Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Conversion by

Full text

Turn on search term navigation

1. Introduction

Plants preserve carbon cycle in nature via photosynthesis process as they convert CO₂ into carbohydrates, but several activities such as industrialization, urbanization, deforestation and excessive consumption of fossil fuels affected this cycle considerably [1]. The accumulation of CO₂ in the atmosphere, beyond the capacity of the nature to handle, has created severe global warming phenomena that result in climate change. Now, the devastating effects from unusual weather patterns are visible all around us. In the recent years, therefore, CO₂ capturing and utilization is a focal subject for the scientific community [2,3], as it addresses the energy crisis and global warming without hindering the development plans or urbanization [4]. In particular, recycling of CO₂ into carbon containing and value-added chemicals regenerates fuel within the present hydrocarbons-based energy infrastructure.

CO₂ is a linear molecule, with weak electron affinity, chemically stable and the nucleophilic approach at the carbon atom governs its conversion reaction [5]. C=O bond dissociation requires more than 750 kJ/mol of energy [6]. Thermodynamically, this reaction is an uphill one, hence input of energy is required to break C=O bond. In nature, the photosensitizers (e.g., chlorophyll) capture energy from sunlight to use it in the endothermic reactions.

To mimic these natural solar energy conversion, several techniques such as photoelectrochemical (PEC) [7], biochemical [8], photocatalysis [9], radiolysis [10], thermo-catalysis [11], and electrocatalysis [12] have been proposed for CO₂ conversion into useful chemicals. Photocatalytic (PC) methods has been identified as one of the most suitable approaches to convert CO₂ into different gaseous (ethane, methane, etc.) and liquid (ethanol, methanol, formate etc.) products under solar light irradiation at ambient temperature and pressure [13]. The most attractive aspect of such approach is the utilization of renewable solar radiation to draw the energy required for driving the catalytic process. In the case of a pure photocatalytic approach (without any electric field), this is called artificial photo-synthesis that imitates the energy cycle of nature [14]. In addition, use of renewable solar energy brings in associated advantages such as environmental compatibility, economic feasibility, and product selectivity [15].

Up to now, several different types of materials such as metal complexes, organic molecules, precious metals, ions, organic molecules, and semiconductors have been explored to enhance the efficiency of photocatalytic processes. Among these materials, semiconductors in general and metal oxides in particular have shown immense potential over the others with regard to stability, toxicity, and feasibility of the fabrication etc., which makes them desirable in photocatalytic applications [16].

The general understanding for an efficient photocatalytic process by semiconductor materials, the electrons and holes in the semiconductor materials should have sufficient energy to ionize the CO₂ and H₂O, respectively. In other words, energies of the photogenerated electron and hole (e⁻/h⁺) must be higher than the overpotential of H₂O/O₂ (0.82 vs. NHE at pH 7) and lower than the overpotential of CO₂/HCOOH (−0.61 V vs. NHE at pH 7), respectively [17,18]. Performing photo-assisted redox reactions such as CO₂ reduction or water oxidation therefore requires a photocatalyst with an optimum bandgap (at least 2.88 eV) [19] so as to generate electrons and holes with sufficient energies. Simultaneously, the photocatalyst must be able to absorb large fraction of the solar spectrum even from visible and near IR light absorption (in addition to UV) [20].

Historically, TiO₂ is the most extensively investigated semiconductor material for photocatalytic CO₂ conversion since the successful demonstration of the photoelectrochemical CO₂ conversion by Inoue et al. in 1979 [21]. Moreover, owing to superior advantages such as material robustness, chemical and thermal stability, nontoxicity, corrosion resistance, and ease of synthesis, TiO₂-based photocatalytic systems became popular and related applications have been focal target for researchers due to its tremendous potential in different solar driven processes such as water splitting, pollutant degradation and CO₂ conversion [21,22]. It is well known TiO₂ has three crystalline phases, anatase, rutile, and brookite possessing the bandgap values in the range of 3.0–3.6 eV. However, the bandgap is relatively large to absorb whole solar spectrum and this limits the light absorption of TiO₂ only to UV region, which is ~5% of total solar energy available. Moreover, the charge recombination in TiO₂ is a serious issue and this makes the photocatalytic reaction by TiO₂ inefficient. Hence, increasing the optical absorption and decreasing the charge recombination of the TiO₂ are of another prime importance. To overcome these limitations, lots of research has proposed on material modification, low dimensional introduction, and design of photocatalytic structure for TiO₂ to achieve highly efficient photocatalytic CO₂ conversion.

Therefore, in this review, we summarize the works that have been carried out for the enhancement of photocatalytic CO₂ conversion by material and structural modification of TiO₂ and TiO₂-based photocatalytic system. We provide several strategies and their details: (1) crystal facet engineering (2) nanostructures (3) junction formation (4) material modification, in particular, by hydrogenation (5) single atom photocatalysts (6) metal-organic framework.

2. Strategy I: Crystal Facet Engineering of TiO₂ Photocatalyst

Titanium dioxide is a multifunctional material that has attracted researchers due to its applicability to various fields such as photocatalysis, photovoltaics, and biomedical applications [23,24]. TiO₂ nanoparticles and nanocrystals have been obtained via different preparation methods such as flame spray pyrolysis, hydrothermal treatment and sol-gel method. In particular, crystallites with selective facets are helpful in catalysis. In addition to wet chemistry approaches, powders produced from flame pyrolysis resulted in nanocrystals with thermodynamically stable (101) surface [25,26] and (100)/(010) surface planes, and some reactive (001) facets (Figure 1 shows the different types) [27,28].

While, the size of TiO₂ nanoparticles differs remarkably depending on the synthesis process [29], the preparation techniques affect the crystal shapes significantly [30]. Choosing a specific synthesis method depends on the required morphology of TiO₂ material, which further depends on the target application. The methods of synthesis significantly affect the morphology, crystallinity, and phase, which have their influence on the physical and chemical properties. The synthesis strategies are chosen, considering the ability to tailor particle-size, the integration with other structures or phases [31], flexibility of self-assembly [32], possibility of doping with other elements [33,34], also inlaying heteroatoms, heterostructures or quantum dots [35,36] in order to manipulate the electronic and optical properties.

Anatase is the most investigated photoactive polymorph of TiO₂, with its thermodynamically stable (101) facets (>94%), dominating in consonance with the Wulff construction. The morphology, crystal growth, and facets can be controlled by using a shape and growth controller such as HF [28]. In addition, in another approach, a mixture of HF/alcohol has been employed for establishing metastable surfaces reaching 98.7% of (001) and 1.3% of (100) facets [37]. Using F⁻ along with citric acid or hydroxyl acids results in continuous curvature of rutile and anatase, where F⁻ ions play not only the role of a stabilizer for (001) facets growth but also as an etching reagent [38,39]. The morphology of the anatase nanoparticles can be manipulated via the relative concentrations of OH⁻ and F⁻ [40]. Hydroxyl groups boost the isotropic growth, whereas F⁻ eliminates (001) surfaces supporting the TiO₂ crystals lateral growth. However, an excessive concentration of F⁻ reduces the size of particles significantly as a result of TiOF₂ formation.

The facet engineering effect was reported by Wang et al. [41]; where they found that the Schottky barrier height of Au/TiO₂ (101) interface is lower than its counterparts from the interface (001). Which enhanced the electrons transfer from CB of TiO₂ to Au and significantly enhances the photocatalytic performance in producing CO and CH₄ in comparison with other samples containing Au/TiO₂ (001) interfaces. In another study, Dong et al. [42] showed that crystal facets engineering of TiO₂ loaded with Cr₂O₃, (2HF-TiO₂/0.2Cr₂O₃) exhibited 30-fold increment in CO₂ conversion compared to the TiO₂ without facet engineering.

Studies and theories illustrated that (101) facets are the most stable facets thermodynamically for anatase TiO₂, whilst other facets (100) and (001) are active and possess high surface energy [43]. Anatase crystal has an equilibrium shape consisted of slightly truncated tetragonal bipyramid enclosed with two (001) and eight (101) facets [44]. Tetragonal nanorods of anatase crystals consisted of high ratio of lateral (100) facets have been fabricated via immersing alkali titanate nanotubes in basic solution followed with hydrothermal transformation [45]. In addition, Anatase crystals with elongated truncated tetragonal bipyramids that contains high ratio of (100) facets; enclosed via different types of facets (001), (100) and (101) were fabricated via hydrothermal reaction in aqueous HF solution [46]. However, still a dilemma to fabricate tetragonal cuboid of anatase crystals enclosed only with (001) and (100) facets. Keeping in mind that anatase nanosheets were fabricated by using solvothermal route in 1-butanol solvent containing HF; these nanosheets consists of (100) and (001) facets, 1.3% and 98.7, respectively [47,48]. Preparing anatase cuboids and manipulating facets percentage (100) and (001) may help in evaluating facet reactivity throughout the photocatalytic reactions. Hence, it is for crucial significance to synthesize anatase cuboids enclosed by (001) and (100) facets over a wide size range, as in lithium-ion batteries and solar cells where several studies [49,50,51,52] relied on the exposed facets of anatase effect on its optical and electrochemical features to be applied in such applications. Photocatalytic materials can be formed via the integration of multiple components, adjusting the facet of each component. This method enables to boost the photocatalytic performance but, since the facet engineering in the multiple component system, in general, are complicated for its delicate control, the combination of two pre-synthesized components is more preferable for its usage, rather than a new component on the one pre-synthesized material [53]. For example, tailoring the surface facets of TiO₂ seeds into nanocrystals with graphene oxide can be seen in Figure 2a. capping agent deficiency results in octahedral TiO₂ nanocrystals enclosed by TiO₂-101-G. TiO₂-001-G nanosheets and TiO₂-100-G nanorods were formed on graphene with F⁻ and $S O_{4}^{2 -}$ Semployed as capping agents, as shown in Figure 2b–g).

3. Strategy II: Nanostructured TiO₂

Although TiO₂ in its bulk form has been investigated for decades, its nanostructured morphologies also have been investigated for photocatalysis and other applications [55], focusing on one dimensional (1D) [56], two dimensional (2D) [57], or three dimensional (3D) structures [58]. Nanostructures or nanomaterials are defined as features where at least one dimension is smaller than 100 nm [59]. However, in a more technically elaborated way, a nanomaterial is defined as where charge carriers are quantum-mechanically confined as evidenced by the consequent modifications in electronic and optical properties. However, even before the electronic or optical properties are investigated, the nanomaterials are characterized by a huge enhancement in the surface to volume which enhances the interaction with the surrounding environment [60]. Each of these nanostructures have their own characteristics in terms of light scattering, aspect ratio, recyclability, major surface area, stability, and directional transfer of photogenerated charges that decreases recombination rate. Synthesis method for 1D nanostructures involves tailored and directional growth, which is achieved either by the structure directing agents or by the use of templates. The directional growth is not required for 2D and 3D morphologies, but the synthesis process may involve multiple steps and highly optimized conditions to obtain structures with minimal defects. In the case of 0D nanostructures such as quantum dots, although there have been studies reported in the literature, the enhancement in band gap caused by the quantum confinement effect reduces the effectiveness of use in photocatalysis. Following chapters provide fundamental features of each nanostructure and its application for CO₂ conversion.

3.1. Zero-Dimensional Nanostructured TiO₂

The nanoparticles or 0D nanostructures offer a lot of advantages and a high degree of flexibility in terms of use in photocatalysis. In particular, nanoparticles can be used to functionalize various surfaces of materials that help in forming either heterojunctions or modifying light absorption. Further, tailoring the size of the nanoparticles changes the surface area, which, in turn, influence the catalytic reactions. Moreover, when formed into quantum dots, the optical and electronic properties are modified drastically to help in catalytic reactions. These nanostructures are cheap, stable, recyclable, and biocompatible [61]. TiO₂ nanoparticles with their special morphology and acid-base sites have been useful in many catalytic reactions under mild conditions compared to other metal oxides (e.g., CuO, ZnO, etc.) [62]. Liu et al. [63] constructed 0D nanoparticles/2D CoP nanosheets heterojunction and the results showed improvement in photocatalytic H₂ evolution rate in comparison to pure TiO₂. Another study [64] reported that In-doped TiO₂ nanoparticles improved the photocatalytic activity for CO₂ reduction where CO was detected and CH₄ yield increased remarkably. In addition, Wada et al. [65] employed rutile TiO₂ nanoparticles as a modifier to enhance the charge transfer, where RuRe/TiO₂/NS-C₃N₄ showed capability in converting CO₂ into CO with high selectivity under visible light (λ > 400). Tseng et al. [66] used sol-gel method in synthesizing Cu/TiO₂ nanoparticles and measured the photoreduction that showed methanol yield much higher than those resulted from sol-gel TiO₂ and Degussa P25, as well. Moreover, Pt/TiO₂ nanoparticles composites yield CH₄, H₂ and C₂H₆ under visible light irradiation with increment of 3.7 times in comparison with Pt/P25 [67]. Perovskite quantum dots also showed its potential for photocatalytic CO₂ conversion with TiO₂ [68,69].

3.2. One-Dimensional Nanostructured TiO₂

The one-dimensional morphologies such as nanowires, nanorods, nanobelts and nanotubes have several interesting properties including directional charge transport, improved light absorption by high aspect ratio and widen surface area [70]. A lot of research reports further modified properties of nanostructures through doping or decoration of other materials such as graphene derivatives or noble metals to enhance photocatalytic CO₂ conversion with high aspect ratio [71,72]. The integration of the specific geometry and the high aspect ratio yield dramatical enhancement in charge carrier generation, separation, and transport which boost the conversion efficiency [73]. For instance, TiO₂ nanorods (TNRs) have a single-crystalline structure and small boundary resistance [74], that reduces the impact from grain boundaries and supplies fast electron transportation [75,76]. It was reported that TNRs as shown in Figure 3 shows higher photocatalytic activity than the nanoparticles because of the increment in active sites and the influence of the crystal plane [77]. Moreover, the comparison between TiO₂ nanorods and the counterparts of nanoparticles showed that the recombination rate of the nanorods are lower that enhanced the photocatalyst photocatalytic activity [78].

Wang et al. [80] fabricated a one-dimensional TiO₂ single crystal with ultrafine Pt nanoparticles (0.5–2.0 nm) by versatile gas-phase deposition. This film showed extremely high efficiency in CO₂ photoreduction with selective formation of methane compared to pristine P25. In addition, TiO₂ nanotubes fabricated by Ping et al. [81] reduced CO₂ with H₂ into methanol and ethanol with photocatalytic performance higher than that of TiO₂ nanoparticles. Another study used microwave solvothermal approach in deposition of Pt nanoparticles on TiO₂ nanotubes (TNT). This composite promoted the photocatalytic conversion of CO₂ with water into methane [82]. TiO₂ 1D nanostructured by alkaline hydrothermal method also exhibited its promising CO₂ conversion performance via the heterostructure formation with some materials such as Nb₂O₅, CNM and Bi₂S₃ under visible light irradiation [83]. The results showed improved efficiency attributed to the enhanced light absorption and the charge separation [83]. The band edges of the aforementioned materials embedded well over the band edge of TiO₂; hence, applying light irradiation excites electrons, which, in turn, flow to the conduction band of the TiO₂ and react with the absorbed CO₂ species. Although deposition of these materials reduces the surface area and CO₂ adsorption of the TNT, enhancing charge transfer kinetics brought advantage over the reduction of surface area. In addition, the 1D structures showed excellent performances, combining with various techniques and materials: for examples, TiO₂ nanoflower films modified with Cu, depositing CdS, grafting CoOx nanoparticles on TNTs with defects via hydrogenation through the heterostructure by N₂/H₂ annealing [84], TiO₂ nanowires (TNWs) loaded with noble metal nanoparticles such as Au [85] or Ag [86], TNT with electrodeposited Ag nanoparticles [87], TNW with Pd nanoparticles [88], TiO₂ nanobelts (TNB) forming heterostructures with ZnFe₂O₄ nanoparticles [89], and TNT covered with rGO sheets with embedded TiO₂ nanoparticles [90]. All the techniques and materials implemented onto 1D TiO₂ nanostructures enhanced the photocatalytic performance by improving the product (CO, CH₄, CH₃OH, CH, CF) yield under light irradiation because of all or some of these factors: (i) increasing active surface area, (ii) increasing CO₂ adsorption on the surface (iii) trapping electrons via oxygen defects (iv) enhancing charge separation.

3.3. Two-Dimensional Nanostructured TiO₂

Ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials possess sheet-like structure with a thickness of few atoms (less than 5 nm), their widths are larger than several hundred nanometers [91,92]. Their superb physical and chemical properties have led significant attention for diverse lateral structured applications [93]. In comparison with 0D and 1D, 2D nanomaterials have extraordinary advantages; support them with optimistic potential for photocatalytic applications.

First and foremost, 2D materials possess larger surface-to-volume ratio over their bulk counterparts [94]. Hence, 2D materials have more active sites on their surface that can enhance their photocatalytic performance significantly.
Second, their atomic thickness benefits mass transport and light energy harvest [93]. The ultrathin structure minimizes the distance of the charge migration from the bulk to the surface, decreasing carrier recombination and enhancing the photocatalytic activity [95].
Third, the high fraction of coordinated unsaturated centers can work as active centers and interact with the substrate intimately [96].

Hence, they perform stellar platforms to prepare multicomponent photocatalysts. The aforementioned extraordinary properties provide diversified number of opportunities with high activity and selectivity for CO₂ reduction. In particular, synthesizing fine-tuned and strong photocatalysts that fulfil the requirements of CO₂ reduction applications [97]. These properties encouraged Tu et al. to fabricate 2D sandwich-like hybrid nanosheet out of graphene and TiO₂ in Figure 4, where TiO₂ nanoparticles uniformly were loaded onto graphene nanosheet to prevent their breakdown and restacking.

2D structures provide large active surface area, enhanced surface adsorption, enhanced interfacial charge transfer, and selectivity caused by the band edge alignment. Zhou et al. loaded with TiO₂ nanoparticles onto layered nanosheets of g-C₃N for CO₂ conversion [99]. Urea served as a source of N doping as well as g-C₃N₄ precursor. Low urea formed an N-doped TiO₂ and resulted in CH₄ during the photocatalytic CO₂ reduction while high urea formed composite of g-C₃N₄ and N-TiO₂ that produced CO. The reason behind the selectivity of products is alignment of band edges with respect to the redox potentials of the possible products. The photocatalytic yield increased due to average surface area, enhanced light absorption, promoted charge transfer and well-aligned band edges with respect of product redox potentials. Likewise, TiO₂-g-C₃N₄ nanosheets heterostructure (TNS-CNN) has been synthesized via in situ pyrolysis approach [100]. TNS-CNN used H₂O and H₂ as reducing agents in CO₂ conversion process where its CO yield was very high compared to pristine TNS. This performance is attributed to the surface area increment, enhanced charge transfer kinetics, role played by H₂ and light absorption. Ultrathin TiO₂ nanosheets also play an essential role for efficient photocatalytic CO₂ conversion, when prepared from the lamella structure of TiO₂-Octylamine [101]. The conversion efficiency is a result of several factors such as increasing CO₂ adsorption sites, enormous increasing in surface area, which in turn, increased the light absorption. Moreover, the fluorescence lifespan of the generated charges into the ultrathin TiO₂ nanosheets is higher when compared to their counterparts in bulk material. Thus, these ultrathin nanosheets provide efficient charge separation within its 2D channels. In another report, TiO₂ ultrathin nanosheets (TiO₂-U) were synthesized by hydrothermal method followed by photochemical deposition of Pt nanoparticles [102]. Moreover, an interesting study suggested growing the photocatalytic material onto a 2D conductive substrate. Recently, Ti₃C₂ MXenes (TT) has been synthesized and covered with TiO₂ nanoparticles [103]. Upon calcinating TT at 550 °C, the TiO₂ nanoparticles formed at the edges and the surfaces of TT layers which improves the surface area by making it rougher. Applying higher temperature than 550 °C decreased the photocatalytic performance due to the decreased proportion of the conductive TT. Hence, TT offers an efficient charge separation that improves the performance and the surface area contributed significantly in providing more reactive sites for CO₂ adsorption for conversion process, as well. Another report described the 2D nanostructure of Bi₂WO₆-TiO₂ bi-nanosheet (BT) for CO₂ conversion into CH₄ and CO [104]. This report provided an approach concerning carbonaceous intermediates or surface species in the value-added chemicals generation. It was found that BT resulted in improved CO and CH₄ yield compared to pristine material due to the enhanced charge transfer and the Z-scheme mechanism.

As known, TiO₂ has three common polymorphs anatase, brookite, and rutile. Brookite is the least used one while rutile is the most common one. It is well known that TiO₂ has a wide bandgap of 3.0 eV for rutile. In addition to this, it was reported that the bandgap of anatase is about 3.2 eV, while that of the brookite is anywhere between 3.0–3.6 eV. Anatase nanoparticles with grain size (5–10 nm) shows a blue shift in the absorption edge of 10 nm, and their bandgap is about 3.3–3.4 eV in comparison with the commercial sample with a crystal size 39 nm which bandgap is about 3.2 eV [105]. Another study reported that the bandgap of pure TiO₂ nanoparticles is 3.7–3.9 eV, as shown in Figure 5a [106].

Studies proved that as the material shrinks to the nanometer scale, the bandgap starts to increase due to the quantum size effect [107]. Hence, TiO₂ nanowires (TNWs) have higher bandgap compared to the bulk materials, for instance growing the TNWs along with (001) direction results in a blue shift and this shift depends on the size of the TNRs [107]. In addition, the bandgap of titanate nanotubes is almost 3.84 eV ascribed to quantum confinement effect, shown in Figure 5b [60]. Moreover, in a comparison between TiO₂ nanosheets (TNSs) and bulk materials, the spectrum of the TNSs showed significant blue-shift that indicates increasing in the bandgap [108].

4. Strategy III: Formation of the Junction with TiO₂

Photocatalysis CO₂ conversion is closely related to the management of charge carriers, namely, electrons and holes, that are necessary for CO₂ reduction and water oxidation, mainly governed by photon absorption, photocarrier generation, and charge separation and transfer. These reactions rely on several factors: bandgap, E_g of photocatalyst, photo carrier generation rate, charge transfer kinetics, and recombination rate. Photocarrier generation rate depends on the conditions of the irradiation and the optical absorption properties of photocatalysts while the charge transfer depends on the reaction occurrence whether it takes place at the surface or within photocatalysts. The recombination can be minimized by improving the crystallinity, increasing transfer kinetics, or the control of the crystallite size [109]. Highly crystallized material minimizes the presence of impurities, surface or bulk defects. Crystallite size control stimulates the point defects of particles that trap e⁻ or h⁺ which in turn delays the recombination for a few micro or nanoseconds [95]. In addition, the reaction efficiency can be enhanced by increasing the adsorption capability of the surface [110].

To achieve these improvement and enhancement in properties and performance of TiO₂ photocatalysts, we can make an effective junction with other materials. As mentioned, since TiO₂ has disadvantages for efficient light absorption and charge transfer, making a junction with efficient light absorbers or/and charge transporting materials would be beneficial for the enhancement of the performance. The subchapters below provide the features and examples of several junctions that can be made with TiO₂.

4.1. A Semiconductor-Semiconductor Heterojunction

The most typical semiconductor-semiconductor heterojunction can be formed in p-n junction. The p-n junction, where an n-type and a p-type semiconductor are in intimate contact (for charge transport across the interface), has several advantages in photocatalysis. When two such semiconductors make a junction, a depletion layer is formed at the interface and internal electric field is established at the interface due to the relative positions of the Fermi levels. This built-in electric field at this junction helps in separating the photogenerated electron-hole pairs thus minimizing the recombination. Further, the junction can be designed in such a way that the light absorption range of one semiconductor can be extended by choosing the other semiconductor with a smaller band gap. Therefore, two fundamental challenges, light absorption and charge carrier separation, in TiO₂-based photocatalysts n photocatalysis- can be tackled by creating p-n junction with materials that have suitable band gaps and intimate energy band structure [111].

Moreover, non-p-n junction, that is, n-n junction between the materials also helps in photocatalysis in a similar manner. In such a heterostructure, the band edge offsets at conduction and valance bands endow a driving force for charge transfer and separation and, with a proper selection of materials, enhanced light absorption can be expected. Such a configuration, called a type II heterojunction is highly useful in photocatalysis [112].

These semiconductor-semiconductor heterojunction structure has been demonstrated in lots of work in the field of photocatalysts. Guo et al. [113] reported that Bi₂WO₆/TiO₂ heterojunction photocatalysts showed strong adsorption ability and improved visible light photocatalytic activities. Shang et al. [114] also studied Bi₂WO₆/TiO₂ photocatalytic activity as it demonstrated enhanced photocatalytic activity by 8 orders compared to the bare Bi₂WO₆. MgO⁻ covered TNT via alkaline hydrothermal reaction also demonstrated for CO₂ conversion [115]. This heterojunction enhanced the CO₂ photoreduction as indicated by higher amounts of CO and CH₄ compared to that from sole TNT photocatalysts. This enhancement is attributed to the chemisorption of CO₂ and subsequent conversion into MgCO₃ which is more reactive than the linear molecules of CO₂. Li et al. [83] fabricated TNT via hydrothermal reaction followed by constructing CdS/TiO₂ and Bi₂S₃/TiO₂, the photocatalytic performance of both of them enhanced CO₂ reduction into CH₃OH under visible light irradiation. In addition, Li et al. [115] presented a study showing the development of MgO/TNTs films in CO₂ photoreduction activity into methane in comparison with TiO₂ films where MgO played a crucial role in CO₂ methanization.

4.2. Semiconductor-Metal Heterojunction

TiO₂ photocatalysts forms a junction with various metal materials to enhance the photocatalytic performance. A metal in contact with a semiconductor creates Schottky or ohmic contact and these contacts influence on electric field or charge concentration distribution at interface. As in the semiconductor-semiconductor junction above, the metal materials can affect the electrical properties of the photocatalytic structures for charge separation and transfer of the semiconductor materials forming a junction together. In addition, some special metals such as Ag, Au, or Cu help in extending light absorption with suitable plasmonic effect when they make a junction with TiO₂ [116,117,118,119]. Further, metals with suitable surface energies also help in enhancing the adsorption of the gaseous/liquid species under catalytic reaction [18]. Wang et al. [120] successfully fabricated Au/TiO₂ heterojunction that resulted in reduction products CH₄ and CO, with 80% CH₄ selectivity. Saraev et al. [121] modified TiO₂ with Pt and Cu/CuO_x and reported that this design is an efficient photocatalyst for CO₂ conversion as it shifted the working range to the visible light and produced CH₄. Another study reported that Au0.25Pt0.75/TiO₂ nanofiber showed higher activity of CO₂ photoreduction into CH₄ under UV-vis irradiation [122]. In addition, Mankidy et al. [123] reported that Ag-Pt bimetallic and core sell Ag@SiO₂ onto TiO₂ showed a significant development in the photoreduction of CO₂ with H₂O into CH₄.

4.3. Semiconductor-Carbon Heterojunction

Similarly, to the metal-semiconductor junctions, carbon materials are also used to form heterostructures with photoactive semiconductors. Several carbon materials such as activated carbon, graphene, and graphene oxide have been employed in heterojunctions preparation. These materials demonstrate high surface area that improves molecules adsorption and the photocatalysis performance of the material [124]. The porous morphology demonstrated by carbon materials adsorbs gaseous species for catalytic reactions. Further, graphene and carbon nanotube (CNT) have a metallic structure and forms a Schottky barrier with a semiconductor material at the interface that improve charge transfer and alleviate the recombination rate by the established built-in electric field. Simultaneously, the metallic nature of graphene or CNTs efficiently collect photogenerated charges from the semiconductor [125,126]. Photogenerated electrons move by the built-in electrical field from conduction band of semiconductor to CNTs in order to balance Fermi levels, while holes exist in the semiconductor share in redox reaction [127]. Padmanabhan et al. [128] prepared a study showing that TiO₂/graphene is more active for photocatalysis than sole TiO₂. In the report, the graphene sheet acted similar to an electron acceptor facilitating the transfer and separation of the generated electrons during irradiation, thus reducing the e/h recombination. Carbon quantum dots also led the improvement for photocatalytic reaction with TiO₂. A CQD/TNT nanocomposite yields more than two times higher production rates both for CO and CH₄ compared to those of bare TNTs [129]. Another study presented by Morawski et al. [130] stated that combining commercial P25 with carbon spheres then depositing this composite on glass fiber fabric showed high efficiency and selectivity in CO₂ reduction into CO.

5. Strategy IV: Modified TiO₂ Nanostructures by Hydrogenation

The next strategy applicable for efficient TiO₂ photocatalysts is to modify its properties. Several approaches have been explored to modify properties of TiO₂ through conventional doping process. Doping of metal ions (Cr, Sn, Zn, W, etc.) and nonmetallic ions (C, P, I, N etc.) into TiO₂ to create discrete or midgap energy states within its bandgap has been attempted to enhance its electro- and photo-response [131,132]. However, the doping elements are also known to create recombination center simultaneously [131]. While, nonmetallic ion doping is difficult due to the diverse chemical properties of the dopant ions and the existence of O²⁻ in TiO₂, Nitrogen is one of the elements that has been extensively doped into TiO₂ for visible light absorption [133,134].

Another way of modifying the properties of TiO₂ is hydrogenation that is different from the conventional doping method. The hydrogenation is the way of introducing oxygen vacancy by hydrogen element that results in the incorporation of Ti³⁺ to TiO₂ [135,136]. Namely, Hydrogenation reduces TiO₂ through the conversion of Ti⁴⁺ to Ti³⁺ or other states. Depending on the degree or method of hydrogenation, the colors of the hydrogenated TiO₂ can be varied: black, blue, or brown [137]. Hydrogenation generally results in surface modifications in few nm and leads to the modification of energy band structure of TiO₂, forming additional energy states located under the conduction band edge [137]. These modified properties of TiO₂ by the hydrogenation can contribute to many advantageous characteristics for more efficient photocatalytic performance: enhanced light absorptions and control of bandgap. To implement the hydrogenation to TiO₂, a number of techniques such as electrochemical reduction, metal reduction, NaBH₄ reduction, laser ablation, microwave radiation, ultrasonication, ion thermal process, and oxidation have been carried out [138,139]. The characteristics of the modified TiO₂ are affected by various factors, including not only experiment conditions such as reactants, temperature, concentration and pressure of hydrogen and reaction time but also material conditions such as the surface morphology, defect content, shape, and size [140,141,142]. Here this section provides the examples of hydrogenated TiO₂ synthesis and characteristics, and investigates its applicability to TiO₂ nanostructures.

The several approaches are valid for the formation of the hydrogenated TiO₂ to modify nanotubes. The hydrogenated TiO₂ is basically a reduced form of TiO₂ and can have extended light absorption region due to the creation of midgap states. In one of the reports, black TiO₂ has been synthesized via solvothermal method using ethylenediamine followed with calcination of the nanotubes (NT) at 600 °C in a hydrogen atmosphere [143]. The photoelectron spectra of the surface showed Ti³⁺ and oxygen deficiencies (it is also named as self-doping defects) which contributed in bandgap reduction [143]. In another report, 2D TiO₂ nanosheets have been synthesized via evaporation-induced self-assembly, followed by solvothermal treatment and ethylenediamine reflux [144]. Further, TiO₂ nanospheres has been obtained via combining hydrogenation with surfactant-induced solvothermal method [145] to achieve reduced TiO₂ in a controlled manner. These helped the morphology of TiO₂ to mitigate aggregation and to have low surface energy [145]. Furthermore, 1D TiO₂ nanotubes have been fabricated via applying hydrogenation and facile solvothermal method [146]. All these reports indicate that controlled hydrogenation leads to the formation of the reduced TiO₂ that helps in photocatalytic processes [146].

To obtain decent hydrogenation, the experimental conditions in the synthesis process play a significant role in controlling properties of the materials. It has been found that the reactor materials impact the properties: stainless-steel reactor resulted in black powder, while in quartz reactor blue powder was obtained indicating different extents of reduction [147,148]. The initial powder was prepared via mixing 2 g of TiO₂ in 50 mL NaOH at 120 °C for 48 h, then washed in water and HCl followed by drying overnight at 110 °C to yield titanate nanotubes [142]. Moreover, hydrogen in the atmosphere can easily reduce TiO₂, and processing in hydrogen ambient resulted in gray TiO₂. Depending on the degree of hydrogenation and processing conditions, various colors appear on TiO₂. In another report, the color of protonated titanates converted into brown through calcination at 500 °C in H₂ atmosphere (N₂:5%) for 4 h [142]. Hydrogenation of anatase nanowire microspheres demonstrated high visible light absorption and contained Ti-H and O-H bonds which in turn leads to stabilization of surface disordered layer [142]. In addition, the pressure can be also an important factor for the hydrogenation. The hydrogenation of TiO₂ was implemented using H₂ pressure at lower temperature with small amount of Pt. In this hydrogenation, hydrogen flow was directed from platinum to TiO₂, which is known as an advanced reduction procedure [149].

Hydride processes are also applied for the hydrogenation of TiO₂. When hydrogenation process leads to reduced TiO₂, the annealing and thermal conditions may pose safety hazards. To avoid these problems, hydride processing has been proposed, in which, hydrides are used in modest conditions to release molecular hydrogen that works as a safe reductant to obtain black TiO₂ [150]. Both dry and sol-gel methods can be used in hydride reduction. In the dry method, pristine TiO₂ and hydride are mixed and annealed in Ar and N₂ atmosphere [151]. In the sol-gel process, NaBH₄ is used as the reduction agent. NaBH₄ is added to a mixture of two solutions that is made of (EtOH/HNO₃) and (EtOH/titanium tetra butoxide), until the gel is reformed. The gel is calcined in a muffle furnace for 3 h to obtain hydrogenated TiO₂ nanoparticles [152]. Although a completion of hydrogenation may lead to black TiO₂, other colors is also obtainable by adjusting the temperature and the reduction duration [153]. The synthesized black TiO₂ nanoparticles were able to absorb > 80% of the sunlight [145]. Nevertheless, the reaction between CaH₂ and TiO₂ may result in TiO₃ and Magneli phase if process is allowed to continue for 240 h. Table 1 summarize hydrogenated TiO₂ materials by various techniques, their features fabrication, and performance measure for CO₂ conversion.

6. Strategy V: Single Atom Photocatalysts

In the past few years, single atom catalysts (SACs) have nominated as potent photocatalysts that can be employed in CO₂ reduction efficiently, owing to their compelling properties. First, SACs have high activity and selectivity caused by their distinctive electron structure and unsaturated coordination sites. Second, they have a notable reduction in metal usage brought by the maximum atom utilization. Third, they possess clear reaction mechanisms endowed by the well-defined active sites. Fourth, they help in understanding and realizing the structure and activity relationship due to their atomic scale structure [172,173]. Theoretically, the valence of a single-atom on a support surface supposed to be zero; but practically the value is different. These atoms are being stabilized depending on the covalent coordination or ionic interaction with the supporting surface atoms, hence it possesses partial charge provided via the metal support interactions. In photocatalytic systems, the photogenerated electrons reduces the stabilized ions into metal ions during the photocatalytic reaction [33]. However, Zhang et al. [174] reported a mass production method of a single atom cobalt to be used in photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. As well as, Xiong et al. [175] presented a study of CO₂ reduction over Ni single atoms supported on defect-rich ZrO₂. This strategy requires further studies to define its influencing factors. It is true that throughout the past decades, physicochemical characteristics and functions of these photocatalysts have been attained. Still, more studies required to tailor the electronic and chemical structures in order to widen its use in photocatalytic applications.

7. Strategy VI: Metal Organic Framework

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are microporous or mesoporous crystalline solid where the lattice is being formed via linking metallic nodes with rigid organic linkers possessing two or more coordination positions; the metallic nodes comprise of metal cations or clusters of few ions of metals. In addition, they can be called porous coordination polymers (PCPs) attributed to the nature of the interaction between the metallic nodes and the organic linkers. MOFs includes almost all the di-, tri- and tetra-positive ions mentioned in the periodic table. The materials that can be used in structure and binding groups of the organic linkers are abundant, as well. Yet, the most renowned ones are organo-phosphorous compounds, aromatic polycarboxylates and nitrogenated heterocycles [176].

MOFs has shown promising potentials in photocatalysis applications and energy conversion [177]. Titanium-based MOFs (Ti-MOFs) are attractive for practical applications, especially tetravalent cation due to its good redox activity, rigid framework and strong metal-ligand bonding [178]. Ti-MOFs represent an exemplary role in MOF family for their rich content, low toxicity, excellent structural topologies, and fascinating photocatalytic activity [179]. The variety of Ti-MOFs has been expanded by manipulating the synthesis parameters of organic ligands and titanium precursors. Nowadays, Ti-MOF derived materials showed high capability in the fields of energy conversion because of their stability, porosity, and regular component arrangement [177]. For instance, preparing Au/TiO₂ by pyrolyzed Au/NH₂-MIL-125 boosted CO₂ reduction into CH₄ [180]. It was reported that NH₂-MIL-125 (Ti) reduced CO₂ into HCOO⁻ in presence of TEOA as electron donor [181]. Zhang et al. synthesized Cu-NH2-MIL-125 (Ti) that showed improved light absorption and ameliorated the charge separation, supported with an extended stability throughout four photocatalysis cycles [182]. The photocatalytic conversion rate of CdS-MIL-125 (Ti) was enhanced by the improved light absorption and e/h pairs separation [183]. Moreover, the reports showed that coupling narrow band-gap semiconductors with Ti-MOFs boosts the photosensitive impact and enhances light absorption capacity [184]. Yang et al. proposed a study about ternary heterostructured MIL-125/Ag/g-C₃N₄ nanocomposites that showed efficient photoreduction in visible light [185]. Many other applications in different fields of renewable energy have received extensive attention due to the promising results via reducing the recombination centers, controlling reactive sites and enhancing the light absorption.

8. Conclusions

TiO₂ has been one of the most investigated materials in photocatalysis and studies are in progress among the scientific community to address the unresolved issues. Crystal facet engineering is an important strategy for optimizing both reactivity and selectivity, Researchers have investigated several fabrication routes to control the crystal facets’ type and density. Studies have been able to synthesize photocatalysts with defined facets and their effects on selectivity of product formation have been investigated both theoretically and experimentally, controlling the ratio of different facets and achieving a dominant orientation still remains a challenge.

The nanostructures of TiO₂ in its several types and morphologies have been fabricated to explore the novel electronic and the optical properties. Anodization is the most common technique to synthesize vertically aligned nanotubes, however, several other of the 1D and 2D structures have been synthesized using various chemical approaches such as solution growth, hydrothermal and sol-gel process. In particular, designing anatase nanocrystals with the most active facet of (001) helped in scrutinizing catalytic activity in a systematic way.

These morphologies and preparation methods directly control the photocatalytic performance of the synthesized nanomaterials in the form of band gap, electronic structure, light absorption, and surface adsorption. These property enhancements have been explained by the existence of Ti³⁺, oxygen vacancies, active surface area, charge separation and photocatalysis response. Moreover, owing to the reduction of the e-h recombination, the subsequent lifetime enhancement, the charge transfer kinetics is enhanced as well.

Nevertheless, there are still several challenges remain with the TiO₂ nanostructures to achieve higher and better efficiency in photocatalysis. Taking into consideration the different modification approaches of these structures through the synthesis via different methods, there is no unambiguous approach to achieve all properties in the best possible values and hence the synthesis approaches depend on desired morphology or application. However, more investigations are required to achieve in-depth understating of the structure-property relationships in various types and forms of TiO₂, and to address the issues such as recombination of photo generated charges and extending the light absorption. The heterojunction approach is expected to play a big role in scaling up and commercially viable technologies. By a suitable selection of the heterojunction component (metal or semiconductor), several drawbacks of TiO₂ such as narrow light absorption, higher recombination, surface area for molecular adsorption can be addressed. Further, the regeneration of the photocatalysts and slowing the rate of degradation are severe challenges for practical and scalable implementation. Hence, more theoretical and experimental studies are required to reach comprehensive understanding of TiO₂ nanostructures and further research needed to promote its properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.F. and H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, T.F., S.C.R., S.R. and H.L.; writing—review and editing, T.F., S.C.R., S.R. and H.L.; visualization, T.F.; supervision, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures and Table

View Image - Figure 1. Ball and stick models of anatase TiO2 low-index surfaces: (a) (101) surface; (b) (100) surface, and (c) (001) surface (red: oxygen; grey: titanium). (Taken with permission from [28]).

Figure 1. Ball and stick models of anatase TiO2 low-index surfaces: (a) (101) surface; (b) (100) surface, and (c) (001) surface (red: oxygen; grey: titanium). (Taken with permission from [28]).

View Image - Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustrating the synthesis of TiO2-graphene nanocomposites with controllable TiO2 crystal facets. (b–g) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of the as-prepared (b,e) TiO2-101-G, (c,f) TiO2-001-G, and (d,g) TiO2-100-G. (Taken with permission from [54]).

Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustrating the synthesis of TiO2-graphene nanocomposites with controllable TiO2 crystal facets. (b–g) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of the as-prepared (b,e) TiO2-101-G, (c,f) TiO2-001-G, and (d,g) TiO2-100-G. (Taken with permission from [54]).

Figure 3. Field emission scanning electron microscopy image of the synthesized TiO2 nanorod arrays. (Taken with permission from [79]).

View Image - Figure 4. SEM image of 2D nanosheet sandwich-like graphene/TiO2. (a) The typical G2-TiO2 with remarkable structural flexibility. (b) The TiO2 nanoparticles intimate contact with graphene. (Taken with permission from [98]).

Figure 4. SEM image of 2D nanosheet sandwich-like graphene/TiO2. (a) The typical G2-TiO2 with remarkable structural flexibility. (b) The TiO2 nanoparticles intimate contact with graphene. (Taken with permission from [98]).

Figure 5. Tauc plots of (a) TiO2 nanoparticles (b) Titanate nanotubes and rutile.

Table 1

Various techniques for the synthesis of hydrogenated TiO₂ materials and their features in the synthesis processes.

Catalyst	Treatment	Note	H₂ Evolution Rate/Removal Efficacy	Reference
Black TiO₂ nanoparticles	Thermal plasma furnace	The absorption increases promptly and monotonously in visible spectrum, when the wavelength is >400 nm	Visible light: 83%	[154]
Black TiO₂ nanotubes	Hydrogen plasma method	NaOH solution (10M, 50 mL), to be used in heating 2g of P25 for 12 h, then being washed with water and HCL.	7 µmol h⁻¹ cm⁻²	[155]
Black TiO₂ nanoparticles	Electron beam treatment	Electron-beam-assisted high energy electron used in changing the composition of TiO₂. Electron beam maximum energy 0.7 MeV. Electron beam maximum power 28 kW	Visible light: 85%	[156]
TiO₂ nanotubes with black appearance for the proton-implanted layer	Proton implantation	The top of the nanotubes is being modified via high energy proton ion-implantation strategy. Then implanting the substrate with Varian 350D ion implanter. The resulted nanotubes showed high performance in aqueous solution.	UV: 38%	[157]
Defective TiO₂	Metal reduction	Metals like Zn, Al, Mg are excellent reductants that for being cheap, safe and convenient in comparison with hydrogen.	Solar light: 95%	[142]
Black TiO₂ andTiO₂ nanotubes	Aluminum reduction	TiO₂ and Al are being processed in a dual tube furnace below 0.5 Pa	3.9 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	[158,159]
Gray TiO₂ nanowires	Aluminum reduction	Titanate nanowires are being processed in double zone furnace in Al atmosphere for 4 h	Solar light: 95%	[160]
Black brookite TiO₂ nanoparticles	Aluminum reduction	Brookite TiO₂ and Al powder are being placed in dual vacuum furnace and heated for 4 h at 300–600 and 800 °C.This process promoted the absorption of visible spectrum and IR of brookite TiO₂	Solar light: 92%	[159]
Black rutile TiO₂ Nanoparticles	Molten Aluminum	The sample is being heated at 550–800 °C at a pressure of 6 × 10⁻⁴ Pa in a vacuum-double-zone furnace. And the results showed enhanced absorption.	932 µmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[161]
Black TiO_2−x nanoparticles	Al powder	Al powder and P25 (0.5 g) are being processed in a two-zone vacuum furnace. Then using thermal plasma furnace to apply hydrogen plasma for 5 h	15 mmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[162]
Black TiO₂-N nanoparticles		The material is being heated in a gas stream of NH₃-Ar	Solar light: 85%	[162]
Rutile TiO₂ nanoparticles	Zn reduction	Mixing aqueous TiCl₂ (1 mL) and isopropanol (30 mL) at 180 °C in existence of Zn powder for 6 h.	1.4 mmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[163]
Black TiO₂ photocatalyst	Mg reduction	Mixing TiO₂ with Mg powder resulted black TiO₂. But Mg and H₂ resulted in highly stable and active reduced black TiO₂.	440 µmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[164]
Porous amorphous Vo-TiO₂	Organic reduction	300-Xe lamp has been used as a light source. The target is aqueous methanol solution (25 vol%, 120 mL) for 8 h in UV and visible light: 5.67 mmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹For 14 h, in visible light radiation: 115 µmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	Visible light and UV: 5.67 mmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[165]
Ti³⁺ doped TiO₂	Organic reduction	300 W Xe lamp, aqueous methanol solution (25 vol%, 120 mL), for 4 h in visible light irradiation: 50 μmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	Visible light: 115 µmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[166]
Defective TiO_2−x	Organic reduction	Imidiazole and 2-ethylimidazole	-	[165,166,167]
Gray TiO₂	Organic reduction	A TiO₂ precursor exposed to UV for one hour then annealed with hydrochloric acid, and imidazole (1 g) in a muffle furnace at 450 °C	115 µmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[165]
Black defective TiO₂ nanotubes	Electrochemical reduction	TiO₂ were synthesized via Ti foil anodization in (4 mA for 5000 s or 80 V for 7200 s). then calcined in air.	Visible light: 72%	[168]
Ti³⁺ self-doped TiO_2−x nanoparticles	Chemical oxidation	The light source used is 300 W Xe lamp. Target and concentration are aqueous methanol solution (100 mL, 20%) MB (120 mL, 5 × 10⁻⁴ mol/L), for 4 h.	250 µmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[169]
Ti³⁺ self-doped rutile TiO₂	Chemical oxidation	Using solar simulator, MB (30 mL, 10⁻⁵ M), for 1 h	-	[170]
Ti³⁺ self-doped TiO_2−x anatase nanoparticles	Chemical oxidation	Light source: 300 W Xe arc lampMB (100 mL, 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L) aqueous methanol solution (20 vol%) for 30 min	147 µmol h⁻¹ g⁻¹	[171]

References

1. Mardani, A.; Streimikiene, D.; Cavallaro, F.; Loganathan, N.; Khoshnoudi, M. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and economic growth: A systematic review of two decades of research from 1995 to 2017. Sci. Total Environ.; 2017; 649, pp. 31-49. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.229] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30170214]

2. Pipes, R.; Bhargav, A.; Manthiram, A. Phenyl Disulfide Additive for Solution-Mediated Carbon Dioxide Utilization in Li−CO₂ Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater.; 2019; 9, 1900453. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201900453]

3. Song, C.; Liu, Q.; Deng, S.; Li, H.; Kitamura, Y. Cryogenicbased CO₂ capture technologies: State-of-the-art developments and current challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.; 2019; 101, pp. 265-278. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.018]

4. Duan, Y.-X.; Meng, F.-L.; Liu, K.-H.; Yi, S.-S.; Li, S.-J.; Yan, J.-M.; Jiang, Q. Amorphizing of Cu nanoparticles toward highly efficient and robust electrocatalyst for CO₂ reduction to liquid fuels with high faradaic efficiencies. Adv. Mater.; 2018; 30, 1706194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706194] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29473227]

5. Sun, Z.; Ma, T.; Tao, H.; Fan, Q.; Han, B. Fundamentals and challenges of electrochemical CO₂ reduction using two-dimensional materials. Chem; 2017; 3, pp. 560-587. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.009]

6. Zhang, N.; Long, R.; Gao, C.; Xiong, Y. Recent progress on advanced design for photoelectrochemical reduction of CO₂ to fuels. Sci. China Mater.; 2018; 61, pp. 771-805. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40843-017-9151-y]

7. Yang, D.; Yu, H.; He, T.; Zuo, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, H.; Ni, B.; Li, H.; Gu, L.; Wang, D. et al. Visible-light-switched electron transfer over single porphyrin-metal atom center for highly selective electroreduction of carbon dioxide. Nat. Commun.; 2019; 10, 3844. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11817-2]

8. Liu, X.; Kang, F.; Hu, C.; Wang, L.; Xu, Z.; Zheng, D.; Gong, W.; Lu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J. A genetically encoded photosensitizer protein facilitates the rational design of a miniature photocatalytic CO₂-reducing enzyme. Nat. Chem.; 2018; 10, 1201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0150-4]

9. Meng, A.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J. TiO₂−MnO_x−Pt Hybrid Multiheterojunction Film Photocatalyst with Enhanced Photocatalytic CO₂-Reduction Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2019; 11, pp. 5581-5589. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b02552]

10. Lisovskaya, A.; Bartels, D.M. Reduction of CO₂ by hydrated electrons in high temperature water. Radiat. Phys. Chem.; 2019; 158, pp. 61-63. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.01.017]

11. Ferrah, D.; Haines, A.R.; Galhenage, R.P.; Bruce, J.P.; Babore, A.D.; Hunt, A.; Waluyo, I.; Hemminger, J.C. Wet Chemical Growth and Thermocatalytic Activity of Cu-Based Nanoparticles Supported on TiO₂ Nanoparticles/HOPG: In Situ Ambient Pressure XPS Study of the CO₂ Hydrogenation Reaction. ACS Catal.; 2019; 9, pp. 6783-6802. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b01419]

12. Huang, J.; Buonsanti, R. Colloidal nanocrystals as heterogeneous catalysts for electrochemical CO₂ conversion. Chem. Mater.; 2019; 31, pp. 13-25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04155]

13. Kang, M.J.; Kim, C.W.; Pawar, A.U.; Cha, H.G.; Ji, S.; Cai, W.-B.; Kang, Y.S. Selective Alcohol on Dark Cathode by Photoelectrochemical CO₂ Valorization and Their in-situ Characterization. ACS Energy Lett.; 2019; 4, pp. 1549-1555. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00927]

14. Ji, Y.; Luo, Y. Direct Donation of Protons from H₂O to CO₂ in Artificial Photosynthesis on the Anatase TiO₂ (101) Surface. J. Phys. Chem. Commun.; 2019; 123, pp. 3019-3023. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11936]

15. Xu, S.; Carter, E.A. Theoretical insights into heterogeneous (Photo) electrochemical CO₂ reduction. Chem. Rev.; 2019; 119, pp. 6631-6669. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00481]

16. Raizada, P.; Soni, V.; Kumar, A.; Singh, P.; Khan, A.A.P.; Asiri, A.M.; Thakur, V.K.; Nguyen, V.-H. Surface defect engineering of metal oxides photocatalyst for energy application and water treatment. J. Mater.; 2021; 7, pp. 388-418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2020.10.009]

17. Wang, P.; Wang, S.; Wang, H.; Wu, Z.; Wang, L. Recent progress on photo-electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. Part. Part. Syst. Charact.; 2018; 35, 1700371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201700371]

18. Wang, L.; Chen, W.; Zhang, D.; Du, Y.; Amal, R.; Qiao, S.; Wu, J.; Yin, Z. Surface strategies for catalytic CO₂ reduction: From two-dimensional materials to nanoclusters to single atoms. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2019; 48, pp. 5310-5349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00163H]

19. Kong, L.; Qiao, J.; Ruan, Q.; Wang, H.; Xi, X.; Zha, W.; Zhou, Z.; He, W.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Z. A very low charge potential for zinc-air battery promoted by photochemical effect of triazine-based conjugated polymer nanolayer coated TiO₂. J. Power Sources; 2022; 536, 231507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231507]

20. Pawar, A.U.; Kim, C.W.; Nguyen-Le, M.-T.; Kang, Y.S. General review on the components and parameters of photoelectrochemical system for CO₂ reduction with in situ analysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2019; 7, pp. 7431-7455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06303]

21. Inoue, T.; Fujishima, A.; Konishi, S.; Honda, K. Photoelectrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide in aqueous suspensions of semiconductor powders. Nature; 1979; 277, pp. 637-638. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/277637a0]

22. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature; 1972; 238, pp. 37-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/238037a0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12635268]

23. Tamgadge, R.M.; Shukla, A. Fluorine-doped anatase for improved supercapacitor electrode. Electrochim. Acta; 2018; 289, pp. 342-353. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.034]

24. Hussain, I.; Chowdhury, A.R.; Jaksik, J.; Grissom, G.; Touhami, A.; Ibrahim, E.E.; Schauer, M.; Okoli, O.; Uddin, M.J. Conductive glass free carbon nanotube micro yarn based perovskite solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2019; 478, pp. 327-333. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.233]

25. Mino, L.; Ferrari, A.M.; Lacivita, V.; Spoto, G.; Bordiga, S.; Zecchina, A. CO adsorption on anatase nanocrystals: A combined experimental and periodic DFT study. J. Phys. Chem. C; 2011; 115, pp. 7694-7700. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp2017049]

26. Das, S.; Dhara, S. Chemical Solution Synthesis for Materials Design and Thin Film Device Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021.

27. Mino, L.; Zecchina, A.; Martra, G.; Rossi, A.M.; Spoto, G. A surface science approach to TiO₂ P25 photocatalysis: An in situ FTIR study of phenol photodegradation at controlled water coverages from sub-monolayer to multilayer. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2016; 196, pp. 135-141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.029]

28. Li, G.; Fang, K.; Ou, Y.; Yuan, W.; Yang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y. Surface study of the reconstructed anatase TiO₂ (001) surface. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int.; 2021; 31, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2020.11.002]

29. Liu, Y.; Du, Y.E.; Bai, Y.; An, J.; Li, J.; Yang, X.; Feng, Q. Facile Synthesis of {101},{010} and [111]-Faceted Anatase-TiO₂ Nanocrystals Derived from Porous Metatitanic Acid H₂TiO₃ for Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance. ChemistrySelect; 2018; 3, pp. 2867-2876. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201800018]

30. Mollavali, M.; Rohani, S.; Elahifard, M.; Behjatmanesh-Ardakani, R.; Nourany, M. Band gap reduction of (Mo+ N) co-doped TiO₂ nanotube arrays with a significant enhancement in visible light photo-conversion: A combination of experimental and theoretical study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy; 2021; 46, pp. 21475-21498. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.249]

31. Grissom, G.; Jaksik, J.; McEntee, M.; Durke, E.M.; Aishee, S.T.; Cua, M.; Okoli, O.; Touhami, A.; Moore, H.J.; Uddin, M.J. Three-dimensional carbon nanotube yarn based solid state solar cells with multiple sensitizers exhibit high energy conversion efficiency. Solar Energy; 2018; 171, pp. 16-22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.053]

32. Likodimos, V. Photonic crystal-assisted visible light activated TiO₂ photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2018; 230, pp. 269-303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.039]

33. Cravanzola, S.; Cesano, F.; Gaziano, F.; Scarano, D. Sulfur-doped TiO₂: Structure and surface properties. Catalysts; 2017; 7, 214. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal7070214]

34. Humayun, M.; Raziq, F.; Khan, A.; Luo, W. Modification strategies of TiO₂ for potential applications in photocatalysis: A critical review. Green Chem. Lett. Rev.; 2018; 11, pp. 86-102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2018.1440324]

35. Uddin, M.J.; Daramola, D.E.; Velasquez, E.; Dickens, T.J.; Yan, J.; Hammel, E.; Cesano, F.; Okoli, O.I. A high efficiency 3D photovoltaic microwire with carbon nanotubes (CNT)-quantum dot (QD) hybrid interface. Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Res. Lett.; 2014; 8, pp. 898-903. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201409392]

36. Jia, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, B.; Yang, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z. TiO₂/CuS heterostructure nanowire array photoanodes toward water oxidation: The role of CuS. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2019; 463, pp. 829-837. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.003]

37. Uddin, M.J.; Cesano, F.; Chowdhury, A.R.; Trad, T.; Cravanzola, S.; Martra, G.; Mino, L.; Zecchina, A.; Scarano, D. Surface structure and phase composition of TiO₂ P25 particles after thermal treatments and HF etching. Front. Mater.; 2020; 7, 192. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00192]

38. Peng, Y.-K.; Chou, H.-L.; Tsang, S.C.E. Differentiating surface titanium chemical states of anatase TiO₂ functionalized with various groups. Chem. Sci.; 2018; 9, pp. 2493-2500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7SC04828A]

39. Zou, Y.; Gao, G.; Wang, Z.; Shi, J.-W.; Wang, H.; Ma, D.; Fan, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z.; Niu, C. Formation mechanism of rectangular-ambulatory-plane TiO₂ plates: An insight into the role of hydrofluoric acid. Chem. Commun.; 2018; 54, pp. 7191-7194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8CC02309C]

40. Ma, M.J.; Li, W.; Dambournet, D. Solution-Based Synthesis of Nano-Sized TiO₂ Anatase in Fluorinating Media. Modern Synthesis Processes and Reactivity of Fluorinated Compounds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 651-669.

41. Wang, A.; Wu, S.; Dong, J.; Wang, R.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, S.; Bai, S. Interfacial facet engineering on the Schottky barrier between plasmonic Au and TiO₂ in boosting the photocatalytic CO₂ reduction under ultraviolet and visible light irradiation. Chem. Eng. J.; 2021; 404, 127145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127145]

42. Dong, J.; Wang, Z.; Cao, H.; Xue, J.; Liu, C.; Sun, S.; Gao, C.; Zhu, X.; Bao, J. Independent Cr₂O₃ functions as efficient cocatalyst on the crystal facets engineered TiO₂ for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2021; 554, 149634. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149634]

43. Butburee, T.; Kotchasarn, P.; Hirunsit, P.; Sun, Z.; Tang, Q.; Khemthong, P.; Sangkhun, W.; Thongsuwan, W.; Kumnorkaew, P.; Wang, H. New understanding of crystal control and facet selectivity of titanium dioxide ruling photocatalytic performance. J. Mater. Chem. A; 2019; 7, pp. 8156-8166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8TA11475G]

44. Li, X. Synthesis and Metal-Insulator Transition Properties of Vanadium Dioxide Nanostructures; The Pennsylvania State University: State College, PA, USA, 2019.

45. Du, Y.-E.; Niu, X.; He, X.; Hou, K.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of TiO₂/CdS nanocomposites with co-exposed anatase highly reactive facets. Molecules; 2021; 26, 6031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26196031] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641575]

46. Du, Y.-E.; Niu, X.; He, J.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, C.; Yang, X.; Feng, Q. Hollow square rodlike microtubes composed of anatase nanocuboids with coexposed {100},{010}, and {001} facets for improved photocatalytic performance. ACS Omega; 2020; 5, pp. 14147-14156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01827] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566882]

47. Wen, C.Z.; Zhou, J.Z.; Jiang, H.B.; Hu, Q.H.; Qiao, S.Z.; Yang, H.G. Synthesis of micro-sized titanium dioxide nanosheets wholly exposed with high-energy {001} and {100} facets. Chem. Commun.; 2011; 47, pp. 4400-4402. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0cc05798c]

48. Li, W. Sol-Gel Synthesis of TiO₂ Anatase in a Fluorinated Medium and Its Applications as Negative Electrode for Li+ and Na+ Batteries. Ph.D. Thesis; Paris 6, Doctoral School of Physical Chemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Paris Center: Paris, France, 2015.

49. Bokare, A.; Erogbogbo, F. Photocatalysis and Li-Ion Battery Applications of {001} Faceted Anatase TiO₂-Based Composites. J; 2021; 4, pp. 500-530. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/j4030038]

50. Du, D.-J.; Du, Y.-E.; Yue, W.-B.; Yang, X.-J. Lithium storage performance of {010}-faceted and [111]-faceted anatase TiO₂ nanocrystals. J. Cent. South Univ.; 2019; 26, pp. 1530-1539. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11771-019-4109-4]

51. Maitani, M.M.; Tateyama, A.; Boix, P.P.; Han, G.; Nitta, A.; Ohtani, B.; Mathews, N.; Wada, Y. Effects of energetics with {001} facet-dominant anatase TiO₂ scaffold on electron transport in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Electrochim. Acta; 2019; 300, pp. 445-454. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.102]

52. Liu, X.; Du, G.; Li, M. True photoreactivity origin of Ti3+-doped anatase TiO₂ crystals with respectively dominated exposed {001},{101}, and {100} facets. ACS Omega; 2019; 4, pp. 14902-14912. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01648]

53. Liu, G.; Wang, T.; Zhou, W.; Meng, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Kako, T.; Ye, J. Crystal-facet-dependent hot-electron transfer in plasmonic-Au/semiconductor heterostructures for efficient solar photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. C; 2015; 3, pp. 7538-7542. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5TC01406A]

54. Liu, L.; Liu, Z.; Liu, A.; Gu, X.; Ge, C.; Gao, F.; Dong, L. Engineering the TiO₂–graphene interface to enhance photocatalytic H₂ production. ChemSusChem; 2014; 7, pp. 618-626. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201300941]

55. Pathakoti, K.; Manubolu, M.; Hwang, H.-M. Nanotechnology applications for environmental industry. Handbook of Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 894-907.

56. Kozak, M.; Mazierski, P.; Żebrowska, J.; Kobylański, M.; Klimczuk, T.; Lisowski, W.; Trykowski, G.; Nowaczyk, G.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Electrochemically obtained TiO₂/CuxOy nanotube arrays presenting a photocatalytic response in processes of pollutants degradation and bacteria inactivation in aqueous phase. Catalysts; 2018; 8, 237. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal8060237]

57. Qu, J.; Sha, L.; Wu, C.; Zhang, Q. Applications of mechanochemically prepared layered double hydroxides as adsorbents and catalysts: A mini-review. Nanomaterials; 2019; 9, 80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano9010080] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30626167]

58. Xue, Y.; Wu, Z.; He, X.; Yang, X.; Chen, X.; Gao, Z. Constructing a Z-scheme heterojunction of egg-like core@ shell CdS@ TiO₂ photocatalyst via a facile reflux method for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Nanomaterials; 2019; 9, 222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano9020222]

59. Shahvaranfard, F. Modification of Low Dimensional Nanostructured TiO₂ for Energy Application. Ph.D. Thesis; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU): Erlangen, Germany, 2022.

60. Lee, K.; Mazare, A.; Schmuki, P. One-dimensional titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Nanotubes. Chem. Rev.; 2014; 114, pp. 9385-9454. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr500061m] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121734]

61. Haider, A.J.; Jameel, Z.N.; Al-Hussaini, I.H. Review on: Titanium dioxide applications. Energy Procedia; 2019; 157, pp. 17-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.159]

62. Ranjan, S.; Ramalingam, C. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce bacterial membrane rupture by reactive oxygen species generation. Environ. Chem. Lett.; 2016; 14, pp. 487-494. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10311-016-0586-y]

63. Liu, Q.; Huang, J.; Tang, H.; Yu, X.; Shen, J. Construction 0D TiO₂ nanoparticles/2D CoP nanosheets heterojunctions for enhanced photocatalytic H₂ evolution activity. J. Mater. Sci. Technol.; 2020; 56, pp. 196-205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.026]

64. Tahir, M.; Amin, N.S. Indium-doped TiO₂ nanoparticles for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction with H₂O vapors to CH₄. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2015; 162, pp. 98-109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.06.037]

65. Wada, K.; Ranasinghe, C.S.K.; Kuriki, R.; Yamakata, A.; Ishitani, O.; Maeda, K. Interfacial manipulation by rutile TiO₂ nanoparticles to boost CO₂ reduction into CO on a metal-complex/semiconductor hybrid photocatalyst. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2017; 9, pp. 23869-23877. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b07484]

66. Tseng, I.-H.; Chang, W.-C.; Wu, J.C. Photoreduction of CO₂ using sol–gel derived titania and titania-supported copper catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2002; 37, pp. 37-48. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(01)00322-8]

67. Wang, Y.; Lai, Q.; Zhang, F.; Shen, X.; Fan, M.; He, Y.; Ren, S. High efficiency photocatalytic conversion of CO₂ with H₂O over Pt/TiO₂ nanoparticles. RSC Adv.; 2014; 4, pp. 44442-44451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4RA07457B]

68. Liu, Y.; Lee, C.-C.; Horn, M.W.; Lee, H. Toward efficient photocatalysts for light-driven CO₂ reduction: TiO₂ nanostructures decorated with perovskite quantum dots. Nano Express; 2021; 2, 020003. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2632-959X/abf3d2]

69. Xu, Y.-F.; Yang, M.-Z.; Chen, B.-X.; Wang, X.-D.; Chen, H.-Y.; Kuang, D.-B.; Su, C.-Y. A CsPbBr3 perovskite quantum dot/graphene oxide composite for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2017; 139, pp. 5660-5663. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b00489] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28385017]

70. Cheng, M.; Yang, S.; Chen, R.; Zhu, X.; Liao, Q.; Huang, Y. Copper-decorated TiO₂ nanorod thin films in optofluidic planar reactors for efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO₂. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy; 2017; 42, pp. 9722-9732. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.126]

71. Devi, A.D.; Pushpavanam, S.; Singh, N.; Verma, J.; Kaur, M.P.; Roy, S.C. Enhanced methane yield by photoreduction of CO₂ at moderate temperature and pressure using Pt coated, graphene oxide wrapped TiO₂ nanotubes. Results Eng.; 2022; 14, 100441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100441]

72. Rambabu, Y.; Kumar, U.; Singhal, N.; Kaushal, M.; Jaiswal, M.; Jain, S.L.; Roy, S.C. Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide using graphene oxide wrapped TiO₂ nanotubes. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2019; 485, pp. 48-55. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.041]

73. Ouyang, W.; Teng, F.; He, J.H.; Fang, X. Enhancing the photoelectric performance of photodetectors based on metal oxide semiconductors by charge-carrier engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater.; 2019; 29, 1807672. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201807672]

74. Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Tao, J.; Gong, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, L.; Lv, J.; He, G. Silver-decorated TiO₂ nanorod array films with enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic properties. J. Electrochem. Soc.; 2016; 163, H943. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0551610jes]

75. Qu, J.; Lai, C. One-dimensional nanostructures as photoanodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Nanomater.; 2013; 2013, 2. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/762730]

76. Subramanian, A.; Pan, Z.; Li, H.; Zhou, L.; Li, W.; Qiu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Muzi, C.; Zhang, Y. Synergistic promotion of photoelectrochemical water splitting efficiency of TiO₂ nanorods using metal-semiconducting nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2017; 420, pp. 631-637. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.190]

77. Jiang, L.; He, J.; Yang, Y.; Mao, D.; Chen, D.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.; Sharma, V.K.; Wang, J. Enhancing visible-light photocatalytic activity of hard-biotemplated TiO₂: From macrostructural morphology replication to microstructural building units design. J. Alloys Compd.; 2022; 898, 162886. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162886]

78. Ghosh, M.; Liu, J.; Chuang, S.S.; Jana, S.C. Fabrication of hierarchical V₂O₅ nanorods on TiO₂ nanofibers and their enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light. ChemCatChem; 2018; 10, pp. 3305-3318. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201800172]

79. Attar, A.S.; Ghamsari, M.S.; Hajiesmaeilbaigi, F.; Mirdamadi, S.; Katagiri, K.; Koumoto, K. Sol–gel template synthesis and characterization of aligned anatase-TiO₂ nanorod arrays with different diameter. Mater. Chem. Phys.; 2009; 113, pp. 856-860. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.040]

80. Wang, W.-N.; An, W.-J.; Ramalingam, B.; Mukherjee, S.; Niedzwiedzki, D.M.; Gangopadhyay, S.; Biswas, P. Size and structure matter: Enhanced CO₂ photoreduction efficiency by size-resolved ultrafine Pt nanoparticles on TiO₂ single crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2012; 134, pp. 11276-11281. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja304075b]

81. Ping, G.; Wang, C.; Chen, D.; Liu, S.; Huang, X.; Qin, L.; Huang, Y.; Shu, K. Fabrication of self-organized TiO₂ nanotube arrays for photocatalytic reduction of CO₂. J. Solid State Electrochem.; 2013; 17, pp. 2503-2510. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10008-013-2143-y]

82. Feng, X.; Sloppy, J.D.; LaTempa, T.J.; Paulose, M.; Komarneni, S.; Bao, N.; Grimes, C.A. Synthesis and deposition of ultrafine Pt nanoparticles within high aspect ratio TiO₂ nanotube arrays: Application to the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Mater. Chem.; 2011; 21, pp. 13429-13433. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12717a]

83. Li, X.; Liu, H.; Luo, D.; Li, J.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Fang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, L. Adsorption of CO₂ on heterostructure CdS (Bi₂S₃)/TiO₂ nanotube photocatalysts and their photocatalytic activities in the reduction of CO₂ to methanol under visible light irradiation. Chem. Eng. J.; 2012; 180, pp. 151-158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.11.029]

84. Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Song, M.; Li, D.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y. TiO_2−x/CoOx photocatalyst sparkles in photothermocatalytic reduction of CO₂ with H₂O steam. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2019; 243, pp. 760-770. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.022]

85. Tahir, M.; Tahir, B.; Amin, N.A.S. Gold-nanoparticle-modified TiO₂ nanowires for plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic CO₂ reduction with H₂ under visible light irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2015; 356, pp. 1289-1299. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.231]

86. Tahir, M.; Tahir, B.; Amin, N.A.S.; Zakaria, Z.Y. Photo-induced reduction of CO₂ to CO with hydrogen over plasmonic Ag-NPs/TiO₂ NWs core/shell hetero-junction under UV and visible light. J. CO₂ Util.; 2017; 18, pp. 250-260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.02.002]

87. Low, J.; Qiu, S.; Xu, D.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, B. Direct evidence and enhancement of surface plasmon resonance effect on Ag-loaded TiO₂ nanotube arrays for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2018; 434, pp. 423-432. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.194]

88. Su, K.-Y.; Chen, C.-Y.; Wu, R.-J. Preparation of Pd/TiO₂ nanowires for the photoreduction of CO₂ into renewable hydrocarbon fuels. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.; 2019; 96, pp. 409-418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.12.010]

89. Song, G.; Xin, F.; Yin, X. Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide over ZnFe₂O₄/TiO₂ nanobelts heterostructure in cyclohexanol. J. Colloid Interface Sci.; 2015; 442, pp. 60-66. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.039] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25514648]

90. Razzaq, A.; Grimes, C.A.; In, S.-I. Facile fabrication of a noble metal-free photocatalyst: TiO₂ nanotube arrays covered with reduced graphene oxide. Carbon; 2016; 98, pp. 537-544. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.053]

91. Zhang, H. Ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials. ACS Nano; 2015; 9, pp. 9451-9469. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05040]

92. Madkour, L.H. Carbon Nanomaterials and Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (2D TMDCs). Nanoelectronic Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 165-245.

93. Tan, C.; Cao, X.; Wu, X.-J.; He, Q.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, W.; Han, S.; Nam, G.-H. Recent advances in ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials. Chem. Rev.; 2017; 117, pp. 6225-6331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00558]

94. Late, D.J.; Bhat, A.; Rout, C.S. Fundamentals and properties of 2D materials in general and sensing applications. Fundamentals and Sensing Applications of 2D Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 5-24.

95. Chen, F.; Ma, T.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H. Atomic-level charge separation strategies in semiconductor-based photocatalysts. Adv. Mater.; 2021; 33, 2005256. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.202005256]

96. Liu, Y.; Zou, J.; Guo, B.; Ren, Y.; Wang, Z.; Song, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wu, L. Selective photocatalytic oxidation of thioanisole on DUT-67 (Zr) mediated by surface coordination. Langmuir; 2020; 36, pp. 2199-2208. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02582]

97. Sadeghfar, F.; Zalipour, Z.; Taghizadeh, M.; Taghizadeh, A.; Ghaedi, M. Photodegradation processes. Interface Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 32, pp. 55-124.

98. Tu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Q.; Yan, S.; Bao, S.; Wang, X.; Xiao, M.; Zou, Z. An in situ simultaneous reduction-hydrolysis technique for fabrication of TiO₂-graphene 2D sandwich-like hybrid nanosheets: Graphene-promoted selectivity of photocatalytic-driven hydrogenation and coupling of CO₂ into methane and ethane. Adv. Funct. Mater.; 2013; 23, pp. 1743-1749. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201202349]

99. Zhou, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, D.; Duan, A.; Liu, J.; Wei, Y. Facile in situ synthesis of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-N-TiO₂ heterojunction as an efficient photocatalyst for the selective photoreduction of CO₂ to CO. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2014; 158, pp. 20-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.03.037]

100. Crake, A.; Christoforidis, K.C.; Godin, R.; Moss, B.; Kafizas, A.; Zafeiratos, S.; Durrant, J.R.; Petit, C. Titanium dioxide/carbon nitride nanosheet nanocomposites for gas phase CO₂ photoreduction under UV-visible irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2019; 242, pp. 369-378. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.023]

101. Qamar, S.; Lei, F.; Liang, L.; Gao, S.; Liu, K.; Sun, Y.; Ni, W.; Xie, Y. Ultrathin TiO₂ flakes optimizing solar light driven CO₂ reduction. Nano Energy; 2016; 26, pp. 692-698. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.029]

102. Liu, Y.; Miao, C.; Yang, P.; He, Y.; Feng, J.; Li, D. Synergetic promotional effect of oxygen vacancy-rich ultrathin TiO₂ and photochemical induced highly dispersed Pt for photoreduction of CO₂ with H₂O. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2019; 244, pp. 919-930. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.028]

103. Low, J.; Zhang, L.; Tong, T.; Shen, B.; Yu, J. TiO₂/MXene Ti₃C₂ composite with excellent photocatalytic CO₂ reduction activity. J. Catal.; 2018; 361, pp. 255-266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.03.009]

104. Yuan, L.; Lu, K.-Q.; Zhang, F.; Fu, X.; Xu, Y.-J. Unveiling the interplay between light-driven CO₂ photocatalytic reduction and carbonaceous residues decomposition: A case study of Bi₂WO₆-TiO₂ binanosheets. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2018; 237, pp. 424-431. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.019]

105. Reddy, K.M.; Manorama, S.V.; Reddy, A.R. Bandgap studies on anatase titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Mater. Chem. Phys.; 2003; 78, pp. 239-245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00343-7]

106. Munir, S.; Shah, S.M.; Hussain, H. Effect of carrier concentration on the optical band gap of TiO₂ nanoparticles. Mater. Des.; 2016; 92, pp. 64-72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.022]

107. Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Shi, J.; Yu, Y. One-dimensional titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Nanowires, nanorods, and nanobelts. Chem. Rev.; 2014; 114, pp. 9346-9384. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr400633s]

108. Lee, M.; Seo, Y.; Shin, H.S.; Jo, C.; Ryoo, R. Anatase TiO₂ nanosheets with surface acid sites for Friedel–Crafts alkylation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.; 2016; 222, pp. 185-191. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.10.019]

109. Xu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Si, H.; Ma, S.; Fan, W.; Xiong, Z.; Liao, Q.; Sattar, A.; Kang, Z. Manipulation of perovskite crystallization kinetics via Lewis base additives. Adv. Funct. Mater.; 2021; 31, 2009425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202009425]

110. Sheng, Y.; Wei, Z.; Miao, H.; Yao, W.; Li, H.; Zhu, Y. Enhanced organic pollutant photodegradation via adsorption/photocatalysis synergy using a 3D g-C₃N₄/TiO₂ free-separation photocatalyst. Chem. Eng. J.; 2019; 370, pp. 287-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.197]

111. Yang, K.; Cheng, G.; Chen, R.; Zhao, K.; Liang, Y.; Li, W.; Han, C. Simply Coupling TiO₂ Nanospheres with Cu₂O Particles to Boost the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution through p–n Heterojunction-Induced Charge Transfer. Energy Technol.; 2022; 10, 2100259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ente.202100259]

112. Liu, Y.; Zheng, X.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, W.; Shen, Y.; Tian, X. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Using Ternary-Metal-Sulfide/TiO₂ Heterojunction Photocatalysts. ChemCatChem; 2022; 14, e202101439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202101439]

113. Guo, Q.; Huang, Y.; Xu, H.; Luo, D.; Huang, F.; Gu, L.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, H.; Fan, L.; Wu, J. The effects of solvent on photocatalytic properties of Bi₂WO₆/TiO₂ heterojunction under visible light irradiation. Solid State Sci.; 2018; 78, pp. 95-106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.02.013]

114. Shang, M.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Sun, S.; Wang, L.; Zhou, L. 3D Bi₂WO₆/TiO₂ hierarchical heterostructure: Controllable synthesis and enhanced visible photocatalytic degradation performances. J. Phys. Chem. C; 2009; 113, pp. 14727-14731. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp9045808]

115. Li, Q.; Zong, L.; Li, C.; Yang, J. Reprint of “Photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ on MgO/TiO₂ nanotube films”. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2014; 319, pp. 16-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.070]

116. Ran, H.; Fan, J.; Zhang, X.; Mao, J.; Shao, G. Enhanced performances of dye-sensitized solar cells based on Au-TiO₂ and Ag-TiO₂ plasmonic hybrid nanocomposites. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2018; 430, pp. 415-423. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.107]

117. Yao, G.-Y.; Zhao, Z.-Y.; Liu, Q.-L.; Dong, X.-D.; Zhao, Q.-M. Theoretical calculations for localized surface plasmon resonance effects of Cu/TiO₂ nanosphere: Generation, modulation, and application in photocatalysis. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells; 2020; 208, 110385. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110385]

118. Wang, Z.; Lee, H.; Chen, J.; Wu, M.; Leung, D.Y.; Grimes, C.A.; Lu, Z.; Xu, Z.; Feng, S.-P. Synergistic effects of Pd–Ag bimetals and g-C3N4 photocatalysts for selective and efficient conversion of gaseous CO₂. J. Power Sources; 2020; 466, 228306. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228306]

119. Taghizadeh, A.; Taghizadeh, M.; Sabzehmeidani, M.M.; Sadeghfar, F.; Ghaedi, M. Electronic structure: From basic principles to photocatalysis. Interface Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 32, pp. 1-53.

120. Wang, R.; Shen, J.; Sun, K.; Tang, H.; Liu, Q. Enhancement in photocatalytic activity of CO₂ reduction to CH₄ by 0D/2D Au/TiO₂ plasmon heterojunction. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2019; 493, pp. 1142-1149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.121]

121. Saraev, A.A.; Kurenkova, A.Y.; Gerasimov, E.Y.; Kozlova, E.A. Broadening the Action Spectrum of TiO₂-Based Photocatalysts to Visible Region by Substituting Platinum with Copper. Nanomaterials; 2022; 12, 1584. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12091584]

122. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Cao, S.-W.; Xue, C. Au/Pt nanoparticle-decorated TiO₂ nanofibers with plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic activities for solar-to-fuel conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C; 2013; 117, pp. 25939-25947. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp409311x]

123. Mankidy, B.D.; Joseph, B.; Gupta, V.K. Photo-conversion of CO₂ using titanium dioxide: Enhancements by plasmonic and co-catalytic nanoparticles. Nanotechnology; 2013; 24, 405402. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/24/40/405402] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028861]

124. Tayebi, M.; Kolaei, M.; Tayyebi, A.; Masoumi, Z.; Belbasi, Z.; Lee, B.-K. Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) on TiO₂ for an improved photoelectrochemical (PEC) and photocatalytic activity. Sol. Energy; 2019; 190, pp. 185-194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.020]

125. Mondal, A.; Prabhakaran, A.; Gupta, S.; Subramanian, V.R. Boosting photocatalytic activity using reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/semiconductor nanocomposites: Issues and future scope. ACS Omega; 2021; 6, pp. 8734-8743. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06045]

126. Shin, D.H.; Choi, S.-H. Graphene-based semiconductor heterostructures for photodetectors. Micromachines; 2018; 9, 350. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi9070350]

127. Sun, P.; Zhou, S.; Yang, Y.; Liu, S.; Cao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wågberg, T.; Hu, G. Artificial chloroplast-like phosphotungstic acid—Iron oxide microbox heterojunctions penetrated by carbon nanotubes for solar photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline antibiotics in wastewater. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater.; 2022; pp. 1-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00462-x]

128. Padmanabhan, N.T.; Thomas, N.; Louis, J.; Mathew, D.T.; Ganguly, P.; John, H.; Pillai, S.C. Graphene coupled TiO₂ photocatalysts for environmental applications: A review. Chemosphere; 2021; 271, 129506. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129506]

129. Zhang, J.; Xu, J.; Tao, F. Interface Modification of TiO₂ Nanotubes by Biomass-Derived Carbon Quantum Dots for Enhanced Photocatalytic Reduction of CO₂. ACS Appl. Energy Mater.; 2021; 4, pp. 13120-13131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c02760]

130. Morawski, A.W.; Ćmielewska, K.; Witkowski, K.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Pełech, I.; Staciwa, P.; Ekiert, E.; Sibera, D.; Wanag, A.; Gano, M. CO₂ Reduction to Valuable Chemicals on TiO₂-Carbon Photocatalysts Deposited on Silica Cloth. Catalysts; 2021; 12, 31. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal12010031]

131. Rajaraman, T.S.; Parikh, S.P.; Gandhi, V.G. Black TiO₂: A review of its properties and conflicting trends. Chem. Eng.; 2020; 389, 123918. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123918]

132. Mezzat, F.; Zaari, H.; El Kenz, A.; Benyoussef, A. Effect of metal and non metal doping of TiO₂ on photocatalytic activities: Ab initio calculations. Opt. Quantum Electron.; 2021; 53, pp. 1-14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11082-020-02655-4]

133. Jeon, J.P.; Kweon, D.H.; Jang, B.J.; Ju, M.J.; Baek, J.B. Enhancing the photocatalytic activity of TiO₂ catalysts. Adv. Sustain. Syst.; 2020; 4, 2000197. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202000197]

134. Xu, T.; Wang, M.; Wang, T. Effects of N doping on the microstructures and optical properties of TiO₂. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed.; 2019; 34, pp. 55-63. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11595-019-2014-1]

135. Yamazaki, Y.; Toyonaga, T.; Doshita, N.; Mori, K.; Kuwahara, Y.; Yamazaki, S.; Yamashita, H. Crystal Facet Engineering and Hydrogen Spillover-Assisted Synthesis of Defective Pt/TiO₂–x Nanorods with Enhanced Visible Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2021; 14, pp. 2291-2300. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c20148]

136. Chen, X.; Peng, X.; Jiang, L.; Yuan, X.; Fei, J.; Zhang, W. Photocatalytic removal of antibiotics by MOF-derived Ti³⁺-and oxygen vacancy-doped anatase/rutile TiO₂ distributed in a carbon matrix. Chem. Eng. J.; 2022; 427, 130945. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130945]

137. Sorcar, S.; Hwang, Y.; Grimes, C.A.; In, S.-I. Highly enhanced and stable activity of defect-induced titania nanoparticles for solar light-driven CO₂ reduction into CH4. Mater. Today; 2017; 20, pp. 507-515. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.09.005]

138. Nas, M.S.; Calimli, M.H. Recent Development of Nanoparticle by Green-Conventional Methods and Applications for Corrosion and Fuel Cells. Curr. Nanosci.; 2021; 17, pp. 525-539. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573413716999200925163316]

139. Behera, A. Nanomaterials. Advanced Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 77-125.

140. Gupta, T.; Cho, J.; Prakash, J. Hydrothermal synthesis of TiO₂ nanorods: Formation chemistry, growth mechanism, and tailoring of surface properties for photocatalytic activities. Mater. Today Chem.; 2021; 20, 100428. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100428]

141. Wang, Y.-H.; Rahman, K.H.; Wu, C.-C.; Chen, K.-C. A review on the pathways of the improved structural characteristics and photocatalytic performance of titanium dioxide (TiO₂) thin films fabricated by the magnetron-sputtering technique. Catalysts; 2020; 10, 598. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal10060598]

142. Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Wu, J.; Zhou, W. Recent progress in defective TiO₂ photocatalysts for energy and environmental applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.; 2022; 156, 111980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111980]

143. Zhang, X.; Hu, W.; Zhang, K.; Wang, J.; Sun, B.; Li, H.; Qiao, P.; Wang, L.; Zhou, W. Ti³⁺ self-doped black TiO₂ nanotubes with mesoporous nanosheet architecture as efficient solar-driven hydrogen evolution photocatalysts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2017; 5, 901. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01114]

144. Wu, J.; Qiao, P.; Li, H.; Xu, Y.; Yang, W.; Yang, F.; Lin, K.; Pan, K.; Zhou, W. Engineering surface defects on two-dimensional ultrathin mesoporous anatase TiO₂ nanosheets for efficient charge separation and exceptional solar-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Mater. Chem.; 2020; 8, 82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9TC07032J]

145. Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Xie, Y.; Yang, W.; Tao, B.; Lu, J.; Wu, J.; Qu, Y.; Zhou, W. Surface defects induced charge imbalance for boosting charge separation and solar-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Colloid Interface Sci.; 2021; 596, 21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.116] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33831749]

146. Yang, W.T.; Li, M.; Pan, K.; Guo, L.P.; Wu, J.X.; Li, Z.J.; Yang, F.; Lin, K.; Zhou, W. Surface engineering of mesoporous anatase titanium dioxide nanotubes for rapid spatial charge separation on horizontal-Vertical dimensions and efficient solar-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Colloid Interface Sci.; 2021; 586, 83. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.071] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33153714]

147. Liu, X.; Zhu, G.; Wang, X.; Yuan, X.; Lin, T.; Huang, F. Progress in black titania: A new material for advanced photocatalysis. Adv. Energy Mater.; 2016; 6, 1600452. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600452]

148. Shoneye, A.; Sen Chang, J.; Chong, M.N.; Tang, J. Recent progress in photocatalytic degradation of chlorinated phenols and reduction of heavy metal ions in water by TiO₂-based catalysts. Int. Mater. Rev.; 2022; 67, pp. 47-64. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2021.1891368]

149. Janczarek, M.; Kowalska, E. Defective dopant-free TiO₂ as an efficient visible light-active photocatalyst. Catalysts; 2021; 11, 978. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal11080978]

150. Dobrosielska, M.; Zieliński, M.; Frydrych, M.; Pietrowski, M.; Marciniak, P.; Martyła, A.; Sztorch, B.; Przekop, R.E. Sol–Gel Approach for Design of Pt/Al₂O₃-TiO₂ System—Synthesis and Catalytic Tests. Ceramics; 2021; 4, pp. 667-680. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4040047]

151. Lluna-Galán, C.; Izquierdo-Aranda, L.; Adam, R.; Cabrero-Antonino, J.R. Catalytic Reductive Alcohol Etherifications with Carbonyl-Based Compounds or CO₂ and Related Transformations for the Synthesis of Ether Derivatives. ChemSusChem; 2021; 14, pp. 3744-3784. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202101184]

152. Tian, J.; Hu, X.; Yang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Cui, H.; Liu, H. High yield production of reduced TiO₂ with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2016; 360, 43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.056]

153. Fang, W.; Xing, M.; Zhang, J. A new approach to prepare Ti³⁺ self-doped TiO₂ via NaBH4 reduction and hydrochloric acid treatment. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2014; 240, pp. 160-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.05.031]

154. Tan, H.; Zhao, Z.; Niu, M.; Mao, C.; Cao, D.; Cheng, D.; Feng, P.; Sun, Z. A facile and versatile method for preparation of colored TiO₂ with enhanced solar-driven photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale; 2014; 6, 23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4NR02677B]

155. Wang, Z.; Yang, C.; Lin, T.; Yin, H.; Chen, P.; Wan, D.; Xu, F.; Huang, F.; Lin, J.; Xie, X. et al. H-doped black titania with very high solar absorption and excellent photocatalysis enhanced by localized surface plasmon resonance. Adv. Funct Mater.; 2013; 23, 50. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300486]

156. Teng, F.; Li, M.; Gao, C.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Xie, E. Preparation of black TiO₂ by hydrogen plasma assisted chemical vapor deposition and its photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2014; 339, pp. 148-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.11.015]

157. Khan, M.M.; Ansari, S.A.; Pradhan, D.; Ansari, M.O.; Han, D.H.; Lee, J.; Cho, M.H. Band gap engineered TiO₂ nanoparticles for visible light induced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic studies. Mater. Chem.; 2014; 2, 44.

158. Liu, N.; Haublein, V.; Zhou, X.M.; Venkatesan, U.; Hartmann, M.; Mackovic, M.; Nakajima, T.; Spiecker, E.; Osvet, A.; Frey, L. et al. “Black” TiO₂ nanotubes formed by high-energy proton implantation show noble-metal-co-catalyst free photocatalytic H₂-evolution. Nano Lett.; 2015; 15, 20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02663]

159. Wang, Z.; Yang, C.; Lin, T.; Yin, H.; Chen, P.; Wan, D.; Xu, F.; Huang, F.; Lin, J.; Xie, X. et al. Visible-light photocatalytic, solar thermal and photoelectrochemical properties of aluminium-reduced black titania. Energy Environ. Sci.; 2013; 6, 14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ee41817k]

160. Zhu, G.; Lin, T.; Lü, X.; Zhao, W.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Yin, H.; Liu, Z.; Huang, F.; Lin, J. Black brookite titania with high solar absorption and excellent photocatalytic performance. Mater. Chem.; 2013; 1, 3. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ta11782k]

161. Yin, H.; Lin, T.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, G.; Xu, T.; Xie, X.; Huang, F.; Jiang, M. Gray TiO₂ nanowires synthesized by aluminum-mediated reduction and their excellent photocatalytic activity for water cleaning. Chem. Eur. J.; 2013; 19, 6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201302286]

162. Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Lin, T.; Yin, H.; Lü, X.; Wan, D.; Xu, T.; Zheng, C.; Lin, J.; Huang, F. et al. Core-shell nanostructured “black” rutile titania as excellent catalyst for hydrogen production enhanced by sulfur doping. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2013; 135, 8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja4076748] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24164550]

163. Lin, T.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Yin, H.; Lü, X.; Huang, F.; Lin, J.; Xie, X.; Jiang, M. Effective nonmetal incorporation in black titania with enhanced solar energy utilization. Energy Environ. Sci.; 2014; 7, 72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ee42708k]

164. Zhao, Z.; Tan, H.; Zhao, H.; Lv, Y.; Zhou, L.-J.; Song, Y.; Sun, Z. Reduced TiO₂ rutile nanorods with well-defined facets and their visible-light photocatalytic activity. Chem. Commun.; 2014; 50, 7.

165. Sinhamahapatra, A.; Jeon, J.-P.; Yu, J.-S. A new approach to prepare highly active and stable black titania for visible light-assisted hydrogen production. Energy Env. Sci.; 2015; 8, 44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5EE02443A]

166. Zou, X.; Liu, J.; Su, J.; Zuo, F.; Chen, J.; Feng, P. Facile synthesis of thermal- and photostable titania with paramagnetic oxygen vacancies for visible-light photocatalysis. Chem. Eur. J.; 2013; 19, 73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201202833]

167. Zuo, F.; Wang, L.; Wu, T.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Borchardt, D.; Feng, P.Y. Self-doped Ti³⁺ enhanced photocatalyst for hydrogen production under visible light. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2010; 132, 7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja103843d]

168. Chen, X.; Liu, L.; Huang, F. Black titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2015; 44, 85. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00330F] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25590565]

169. Li, H.; Chen, Z.; Tsang, C.K.; Li, Z.; Ran, X.; Lee, C.; Nie, B.; Zheng, L.; Hung, T.; Lu, J. et al. Electrochemical doping of anatase TiO₂ in organic electrolytes for high-performance supercapacitors and photocatalyst. Mater. Chem.; 2014; 2, 36.

170. Liu, X.; Gao, S.; Xu, H.; Lou, Z.; Wang, W.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y. Green synthetic approach for Ti³⁺ self-doped TiO_2−x nanoparticles with efficient visible light photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale; 2013; 5, 5. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2nr33563h]

171. Grabstanowicz, L.R.; Gao, S.; Li, T.; Rickard, R.M.; Rajh, T.; Liu, D.J.; Xu, T. Facile oxidative conversion of TiH₂ to high-concentration Ti3+-self-doped rutile TiO₂ with visible-light photoactivity. Inorg. Chem.; 2013; 52, 90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic3026182]

172. Liu, X.; Xu, H.; Grabstanowicz, L.R.; Gao, S.; Lou, Z.; Wang, W.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y.; Xu, T. Ti³⁺ self-doped TiO_2−x anatase nanoparticles via oxidation of TiH₂ in H₂O₂. Catal. Today; 2014; 225, 9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.08.025]

173. Li, X.; Yang, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Liu, B. Supported noble-metal single atoms for heterogeneous catalysis. Adv. Mater.; 2019; 31, 1902031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902031] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282036]

174. Huang, P.; Huang, J.; Pantovich, S.A.; Carl, A.D.; Fenton, T.G.; Caputo, C.A.; Grimm, R.L.; Frenkel, A.I.; Li, G. Selective CO₂ reduction catalyzed by single cobalt sites on carbon nitride under visible-light irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2018; 140, pp. 16042-16047. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10380] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30415539]

175. Zhang, P.; Zhan, X.; Xu, L.; Fu, X.; Zheng, T.; Yang, X.; Xu, Q.; Wang, D.; Qi, D.; Sun, T. Mass production of a single-atom cobalt photocatalyst for high-performance visible-light photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A; 2021; 9, pp. 26286-26297. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1TA07169F]

176. Xiong, X.; Mao, C.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Waterhouse, G.I.; Gu, L.; Zhang, T. Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction to CO over Ni single atoms supported on defect-rich zirconia. Adv. Energy Mater.; 2020; 10, 2002928. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002928]

177. Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Li, Z.; Garcia, H. Catalysis and photocatalysis by metal organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2018; 47, pp. 8134-8172. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00256H]

178. Chen, X.; Peng, X.; Jiang, L.; Yuan, X.; Yu, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Xia, Q. Recent advances in titanium metal–organic frameworks and their derived materials: Features, fabrication, and photocatalytic applications. Chem. Eng. J.; 2020; 395, 125080. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125080]

179. Yang, S.; Peng, L.; Bulut, S.; Queen, W.L. Recent Advances of MOFs and MOF-Derived Materials in Thermally Driven Organic Transformations. Chem. A Eur. J.; 2019; 25, pp. 2161-2178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201803157]

180. Zhu, J.; Li, P.-Z.; Guo, W.; Zhao, Y.; Zou, R. Titanium-based metal–organic frameworks for photocatalytic applications. Coord. Chem. Rev.; 2018; 359, pp. 80-101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.12.013]

181. Khaletskaya, K.; Pougin, A.; Medishetty, R.; Rosler, C.; Wiktor, C.; Strunk, J.; Fischer, R.A. Fabrication of gold/titania photocatalyst for CO₂ reduction based on pyrolytic conversion of the metal–organic framework NH2-MIL-125 (Ti) loaded with gold nanoparticles. Chem. Mater.; 2015; 27, pp. 7248-7257. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03017]

182. Bueken, B.; Vermoortele, F.; Vanpoucke, D.E.; Reinsch, H.; Tsou, C.C.; Valvekens, P.; De Baerdemaeker, T.; Ameloot, R.; Kirschhock, C.E.; Van Speybroeck, V. A Flexible Photoactive Titanium Metal–Organic Framework Based on a [TiIV3 (μ3-O)(O) 2 (COO) 6] Cluster. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2015; 54, pp. 13912-13917. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201505512] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404186]

183. Ao, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H. Visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of pollutants over Cu-doped NH2-MIL-125 (Ti). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem.; 2018; 364, pp. 524-533. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.06.044]

184. Rahmani, A.; Emrooz, H.B.M.; Abedi, S.; Morsali, A. Synthesis and characterization of CdS/MIL-125 (Ti) as a photocatalyst for water splitting. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Processing; 2018; 80, pp. 44-51. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.02.013]

185. An, X.; Jimmy, C.Y.; Wang, F.; Li, C.; Li, Y. One-pot synthesis of In2S3 nanosheets/graphene composites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2013; 129, pp. 80-88. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.008]

Word count: 14049

Show less

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Translate

TiO₂ has aroused considerable attentions as a promising photocatalytic material for decades due to its superior material properties in several fields such as energy and environment. However, the main dilemmas are its wide bandgap (3–3.2 eV), that restricts the light absorption in limited light wavelength region, and the comparatively high charge carrier recombination rate of TiO₂, is a hurdle for efficient photocatalytic CO₂ conversion. To tackle these problems, lots of researches have been implemented relating to structural and material modification to improve their material, optical, and electrical properties for more efficient photocatalytic CO₂ conversion. Recent studies illustrate that crystal facet engineering could broaden the performance of the photocatalysts. As same as for nanostructures which have advantages such as improved light absorption, high surface area, directional charge transport, and efficient charge separation. Moreover, strategies such as doping, junction formation, and hydrogenation have resulted in a promoted photocatalytic performance. Such strategies can markedly change the electronic structure that lies behind the enhancement of the solar spectrum harnessing. In this review, we summarize the works that have been carried out for the enhancement of photocatalytic CO₂ conversion by material and structural modification of TiO₂ and TiO₂-based photocatalytic system. Moreover, we discuss several strategies for synthesis and design of TiO₂ photocatalysts for efficient CO₂ conversion by nanostructure, structure design of photocatalysts, and material modification.

Details

Title

Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Conversion by Structurally and Materially Modified Titanium Dioxide Nanostructures

Author

Fawzi, Tarek¹

; Rani, Sanju²

; Roy, Somnath C³; Lee, Hyeonseok¹

¹ Department of Photonics, National Sun Yat-sen University, No. 70, Lien-Hai Rd, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan; [email protected] or
² Department of Physics, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram Campus, Chennai 600089, Tamil Nadu, India; [email protected]
³ Semiconducting Oxide Materials, Nanostructures and Tailored Heterojunction (SOMNaTH) Lab, Functional Oxides Research Group (FORG) and 2D Materials and Innovation Centre, Department of Physics, IIT Madras, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India; [email protected]

First page

8143

Publication year

2022

Publication date

2022

Publisher

MDPI AG

ISSN

16616596

e-ISSN

14220067

Source type

Scholarly Journal

Language of publication

English

DOI

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158143

ProQuest document ID

2700752756

Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Conversion by Structurally and Materially Modified Titanium Dioxide Nanostructures

Jump to:

Full text

Abstract

Details

Suggested sources