It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose substantial challenges to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Exploring systematic SDG strategies is urgently needed to aid recovery from the pandemic and reinvigorate global SDG actions. Based on available data and comprehensive analysis of the literature, this paper highlights ongoing challenges facing the SDGs, identifies the effects of COVID-19 on SDG progress, and proposes a systematic framework for promoting the achievement of SDGs in the post-pandemic era. Progress towards attaining the SDGs was already lagging behind even before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Inequitable distribution of food–energy–water resources and environmental crises clearly threaten SDG implementation. Evidently, there are gaps between the vision for SDG realization and actual capacity that constrain national efforts. The turbulent geopolitical environment, spatial inequities, and trade-offs limit the effectiveness of SDG implementation. The global public health crisis and socio-economic downturn under COVID-19 have further impeded progress toward attaining the SDGs. Not only has the pandemic delayed SDG advancement in general, but it has also amplified spatial imbalances in achieving progress, undermined connectivity, and accentuated anti-globalization sentiment under lockdowns and geopolitical conflicts. Nevertheless, positive developments in technology and improvement in environmental conditions have also occurred. In reflecting on the overall situation globally, it is recommended that post-pandemic SDG actions adopt a “Classification–Coordination–Collaboration” framework. Classification facilitates both identification of the current development status and the urgency of SDG achievement aligned with national conditions. Coordination promotes domestic/international and inter-departmental synergy for short-term recovery as well as long-term development. Cooperation is key to strengthening economic exchanges, promoting technological innovation, and building a global culture of sustainable development that is essential if the endeavor of achieving the SDGs is to be successful. Systematic actions are urgently needed to get the SDG process back on track.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Beijing Normal University, State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.20513.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1789 9964); Beijing Normal University, Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.20513.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1789 9964)
2 University of Cape Town, Department of Environmental & Geographical Science, Rondebosch, South Africa (GRID:grid.7836.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 1151); Nanjing University, School of Geographic and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.41156.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2314 964X); Zhejiang Normal University, College of Environmental Sciences, Jinhua, China (GRID:grid.453534.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2219 2654)
3 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Industrial Ecology Program, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Trondheim, Norway (GRID:grid.5947.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1516 2393)
4 Mykolas Romeris University, Environmental Management Center, Vilnius, Lithuania (GRID:grid.5259.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1009 8986)
5 Beijing Normal University, State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.20513.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1789 9964); Beijing Normal University, Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.20513.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1789 9964); Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)