F. Briefly, recombinant toxins (14 μg) were mixed with 2 μL of 10× Denaturing Buffer (5% SDS, 400 mM Dithiothreitol [DTT]; Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK) and ddH20 to make a 20 μL total reaction volume, before incubation at 100 °C for five minutes. Next, 4 μL of 10× G7 Reaction Buffer (500 mM Sodium Phosphate pH 7.5), 4 µL of 10% triton™ X-100 (t-Octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol; Sigma-Aldrich, UK), 1 μL PNGase F (New England Biolabs, UK) and 1 μL ddH20 were added and samples left to digest overnight at 37 °C. Reaction products were then analysed by reduced SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis as described above, with 40 µL 2 × PLOB reduction buffer and 60 µL PBS added to the 30 µL of each deglycosylated sample.
2.8.3. End-Point Titration ELISA
Microtiter 96 well ELISA plates (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK) were coated with coating buffer (100 mM carbonate/Bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6) containing 100 ng per well of each immunogen and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Plates were then washed three times with TBST before adding 5% non-fat milk in 100 mL TBST. Following incubation at room temperature for two hours, the plates were washed another three times with TBST. Next, 120 µL of the primary antibodies (1 mg/mL) were added to the plate in duplicate at an initial dilution of 1:50 in 5% non-fat milk in TBST, followed by five-fold serial dilutions across the plate and incubation at 4˚C overnight. The plates were then rewashed with TBST and incubated for two hours at room temperature with appropriate secondary antibodies (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG, Sigma-Aldrich, UK) diluted to 1:2000 in PBS. The plates were then rewashed with TBST before the addition of substrate (0.2% 2,2/-azino-bis (2-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) in citrate buffer (0.5 M, pH 4.0) containing 0.015% hydrogen peroxide, Sigma-Aldrich, UK). Plates were gently mixed and incubated at room temperature for 15 min before the signal was read spectro-photometrically at 405 nm on a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader.
2.9. In Vitro Functional Assays
2.9.1. Fibrinogenolytic Activity
To assess the fibrinogenolytic activity of the immunogens and their inhibition by the resulting experimental antivenoms, we used an SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis approach using human plasma fibrinogen (Sigma-Aldrich, UK). The recombinant toxin immunogens (3 μg, 1 mg/mL) and various crude venoms (1.05 μg, 0.3 mg/mL) were incubated with human fibrinogen (3.75 µg, 2.5 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, UK) for two hours at 37 °C. All immunogen samples were also used in neutralisation experiments following a pre-incubation step at 37 °C for 15 min with 1.75 µg (1 mg/mL) of the corresponding toxin-specific experimental antivenom (i.e., for ancrod and C. rhodostoma venom, anti-ancrod was used). Next, ten well 8% SDS-PAGE gels were hand-cast using the following approach: 10 mL resolving gel (4.7 mL H2O, 2.5 mL 1.5 M Tris pH 8.8, 2.7 mL 30% bis-acrylamide, 50 µL 20% SDS, 100 µL 10% APS and 7 µL TEMED); 4 mL of 4% stacking gel (2.7 mL H2O, 0.5 mL 1M Tris pH 6.8, 800 µL 30% bis-acrylamide, 20 µL 20% SDS, 40 µL 10% APS and 4 µL TEMED). Thereafter, 10 µL of each sample was loaded on the gel and analysed under reducing conditions as described earlier. The negative control consisted of human fibrinogen only (3 µg, 2.5 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, UK).
2.9.2. Blood Sample Collection and Reagents for Clotting Profiling
Blood samples for clotting profiling experiments were obtained according to ethically approved protocols (LSTM research tissue bank, REC ref. 11/H1002/9) from consenting healthy volunteers who confirmed that they had not taken any anticoagulant treatments for at least three months prior to blood collection. Blood samples were collected in tubes containing acid citrate dextrose adenine (ACD-A) as an anticoagulant. To prepare Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP), fresh blood samples were centrifuged at 2500× g at 20–25 °C for 10 min, and the supernatant was retained and stored at −80 °C until use. We used commercially sourced samples (Diagnostic Reagents Ltd., Thame, UK) to serve as quality controls for the various reagents employed in the methods described below. To this end, normal and abnormal test controls were implemented for the experiments described below prior to experimentation. These consisted of 1) Diagen control plasma for fibrinogen: normal (RCPN070) and abnormal (RCPA080) and 2) control plasma for aPTT and PT: normal (IQCN130), abnormal 1 (Mild, IQCM140) and abnormal 2 (Severe, IQCS150). All QC samples were aliquoted into 500 µL, stored at −80 °C, and defrosted in a water bath for five minutes at 37 °C immediately prior to use. To act as positive controls for the experimental antivenoms generated here, we used commercially available antivenoms, specifically the Thai Red Cross monovalent equine antivenoms directed against the Malayan Pit Viper C. rhodostoma (CRAV; Lot #CR00316, expiry date 06/2021) and the Russell’s viper D. siamensis (DSAV; Lot #WR00117, expiry date 11/2022) as controls for C. rhodostoma and D. russelli venom, respectively, and the Instituto Butantan polyvalent equine SORO anti-botropico/crotalico antivenom (Lot #1012308, expiry date: 2013) for B. atrox. Antivenoms were reconstituted with pharmaceutical grade water supplied by the manufacturer, protein concentrations measured using a Nanodrop (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK), and then stored short term at 4 °C until use. Normal horse IgG (1 mg/mL; Bio-Rad, UK) and normal mouse IgG (1 mg/mL, as above) were used as negative controls for the commercial antivenoms and experimental antivenoms, respectively, throughout.
2.9.3. Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)
To measure the inhibitory capability of the experimental antivenoms against recombinant toxins acting on the intrinsic and common coagulation pathways, we quantified differences in the activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) between toxin and venom samples in their presence and absence. To do so, 50 µL of Micronised Silica/Platelet Substitute Mixture (Diagnostic Reagents Ltd., UK) was placed in glass test tubes (10 × 75 mm) in a water bath at 37 °C and incubated for 60–120 s. Next, 50 µL of FFP was spiked with 0.6 ng (100 ng/mL) of ancrod, batroxobin, RVV-V, C. rhodostoma venom, B. atrox venom or D. russelii venom, or saline solution as the negative control. All immunogen samples were also co-incubated at 37 °C for 15 min with 0.5 µg of either: (i) the corresponding toxin-specific experimental antivenom (i.e., for ancrod, anti-ancrod was used), (ii) the anti-toxin mix experimental antivenom, (iii) the anti-venom mix experimental antivenom, (iv) the corresponding commercial antivenom (i.e., for ancrod the Malayan pit viper antivenom was used) and (iv) normal mouse IgG as a non-immunised control. Thereafter, samples were added to the glass test tubes and gently tilted at regular intervals for precisely five minutes at 37 °C. Finally, 50 µL of 25 mM calcium chloride (pre-incubated at 37 °C) was added to each tube, and the tube was gently tilted until the resulting clot time was recorded. All experiments were performed in duplicate.
2.9.4. Prothrombin Time
To measure the inhibitory capability of the experimental antivenoms against recombinant toxins acting on the extrinsic coagulation pathway, we quantified differences in the prothrombin time (PT) between toxin and venom samples in the presence and absence of the different antivenoms. Measurements of PT were undertaken by first adding 100 µL of Calcium Rabbit Brain Thromboplastin (Diagnostic Reagents Ltd., UK) to a glass test tube (10 × 75 mm) and incubating at 37 °C for 60–120 s in a water bath. Next, 50 µL of FFP was spiked with 0.6 ng (100 ng/mL) of ancrod, batroxobin, RVV-V, C. rhodostoma venom, B. atrox venom or D. russelii venom, or saline solution as the negative control. All immunogen samples were also co-incubated at 37 °C for 15 min with 0.5 µg of either: (i) the corresponding toxin-specific experimental antivenom (i.e., for ancrod, anti-ancrod was used), (ii) the anti-toxin mix experimental antivenom, (iii) the anti-venom mix experimental antivenom, (iv) the corresponding commercial antivenom (i.e., for ancrod the Malayan pit viper antivenom was used) and (iv) normal mouse IgG as a non-immunised control. Next, samples were introduced to the thromboplastin and time measurements were commenced, with tubes gently tilted at regular intervals (returning to the water bath between tilting), and the time for the formation of a clot recorded. All experiments were performed in duplicate.
2.9.5. Fibrinogen Consumption via the Clauss Method
The Clauss method is a quantitative, clot-based assay that measures the ability of thrombin to convert fibrinogen to a fibrin clot, followed by manual time measurements of clotting [45]. Here we applied this method in recombinant toxin- and venom-spiking experiments to assess the inhibitory capability of the experimental antivenoms against the depletion of fibrinogen. Twenty microlitres of FFP was spiked with 0.6 ng (100 ng/mL) of either: ancrod, batroxobin, RVV-V, C. rhodostoma venom, B. atrox venom or D. russelii venom, or 0.9% saline solution as the negative control. All immunogen samples were also co-incubated at 37 °C for 15 min with 0.5 µg of either: (i) the corresponding toxin-specific experimental antivenom (i.e., for ancrod the anti-ancrod was used), (ii) the anti-toxin mix experimental antivenom, (iii) the anti-venom mix experimental antivenom, (iv) the corresponding commercial antivenom (i.e., for ancrod the Malayan pit viper antivenom was used) or (iv) normal mouse IgG as a non-immunised control. Samples were then diluted tenfold with 0.02 M imidazole buffer (pH 7.35), transferred to glass test tubes (10 × 75 mm) and warmed at 37 °C for 120 s. Thereafter, 100 µL of thrombin reagent (20 units/mL; Diagnostic Reagents Ltd., UK) was added, and time measurements commenced. Tubes were gently tilted at regular intervals (returning to the water bath between tilting), and the time for the formation of a clot was recorded. To calculate the fibrinogen concentration (g/L) from the clotting time, calibration curve analysis was used. All experiments were performed in duplicate.
2.9.6. Statistical Analyses
To statistically test whether experimental antivenoms, commercial antivenoms or normal mouse control antibodies inhibited the pro-coagulant activity of each toxin/venom in the PT and fibrinogen consumptions assays, we used one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and a significance threshold of (p ≤ 0.05). Specifically, we tested whether the experimental antivenoms exhibited significantly increased inhibitory profiles over the negative (normal mouse) controls. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism v8 software (GraphPad).
3. Results
3.1. Expression, Purification, and Evaluation of Recombinantly Expressed SVSP Toxins
The isolated DNA of the three selected recombinant SVSP toxins were transformed using TOP10 E. coli competent cells, transfected into mammalian HEK293F cells, and the resulting expressed protein purified using hydrophobic affinity chromatography. Reduced 10% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoretic profiles of the resulting eluted recombinant toxins revealed protein bands corresponding with the expected molecular mass range of SVSP toxins, and demonstrated a single sharp protein band for RVV-V, a doublet band for batroxobin and a single ‘band’ extending over several kilodaltons (≈35–45 kDa) for ancrod, suggesting the production of several different glyco-forms (see right hand columns of Figure 1A–C). Treatment of each toxin with the deglycosylating agent PNGase F resulted in findings supporting this assertion, with molecular mass shifts observed for each protein, including the resolution of the molecular mass range for ancrod resolving into a single protein band (Supplementary Figure S2). To test whether the three recombinant toxins were correctly folded, we next used degradation SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis to assess their fibrinogenolytic activity. Our findings revealed that recombinantly expressed ancrod, batroxobin and RVV-V were all functionally active, as evidenced by effective cleavage of the α chain of fibrinogen by all three proteins, alongside additional partial cleavage of the β chain by batroxobin (Figure 1A–C).
3.2. Monitoring Seroconversion to the Toxin Immunogens
Approximately 1.5 mg of each recombinantly expressed protein was recovered following purification, amounts more than sufficient for murine immunisation experiments. Over 14 weeks, different groups of mice received multiple immunising doses of each recombinant toxin, alongside a group receiving a mixture of all three toxins (in a 1:1:1 ratio), and a control group that received a native venom mixture. To quantify antibody binding levels to the immunogens, serum samples were collected at weeks 3, 6, 10 and 14 (terminal sample) and assessed via ELISA. The mice responded to the recombinant immunogens in a variable manner, though gradual increases in antibody binding levels were typically observed following primary immunisation until the end of the experiment (Figure 2). The exception to this was the responses observed in the group immunised with batroxobin, which showed lower binding levels until week eight (Figure 2). The resulting titres of specific antibodies were highest in the groups immunised with ancrod (Figure 2A) and the 1:1:1 mixture of the three recombinant toxins (Figure 2D). In addition to monitoring responses against the immunogens, we also quantified time-course immunological responses to the three crude venoms from which the recombinant toxins are derived. As anticipated, binding levels were reduced compared with the immunogens, likely due to SVSPs toxins only making up a proportion of the crude venoms compared with the recombinant toxin immunogens, though binding levels of the anti-batroxobin sera against B. atrox venom remained very low even following the third and fourth immunisation (Figure 2F). However, binding levels of the anti-ancrod and anti-RVV-V sera against the corresponding venoms (i.e., C. rhodostoma and D. russelii venom, respectively) provided clear evidence that these two recombinant toxins stimulated the production of antibodies by the end of the experimental time course that recognised native venom proteins (Figure 2E,G). High levels of immunological binding were observed between the positive control experimental sera (i.e., the “antivenom mix”) and the three crude snake venoms mixed and used as the immunogen, with maximal binding effectively achieved after only four weeks (Figure 2H), unlike that observed with the recombinant proteins. Nonetheless, as anticipated, mice serum samples collected at the end of the immunisation schedule (14 weeks) exhibited the highest antibody binding titres across all groups. These samples were subjected to IgG purification to produce the experimental antivenoms used for all downstream analyses.
3.3. Quantifying and Visualising Immunological Cross-Reactivity
We used endpoint ELISA (EPT-ELISA) experiments to quantify the binding levels detected between the resulting experimental IgG antivenoms and the toxins and venoms used as immunogens. Comparisons of the binding profiles revealed that responses to ancrod, RVV-V and the mixture of the three recombinant toxins were highly consistent across the different experiential antivenoms generated and stimulated the highest binding titres (Figure 3A–D). Notably, binding levels to each recombinant toxin by the corresponding experimental antivenoms were higher than the positive control antivenom (i.e., generated via immunisation with the three crude venoms), presumably as the result of the majority of antibodies being directed towards specific SVSP immunogens, rather than the broad diversity of toxins present in the crude venoms (Figure 3). Despite these findings, the anti-batroxobin antivenom generally underperformed (consistent with serology data shown in Figure 2) and exhibited binding titres considerably lower than the other experimental antivenoms against each immunogen, with the exception of cross-reactivity to recombinant batroxobin (Figure 3A–D). The immunological responses to crude venoms by the experimental antivenoms were also variable. Unsurprisingly, the highest binding levels were observed with the positive control antivenom (i.e., generated using the three venom mix as an immunogen). While the anti-ancrod, anti-RVV-V and anti-toxin mix antivenoms all exhibited moderate binding against C. rhodostoma venom and the three-venom mixture (Figure 3E,H), responses to B. atrox and D. russelii venom were very low (Figure 3F,G), perhaps suggesting low SVSP abundance in these venoms.
Next, reduced SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and western blotting experiments were performed to visualise the immunological recognition of the experimental antivenoms to each of the toxins and venoms used as immunogens (Figure 4A). Each of the experimental antivenoms generated with recombinant toxin immunogens exhibited immunological recognition of each of the three recombinant toxins, irrespective of which was used to generate the antibodies (Figure 4B–D). Further, both the anti-ancrod and anti-RVV-V antivenoms displayed recognition of various toxins found in the crude venoms of C. rhodostoma, B. atrox and D. russelii in a highly comparable manner (Figure 4B,D), though recognition by the anti-batroxobin antivenom was considerably reduced (Figure 4C), consistent with the earlier ELISA experiments (Figure 3). When tested against a broader panel of crude snake venoms, antibodies generated against the recombinant toxins showed immunological cross-reactivity with proteins exhibiting molecular masses consistent with SVSP toxins present in other pit vipers (i.e. Bothrops and Crotalus spp.) (Supplementary Figure S3), and these findings were also consistent with EPT-ELISA binding levels being increased against these venoms, except in the case of the anti-batroxobin experimental antivenom (Supplementary Figure S4). The positive control antivenom generated against the mixture of the three crude venoms exhibited a distinct binding pattern, characterised by broad binding against the diversity of toxins found in each of the crude venoms (both those used as immunogens and others), but with only noticeable recognition of ancrod out of the three toxins recombinantly expressed in this study (Figure 4F and Supplementary Figures S3 and S4).
3.4. Inhibition of Fibrinogenolytic Activity
Many SVSP toxins exhibit fibrinogenolytic activity similar to human thrombin (i.e., TLEs). While thrombin can convert fibrinogen to fibrin via cleavage of the α and β chains [46], venom TLEs exert variable specificities and can cleave either both the α and β chains, or preferentially cleave either the α or β chains, of fibrinogen [47]. During validation of protein expression, we demonstrated that recombinant ancrod, batroxobin and RVV-V all cleaved the α chain of fibrinogen (Figure 1). Co-incubation of these recombinant toxins with their corresponding experimental antivenoms resulted in inhibition of fibrinogenoylsis, as evidenced by visualisation (i.e., restoration vs. toxin only control) of the α chain (Figure 5A–C), and demonstrating that the immunological cross-reactivity described above can also confer inhibition of toxin function. Unsurprisingly, crude venoms from C. rhodostoma, B. atrox and D. russelii were also able to cleave the α chain of fibrinogen, though D. russelii was the least potent in this regard, and C. rhodostoma venom additionally cleaved the β chain (Supplementary Figure S5). Although inhibition experiments with the corresponding experimental antivenoms did not result in complete inhibition of venom activity, likely due to distinct non-SVSP toxins also contributing, in each case the experimental antivenoms did reduce the extent of venom-induced fibrinogenolysis observed (Supplementary Figure S5). Comparisons with the normal mouse control, where no inhibition was observed (Supplementary Figure S6), demonstrated that this effect was the result of antibody specificities stimulated by the recombinant toxin immunogens.
3.5. Inhibition of Coagulation Disturbances
To assess the inhibitory capability of the experimental antivenoms against recombinant toxins and crude venoms acting more broadly on components of the blood clotting cascade, we next quantified various coagulation parameters. First, using FFP, we measured the PT and aPTT stimulated by the recombinant toxins and corresponding crude venoms in the presence and absence of our experimental antivenoms, and using commercial antivenoms as controls. The PT measures clotting dictated by the extrinsic and common coagulation cascades, and a prolonged PT can result from an absence or deficiency of one or more of Factors X, VII, V, II or I (fibrinogen). Our results showed that each of the recombinant toxins and corresponding crude venoms substantially prolonged the PT, with the crude venoms resulting in increased clotting time delays over each of the corresponding recombinant toxins (Figure 6), likely due to additional toxins contributing to the overall effect on the coagulation cascade. In terms of inhibition, although the normal mouse control (i.e., containing non-specific antibodies) noticeably reduced the venom/toxin-induced PT prolongation observed in these experiments, suggesting considerable non-specific inhibitory effects from the antibodies, the experimental antivenoms directed against specific recombinantly expressed SVSP toxins exhibited superior inhibitory profiles. Indeed, at the doses of antivenom tested, the anti-toxin experimental antivenoms consistently produced the greatest levels of venom inhibition, exceeding those of the experimental anti-toxin mix antivenom mix antivenoms and also the specific commercial antivenoms, and generally reduced toxin- and venom-induced PT prolongations to near control levels (Figure 6). However, these enhanced reductions in comparison with the normal mouse control were only statistically significant against ancrod and the three venoms tested (all p <0.05), but not against batroxobin or RVV-V (Figure 6).
In contrast to these findings using the PT, none of the recombinant toxins or crude venoms under study affected the aPTT, which measures clotting dictated by the intrinsic and common coagulation cascades, and thus inhibitory effects could not be measured (Supplementary Figure S7).
The clotting time of diluted plasma with a standard concentration of thrombin is inversely related to the fibrinogen concentration, and at low fibrinogen concentrations, the reaction rate is, therefore, a function of fibrinogen concentration [45]. To further assess the inhibitory capabilities of the experimental antivenoms against the fibrinogenolytic activity of the recombinant SVSP toxins and venoms used as immunogens, we quantified the consumption of fibrinogen using clotting time experiments with FFP. Quantification of resulting fibrinogen concentrations demonstrated that the three SVSP toxins (ancrod, batroxobin and RVV-V) and the three native snake venoms tested (C. rhodostoma, B. atrox and D. russelii) all dramatically reduced fibrinogen levels compared to the control (0.73–1.96 g/L vs. 3.68 g/L, respectively) (Figure 7). Noticeably, none of the antivenoms tested, including the commercial antivenom controls, were able to restore fibrinogen levels to those of the control, irrespective of which recombinant toxin or venom was used. Broadly speaking, the anti-toxin mix and antivenom mix experimental antivenoms exhibited highly comparable inhibitory responses, though both provided either highly comparable or modest additional reductions in fibrinogen depletion over the commercial antivenom control (Figure 7). However, these resulting fibrinogen levels were generally similar to, or slightly higher than, those obtained using the non-specific normal mouse control samples, and were only significantly different against ancrod and RVV-V (all p < 0.05; Figure 7). Contrastingly, the toxin-specific experimental antivenoms (i.e., anti-ancrod, anti-batroxobin and anti-RVV-V) displayed clear evidence of protection against fibrinogen depletion, with the resulting fibrinogen concentrations recovered in all homologous toxin and venom combinations significantly higher than the corresponding toxin or venom only control values (2.23–2.56 g/L vs. 0.73–1.96 g/L) and those treated with the normal mouse controls (all p < 0.01; Figure 7).
4. Discussion
Antivenom is the only specific treatment for snakebite envenoming, and though these therapeutics save countless lives each year, they have several limitations that need to be overcome to ensure that effective, safe and affordable treatment is accessible for tropical snakebite victims. One of the main limitations with current antivenoms is that only about 10–20% of the antibodies present in them are specific to the toxins found in the venom immunogens [23,27]. Furthermore, of that 10–20%, a substantial proportion will be directed towards toxins that may not necessarily be of great importance for neutralisation, for example if they are of low toxicity or relevance for causing pathology in snakebite victims [48]. Consequently, there have been many experimental attempts to improve conventional antivenoms by focusing the immune response towards the generation of polyclonal antibodies against key pathogenic toxins, rather than all toxins, via the use of immunogens distinct from crude venom. Examples of such strategies include the use of strings of linear epitopes [49], virus-like particles decorated in conserved epitopes [44], recombinantly expressed venom toxins [50] and recombinantly expressed consensus toxins [51].
In this study, we explored the potential utility of using recombinantly expressed toxins to generate polyclonal antibody responses directed against the haemotoxic SVSP toxin family. The SVSPs are enzymatic proteases that are common toxins in snake venom systems and have been studied for many decades due to their ability to interfere with haemostasis in a variety of ways [52]. Many SVSPs act as thrombin-like enzymes (i.e., the TLEs) and during envenoming their fibrinogenolytic activity contributes towards VICC and the severity of haemotoxicity [8,11], thus making them priority targets for neutralisation. In this study we applied a mammalian cell expression approach for SVSP immunogen production, rather using other expression systems or native toxin purification. We chose mammalian cells for expression because SVSPs are often glycosylated and have a number of disulfide bonds, which present obstacles to effectively refold the recombinant proteins as active forms from E. coli-expressed insoluble inclusion bodies, even under conditions intended to favour disulfide bond formation [35,36]. Such refolding steps are crucial but are frequently unsuccessful and/or time-consuming to optimise sufficient yield recovery, as reported in several previous snake venom toxin expression studies [31,32,53,54]. Consequently, here we used mammalian HEK293F cells for the expression of three pathogenically relevant SVSP toxins sourced from geographically diverse medically important viperid snakes, specifically ancrod from C. rhodostoma, batroxobin from B. atrox and RVV-V from D. russelli. Expression of each protein resulted in acceptable yields (≈0.7 g from 1 L culture), purity and, since many SVSPs are variably glycosylated [55,56], evidence of glycosylation. As a measure of success of correct disulfide bond formation and native protein folding, we tested the functional activities of the toxins in haemotoxicity bioassays, which revealed each exhibited fibrinogenolytic activities, and dramatically decreased fibrinogen concentrations and prolonged prothrombin times when incubated with FFP.
To further explore the utility of recombinant toxins for the future development of snakebite antivenoms with more focused anti-toxin inhibitory profiles, we used the recombinantly expressed SVSPs as immunogens. The toxins elicited variable immune responses, though the resulting experimental murine antivenoms demonstrated promising cross-reactivity to both the recombinant SVSP immunogens and native toxins found in a variety of crude snake venoms. Although comparisons of the resulting binding profiles indicated that responses to ancrod, RVV-V, and the recombinant toxin mixture were strong and highly consistent across the different experimental antivenoms generated, the responses generated by recombinant batroxobin were considerably reduced, except against batroxobin itself (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The reason for this remains unclear, and is also despite increased immunogen doses being used for the third and fourth immunisations, but provides evidence that related toxins (batroxobin shares 93% and 62% amino acid percentage identity with ancrod and RVV-V, respectively) [43,57,58] may stimulate considerably different titres of specific antibodies. It was also noticeable, and perhaps unsurprising, that each of the experimental antivenoms generated against the recombinant toxins exhibited considerably reduced immunological binding levels to the crude venoms, and were outperformed by the ‘antivenom mix’ control antivenom in this regard (Figure 3). These findings are not unexpected considering that snake venoms consist of a variety of distinct toxins, and thus our SVSP-focused antivenoms can only be expected to recognise a proportion (i.e., binding titres are likely to be somewhat proportional to SVSP content in each venom). This perhaps makes our findings observed with C. rhodostoma venom particularly noticeable, as the anti-ancrod, anti-RVV-V and the anti-toxin mix antivenoms produced end-point titration ELISA binding profiles nearly comparable to the antivenom mix control antivenom against this venom (Figure 3).
It is promising that the immunological profiling described above also extended to the experimental antivenoms conferring protection against toxin functional activities. Each of the toxin-specific antivenoms were capable of inhibiting a pathologically relevant functional activity of the recombinant toxins (fibrinogenolysis), and also reduced the consumption of fibrinogen and the prolongation of the PT measured in plasma spiking experiments (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). Although these inhibitory effects were generally greater against the recombinant toxin immunogens than the crude venoms, again likely due to distinct non-SVSP toxins also contributing to these functional activities, reductions in fibrinogenolysis, fibrinogen depletion and PT prolongations were observed with each of the toxin-specific experimental antivenoms. To contextualise these findings, it is worth nothing that for the latter two experiments, the toxin-specific antivenoms outperformed the commercial antivenom controls. Collectively these findings strongly suggest that a single recombinant toxin is capable of stimulating desirable inhibitory antibody responses against snake venom toxins.
However, perhaps somewhat surprisingly, we failed to observe any discernible advantage in combining the three recombinant SVSP toxins together as immunogens. The ‘anti-toxin mix’ antivenom resulted in highly comparable binding titres and toxin specificities to the anti-ancrod and anti-RVV-V antivenoms against the various immunogens and the panel of native snake venoms used in this study (Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Supplementary Figures S3 and S4), while this antivenom was inferior in inhibiting the activity of the toxins and venoms measured in the plasma-spiking functional assays (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Thus, in this case, a single representative SVSP toxin was capable of generating at least comparable antibody responses to a mixture of multiple different SVSPs, which is an intriguing finding analogous to recent observations with crude venoms that fewer immunogens covering toxin diversity may be superior to more [27]. However, for such an approach to be successful, the ‘right’ immunogen to select remains of critical importance, and relying on a single toxin to generate broad, yet toxin family-specific, antibody responses comes with considerable risk, and perhaps even more so given that use of recombinant batroxobin here resulted in an antivenom with poor immunological recognition of native venom toxins.
Despite the promise of the findings presented herein, it is important to note that there are several limitations associated with this study. The most important of these is that, due to the restricted blood sample volumes collected post-immunisation (which were due to the relatively small sample size per immunogen group (n = 5) and ethical constraints), our analyses of the binding and functional neutralisation of SVSP toxins and crude venoms were limited to in vitro experiments. While there remain considerable issues associated with current preclinical models used to assess antivenom efficacy, including their questionable relevance for modelling VICC [59], these in vivo models remain the gold standard for efficacy testing. Thus, important next steps with recombinant toxin-specific antivenoms, such as those generated here, would be to test whether their functional inhibitory profiles are capable of conferring preclinical protection against venom-induced pathologies in appropriate in vivo models. In the context of the SVSP toxins targeted in this study, assessing whether experimental antivenoms designed against recombinant toxins can reduce systemic haemorrhage and/or the severity of coagulopathy would be valuable readouts.
The capability of toxin family-specific antivenoms to broadly protect against venom-induced lethality may be restrictive, particularly when attempting to neutralise snake venoms where distinct toxin families contribute substantially towards severe pathology. However, a previous study that used a recombinantly expressed neurotoxin as immunogen, specifically a chimeric consensus short-chain α-neurotoxin three finger toxin, resulted in an equine experimental antivenom capable of neutralising the lethal effects of both specific neurotoxins and a variety of crude neurotoxic snake venoms [51]. Thus, in future research it would be fascinating to explore whether recombinant ancrod or RVV-V, perhaps also along with an informatically designed consensus SVSP toxin, might be capable of generating an antivenom capable of providing a degree of preclinical protection against geographically diverse vipers that cause systemic haemotoxicity in vivo. Should such an approach provide limited efficacy, a strong case would likely remain for recombinant toxins retaining value for antivenom production in the form of their use as either supplemental immunogens to either ‘boost’ or redirect the immune response towards specific toxins of greatest pathological importance, or for generating separate polyclonal antibody pools that could be blended or used in conjunction with existing antivenom therapies in a fortifying approach.
Overall, our findings further strengthen the potential value of using recombinant venom toxins as immunogens to stimulate focused and desirable antibody responses capable of neutralising specific venom-induced pathological effects. Such tools are a welcome addition to the diversity of experimental approaches currently being explored to circumvent limitations associated with current antivenoms, with the long-term goal of dramatically improving therapeutics for the world’s neglected tropical snakebite victims.
Conceptualization, N.A., R.A.H. and N.R.C.; methodology, N.A., P.B., J.A. and M.C.W.; formal analysis, N.A.; investigation, N.A., P.B., J.A., E.C., S.A., C.A.D., R.J.E., S.R.H., R.A.H., M.C.W., S.K.M. and N.R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A. and N.R.C.; writing—review and editing, P.B., J.A., S.A., M.C.W., S.K.M. and N.R.C.; Funding acquisition, N.A. and N.R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
The authors wish to thank Paul Rowley for expert snake husbandry at LSTM, Richard Pleass for support relating to recombinant protein expression, and the Biomedical Service Unit provided by Liverpool Shared Research Facilities, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool for supporting in vivo research.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. The protein profiles of the purified recombinant toxins and their activity on human fibrinogen. Degradation SDS-PAGE gel electrophoretic profiles (reduced conditions, 8% gel) displaying the fibrinogenolytic activity of the recombinant toxins (3 μg, 1 mg/mL) following their incubation with human fibrinogen (3.75 µg, 2.5 mg/mL) at 37 °C for 120 min: (A) ancrod, (B) batroxobin and (C) RVV-V. PM represents the molecular mass protein marker, and the α, β and γ chains of fibrinogen are highlighted by corresponding labels.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Time-course analysis of the immunological cross-reactivity of pooled sera to the recombinant toxins and crude venoms used as immunogens over 14 weeks of murine immunisation. (A) Responses of anti-ancrod pooled mice sera against ancrod; (B) anti-batroxobin sera against batroxobin; (C) anti-RVV-V sera against RVV-V; (D) anti-toxin mix sera against a 1:1:1 mixture of the three recombinant toxins; (E) anti-ancrod sera against C. rhodostoma venom; (F) anti-batroxobin sera against B. atrox venom; (G) anti-RVV-V sera against D. russelii venom; (H) antivenom mix sera (positive control) against a 1:1:1 mixture of the three crude venoms. Data is shown for sera collected at weeks 3, 6, 10 and 14 (end of the experiment) of the immunisation time course. Non-immunised mouse sera (“normal mice control”) was used as a negative control. All mice serum samples were standardised to 1:50, then diluted fivefold. Data points represent means of duplicate readings, and error bars represent the standard deviation (SD).
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. EPT-ELISA analyses of immunological binding between the experimental antivenoms and the recombinant toxins and crude venoms used as immunogens. Each resulting experimental antivenom (anti-ancrod, anti-batroxobin, anti-RVV-V, anti-toxin mix and antivenom mix) is coloured differently, and their binding to the various toxin and venom immunogens are displayed in different panels, alongside data obtained with the normal mouse control negative control. Data shown represents binding levels to: (A) ancrod, (B) batroxobin, (C) RVV-V, (D) a mixture of the three recombinant toxins, (E) C. rhodostoma venom, (F) B. atrox venom, (G) D. russelii venom, and (H) a mixture of the three venoms. Each antivenom sample was serially diluted fivefold in duplicate, with data points representing means of duplicate readings, and error bars representing standard deviations (SD).
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Immunological recognition of the toxin and venom immunogens by the different experimental antivenoms. (A) Reduced 15% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and Coomassie blue staining was used to visualise the toxin and venom immunogens (ancrod, batroxobin, RVV-V, a 1:1:1 mix of these three toxins, and a 1:1:1 mix of C. rhodostoma, B. atrox and D. russelii venoms). The same venom samples were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for immunoblotting experiments and incubated with 1:5000 dilutions of primary antibodies (1 mg/mL) of each of the experimental antivenoms, specifically: (B) anti-ancrod, (C) anti-batroxobin, (D) anti-RVV-V, (E) anti-toxin mix, (F) antivenom mix (as positive control) and (G) normal mouse IgG (as negative control). PM indicates protein marker and note that different molecular mass markers were used for SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting experiments.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Experimental antivenoms directed against recombinant SVSP toxins inhibit their fibrinogenolytic activity. Degradation SDS-PAGE gel electrophoretic profiles are displayed following the incubation of various samples at 37 °C for 120 min. Panels show different data obtained with the different recombinant toxins: (A) Ancrod, (B) Batroxobin and (C) RVV-V. For each, the following layout was used: Lane 1, protein marker (PM); Lane 2, human fibrinogen (3.75 µg, 2.5 mg/mL); Lane 3, fibrinogen (3.75 µg, 2.5 mg/mL) + recombinant toxin (3 μg, 1 mg/mL; ancrod, batroxobin or RVV-V); Lane 4, fibrinogen (3.75 µg, 2.5 mg/mL) + recombinant toxin (3 μg, 1 mg/mL) + experimental antivenom (1.75 µg,1 mg/mL; anti-ancrod, anti-batroxobin or anti-RVV-V); Lane 5, recombinant toxin only (3 μg, 1 mg/mL); Lane 6, specific experimental antivenom only (1.75 μg, 1 mg/mL): H represents IgG heavy chain (≈50 kDa) and L IgG light chain (≈25 kDa).
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. Inhibition of coagulation disturbances defined by the prothrombin time (PT). The assay measured the combined effect of the clotting factors of the extrinsic and common coagulation pathways (in seconds) in the presence of the recombinant toxins/crude venoms, and their recovery effect by adding specific experimental antivenoms/specific commercial antivenoms, incubated with FFP. (A) Ancrod, (B) Batroxobin, (C) RVV-V, (D) the experimental/commercial antivenoms controls and the normal mouse control, (E) C. rhodostoma venom, (F) B. atrox venom and (G) D. russelii venom. For each toxin/venom, “homologous” antivenom combinations were used (e.g., for ancrod the anti-ancrod antivenom was used as the anti-toxin antivenom, and the Malayan pit viper antivenom was used as the commercial antivenom). Each experimental antivenom alone, each commercial antivenom alone and the normal mouse control alone were used as negative controls. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD) of duplicate measurements. The resulting data were statistically analysed with one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Values found to be significantly different to the venom + normal mouse control are indicated by asterisks: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01.
Enlarge this image.Figure 7. Quantification of fibrinogen concentrations following co-incubation of recombinant toxins and crude venoms with the specific experimental and commercial antivenoms and human plasma. The assay uses an excess of thrombin to convert fibrinogen to fibrin in diluted citrated human fresh frozen plasma (FFP). The resulting fibrinogen concentration is shown for each recombinant toxin/crude venom against the specific experimental antivenoms incubated in FFP. Data shown represents the following immunogens: (A) Ancrod, (B) Batroxobin, (C) RVV-V, (D) the experimental/commercial antivenoms controls and the normal mouse control, (E) C. rhodostoma venom, (F) B. atrox venom and (G) D. russelii venom. For each toxin/venom, “homologous” antivenom combinations were used (e.g., for ancrod the anti-ancrod antivenom was used as the anti-toxin antivenom, and the Malayan pit viper antivenom was used as the commercial antivenom). Each experimental antivenom alone, each commercial antivenom alone and the normal mouse control alone were used as negative controls. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD) of duplicate measurements. The resulting data were statistically analysed with one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Values found to be significantly different to the venom + normal mouse control are indicated by asterisks: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Kasturiratne, A.; Wickremasinghe, A.R.; de Silva, N.; Gunawardena, N.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Premaratna, R.; Savioli, L.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med.; 2008; 5, e218. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18986210]
2. Gutiérrez, J.M.; Calvete, J.J.; Habib, A.G.; Harrison, R.A.; Williams, D.J.; Warrell, D.A. Snakebite envenoming. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers; 2017; 3, 17063. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.63] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28905944]
3. Alirol, E.; Sharma, K.; Bawaskar, F.; Kuch, U.; Chappuis, F. Snake bite in South Asia: A review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2010; 4, e603. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000603] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20126271]
4. Chippaux, J.-P. Snakebite envenomation turns again into a neglected tropical disease!. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis.; 2017; 23, 38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40409-017-0127-6]
5. Williams, D.J.; Faiz, M.A.; Abela-Ridder, B.; Ainsworth, S.; Bulfone, T.C.; Nickerson, A.D.; Habib, A.G.; Junghanss, T.; Fan, H.W.; Turner, M. et al. Strategy for a globally coordinated response to a priority neglected tropical disease: Snakebite envenoming. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2019; 13, e0007059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007059]
6. Casewell, N.R.; Jackson, T.N.W.; Laustsen, A.H.; Sunagar, K. Causes and consequences of snake venom variation. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.; 2020; 41, pp. 570-581. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2020.05.006]
7. Laxme, R.S.; Khochare, S.; de Souza, H.F.; Ahuja, B.; Suranse, V.; Martin, G.; Whitaker, R.; Sunagar, K. Beyond the ‘big four’: Venom profiling of the medically important yet neglected Indian snakes reveals disturbing antivenom deficiencies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2019; 13, e0007899.
8. Slagboom, J.; Kool, J.; Harrison, R.A.; Casewell, N.R. Haemotoxic snake venoms: Their functional activity, impact on snakebite victims and pharmaceutical promise. Br. J. Haematol.; 2017; 177, pp. 947-959. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14591]
9. White, J. Snake venoms and coagulopathy. Toxicon; 2005; 45, pp. 951-967. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.030]
10. Warrell, D.A. Snake bite. Lancet; 2010; 375, pp. 77-88. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61754-2]
11. Maduwage, K.; Isbister, G.K. Current treatment for venom-induced consumption coagulopathy resulting from snakebite. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2014; 8, e3220. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003220] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25340841]
12. Joseph, J.S.; Kini, R.M. Snake venom prothrombin activators homologous to blood coagulation factor Xa. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb.; 2001; 31, pp. 234-240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000048068]
13. Ainsworth, S.; Slagboom, J.; Alomran, N.; Pla, D.; Alhamdi, Y.; King, S.I.; Bolton, F.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Vonk, F.J.; Toh, C.H. et al. The paraspecific neutralisation of snake venom induced coagulopathy by antivenoms. Commun. Biol.; 2018; 1, 34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0039-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30271920]
14. Isbister, G.K. Editor Snakebite doesn’t cause disseminated intravascular coagulation: Coagulopathy and thrombotic microangiopathy in snake envenoming. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Thieme Medical Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
15. Isbister, G.K. Editor Procoagulant snake toxins: Laboratory studies, diagnosis, and understanding snakebite coagulopathy. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Thieme Medical Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Volume 35, pp. 93-103.
16. Phillips, D.J.; Swenson, S.D.; Francis, S.; Markland, J.; Mackessy, S. Thrombin-like snake venom serine proteinases. Handbook of Venoms and Toxins of Reptiles; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; Volume 139, 154.
17. Gutierrez, J.; León, G.; Lomonte, B.; Angulo, Y. Antivenoms for snakebite envenomings. Inflamm. Allergy-Drug Targets (Former. Curr. Drug Targets-Inflamm. Allergy) (Discontin.); 2011; 10, pp. 369-380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/187152811797200669] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21745181]
18. Gutierrez, J.M.; Lomonte, B.; León, G.; Rucavado, A.; Chaves, F.; Angulo, Y. Trends in snakebite envenomation therapy: Scientific, technological and public health considerations. Curr. Pharm. Des.; 2007; 13, pp. 2935-2950. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138161207782023784] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17979738]
19. Lalloo, D.G.; Theakston, R.D.G. Snake antivenoms: Antivenoms. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol.; 2003; 41, pp. 277-290. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1081/CLT-120021113]
20. de Silva, H.A.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Ranasinha, C.D.; Jayamanne, S.; Samarakoon, S.B.; Hittharage, A.; Kalupahana, R.; Ratnatilaka, G.A.; Uluwatthage, W.; Aronson, J.K. et al. Low-dose adrenaline, promethazine, and hydrocortisone in the prevention of acute adverse reactions to antivenom following snakebite: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med.; 2011; 8, e1000435. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000435]
21. Kularatne, S.A.; Gawarammana, I.B.; Kumarasiri, P.V.; Senanayake, N.; Dissanayake, W.P.; Ariyasena, H. Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous adrenaline as a treatment for anaphylactic reactions to polyvalent antivenom. Ceylon Med. J.; 2003; 48, pp. 148-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v48i4.3339]
22. Williams, D.J.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Calvete, J.J.; Wüster, W.; Ratanabanangkoon, K.; Paiva, O.; Brown, N.I.; Casewell, N.R.; Harrison, R.A.; Rowley, P.D. et al. Ending the drought: New strategies for improving the flow of affordable, effective antivenoms in Asia and Africa. J. Proteom.; 2011; 74, pp. 1735-1767. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.05.027]
23. Casewell, N.R.; Cook, D.A.; Wagstaff, S.C.; Nasidi, A.; Durfa, N.; Wüster, W.; Harrison, R.A. Pre-clinical assays predict pan-African Echis viper efficacy for a species-specific antivenom. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2010; 4, e851. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000851]
24. Brown, N.I. Consequences of neglect: Analysis of the sub-Saharan African snake antivenom market and the global context. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2012; 6, e1670. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001670] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22679521]
25. Harrison, R.A.; Oluoch, G.O.; Ainsworth, S.; Alsolaiss, J.; Bolton, F.; Arias, A.S.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Rowley, P.; Kalya, S.; Ozwara, H. et al. Correction: Preclinical antivenom-efficacy testing reveals potentially disturbing deficiencies of snakebite treatment capability in East Africa. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2020; 14, e0008698. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008698] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32866144]
26. Habib, A.G.; Brown, N.I. The snakebite problem and antivenom crisis from a health-economic perspective. Toxicon; 2018; 150, pp. 115-123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.05.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29782952]
27. Alomran, N.; Alsolaiss, J.; Albulescu, L.O.; Crittenden, E.; Harrison, R.A.; Ainsworth, S.; Casewell, N.R. Pathology-specific experimental antivenoms for haemotoxic snakebite: The impact of immunogen diversity on the in vitro cross-reactivity and in vivo neutralisation of geographically diverse snake venoms. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.; 2021; 15, e0009659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009659]
28. Jenkins, T.P.; Laustsen, A.H. Cost of manufacturing for recombinant snakebite antivenoms. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.; 2020; 8, 703. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00703]
29. Albulescu, L.O.; Xie, C.; Ainsworth, S.; Alsolaiss, J.; Crittenden, E.; Dawson, C.A.; Softley, R.; Bartlett, K.E.; Harrison, R.A.; Kool, J. et al. A therapeutic combination of two small molecule toxin inhibitors provides pancontinental preclinical efficacy against viper snakebite. bioRxiv; 2020; 11, pp. 1-4.
30. Yu, X.; Li, Z.; Xia, X.; Fang, H.; Zhou, C.; Chen, H. Expression and purification of ancrod, an anticoagulant drug, in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr. Purif.; 2007; 55, pp. 257-261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2007.07.002]
31. Liu, X.-L.; Pan, H.; Yang, G.-Z.; Wu, X.-F.; Zhou, Y.-C. Cloning and Sequencing of Genes Encoding Phospholipase A (2) from Agkistrodon acutus. Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao Acta Biochim. Et Biophys. Sin.; 1999; 31, pp. 41-45.
32. Maeda, M.; Satoh, S.; Suzuki, S.; Niwa, M.; Itoh, N.; Yamashina, I. Expression of cDNA for batroxobin, a thrombin-like snake venom enzyme. J. Biochem.; 1991; 109, pp. 632-637. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a123432]
33. Siigur, E.; Aaspõllu, A.; Siigur, J. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a cDNA for factor V activating enzyme, a coagulant protein from Vipera lebetina snake venom. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 1999; 262, pp. 328-332. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.1200]
34. Kalita, B.; Patra, A.; Mukherjee, A.K. Unraveling the proteome composition and immuno-profiling of western India Russell’s viper venom for in-depth understanding of its pharmacological properties, clinical manifestations, and effective antivenom treatment. J. Proteome Res.; 2017; 16, pp. 583-598. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00693] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27936776]
35. Gibbs, G.M.; Orta, G.; Reddy, T.; Koppers, A.J.; Martínez-López, P.; Luis de la Vega-Beltran, J.; Lo, J.C.; Veldhuis, N.; Jamsai, D.; McIntyre, P. et al. Cysteine-rich secretory protein 4 is an inhibitor of transient receptor potential M8 with a role in establishing sperm function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2011; 108, pp. 7034-7039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015935108] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21482758]
36. Gibbs, G.M.; Scanlon, M.J.; Swarbrick, J.; Curtis, S.; Gallant, E.; Dulhunty, A.F.; O’Bryan, M.K. The cysteine-rich secretory protein domain of Tpx-1 is related to ion channel toxins and regulates ryanodine receptor Ca2+ signaling. J. Biol. Chem.; 2006; 281, pp. 4156-4163. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M506849200] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16339766]
37. Frenzel, A.; Hust, M.; Schirrmann, T. Expression of recombinant antibodies. Front. Immunol.; 2013; 4, 217. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00217]
38. Yonamine, C.M.; Prieto-da-Silva, A.R.; Magalhães, G.S.; Rádis-Baptista, G.; Morganti, L.; Ambiel, F.C.; Chura-Chambi, R.M.; Yamane, T.; Camillo, M.A. Cloning of serine protease cDNAs from Crotalus durissus terrificus venom gland and expression of a functional Gyroxin homologue in COS-7 cells. Toxicon; 2009; 54, pp. 110-120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.03.022]
39. Wurm, F.M. Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2004; 22, pp. 1393-1398. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1026]
40. Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, W.-G. Applications of post-translational modifications of FoxO family proteins in biological functions. J. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2011; 3, pp. 276-282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjr013]
41. Lai, T.; Yang, Y.; Ng, S.K. Advances in mammalian cell line development technologies for recombinant protein production. Pharmaceuticals; 2013; 6, pp. 579-603. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph6050579]
42. Au, L.-C.; Lin, S.-B.; Chou, J.-S.; Teh, G.-W.; Chang, K.-J.; Shih, C.-M. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of the cDNA for ancrod, a thrombin-like enzyme from the venom of Calloselasma rhodostoma. Biochem. J.; 1993; 294, pp. 387-390. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj2940387]
43. Itoh, N.; Tanaka, N.; Mihashi, S.; Yamashina, I. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for batroxobin, a thrombin-like snake venom enzyme. J. Biol. Chem.; 1987; 262, pp. 3132-3135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)61479-6]
44. Menzies, S.K.; Dawson, C.A.; Crittenden, E.; Edge, R.; Hall, S.R.; Alsolaiss, J.; Wilkinson, M.C.; Casewell, N.R.; Harrison, R.A.; Ainsworth, S. Virus-Like Particles Displaying Conserved Toxin Epitopes Stimulate Broadly Reactive, Polyspecific, Murine Antibody Responses Capable of Snake Venom Recognition. Res. Sq.; 2021; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1044937/v1]
45. Clauss, A. Gennungsphysiologishe schnellmethode sur Bestimmung des Fibrinogens. Acta Haematol.; 1957; 17, pp. 237-246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000205234] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13434757]
46. Serrano, S.M.T.; Maroun, R.C. Snake venom serine proteinases: Sequence homology vs. substrate specificity, a paradox to be solved. Toxicon; 2005; 45, pp. 1115-1132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.020]
47. Castro, H.C.; Zingali, R.B.; Albuquerque, M.G.; Pujol-Luz, M.; Rodrigues, C.R. Snake venom thrombin-like enzymes: From reptilase to now. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.; 2004; 61, pp. 843-856. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-003-3325-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15095007]
48. Gutiérrez, J.M.; Albulescu, L.O.; Clare, R.H.; Casewell, N.R.; Abd El-Aziz, T.M.; Escalante, T.; Rucavado, A. The search for natural and synthetic inhibitors that would complement antivenoms as therapeutics for snakebite envenoming. Toxins; 2021; 13, 451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070451] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209691]
49. Wagstaff, S.C.; Laing, G.D.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Papaspyridis, C.; Harrison, R.A. Correction: Bioinformatics and Multiepitope DNA Immunization to Design Rational Snake Antivenom. PLoS Med.; 2008; 5, e209. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050209]
50. Liu, B.S.; Jiang, B.R.; Hu, K.C.; Liu, C.H.; Hsieh, W.C.; Lin, M.H.; Sung, W.C. Development of a broad-spectrum antiserum against cobra venoms using recombinant three-finger toxins. Toxins; 2021; 13, 556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080556]
51. de la Rosa, G.; Olvera, F.; Archundia, I.G.; Lomonte, B.; Alagón, A.; Corzo, G. Horse immunization with short-chain consensus α-neurotoxin generates antibodies against broad spectrum of elapid venomous species. Nat. Commun.; 2019; 10, 3642. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11639-2]
52. Swenson, S.; Markland, F.S., Jr. Snake venom fibrin (ogen) olytic enzymes. Toxicon; 2005; 45, pp. 1021-1039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.027]
53. Selistre-de-Araujo, H.S.; de Souza, E.L.; Beltramini, L.M.; Ownby, C.L.; Souza, D.H.F. Expression, refolding, and activity of a recombinant nonhemorrhagic snake venom metalloprotease. Protein Expr. Purif.; 2000; 19, pp. 41-47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/prep.2000.1225]
54. Hung, C.-C.; Chiou, S.-H. Expression of a kallikrein-like protease from the snake venom: Engineering of autocatalytic site in the fusion protein to facilitate protein refolding. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2000; 275, pp. 924-930. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2000.3411] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10973823]
55. Mackessy, S.P. Thrombin-like enzymes in snake venoms. Toxins and Hemostasis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 519-557.
56. Paes Leme, A.F.; Prezoto, B.C.; Yamashiro, E.T.; Bertholim, L.; Tashima, A.K.; Klitzke, C.F.; Camargo, A.C.; Serrano, S.M. Bothrops protease A, a unique highly glycosylated serine proteinase, is a potent, specific fibrinogenolytic agent. J. Thromb. Haemost.; 2008; 6, pp. 1363-1372. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02995.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18433459]
57. MacDonald, R.J.; Stary, S.J.; Swift, G.H. Two similar but nonallelic rat pancreatic trypsinogens. Nucleotide Seq. Cloned Cdnas. J. Biol. Chem.; 1982; 257, pp. 9724-9732. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)34133-4]
58. Tokunaga, F.; Nagasawa, K.; Tamura, S.; Miyata, T.; Iwanaga, S.; Kisiel, W. The factor V-activating enzyme (RVV-V) from Russell’s viper venom. Identification of isoproteins RVV-V alpha,-V beta, and-V gamma and their complete amino acid sequences. J. Biol. Chem.; 1988; 263, pp. 17471-17481. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)77860-0]
59. Silva, A.; Hodgson, W.C.; Tasoulis, T.; Isbister, G.K. Rodent Lethality Models Are Problematic for Evaluating Antivenoms for Human Envenoming. Front. Pharmacol.; 2022; 13, 830384. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.830384]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Crittenden, Edouard 1 ; Ainsworth, Stuart 1 ; Dawson, Charlotte A 1 ; Edge, Rebecca J 1 ; Hall, Steven R 1 ; Harrison, Robert A 3 ; Wilkinson, Mark C 1 ; Menzies, Stefanie K 1
; Casewell, Nicholas R 3
1 Centre for Snakebite Research & Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK;
2 Department of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK;
3 Centre for Snakebite Research & Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK;