It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is an important crop in Chad that plays an economic role in the countryside were stalks are produced mainly for human consumption without any processing. Unfortunately, very little information exists on its genetic diversity and brix content. Studies performed in 2014 and 2015 showed that there were significant variations (p < 0.001) for all assessed quantitative traits. Potential grain yield (0.12–1.67 t ha−1), days to 50% flowering (68.3–126.3 days), and plant height (128.9–298.3 cm) were among traits that exhibited broader variability. Brix content range from 5.5 to 16.7% across accessions, was positively correlated to stalk diameter and plant height, but negatively correlated to moisture content in fresh stalk and potential grain yield. Fresh stalk yield range from 16.8 to 115.7 Mg ha−1, with a mean value of 58.3 Mg ha−1 across accession. Moisture content in fresh stalk range from 33.7 to 74.4% but was negatively correlated to fresh stalk yield. Potential sugar yield range from 0.5 to 5.3 Mg ha−1 across accession with an average of 2.2 Mg ha−1. Theoretical ethanol yield range from 279.5 to 3,101.2 L ha−1 across accession with an average of 1,266.3 L ha−1 which is significantly higher than values reported under similar semiarid conditions. Overall, grain yields were comparatively low. However, two accessions had grain yield of more than 1.5 t ha−1; which is greater than the average 1.0 t ha−1 for local grain sorghum varieties in Chad. These could have multi-purpose uses; grains, sugar and bioenergy production.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Institut Tchadien de Recherche Agronomique Pour le Développement (ITRAD), N’Djaména, Chad
2 USDA-ARS, Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, Lubbock, USA (GRID:grid.512834.9)
3 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Bamako, Mali (GRID:grid.463375.0)
4 University of Montpellier, AGAP, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.121334.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 0141); CIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.8183.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9871)
5 Institut Tchadien de Recherche Agronomique Pour le Développement (ITRAD), N’Djaména, Chad (GRID:grid.8183.2)
6 Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Laboratoire Biosciences, Équipe Génétique et Amélioration des Plantes, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso (GRID:grid.8183.2)
7 Texas Tech University, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Lubbock, USA (GRID:grid.264784.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2186 7496)